Climate of Hate
Maxine Waters…Oh No She Didn’t.
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7KkPbGgxKo
Did she call House Republicans demons?
Seriously?
Did she say that she would be the next Chairman of the Financial Services Committee?
That should scare the hell out of all of us.
We can not allow the democrats to take back the House….or keep the Senate…or the White House. The thought of Maxine Waters (who was investigated by a congressional ethics panel for steering federal dollars to her husband’s failing bank) taking over the chair of the financial services committee is unbelievable. Isn’t that like having the fox guard the hen house?
We’ve got to get off our butts and start campaigning for Republican candidates. ASAP!
Here’s a little picture that’s sure to give you nightmares tonight….
Yikes….now that’s scary!
Now get out there and join a Republican campaign.
Democrats’ Persecution of Mormons Begins: Effort Underway to Depict Latter Day Saints As Virulent Racists
Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election strategy is “Occupy & Persecute”, which replaces 2008′s old-and-broke “Hope & Change”.
You know the Occupy part well, because you’ve seen it manifest in the Occupy Wall Street thugs — who are being trained and revved up to assail Willard “Mittens” Romney as the classic caricature of a Thurston Howell III-grade Wall Street Villain.
The Persecute half of the strategy is to demonize Mormons — as the people who belong to the Church of Latter Day Saints are commonly known (and what they will be called by the elite, agenda-driven media in the general election).
Though Romney has aggressively attacked his Republican opponents (with great media assistance) in the primaries, during a general election campaign the media would be rooting for Obama — and thus gunning for Romney. I have, to date, seen no evidence that Romney would be able to withstand an “Occupy & Persecute” Obama victory strategy (or effectively level attacks on Obama that would cut through the media bias and have the same impact on him that Romney’s attack machine has had on Gingrich or Santorum).
The most-used (and most-effective) weapon in the Democrats’ Alinsky-designed arsenal is to depict political opponents as racists. This is a tactic that succeeds in alienating millions of independent voters from whomever Democrats have aimed the Alinsky Death Star at that particular day. Part of depicting Mormons — and by extension, Romney himself — as racists involves the exclusion of blacks from the Mormon church until the 1970s.
Today, I spotted the first attempt by the Tolerant Left to power up the “RAAACIST!” accusations against Mormons and Romney — in a posting that’s popping up on a great number of Leftist Facebook pages and being shared aggressively by the Leftists I monitor in the social networking world.
The video above is the opening salvo in Democrats’ efforts to depict Mormons as racists. Below the fold, you’ll see comments left by Leftists regarding the video. I’m pleasantly surprised that there’s not a consensus amongst Leftists if this strategy will be effective and if the “Persecute” half of Obama’s two-pronged re-election strategy will work.
If you are a Romney supporter, please start thinking of ways to mitigate the damages from the “Occupy & Persecute” strategy now — because if Romney becomes the Republican nominee this is what will have to combat for the five months of the general election.
Screengrab of “Being Liberal” Facebook page below:
Why Do YOU Think The Tolerant Left Behaves The Way It Does?
I’ve been collecting screengrabs of those on the Tolerant Left taking to Facebook and posting truly hateful screeds attacking anyone who opposes the Democrats’ agenda.
I want to understand what makes these people tick and where the raging hatred they so casually aim at others comes from, because it just makes no sense to me. Politics is my life…and my life’s mission is to bring down the Democrat Party and the Cocktail Party GOP establishment alike, but I’ve never felt any inclination to hate those I oppose politically. When I was in school, I was taught that “hate” is the absolute worst thing in the world — so it still shocks me to see so many on The Tolerante Left treat hatred as a commonplace source of inspiration in their lives.
So far, I’ve identified five key things I see the Tolerant Leftists do on a running basis that are steeped in hatred:
1. Peppering everything they say with needless expletives — why do they need to do that?
2. Wishing death and dismemberment upon those who they disagree with, including often elaborate fantasies where those on the Tolerant Left describe in epic detail exactly how they wish someone would die and the sort of abuse they would do to that person’s corpse after he or she was dead — where do these sick fantasies come from?
3. Repeating apocryphal stories without any attribution or supporting facts — why don’t they make sound arguments based on facts and reason instead of unbalanced emotion?
