OUR ANGLE IS A CENTERFOLD: SUPPORT SCOTT BROWN FOR SENATE IN MASSACHUSETTS
Here’s Scott Brown’s latest campaign ad in Massachusetts:
What are you doing to get this man elected — so that the Healthcare Rationing Bill will be DOA?
All it takes is for Democrats to lose the MA Senate seat and Utopiacare is toast. If they drop to 59 votes, debate has to resume, and they can’t ram through this Obamanation.
Our best angle on stopping this monstrosity is a former centerfold.
Vote Scott Brown: OUR ANGLE IS A CENTERFOLD.
© 2009, HillBuzz. All rights reserved.
Help HillBuzz by Shopping Amazon
"Bee" Advised!
I look forward to your comments. Please follow these simple guidelines:
- Please do not complain about your comment not yet showing up
- Stay on topic of the article ("This is OT, but..." = bad!)
- I will STING if you troll, spam, bait, swear or attack someone








Apparently Campaign Spot is taking on those who think Scott Brown has a chance:
//
I have to respectfully dissent a bit from Ed Morrissey when he declares that
national GOP and party leaders [have] gone AWOL in Massachusetts, where Scott Brown will battle Martha Coakley for Ted Kennedy’s seat in the Senate.
Should Michael Steele and national GOP leaders who can spare the time get up there and do a fundraising event or rally or two for Brown? Absolutely.
But to illustrate how tough the odds are for Brown, let’s pretend that every registered Republican in the state, as of 2008, shows up and votes for him. And let us pretend that the independents split evenly, and that only one third of the state’s Democrats show up and vote for Coakley.
Under that scenario, Coakley still wins by about 1,045 votes. That’s how steep an uphill battle Brown faces in this race. I’m sure there are a lot of Democrats in Massachusetts who don’t like the health-care bill. I’m sure there are a lot of fired-up Republicans, and maybe Brown will even win independents. But there are just so many more Democrats in this state than Republicans that it will take a not-so-small miracle for Brown to eke out a victory. Everybody on the right ought to be pulling for a Brown upset, and doing what they can, but there’s not much point in spending a lot of resources here when there will be a ton of competitive battlefields in the coming year.
//
Now I have a few thoughts on this. Firstly, conventional wisdom said that Corzine was going to win because (paraphrasing Campaign Spot), “With All Due Respect, It’s New Jersey”.
And yet, Christie pulled out a win.
My point is, I don’t think we can trust conventional wisdom and the typical political paradigm right now.
How disaffected are democrats? How charged are republicans?
Also… there’s a follow up on that post:
Two Readers, Making the Case for GOP Optimism in Massachusetts:
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjRlOTgyY2NiYzgwOWU5NDg1MWIzNGM3MDUzZTFmOWM=
Apparently Campaign Spot is taking on those who think Scott Brown has a chance:
//
I have to respectfully dissent a bit from Ed Morrissey when he declares that
national GOP and party leaders [have] gone AWOL in Massachusetts, where Scott Brown will battle Martha Coakley for Ted Kennedy’s seat in the Senate.
Should Michael Steele and national GOP leaders who can spare the time get up there and do a fundraising event or rally or two for Brown? Absolutely.
But to illustrate how tough the odds are for Brown, let’s pretend that every registered Republican in the state, as of 2008, shows up and votes for him. And let us pretend that the independents split evenly, and that only one third of the state’s Democrats show up and vote for Coakley.
Under that scenario, Coakley still wins by about 1,045 votes. That’s how steep an uphill battle Brown faces in this race. I’m sure there are a lot of Democrats in Massachusetts who don’t like the health-care bill. I’m sure there are a lot of fired-up Republicans, and maybe Brown will even win independents. But there are just so many more Democrats in this state than Republicans that it will take a not-so-small miracle for Brown to eke out a victory. Everybody on the right ought to be pulling for a Brown upset, and doing what they can, but there’s not much point in spending a lot of resources here when there will be a ton of competitive battlefields in the coming year.
//
Now I have a few thoughts on this. Firstly, conventional wisdom said that Corzine was going to win because (paraphrasing Campaign Spot), “With All Due Respect, It’s New Jersey”.
And yet, Christie pulled out a win.
My point is, I don’t think we can trust conventional wisdom and the typical political paradigm right now.
How disaffected are democrats? How charged are republicans?
Also… there’s a follow up on that post:
Two Readers, Making the Case for GOP Optimism in Massachusetts.
Go to the campaignspot over at national review dot com to read both.
Am I misreading this, or should it read “angel” instead of “angle.”
n geometry and trigonometry, an angle (in full, plane angle) is the figure formed by two rays sharing a common endpoint, called the vertex of the angle.
Oops, I missed this line. Our best angle on stopping this monstrosity is a former centerfold.
I hate it when I do that.
Did you know that J Geils was from Boston? CLEVA!
Hmm…something went hinky with my post. I shall try again but be pithier.
Apparently Campaign Spot is taking on those who think Scott Brown has a chance.
Now I have a few thoughts on this. Firstly, conventional wisdom said that Corzine was going to win because (paraphrasing Campaign Spot), “With All Due Respect, It’s New Jersey”.
