HillBuzz.org

Political Analysis, Action & Adventure | Kevin DuJan, Founder and Editor

Hillbuzz and Mrs. Fox
  • Home
  • Class vs. Crass
  • Who’s Dressed Better?
  • HillBuzz & Mrs. Fox Radio
  • The Cocktail Party
  • The Tolerant Left
  • Is Barack Obama Gay?
  • Marxism in Public Schools
  • The Voting Dead
  • MUST READ Books
  • Be Breitbart Baby
  • Contact Us/FAQ
    • About Kevin DuJan
    • HillBuzz History
    • Write to Hillbuzz
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Bug Reports
    • HillBuzz Commenting Rules

Oak Park's new penis logo too shocking for some

Posted on November 21, 2009 by HillBuzz // Hillbuzz

This is an example of a decision by committee run amuck.

Oak Park, a suburb of Chicago where we like to go sometimes to watch movies and walk down the cute, Mayberry-like main street, hired a bunch of consultants to come up with a new logo for the city.

So, of course, they chose one that looks like either a penis or a sex toy, depending on your imagination.

We would have drawn something that looked like an oak tree, or maybe a park, for Oak Park.  But, what do we know.  Penises are in this year.

Dealing with liberals who have any sort of ability to spend public money is always hilarity waiting to happen.  These people are RIDUNKULOUS.  Trust us, having lived in Chicago for over five years, and having been privy to more than our fair share of meetings after meetings related to special events in this town.  Every decision is a decision by committee.  The end results are normally as aerodynamic and graceful as a hippopotamus on roller skates. Committees do not make the best decisions.  Watering everything down so that “everyone has a say” is never the right move.  Does anyone else remember that car Homer Simpson once designed, which had a bubble top and ice cream maker and separate pod for the kids to sit in?  That’s what we always think of when we hear “consenus decision” on anything.

Oh, and now we’ll think of the Oak Park penis logo too.

Because this one’s classic.

And the FUNNIEST thing about it is that the committee refuses to even admit it looks like a penis.  Because, if they admitted that, then they’d look foolish, and have to say they were wrong, and those are things liberals can never, ever do.

It’s why the most entrenched liberal elites will never admit what a disaster the current president is either.  Because that would mean having to say they were wrong. And copping to what a d*** they put in the White House, too.

© 2009, HillBuzz. All rights reserved.

Tweet
3160c943793e37e0fed9b70085d3ee33
Share on TumblrShare via email

HillBuzz

Bringing you Political Analysis, Action & Adventure from Boystown in Chicago!

More Posts

Also Recommended:

  • SoetorObama Logo Challenge
  • Obama's logo: a ripoff to believe in
  • First official use of moose logo for nascent Palin 2012 presidential campaign
  • These numbers are shocking
  • SHOCKING: SoetorObama Convention throws American flags in garbage after his speech

Latest Buzz:

  • Obamanomics: Spending Our Country Into Ruin
  • HillBuzz Open Thread Thursday, May 24, 2012
  • 20,000 Felons Signed Walker Recall Petition
  • Another Reason to Never Buy GM: They Sponsor Communist Propaganda
  • Pow! Another Gut Punch Ad From Romney
Help HillBuzz by Shopping Amazon

Tags : HillBuzz, liberals won't admit they were wrong, Oak Park logo, Oak Park's new penis logo

"Bee" Advised!

I look forward to your comments. Please follow these simple guidelines:

  1. Please do not complain about your comment not yet showing up
  2. Stay on topic of the article ("This is OT, but..." = bad!)
  3. I will STING if you troll, spam, bait, swear or attack someone

32 Comments

  • Buttered says:
    2009/11/21 at 8:56 pm  Buttered(Quote)

    I don’t see it. I don’t get it.

    What are they offended about?

    +0
    Reply
    • Buttered says:
      2009/11/21 at 8:58 pm  Buttered(Quote)

      I think it is the committee’s homage to the big O – Obama!

      +0
      Reply
      • Buttered says:
        2009/11/21 at 8:58 pm  Buttered(Quote)

        Seriously!