4. Flipping wildly from supporting someone or something to vowing to destroy that person or thing the next day because they disagreed on an often times minor thing — like with the jihad the Tolerant Left declared on the Susan G. Komen Foundation when it decided it would no longer be extorted to pay for abortions…why does the Tolerant Left seek to destroy anyone or anything it disagrees with instead of realizing that, big picture, some wars don’t need to be declared?
5. Attacking Christians and Christianity and actively seeking ways to destroy the Church and punish Christians for standing by their faith — why does the Tolerant Left do this, while simultaneously doing all it can to aid the spread of Islam in the world?
I would deeply appreciate anyone with psychology training or experience dealing with caustic and unbalanced people to chime in below, or in email if you want to keep it private, and let me know what you think of the questions above.
We have a few months until the general election heats up — when I’m sure the Tolerant Left will rev things up to fever pitch. I think it’s a good use of our time to start taking a hard look at common things the Tolerant Leftists say and do so that we can plan effective strategies for handling these people come summer and fall.
What’s your take on all this? All ideas welcome, even if you aren’t an expert, but especially if you’re someone who’s always wondered about the Tolerant Left’s behavior yourself and have other insight into the terrible and hateful things they do when talking politics.
Is Debbie Wasserman Schultz still blaming the Tea Party for the Gabby Giffords shooting?
For some unknown reason…this morning I stumbled onto the Media Matters website. I think I was following a link that I found on the Fox site about Debbie Wasserman Schultz and before I knew it…I was there. I’ve never been on this site but…let me tell you…it’s worth visiting if you need a good chuckle. Do any of you watch “The Five” on Fox? I watched it yesterday and one of the topics was about DWS and how she is a complete disaster for the DNC but a great asset to Republicans. Four of the five (not Bob Beckel) were laughing about the fact that every time DWS opens her mouth, it turns people away from the Democrat party. It was a really funny segment. Anyway…one of the things discussed was the comment she made this week while she was speaking in New Hampshire. An audience member asked her about the lack of civility in Congress and DWS’s answer contained remarks about the Tea Party. The left is highly insulted that Fox is claiming that DWS is (once again) blaming the Tea Party for the Gabby Giffords shooting. Media Matters claims that her statement was taken out of context.
Here’s the transcript of the question….
AUDIENCE MEMBER: The American people are losing faith in Congress. [inaudible] because of the lack of civility. What do you think can be done to bring that faith back and then we can start thinking that they’re doing their job instead of just fighting with each other?
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: Well, as someone who spent 19 years as a member of a legislative body, I really agree with you, that we need to make sure that we tone things down, particularly in light of the Tucson tragedy from a year ago where my very good friend, Gabby Giffords, who is doing really well by the way, and I know everybody is so thrilled, as I am, to hear that, making tremendous progress.
But the discourse in America, the discourse in Congress in particular, to answer your question, very specifically, has really changed.
And I’ll tell you, I hesitate to place blame, but I have noticed it take a very precipitous turn towards edginess and a lack of civility with the growth of the Tea Party movement.
After the 2010 elections, when you had the Tea Party elect a whole lot of their supporters to the United States House of Representatives and you had town hall meetings that they tried to take over and you saw some of their conduct at those town hall meetings, you know, in the time that I’ve been in my state legislature and in Congress, I’ve never seen a time that was more divisive or where discourse was less civil.
It’s one thing — I’ve always had people come to my town hall meetings, for example, and say that they don’t agree with me on something. And that’s fine. And you know, that’s what those town hall meetings are about, they’re for civil discourse and give-and-take. And I learn something when I hear from a constituent who doesn’t share my view, and hopefully they do also because we’re listening to each other and there’s a back and forth.
What the Tea Party has done is they have taken it to a different level, and so when they come and disagree with you, you’re not just wrong, you are the enemy. I mean, that’s really a place that politics in America shouldn’t go. And you know, when they disagree with you on an issue, you’re not just wrong, you’re a liar. Rather than just have a difference of opinion, accusations like that get hurled, and it brings the entire discourse down to a level that I think none of us want to see remain there.