And yet, Christie pulled out a win.
My point is, I don’t think we can trust conventional wisdom and the typical political paradigm right now.
How disaffected are democrats? How charged are republicans and independents?
Also… there’s a follow up on that post:
Two Readers, Making the Case for GOP Optimism in Massachusetts.
Go to Campaign Spot over at National Review dot com for both those posts.
Testing…
Hmm…something went hinky with my post. I shall try again but be pithier.
Apparently Campaign Spot is taking on those who think Scott Brown has a chance.
Now I have a few thoughts on this. Firstly, conventional wisdom said that Corzine was going to win because (paraphrasing Campaign Spot), “With All Due Respect, It’s New Jersey”.
And yet, Christie pulled out a win.
My point is, I don’t think we can trust conventional wisdom and the typical political paradigm right now.
How disaffected are democrats? How charged are republicans and independents?
Also… there’s a follow up on that post:
Two Readers, Making the Case for GOP Optimism in Massachusetts.
Go to Campaign Spot over at the National Review website for both those posts.
O.K. totally off topic but I’ve been gone for a long time. Re: the scar on Dr. Utopia’s head…..I don’t believe Obama is the AntiChrist but I do believe there will be a real human person who embodies that role and this is one of the descriptions.:
3One of the heads of the beast seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the fatal wound had been healed. The whole world was astonished and followed the beast.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%2013:3&version=NIV
MSNBC has been wearing out the “you’re no Jack Kennedy” thing. My response is neither was Ted Kennedy.
Wow…sorry about that. :S I thought I was having problems with my browser.
Ok – pardon me if I’m missing something here… but hasn’t the stupid healthcare bill already passed the Senate?????
I still support Brown’s campaign and want him to win, but what could he do on the healthcare legislation at this point? If it goes to conference committee, all it needs then is a simple majority in the Senate.
There’s still Crap & Tax, Immigration Reform, and God-Only-Knows-Whatelse Nancy, Harry and Dr U can come up with to destroy this country, so whatever can be done to help Scott is important, for sure!
The house and senate have to combine their bills before a final vote.
Not exactly, Moe. The House has the option of accepting the Senate bill as is (which requires a majority vote in the House ONLY! – and then it goes directly to the President. The other option is a conference committee where members of both house and senate negotiate a compromise bill that then has to go back to each chamber for a vote – but I think that only a majority (51) votes are needed in the Senate.
There are so many possible twists and turns on this…
J.Geil’s wow I love Peter Wolf! Don’t forget the seniors in MA, those folks are terrified of Obamacare. There are also many Catholics that don’t take too kindly to abortion. Finally, Mitt Romney was elected Governor there. This may not be as hard as most think, I’m sending money for the first time evahhh to my home state.
Over 50% of Massachusetts voters are Independent (i.e., “unenrolled” when you go to register).
The centerfold can win here.
Coakley is a very weak AG (sorry Hillbuzz guys, but it’s true), and “Coupe” Deval Patrick is very unpopular, after all his campaign promises of “hope, change, and yes we can.” Sound familiar?
Not saying it’s gonna happen, but it can happen. And, what a sweet shot across the bow it would be, yes?
This guy has charisma and, who knows, after 180 days in the Senate, he could follow in someone else’s footsteps perhaps?
The teapartiers have a good spot on how to help him from wherever you may be……….
http://www.teapartypatriots.org/BlogPostView.aspx?id=ced9246b-83cb-4222-8daf-461ba5427251
Ok, I am not a wackjob, even though I posted three times when I could not see my posts here and now.
Sometimes, I do get an intelligent thought in my mind (just kidding) but to the people that are saying that Sarah Palin should endorse Scott Brown, that is not really going to happen. In all respect, SHE CANNOT ENDORSE this man when she came out and said that Levi’s Playgirl spread was porn. Mind you, not that I did not enjoy seeing him, but she cannot endorse a candidate for doing the same thing that Levi is doing, especially after the brouhaha about the custody battle.
Again, I have to commend the guys at Hillbuzz for not getting involved and completely ignoring the fiasco that would bring. I have great respect for you guys and I would be more than honored to consider you friends. I did not really like Hillary until I came across you all (even though I considered that she was treated unfairly and would have LOVED her to be President considering what we are stuck with now), but WHAT CAN WE DO? The US made a mistake and we have to live with it and hope that the next three years would not cause irreperable damage, that is all we can hope for. I have let people know about your website and so far, everyone LOVES it.
I sent him some today from Tejas, because of this website, and Hot Air & Lucianne and Hannity’s guest host today, Herman Cain. Keep up the good work, guys! For some of us out in the boonies, the net is our main news.
Yes, the GOP should commit serious resources to this race, yes to win, but because something better than a blowout will put the fear of G-d, or at least Sarah Palin in politicians elsewhere in the country,
Capiche?
Capiche!
they will say he is a blasphemer for using Kennedy’s name. But John kennedy would be a Republican today. And he wanted to de-power the Federal Reserve
Love for Brown and the ‘Buzzers!
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/people/features/article_1522677.php