Lamestream Media
Herman Cain schools Lawrence O’Donnell
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEjl5iaSG6I
(this is part 1 of last nights show)
I wanted to get these videos up earlier today but didn’t have time before work. You guys have been talking about it in the Open Thread so I thought I’d get something “official” posted on it. I watched the entire thing last night on MSNBC….it’s hard for me to watch Lawrence O’Donnell because I always expect him to sprout horns and grab his pitchfork. I think he’s a very evil person and he gives me the creeps but I will always watch Herman Cain so I tuned in last night. Herman was simply awesome. This man knows his stuff and he has a very natural way of explaining his plan to get this country out of the hell hole we’ve fallen into. There’s so many parts of this interview to talk about that I’ll leave it up to you guys to comment below on your favorite parts but I’ll just say one thing that I got out of it…. Herman Cain is a very smart man. I don’t think the liberals know quite how to deal with a black man who is so personable, engaging, pro-America and NOT liberal.
Here’s part 2 and 3 of last nights show…..
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykG_QkgJ7zM
I can’t find the ending of the interview ( nobody has posted it yet on YouTube) but let me just sum it up for you. Herman Cain left Lawrence O’Donnell wishing that he had chosen to interview Mitt Romney….who would have kowtowed and apologized about everything and basically made himself and the Republican party look mushy-gushy and weak. Herman gave Lawrence hell and did it with a smile on his face. You can’t help but like him and his ideas are very sound and sensible. He’s someone that most Americans can connect with and this must scare Obama and his re-election campaign.
Growing up and living in the South my whole life…I have been listening to Herman Cain for years on WSB 750 and I have been a BIG Herman fan for a very long time. He is the man with the plan…plain and simple.
I just ordered my Cain 2012 bumper sticker.
I’m joining his campaign.
Jon Stewart to Ron Paul: “The media has a real problem with your consistency.”
It’s a sad day in America when the most substantive, in-depth discussion with a Presidential candidate is conducted by a comedian on Comedy Central.
Check out the last minute or so of this segment, where Jon Stewart gives Ron Paul some tips for becoming more popular with the media. It’s hysterically funny, but unfortunately very true.
Pop Tots: TLC Working with the Left to Normalize Child Exploitation
Megan Fox is a homeschooling, suburban mom in Chicagoland who hosts “The Megan Fox Radio Show” and routinely investigates issues important to her, especially those involving children. Here she explores the disturbing recent trend involving the media’s normalization of child exploitation.
I recently cancelled my cable (for the second time) due to escalating costs and a general disgust at the lack of quality programming. I won’t lie and say I’ve never indulged in reality smut for entertainment. I have caught myself watching Bachelor Pad and no part of me is proud of it. It is the “train-wreck” factor that keeps people paying attention to most of the stuff that passes for good TV.
The other day I caught Toddlers in Tiaras (a disgusting show where mothers, who have failed to make something of themselves, live out weird fantasies of wealth and beauty by forcing their little girls to traipse around in wigs and makeup applied with a trowel.) It was an episode that garnered a lot of controversy because a mother put her 4-year-old in a costume with padded breasts and butt. Frankly, it surprised me that anyone got upset considering the other outrageous things they do to these girls all the time like forcing them to wear false teeth and look like cheap streetwalkers.
Nonetheless, it was the padded butt/boob costume that got tongues wagging. Shortly after that episode, another featured a 3-year-old parading around in the prostitute costume Julia Roberts wore in Pretty Woman complete with hooker boots and cheap wig. While the general public finds such things repulsive, TLC continues to air what amounts to child abuse every week.
Read the rest of this entry »
Media Bias Alert: MSNBC Rigs Post-Debate Poll Results to Suppress Ron Paul
The hostile and sometimes nonsensical questioning by Brian Williams, et al, during last night’s GOP debate at the Reagan Library was to be expected. No one was surprised that a Leftist “news” organization would do everything possible to make the GOP candidates look bad, and skew the event in favor of their hand-picked candidates (Mittens, Huntsman, and Perry).
What surprised me was how blatant another bit of manipulation was.
Visiting MSNBC.com to watch the debate coverage, I noticed a link to a poll: Who do you think won the GOP debate at the Reagan Library?
Of course, I logged in to see who was winning.
To MSNBC’s chagrin, Ron Paul was winning with 42.4% of the votes cast, with nearly twice as many votes as the runner-up, Mittens Romneycare, who got 22%.
But you wouldn’t know that at first glance. The graphic MSNBC posted has Ron Paul and Mittens in a dead heat:
At the time I took the screen capture, Ron Paul had received 42.4% of the votes.
