Herman Cain vs Mitt Romney: Who’s Qualified To Be President?
The LSM is determined to convince you that you are unhappy about your choices for the GOP nomination because of the “Weak GOP Field.”
My contention is that this is the most exciting year for the GOP, conservatives and libertarians in decades. We don’t have a GOP frontrunner yet, because there’s no GOP incumbent, and fewer and fewer people rely on the LSM to tell them what they think. People like you, the readers of Hillbuzz, are taking ownership of the nomination and vetting process.
I found this post on Free Republic over the weekend: Mitt Romney, Herman Cain and Presidential Qualifications.
What makes this analysis interesting is the fact that it was published back on December 29, 2010, before Herman Cain’s exhilarating performance in the South Carolina debate.
The author’s conclusion?
Of course, if after examining the evidence you still don’t believe Herman Cain is qualified to be president, then you would have to also conclude that Mitt Romney is not qualified to be president. The only significant difference in their resumes is Romney’s four year stint as governor of Massachusetts—a governorship that was, from a conservative perspective, an absolute disaster. Mitt Romney was not a success as governor, and it would be pure spin to say otherwise.
Take a look at the article on Free Republic. Would it be useful to have this kind of head-to-head comparison of all the GOP candidates? Should we make this a project for the Blue Team?
© 2011, Kathleen Gee. All rights reserved.
Also Recommended:
Latest Buzz:
Help HillBuzz by Shopping Amazon
"Bee" Advised!
I look forward to your comments. Please follow these simple guidelines:
- Please do not complain about your comment not yet showing up
- Stay on topic of the article ("This is OT, but..." = bad!)
- I will STING if you troll, spam, bait, swear or attack someone
I am so excited about the array of candidates! I'd love to see a comparison like this one for Palin/Pawlenty.
I would love to see head-to-head comparisons of as many candidates as feasible. What a wonderful tool for clarity!
I like the idea of comparing the GOP, conservative, libertarian candidates by showing the strengths, talents and backgrounds of each and how these distinguish each candidate from the others. Could we perhaps also have a complete, detailed, bullet-point rundown of BO's miserable "track record" during his first (last, only) term? That will be what the opposing candidate will be running against.
yes, activate blue team action. and yes, also against the D-ummies. coincidentally, does any one know if any other Ds are running? or did they cede the whole field to obamao?
Of course they’ve ceded the ground to The Won. Failure to do so would mean that they’re raaaaaaaacists! They’d be so radioactive even the Cocktail Party wouldn’t take them.
head to head comparison? maybe Sarah and Romney
but…this american thinker story today about Obama's horrible public speaking skills – STF or Stammering the Future got us thinking and smiling about the future debates between Obama and Sarah Palin – debates which will finally put to rest all of the false Sarah memes as it will be painfully obvious to all who is the really idiot – and folks this is why they are so afraid of this woman!
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/05/stamm…
btw…we just can't stop smiling watching Sarah tie up the LSM, DEMS and even the cocktail party in knots!
or Obama and Herman. Love to see them both (but sadly can't).
Mittens supports ethanol subsidies. Palin says end all energy subsidies.
http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2011/06/end-a…