        +0
        Reply
        • Buttered says:
          2009/11/21 at 9:00 pm  Buttered(Quote)

          But it’s odd, I didn’t know one of Obama’s names was Dick.

          +0
          Reply
        • Buttered says:
          2009/11/21 at 9:01 pm  Buttered(Quote)

          I see an ACORN in that logo too!

          +0
          Reply
        • Mary Quite-Contrary says:
          2009/11/22 at 12:36 pm  Mary Quite-Contrary(Quote)

          What, they couldn’t add a leaf (homage to the “Oak?”

          Buttered, how about ‘Ditherer-in-Chief’ (DiC) for short?

          Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk…my work here is done.

          +0
          Reply
        • Buttered says:
          2009/11/23 at 9:45 am  Buttered(Quote)

          That’s it Mary!

          Bravo Mary!

          My I humbly suggest…..

          “Ditherer-in-Chief Knucklehead” or for
          short, DICK!

          +0
          Reply
        • Buttered says:
          2009/11/23 at 9:46 am  Buttered(Quote)

          May that is!

          +0
          Reply
  • Joe in N. Calif. says:
    2009/11/21 at 8:59 pm  Joe in N. Calif.(Quote)

    If you squint a bit, it sort of looks like the staffel markings in Jagdgeswader units in WWII.

    Geschwader Commander: <<| or <<-)
    Geschwader Vice-Commander: <|
    Geschwader first officer: <-
    Staff Major: <||
    Geschwader technical officer: <|
    Gruppe Commander: <<
    Gruppe vice-commander: <
    Gruppe technical officer: <o
    Staffel commander: 1

    +0
    Reply
  • Buttered says:
    2009/11/21 at 9:03 pm  Buttered(Quote)

    Do the residents of Oak Park practice a lot of scarification?

    Maybe just the committee members do that.

    +0
    Reply
  • noodlenoggin says:
    2009/11/21 at 9:27 pm  noodlenoggin(Quote)

    Hillbuzz, chew on this. Seems this person did an info dump on Turbo Tax Timmy Geithner.

    Timmy was not raised in the US either.

    Apparently, Obama’s momma worked with Timmy’s daddy in Indonesia.

    http://tinyurl.com/ylkddog

    +0
    Reply
    • Buttered says:
      2009/11/21 at 9:33 pm  Buttered(Quote)

      Yes, Obama’s Mommy (the lady banker Drysdale) did work with Geithner’s daddy.

      +0
      Reply
    • California Granny says:
      2009/11/22 at 11:28 am  California Granny(Quote)

      It must be freeing to blithely traipse through life as a liberal … none of that pesky “conscience” thing jam up the works.

      +0
      Reply
      • Buttered says:
        2009/11/23 at 9:48 am  Buttered(Quote)

        LoL That’s right Granny,

        They are 100% convinced they are right and that they are GOD.

        So they waste their whole lives building structures for us mere mortals to live and die in.

        Can you say “Death Panels?”

        Stalin, Mao, and Hilter are smiling up at them methinks.

        +0
        Reply
  • Shiqra says:
    2009/11/21 at 9:34 pm  Shiqra(Quote)

    It looks like one of those mini vibrators. With the “park” the part you twist.

    I’d have gone with an oak leaf or something, but I’m a scientist – what do I know about logos.

    +0
    Reply
    • California Granny says:
      2009/11/22 at 11:30 am  California Granny(Quote)

      You know the old saying: A camel is a horse designed by a committee.

      +0
      Reply
      • Buttered says:
        2009/11/23 at 9:48 am  Buttered(Quote)

        In all our towns
        and in all our cities,
        there are no statues to committees!

        +0
        Reply
  • yttik says:
    2009/11/21 at 9:49 pm  yttik(Quote)

    That’s hilarious, Hillbuzz. In my town we have a giant toliet bowl, a uterus, and what appears to be a bronzed pile of dog poop. I’ve decided that committees and art do not mix.

    +0
    Reply
  • Capt Caveman says:
    2009/11/21 at 9:54 pm  Capt Caveman(Quote)

    I bet they paid a high six figure to low seven figure amount to achieve such a “unique” symbol.

