The amazingly incompetent Debbie Wasserman Schultz
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2d2Qz3XTtKI
Debbie Wasserman Schultz is so incompetent that words can not begin to describe her performance. The only thing she is able to do is parrot the same old DNC tag-line…”we need to focus on continuing to get this economy turned around and focus on job creation.” Really? Her response to Hoffa’s use of threatening language is to focus on the economy? Gretchen just gives it to her and never lets up. The look on DWS’s face is one of pure fluster. She has a hard time looking at the camera and blinks her eyes at least a thousand times a minute. She is way out of her league with Gretchen.
DWS is probably the perfect DNC Chair for Obama. He and his White House thugs can control her like a puppet. She wouldn’t know an original idea if it slapped her in the face and she has about as much spunk and pizazz as a dead fish.
This woman really annoys me.
How about you?
(and that Hoffa fella is one scary dude. He needs to cut back on his caffeine.)
© 2011, Bridget. All rights reserved.
Also Recommended:
- Let’s rename Debbie…..as in Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
- Amazingly, at least someone in Boystown knows Thanksgiving is coming.
- HAWAII GROUND REPORT: Could Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombie not be as incompetent and foolish as he appears, but orchestrating a deliberate birth certificate recovery dead end to cover his own papakole? UPDATED: Mystery solved! Reason Obama will not release birth certificate is because his name is legally written “Barry Soetoro” on it.
- BREAKING: Did Dan Rather really say "Obama is so incompetent, he couldn't even sell watermelons"?
- Debbie Schussel identifies source of Obama-Khalidi tape as Ali Abunimah
Latest Buzz:
Help HillBuzz by Shopping Amazon
"Bee" Advised!
I look forward to your comments. Please follow these simple guidelines:
- Please do not complain about your comment not yet showing up
- Stay on topic of the article ("This is OT, but..." = bad!)
- I will STING if you troll, spam, bait, swear or attack someone
See, Bridget, I CAN'T watch such "interviews" – I find it too irritating {putting it nicely} for 2 or more people to be talking over each other, NOT listening to what the other person is saying – it all seems to have really become de riguer back when Rosie O'Donnell had her 'talk show' – she would NEVER shut up & LISTEN to her guests ………………………….. what little I WAS able to tolerate of this DWS interlude did, indeed, show DWS as a simpleton, reading her script like a good little actress, refusing to be diverted to the ISSUES at hand …………………………
Semper Fi'
DM
I watched this yesterday. It was great to see what a true "deer in the headlights" face looks like.
Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz does give that look. Democrats know she is a moron and know they will recieve no help from the DNC with her in charge.
I saw it, too, and it was almost painful to watch. I wanted to throw my shoe at her ugly mug!
I was reading another board yesterday and came over something that cracked me up. It stated that "Debbie does DC" with all the intimate nuances. After you listen to her and watch her, you begin to realize there is only one redeeming thing this person does and it is difficult doing it standing up.
anthony weiner in a skirt – identical circular arguments
Typical talking points discussion. She certainly takes her marching orders seriously. Of course, even Jimmy Hoffa's remarks, as offensive as they were, didn't make any sense, if you listen to the WORDS. DWS should give up wearing the contact lenses on TV. I suspect that's why she is constantly blinking, which, combined with her words, makes her LOOK like an idiot, as well as SOUNDING like an idiot. But this is why I love FoxNews. At least they call these libs out when they just stick to the party talking points instead of participating in a substantive discussion. On BSNBC or CNN the hosts just parrot the lib talking points and act like the guest is absolutely brilliant – unless they're conservative.
Gretchen Carlson did a good job in not letting up but she failed, in my opinion, by allowing DWS to imply that similar remarks happen at Tea Party rallies! By saying that she has "called out" those on the Right, Gretchen is validating the suggestion that both parties are equally guilty, when in fact it is the Dems who continually make violent, threatening remarks!
This is a classic Alinsky technique and we need to be aware of it and stop it in its tracks. When a Democrat makes an accusation such as DWS did, we need to IMMEDIATELY call them on it and say, "Could you please specify a time/place when a leader in the Conservative movement made a threat to encourage bodily harm to those who disagreed with them?"
Andrew Brietbart offered a large reward to ANYONE who could provide proof that people yelled out "Ni**er" as the members of Congress walked across the Capitol grounds during the Healthcare debate. John Lewis claimed it was yelled at least a dozen times and the media took that comment and ran with it. But, no one ever came forward to claim the reward, because IT DIDN'T HAPPEN, even one time, left alone 15 times! Yet, the narrative was set because no one on the right wanted to push back and call out those who lied! Same thing here – DWS immediately fell back onto the position that leaders of the Tea Party have made the same type of remarks and Gretchen Carlson didn't challenge her on it, thereby inferring that her remarks were accurate!
Absolutely agree with you vikingmom. I cringed when I heard Gretchen's answer that she called the Tea Party out several times. I, for the life of me, cannot recall seeing or hearing TEA Party people acting like this union thug. Is there proof out there of TEA party leaders threatening Dems? I'm not talking about some lone loon in a crowd, because you'll see that anywhere. But actual WORDS, maybe in a speech at a rally when they were introducing the President? No? Didn't think so.
I have to agree – I wish she would have asked Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz to cite examples of any Tea Party member who made statements that were as inflammatory as Hoffa's. I would further question her as to the influence that Tea Party member has over mobs, as opposed to Hoffa's clear leadership of his union thugs who have a history of violence. The difference between a Tea Party grandma saying she would like to raise cain and Hoffa's implication of violence is the difference between Pee Wee Herman and The Incredible Hulk.
That "similar remarks at Tea Parties" line really irked me and Mrs. Carlson didn't handle it well. When DuhDuhDebbie said that, Mrs. Carlson should have said "specifically, which remarks are you refering to" and then held her feet to the fire to come up with an actual "similar remark". DuhDuhDebbie wouldn't be able to answer either question but does she ever??
"DWS is probably the perfect DNC Chair for Obama."
Truer words were never spoke. The inept serving the inept. The clueless defending the indefensible. It would be funny if it weren't so dangerous for the country.
We need solid leadership in these uncertain times, and the current administration, simply can't deliver. Ugh!
F250
Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz repeats the Democratic talking points, but she doesn't understand them and gets lost when anyone asks her questions.
The panic in her expression when she got asked that. Obama needs to say something about what the Teamsters said. Rush Limbaugh attacked her good. She is on 3:10 in.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaeCriJhVbc&fe…
I thought it was just me, but DWS has come across as just a big mouth without much thinking behind all of that hair. She could parrot the line, and it's like you can type text into a teleprompter and she will repeat it.
Focus on the middle class? Earth to Debbie:
Socialism DESTROYS the middle class.
I think every time I hear this promise to focus on the working class Americans, I cringe because there is nothing, absolutely nothing in the Constitution that they are to only focus on a certain group. There is no selective representation. Is that their way of saying that lower class doesn't pay taxes and does not deserve their attention and then the upper class can pay a lot more and yet deserve the DNC's contempt? No point in asking rhetorical questions…
You need to learn the language of Progressives; Working class Americans = Unions