Purple Action Item: Obama named most polarizing president…how to make that word stick to him.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/145937/Obama-Approval-Ratings-Polarized-Year-Year.aspx
One way to take away the word polarizing, as a pejorative the media uses against female politicians, is to make the word synonymous with an effete biracial male politician.
“Obama, the most polarizing American president ever” is how we should start referring to this man as much as possible.
What other things could be called polarizing on a constant basis?
Because when everything is polarizing, nothing is.
© 2011, Kevin DuJan. All rights reserved.
Also Recommended:
- PURPLE TEAM ACTION ITEM: All-Palin February’s Focus = removing the word “polarizing” from the Left’s arsenal against Governor Palin
- Thanks Ann Coulter for the tweet…and for the focus on the need to take the word “polarizing” away from the Left
- Purple Action Item: Brainstorm how to prevent the Media from picking the GOP’s 2012 nominee
- Question: How do we eliminate the word "polarizing" as a weapon used against female candidates?
- RESEARCH HELP: Usage of the word "polarizing" against female candidates
Latest Buzz:
Help HillBuzz by Shopping Amazon
"Bee" Advised!
I look forward to your comments. Please follow these simple guidelines:
- Please do not complain about your comment not yet showing up
- Stay on topic of the article ("This is OT, but..." = bad!)
- I will STING if you troll, spam, bait, swear or attack someone
ILL SEND RECENT OBAMA DECESIONS THAT HE HAS MADE IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF OUR COURTS AND THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE I SENT THESE THREE STORIES TO FOX NEWS BOB H
Sports rivalries are polarizing.
Polarizing in this context typically means “people have strong opinions about this” and that the person using it has a negative opinion.
So, here’s my quick brainstorm list:
Rahm Emmanuel – he’s rude and acts like he’s entitled to whatever he wants and yet there are apparently people who like him.
Nancy Pelosi – though, since she is female that might not be the best choice
Harry Reid
Global Warming
Most members of the Congressional Black Caucus
Reverend Wright
I will try and think of more later
What we need to do is to pin on him the stirring in Egypt.
He is behind the protests and the attempted take-over. Code Pink is involved behind the scenes.
Many good people are protesting and they do not realize that they are being duped.
However, the role here is to show that he is interfering in Egypt in a way that is not Presidential… we need to get it out there.
As he interfered in Kenya, as a senator, when he went there to campaign for his cousin Raile Odinga.
He also sent Dick Morris to help Odinga get elected the Chicago Way.
Dick Morris? The Chicago way? Really? Do you have links from reliable sources?
We need to take our national guard troops out of there, too.
We need a good picture of a polar bear with purple lips. Or even Obama’s mouth.
and big ears
“Because when everything is polarizing nothing is” is absolutely right. This is EXACTLY what the Dems do. They play pile on.
Frankly, I think Obama is in a state of panic with Issa and DeMint chomping at the bit that he’s throwing rocks to keep the Republicans at bay before they start uncovering things. Hence, you have the stories out there about McCain talking about how “centrist” Obama is. That’s an olive branch…showing Republicans are bipartisan. But don’t be fooled. Look at how many “urgent crises” we’ve had since Republicans in congress were sworn in.
He can run…but he can’t hide. The truth will come out.
Libs try to paint Palin as polarizing because they know no one in the US is more polarizing than Soebarkah.
Obamacare.
Not only does the term hit a nerve – if the left are screeching that it must be called “healthcare reform”, and not attached to Teh Won, then you call it Obamacare – it is a genuinely polarising law.
Oh, and here’s some evidence of just how much the term “Obamacare” terrifies the left:
“Obamacare. Pity the poor congressional and White House staffers who spent hours coming up with the bromidic name “Affordable Care Act” only to see the 2,300 page bill (which Republicans complained Obama played far too passive a role in shaping) get labeled, for all eternity, “Obamacare.”"
http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2011/02/nefarious-conspiracy-uncovered.html
Hey, if this is Teh Won’s crowning achievement, why not put his name on it? All. Over. It.
Excellent, Lisette. How about these:
ObamaMotors (obvious)
ObamaBailout (TARP)
ObamaStreet (Wall St. bailouts)
Obamanomics (already exists)
Obamenvironmentalism
Obamimagination (where he comes up with his goofy ideas)
ObamaMac&Mae (Fannie & Freddie)
Obamorruption (his corruption)
Obamafail (everything!)
