[ Click above to embiggen: More change we can believe in…the new phenomenon of Muslim female beggars scaring off shoppers in Chicago, Illinois ]
TIME magazine has a profile of Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel on its newest cover, with an article inside that wonders why Chicagoans don’t like having him as our Mayor. I’ve written before that this is a complicated matter, with no single answer as to why this guy is the wrong fit for running Chicago. He’s petulant, arrogant, and mean-spirited…but that hasn’t stopped others in the past from being good Chief Executives of this town. I think Emanuel is just incompetent in some ways (and purposefully subversive in others) and I believe he just doesn’t know how to prioritize well when it comes to things that are important to Chicagoans (but not part of the Left’s greater agenda). Perhaps energy that should be spent making this a truly great city is being rerouted into persecuting enemies and perpetuating old feuds (or laying the groundwork for the Left’s radical transformation of our country, using Chicago as an operational headquarters). Some other day, we can spend our time trying to come up with a Top Ten list for all the reasons that Rahm is bad at his current job…which is a worthy use of an afternoon indeed.
But, yesterday I was downtown and made a point to take pictures of every beggar I saw outside on the streets of Chicago. My rule was to just walk around town in all the places that tourists go (like Michigan Avenue, State Street, and along all the avenues that have nice shops, good restaurants, and shopping malls) and if I saw someone begging, I’d take his or her pic. I have about three dozen of these shots now…and it took me just about two hours to get them.
It was actually very surprising to see the results of this little photo safari, because in all the years I’ve lived in Chicago I have never seen a proliferation of beggars like this before. I expected maybe one or two, three tops, but the problem seemed endless.
Also surprising was that a lot of these people didn’t seem like there was much of anything wrong with them…in that they looked like they had recently been employed and didn’t appear to be severely mentally ill (like the beggars I’d seen in Chicago in the past). Everyone had hand-written signs on cardboard, either saying they had children at home in need of the money or they tried to be funny and say their girlfriends were kidnapped by ninjas (this one has been circulating in Chicago for at least 8 years now, since I’ve seen it for that amount of time in one variation of another).
What I’ve never seen before, however, were Muslim women begging all up and down Michigan Avenue, in front of the tony shops likes Tiffany’s, Burberry, Apple, etc. This is the part of town that’s called “The Magnificent Mile” and is heavily trafficked by tourists; sometimes, the crowds are so dense that there are traffic jams in the middle of the sidewalk, as people get stopped in bottlenecks while trying to walk down the street. Further hampering movement these days are the Muslim women (who appear to be Pakistani or Bangladeshi) who now are allowed to sit on the sidewalk, camp out, and beg like this in the nicest part of town.
Since these women appear to be from Pakistan, Bangladesh, or elsewhere overseas and describe themselves as immigrants to passers-by (also pretending they speak little or no English, as a means of winning sympathy), I also wonder why in this county people allow the Left to so aggressively import third world peasants. Instead of, say, doctors, education professionals, and other hardworking and respectable immigrants who would not be begging on sidewalks. Instead, Rahm Emanuel seems to have placed an urgent order for the importation of Muslim female beggars…and I think people need to ask WHY IS THAT?
Don’t think for a second it’s not part of the Left’s social engineering long-term strategies. Because, logically, the more third world peasants that Democrats import then the more people will be living in this country who accept the living conditions in third world Hell holes as the norm…with the added bonus that people like this depend on government handouts and are used to autocratic governments with one party rule. They are Democrats’ dream voters, and the Left is working hard (with the help of Marco Rubio we must note) to ensure that the importation of third world peasants to mooch welfare benefits (or just beg on the streets of Chicago) continues at breakneck pace.
I’m not sure how he did it, but Mayor Daley (our former mayor…and also a Democrat) seemed to find a way to keep these people away from the tourist hubs in town. If the Muslim female beggars were in Chicago when Daley was mayor, I never saw them…and believe me, I’d remember. Evidently, either there’s just a larger explosion of this phenomenon that has surged the ranks of ALL beggars in general…or Rahm Emanuel is possibly doing something to specifically import these people as part of some bigger political scheme.