Mittens Romneycare had received 22%. I wasn’t a math major, but I’m pretty sure that’s about twice as many votes for Ron Paul. Around here, we call that “a landslide.”
So why are the bars the same length? How many people would simply glance at the graphic without looking at the numbers?
Michelle Bachmann got twice as many votes as Rick Santorum, so her bar is twice as long.
When this screen grab was taken, Michelle Bachmann was trailing Herman Cain by just 0.1%, so their bars were the same length.
So why is Ron Paul’s bar the same length as Mitten’s Romneycare, when he got nearly twice as many votes?
Is it because MSNBC thinks their viewers are stupid and gullible?
Is it because MSNBC is pushing Mittens Romneycare?
Is it because MSNBC is trying to suppress Ron Paul?
Or is it all of the above?
UPDATE (9/12/11): It appears to be “all of the above.” As demonstrated in this YouTube video, the web developers at MSNBC.com applied different code to Ron Paul’s results in the chart than to anyone else’s.
Hmmmm. Why do you suppose they would they do that?
They are really really really scared of Rick Perry.
I know that most of you watched last night’s GOP debate on MSNBC but did you watch their post debate analysis? Ordinarily, I would switch over to FOX and watch a more sane and rational analysis but I decided to see what the loons thought of Rick Perry and the rest of the field. It was almost like a comedy show. The usual suspects were on board….Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O’Donnell ( this man makes my skin crawl) and as an added bonus, Al Sharpton. They bantered back and forth with the usual left-wing BS nonsense. They don’t like Newt Gingrich because he is so much smarter than them that they don’t even know how to dismantle what he says (plus he calls them out on media bias). They had a great time making Ron Paul look like a complete crackpot (and Ron Paul falls for it every time because he’s so passionate about his beliefs…which have merit). They gave Jon Huntsman a lot of air time…I guess because (as a lot of people think), they want him to be the spoiler for the GOP. They repeated the same old tired Michelle Bachmann routine…making her appear to be a deranged far-right extremist boogeyman. They picked around the edges of the other candidates. They had negative things to say about all of them….except Mitt Romney. Of course they had a little criticism of Mitt but…if I had been an alien who just landed on Earth….I would think that Mitt was the candidate that MSNBC wanted for president. It was obvious to everyone that this debate was between Mitt Romney and Rick Perry. Oh sure…the moderators threw questions out to the other candidates but the focus was squarely on the two front-runners and one thing is very clear….they are terrified of Rick Perry. To be more specific, they are terrified of a Rick Perry presidency. This man is Satan to them. They think that if this man gets elected then the world will come to an end. Al Sharpton could barely string together two sentences he was so riled up (even worse than normal). They were praising Mitt Romney so much it was comical. They were practically tripping over each other to see just how much adoration they could heap on Mitt. It was one of the most entertaining things I have ever watched. Why? Do you think it’s because they have faced the reality that their savior, Obama, will most likely lose in 2012 and they would rather have Romney as president because he is a mushy moderate? Or do you think they want Mitt because they think Obama stands a better chance of winning if Romney is the GOP candidate?
One thing is for sure…..They do not want Rick Perry on the ticket.
To them, he is the Anti-Christ and they are terrified of Perry winning in 2012.
Sort of like we were when Obama won is 2008…and we were right.
Ray Nagin offers his best Hurricane advice.
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfMbIpcfB4k
The absurdity of this is just amazing… Ray Nagin giving advice on Hurricane preparedness. The host calls Nagin a “hurricane expert”…which is true… he’s an expert on what not to do.
And he sits there and shamelessly plugs his book.
Nagin says the biggest advice he can give to the people dealing with Irene? “Make sure people know the seriousness of the situation.” He even goes on to say that his thoughts and prayers go out to those during Irene and that “they can get through it. We got through it in New Orleans.”
Unbelievable. They got through it in New Orleans?
Perhaps Mr. Nagin needs to take a look at the Katrina scrapbook.
May God bless those in the path of Hurricane Irene.
My thoughts and prayers are with you all.
What do the letters “MSDNC” mean to you?
Someone in comments today referred to MSNBC as “MSDNC” , and I just loved that.
The DNC at the end is because the Left clearly controls MSNBC as a perpetual mouthpiece of the DNC, the Democrat National Committee.
What are some good words to go with the “M” and the “S”?
I’d love to find a clear, cogent, lyrical descriptor for MSNBC (“MSDNC”) that really drives home this clever acronym.
What do you think the following letters should stand for?
M =
S =
D =
N =
C =
This way, it can not only have the “DNC” in there pointing back to the DNC itself, but could also get double duty out of those letters by having them mean something biting as well.
What think you?












