Ron Paul: Israel’s Best Friend or Worst Enemy?
Watch and decide for yourself.
© 2011, Kathleen Gee. All rights reserved.
If you enjoyed this post, please leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Political Analysis, Action & Adventure | Kevin DuJan, Founder and Editor
Hillbuzz Proudly Supports
I did not even listen to the video and I can answer this: Ron Paul has always been for taking the chains off Israel and for letting Israel do what is in Israel's best interest. I doubt he video will revel anything different.
OK, I hate to say this, but I do not believe for an instant that Ron Paul has the best interests of Israel EVER in his mind. This is the same Ron Paul who published a newsletter in the 80's and 90's that featured flagrantly anti-semitic material, blamed the first World Trade Center bombing on the Mossad and called for armed insurrection just days prior to the Oklahoma City bombing. While his public stance on spending and the Fed are admirable, he has a decades long record of anti-Semitism, flirting with white-supremacist groups (again, see his newsletters from the 80's and 90's, none of the articles are bylined or attributed to others, all appear under his name on the mast-head) and general kookery. So far he's gotten a pass on all that, he's the crazy uncle in the family, but trust me, the media is just salivating over him getting any real traction, because they have thermo-nuclear hand grenades waiting to throw at him.
Still waiting for that pesky “proof” thingy. It hasn’t been produced in any of Ron Paul’s 10 successful re-election campaigns, nor his previous presidential campaign. So, yet again, I’m calling B.S.
And what I love most about calling Ron Paul a raaaaaaacist, or anti-seeeeeeemite, is it proves to me you’re a Lefty.
You see, Ron Paul is an individualist. Putting people into groups, and judging people by things like race or religion, is antithetical to everything he stands for. But people like you–collectivists–are obsessed with group identity. So if I disagree with Obama, I’m a RAAAAAAAAACIST. If I disagree with a Jewish person, I’m an anti-seeeeeeeemite.
I think we all know who the true anti-semites are. They’re the OccuPoopers. The ones screaming about “The Jews” owning all the banks. You know, the ones who belong to a movement funded by a real RACIST, Nazi-sympathizer George Soros.
Nice try, though! Best of luck with your next ad-hominem attack.
You must be joking. Ron Paul is who he's always been, a person who is dangerously out of touch with foreign affairs, international dangers, the threat of Islam, etc, etc, etc. He's acting innocent and naive about why he wasn't invited to speak at the RJC gathering when he knows all too well why he was not invited. He's a dangerous man.
Mr. Gingrich, you’re welcome to comment here on HillBuzz anytime, but please do so under your real name. Thanks!
Can someone please explain to me why intelligent people just accept the crap the left dishes out about Ron Paul without doing any research or critical thinking of their own? I'm not saying he's the be-all end-all, but seriously – bad foreign policy? He gets more donations from active US military than all the other candidates combined. Doh! Just roll that one around in your head for a few minutes until it clicks.
And while I'm on a rant, can someone also explain why so-called conservatives are falling for the totally obvious set up of making Newt Gingrich the "GOP frontrunner"? It's pretty much a case of, "well if they won't go for Mittens, let's see what other tired, retread we can bring out of the progressive closet".
Ok – go ahead and let the hate rain down on me.