So, I have done my part. I’ll tell you that President Obama, you’ve seen, he’s tried so hard to get the Republicans to work with him, to bring them to the table, to try to get them to compromise and find common ground, but when you have someone like Mitch McConnell, for example, the minority leader of the United States Senate, say at the outset of this Congress that his number one goal is not turning the economy around, not creating jobs, but to defeat Pres– Barack Obama, well, then how are we going to reach compromise if that’s the goal that drives them and all their decisions? Because then — we won’t.
Because if that’s their goal, then anything that they do to compromise gives President Obama a win, a success, and makes it less likely in their minds that they would defeat him. Unfortunately, I think what has driven the Republicans in Congress is their interest in only one job, Barack Obama’s, when Democrats have been fighting for American jobs.
And that’s the difference. And that’s going to be the choice that people have to make.
So…what do you think? She doesn’t come right out and say “The Tea Party is responsible for Gabby’s shooting.” but I believe that the insinuation is there. There is one thing that is obviously missing in her statement. Not one time does she mention the Occupy Wall Street movement and their monstrous behavior. Not one time does she mention the Wisconsin teachers union thugs and their monstrous behavior. Not one time does she give an example of any case of violence or uncivil behavior from the Tea Party.
Greg Gutfeld has such a way with words so I think I’ll let him sum it all up…
GUTFELD (co-host): So, in my mind, which is made of felt and potatoes, Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the best thing to happen to Republicans since Ronald Reagan. Seriously, I’ve had wedgies less irritating than her. And that can only chafe the Democrats. Case in point: Once again the DNC chair links the Tea Party to the Tucson mass murder. So, Frizzilla, I bet you think the discourse in America, the discourse in Congress in particular, has really changed. [Fox News, The Five, 1/12/12]
So true!
Latest Video Message from “Anonymous” Is Flooding Facebook With Claim Senate Has Repealed Bill of Rights
First off, whenever one of these video messages pop up from “Anonymous” and the whole Occupy Wall Street crowd, I’m reminded of the Joker pirating the airwaves of Gotham City in the 1989 Batman movie with Jack Nicholson at the mic (honestly, all that’s missing is some poison-gas-filled parade balloons, a Batwing hovering overhead, and Kim Bassinger lugging around a camera).
See what I mean?
“Anonymous” claims that S. 1867 (the National Defense Authorization Act) repeals the Bill of Rights and declares the entire United States to be a battleground under military control.
I mention this because this video is viral on Facebook, where I’ve seen it posted and reposted by hundreds of the accounts I monitor as a focus group of what the Left’s talking about today.
I never know how much of these videos anyone watches, or if any of the Facebookers reposting it have any idea what “Anonymous” is talking about, but I’ve come to recognize the importance of paying attention to what people decide to send out via Facebook on their profiles.
If you aren’t already quietly watching Facebook for clues into what the Left’s up to, you should be. There’s never been a source of information like this before, with many Leftists severely tipping their hands and very candidly revealing exactly how unstable and dangerous they are with casual posts they make on their iPhones — or by simply reposting or responding to posts like those containing the “Anonymous” videos.
My gut feeling here is that whoever is making these “Anonymous” videos is part of a faction in the Left that’s deliberately laying the groundwork for violence in next year’s presidential election.
Hopeychange won’t work as a campaign theme again; the Left has thus decided to substitute chaos and violence to push Barack Obama’s re-election.
It’s going to get ugly, folks.
And it’s already started.
What would you do if confronted by an eco-nut?
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVdMySWfAIQ
WARNING: This video contains some not so classy language.
I know there’s a lot more important things to discuss today with everything going on but I just couldn’t help but put this one up. I’ve never run into someone quite like this but I know they’re out there. Kudos to this guy for thinking to record this encounter.
Watch your back.
The looney’s are everywhere.
How would you handle this one?
Michael Crichton on environmentalism as a religion
I’m beginning to appreciate what a colossal loss the world suffered with the death of author Michael Crichton.
Someone sent me his book State of Fear, which I just started reading.
It seems Crichton was prophetic and ahead of the pack in terms of recognizing the Anthropogenic Global Warming cult for what it is, and for connecting it to the wider “religion of environmentalism” that permeates the Left.
I want to learn more about Crichton’s thoughts and writings on the subject.
Do you have a take on this you can share?