Obamaregulations (obvy)
Obamalism (Obama socialism)
Obamunism (Obama communism)
Just a few that I could think of real quick… some not so good, but some okay.
Øbamadrillmoratorium
Øbamawarming
ObamaOpenBorders (immigration)
ObamaBackstab (Israel stance)
ObamaBeard (Michelle)
Obamawarming
I still like for a bumpersticker
Impeach OBAMAcare
or Waterboard Obamacare
And to think I voted for that doddering old fool. They had the wrong person at the top of that ticket.
And as much as he is admired for his war service, he had no right to be on the top of that ticket – in the sense that the R’s have that old “it’s his tuuuuuurrrrrrn mentality. God Bless his heart, he was too old, and had cancer, and none of us could count on his path or his beliefs. The most extraordinary thing he did was to introduce the country to the governor of Alaska, who none of us knew and which drove the media mad. It wasn’t in their play book and they will never forgive him for it, despite the way he is trying to get them to pay attention to him again. There are days I think he’s actually going to try to run again.
I’d like to point out that Richard Milhaus Frakking Nixon was less polarising. There has to be something in that.
GW Bush had 50% approval of DEMS?!? And was much less polarizing.
Tricky Dicky was never “that” polarizing.
He was a good man and the left hated him.
Tricky Dicky did what was surprising considering his Quaker beliefs and that was the increase in bombing in Vietnam.
He might have got pinged for lying and covering up over the watergate break-in but that is absolutely nothing compared to the crimes committed by Øbama.
SEIU wavers:
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/02/04/seiu-riding-the-waiver-wave/
Nearly everything the administration has done and is interested in doing. Race-baiting and dividing everyone up into groups of hyphenated Americans.
And sports! Oh, my! Call off the Superbowl NOW, people! Absolutely polarizing!
How about:
Polarizer-In-Chief
Okay, let’s see…these numbers are based on my memory…
First of all I think the Independents make up about 27% of the voting population, Repubs are at about something like 42% which leaves the Dems at roughly 31% currently.
So Obama only has 82% of 31% which is roughly 25% of the population there. Plus I think Independents give Obama–lets be generous–40% approval which is roughly 10.8% total approval.
Put that all together and you get something like (25 = 11) 36 Total Approval. Those are not good numbers.
He won the election with 53% of the vote. 51 – 36 = 25%. Dude’s lost 25% of his base.
Obama is so polarizing that he’s polarized the Dems out of 25% of their electorate! (or something)
(25 + 11) typo
Haha–need an edit key
That would be 53-36 which would equal 27%. Bambi lost 27% of his electorate base.
I mean 17%…oh just erase this. lol
The whole “Let’s Move” initiative is polarizing. No more snap peas!!!!!
How about President NoBama gives and ally’s (England’s)nuclear secrets to Russia?
I think NoBama is POLARIZING our alliances. Is NoBama doing all this stirred? The regulatons, ObamsCare, contempt of multiple courts, shutting our energy supplies — Is he trying to prompt unrest?
This is currently on Drudge as the Headline story. . .
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html#
New report from the Insider:
http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-obama-is-clueless-totally-clueless/
WikiLeaks cables: US agrees to tell Russia Britain’s nuclear secrets
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html
Just start saying it everywhere like the LSM and estabs do–”bho the fraud is the most polarizing (squatter is the best I can say) since AT LEAST Ike.”
Just keep saying it.
Ummm, one problem from my perspective: there are actually people I know, who I TRY to educate re: Øbama, who won’t understand when I refer to him as “polarizing” ………….. truly, there’s one neighbor couple, and BOTH are dumb as a box of rocks {the male half (he’s NO MAN) is cunning, NOT intelligent} – I had to explain the word “cyst” to the wife, from a medical report …………… thank God, not ALL around here are that obtuse, but there IS a sizable minority ……………..
Semper Fi’
DM
Check out Rasmussen latests numbers(Feb 04) 40% Strongly disapprove Obama & 24% Strongly approve Oboma. He is upside down by 16. Whatever bounce , Obama received by the Arizona speech is gone. Why would they would do a Presidential interview on Super Bowl Sunday? I can see millions of TV sets being turned off. Just a bad idea and just plain desperate.