The talking heads are doing it again: pounding Hillary like they did before New Hampshire. It is obvious they are pushing a negative agenda against her and have abandoned whatever objectivity they were taught in journalism school. Here’s the thing with becoming obsessed (either obsessed against someone like Hillary, or obsessively enamored with someone like Obama): you lose perspective and buy into your own narrative.
Articles like this one use statistics and facts to examine the demographic voting patterns that have occurred in all contests so far, with an eye to the March 4th primaries. There is no “momentum” for Obama the way the media claims. He was demographically and statistically favored in the post-Super Tuesday contests of February. This was a rough month for Hillary Clinton, no doubt, but the media has made more of it than they should have, and they don’t have a firm handle on the contests that are to come.
The scientific analysis going on here is very interesting.
© 2008, HillBuzz. All rights reserved.
Help HillBuzz by Shopping Amazon
I look forward to your comments. Please follow these simple guidelines:
- Please do not complain about your comment not yet showing up
- Stay on topic of the article ("This is OT, but..." = bad!)
- I will STING if you troll, spam, bait, swear or attack someone