We need Governor Palin to agree to serve…hold her to her promise
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/holding_sarah_palin_to_her_pro.html
Governor Palin said she would serve as president if people wanted and needed her to.
Well, we want and need her to.
Nice to see American Thinker saying it too.
© 2010, Kevin DuJan. All rights reserved.
Also Recommended:
- Cocktail Party GOP blue blood estaBUSHment officially in Open War against Governor Palin
- EW.com tries to make fun of The Governor but instead creates our new favorite game: Sarah Palin Bingo
- Governor Palin: "I will run for President if the American people want me to"
- Good Scott Conroy piece on Cocktail Party GOP underestimating Governor Palin
- Hilarious: Left tries to ridicule Governor Palin for "don't party like it's 1773 yet" tweet but doesn't know that's when the Boston Tea Party happened
Latest Buzz:
Help HillBuzz by Shopping Amazon
"Bee" Advised!
I look forward to your comments. Please follow these simple guidelines:
- Please do not complain about your comment not yet showing up
- Stay on topic of the article ("This is OT, but..." = bad!)
- I will STING if you troll, spam, bait, swear or attack someone
Sarah will run if we can help her repair her image with the liberal media lamebrains who believe all the lies told about her. I believe her show “Sarah Palins Alaska” was intended for the purpose of restoring her and her families image. Refer your friends to http://www.factcheck.org/slimingpalin
They shoot down many of the flat out lies that the liberal media reported about Palin.
If I ever see on of these so called journalists who have slandered Palin, I will certainly give them a piece of my mind.
The LSM does not believe the lies they tell – that is their job as state propagandists.
What we need to do is out all them each time by name and all the personal data publicly known and repeat early and often(as Democrats vote). This will front-load Google and others – and will get them where it hurts – their reps and most importantly cocktail party reps (where dems and rinos meet)…
…follow Sarah’s lead – her most recent strike (i.e., 57 states, et, al) shut them down.
Also, let’s target the schools that gave them their degrees, so they will think twice about honorary degrees or proclamations for lying…these are the DEM equivalent of monarchical titles… and watch their fundraising dry up…we can’t change the prior generations already rolled out of these assembly line propaganda schools – but let’s save the next generation from this ideological slavery
Just one idea…
It isn’t the LSM believing the lies — as you rightly say, they are the source of the lies. Who needs to be re-educated (I hate that word but it works here) are all the sheeple who get all their news from the alphabet networks. People who have not cable or just watch cable channels for movies and cooking shows have only the propaganda side presented to them at the “news hour”. How great would it be to have a wealthy, conservative conglomerate buy up one of the major networks and offer a fair presentation, available to all?
correct link:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_palin.html
LSM doesn’t need to accept her. They just need to become more and more irrelevant. Which is happening.
I agree. To hell with the LSM.
I see Sarah as the Martin Luther of this millennium. As Luther articulated the German people’s anger against the corruption of the Catholic Church, she does the same with America’s anger against the corruption of the political and media worlds. And she has the perfect tool to do that. Luther had the Gutenberg press to spread his 95 theses (and thus spark the Protestant Reformation); she has her Facebook and Twitter postings to spark the Tea Party revolt. I am sadly mindful that she will suffer the same fate as Luther; an attack without quarter from the powers whose corruption she exposes. But I also know she will prevail because she possesses the same awesome strength which upheld Luther; her abiding and unshakable faith in God and reliance upon His word. God bless Sarah Palin!
Carolyn, I’ve read your post a dozen times. The analogies you use are spot on!
Martin Luther did not attack any “corruption” in the Catholic Church, he stated a thesis that was his idea of a reformed organization that was not rooted in Jesus but on his own private beliefs.
Carmelo – it would help if you would first read the 95 theses before you tell us what’s in them. If you had, you would have seen that corruption was the very heart, the very basis of Luther’s theses against the Church’s selling of salvation (i.e., ‘indulgences’) in order for the Church to pay off its debt.
Points 1-4 of the 95 theses begin with Luther’s declaration that repentance is something that is the choice of the Catholic Church but instead was something an individual and God – it’s not something the Church can sell you; Points 5-9 say the Pope can not remove your sin (via indulgences); only God can; Points 10-19 express Luther’s horror at the Church profiting off of selling release from Purgatory; Points 20-31 state that selling of indulgences is evil, etc. And so and so on.
Again, I repeat that the very basis of Luther’s condemnation of indulgences was his condemnation of the corruption of the Church in profiting from frightened parishioners, etc.
And NO, Luther did not base the Protestant Church on his “private beliefs” that were “not rooted in Jesus”. That is patently false. To the contrary, Luther’s entire life and being were rooted in Jesus, rooted in God. Every action Luther made was for one purpose – to bring his parishioners closer to Jesus, to God, etc. That was why Luther translated the Bible from Latin into German – so that there would be no barrier between the people and the word of God. By doing so, Luther sought to let them know of God’s love and, most of all, that God’s forgiveness was not ‘paid for’ in any coin save that of true repentance and a sincere plea for forgiveness.
Phoo! I wish there was an ‘edit’ button so I could correct my mistakes. The paragraph “Points 1-4 of the 95 theses begin with Luther’s declaration that repentance is something that is the choice of the Catholic Church but instead was something an individual and God – it’s not something the Church can sell you” should instead read:
“Points 1-4 of the 95 theses begin with Luther’s declaration that repentance is NOT something that is the choice of the Catholic Church but instead was something BETWEEN an individual and God – REDEMPTION OF SIN is not something the Church can sell you”.
Sorry.
Martin Luther was a pervert. He did not care about the Church, he cared about his own sexual urges. He even perverted and married a nun.
I am really worried that she won’t run
After reading her first book, I was certain that she was planning to run for president, and her reality show does seem like an effort to introduce her family to America while also further acclimating her family to the spotlight…but then her interviews keep sending mixed messages.
I think she would make a fantastic president, but too many Republicans I talk to say she would do better as the leader of the Republican party. Then there are the conservative purists who still have their panties in a twist because she endorsed John McCain. Ugh!
Sarah Palin is everything I aspire to. I really want to vote for her in 2012!
good one:
She doesn’t usually need a teleprompter because she believes what she says.
let’s use the greatful dead. here’s sarah’s anthem:
Grateful Dead – Scarlet Begonias – 4-27-77
take the greatful dead
Grateful Dead : Uncle John’s Band @ Radio City 10-31-80