    +0
    Reply
    • DeniseVB says:
      2009/11/22 at 9:47 am  DeniseVB(Quote)

      LOL..if they’re anything like my city council, they paid millions just to “study” the design, before the millions they would spend to create it.

      We should have a contest to come up with a better design, as they should have and draw from the graphic talent in the Chicagoland area :)

      +0
      Reply
  • Bill says:
    2009/11/21 at 11:17 pm  Bill(Quote)

    I agree with you guys on the proper logo for Oak Park. I am also a Chicago suburbanite and I have made numerous trips past Oak Park on the way to the city. It’s too bad that they came out with this logo and then deny it to people’s faces when they tell the officials what comes to mind.

    +0
    Reply
  • Jo Chgo says:
    2009/11/22 at 12:06 am  Jo Chgo(Quote)

    Pretty funny. I will have to check it out next time I head to OP for a Five Guys burger.

    +0
    Reply
  • 1539days says:
    2009/11/22 at 1:51 am  1539days(Quote)

    Oak Park: We’re coming on strong!

    Oak Park: A mighty branch

    Oak Park: Cock of the Walk

    I’m sure I’ll have more.

    +0
    Reply
  • terrirobin says:
    2009/11/22 at 7:38 am  terrirobin(Quote)

    Another day, another way to get the d*** out of the White House …
    http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com

    +0
    Reply
  • KJA says:
    2009/11/22 at 8:59 am  KJA(Quote)

    And here in lies the operation of government issues. You take a good thing, “improve upon it” and make it ridiculous.

    Why couldn’t they just stick to oak leave?

    +0
    Reply
  • robert c says:
    2009/11/22 at 9:07 am  robert c(Quote)

    Hey….all it says is…..’Come Squat Here.’

    +0
    Reply
  • robert c says:
    2009/11/22 at 9:07 am  robert c(Quote)

    The welcome wagon has a tube of lube. ;)

    +0
    Reply
    • Buttered says:
      2009/11/23 at 9:49 am  Buttered(Quote)

      Cause you know you’re gonna get the shaft!

      +0
      Reply
  • Pat P says:
    2009/11/22 at 9:18 am  Pat P(Quote)

    I hear they paid $65,000 for a study re promotion of the city, and this came with it. The citizens are not happy about it.

    +0
    Reply
  • Mr. X says:
    2009/11/22 at 12:55 pm  Mr. X(Quote)

    I find it strange that they wouldn’t want to change it after people mention it to them. Normally, companies want nothing to do with it if it just has a hint of suggestive connotation. Oh well, I take it that stuff on their face isn’t eggs.

    +0
    Reply
  • J4140 says:
    2009/11/22 at 3:11 pm  J4140(Quote)

    Awful. Looks like something from 1974.

    +0
    Reply
    • Buttered says:
      2009/11/23 at 9:49 am  Buttered(Quote)

      Or 1984.

      +0
      Reply

Leave Comment

Click here to cancel reply.

or subscribe without commenting.

Follow HillBuzz

Help HillBuzz!

Search HillBuzz.org

HillBuzz Proudly Supports

Operation Gratitude

Tag Cloud

The Left

Email Notification of New Posts


 

  • Blogroll

    • A Conservative Lesbian
    • Ann Coulter
    • Bare Naked Islam
    • Conservatives4Palin
    • Dipnote: State Department official blog
    • Governors' Journal
    • Greta Wire
    • HillaryClinton.com
    • HIllaryis44
    • Legal Insurrection
    • Lynn Sweet
    • Madame Secretary (Foreign Policy magazine)
    • Megan Fox
    • Michelle Malkin
    • NewsBusters
    • Open Secrets
    • Operation Gratitude
    • RGE Monitor (Nouriel Roubini)
    • Robin of Berkeley
    • Second City Cop
    • Tammy Bruce
    • Texas Darlin'
    • Wizbang
© 2009 HillBuzz.org All rights reserved.     Created by Marktime Media.     Powered by Imagine That Creative.

WP Premium Theme by Premium Wordpress Themes