Remember his personal motto: never let a good crisis go to waste…and never miss an opportunity to subversively undermine the rule of law and social stability in this country. One female Muslim beggar at a time, evidently.
QUESTION FOR COMMENTS: Do you notice more beggars where you live? Does the mayor in your town or city do anything to curb this?
Have you seen Muslim women in your city begging like this on the sidewalk…and where do you think this started and why is this happening in American cities now?
Public School Shocker: Gay Porn Actor and Male Stripper Employed As Teacher at Joseph Stockton Elementary School in Chicago!
[ Click above to embiggen: 6th grade teacher Bradley Thomas Balof (sometimes "Bradley T. Balof" or "Bradley Balof") at Joseph Stockton Elementary School in Chicago is really "Brad Thomas" (porn actor) and "Bradley Thomas" (male stripper, erotic entertainer, racist comic, and sometimes-bartender at gay bar Sidetrack in Boystown) ]
The Chicago Public School system is now embroiled in another breaking scandal as it was uncovered this weekend that a gay porn actor and male stripper/erotic entertainer is currently employed as a sixth grade teacher at majority-minority Joseph Stockton Elementary School on Chicago’s north side.
This follows scandals in Florida and Massachusetts where FOX News and other investigative reporting teams discovered former gay porn stars teaching elementary school students in the Miami and Boston environs. Here in Illinois, I’ve uncovered irrefutable proof that the Chicago Public School system currently employs a man who continues to moonlight in the adult entertainment industry; by day, he’s charged with taking care of classrooms full of mostly minority children…but at night he bares his body in sweaty bars and upon public stages for the hungry eyes of other gay men.
Are parents of elementary school students in Chicago informed that at least one of the men teaching their children is currently involved in the adult entertainment industry and does the Chicago Public School System have any idea of the sort of nude moonlighting in which at least one of its teachers engages? These are questions we ask your help in answering this week as we get to the bottom of this new Chicago Public Schools scandal that warrants a full investigation by the state and federal Education Departments.
[ Click above to embiggen: employment information for Bradley T. Balof, who earns nearly $60,000/year as a public school teacher…but still performs as an adult entertainer at night ]
Bradley Thomas Balof has been on my radar for some time, since he performs as a stand-up comic and serves as the master-of-ceremonies (MC) for sexually-charged events at Sidetrack the Video Bar here in Chicago’s heavily-gay Boystown neighborhood.
While on the stage, Balof openly talks about being a Chicago Public School teacher…and, in fact, often mocks the mostly black students in his charge by incorporating variations of racist “Shaniqua” or “Loquisha” ghetto-humor into his comedy stylings; these are “jokes” commonly told by gay white men like Balof that depict his black students as ignorant “Shaniquas”, “Loquishas” and other ebonics-inspired characters who are in his opinion unable to learn, difficult to teach, and almost entirely coming from broken homes with missing fathers and stereotypical black “welfare queen” mothers, whom Balof portrays on stage as having children for the expressed purpose of collecting more government benefits (and then shunting the kids off to him and his fellow Chicago Public School teachers to deal with for the day). White gay men laugh uproariously at these “jokes”, which has made Balof a regular on the gay comedy circuit, according to his website: BradleyThomasComic.com. His experience teaching black students in a Chicago Public School classroom provides roughly 80% of what he talks about in his standup routines…and his jokes primarily boil down to the fact that the “Shaniquas”, “Loquishas”, and other black students in his classes exist entirely to be laughed at by gay men who find this style of “comedy” hilarious.
For the uninitiated, it’s incredibly common to find gays mocking blacks in niche comedy venues…while simultaneously black comedians often find it hilarious to make fun of gay people; this is part of the dynamic of the Left where one specific demographic group often mocks and targets another (but the national media never calls any of them out on it, since it’s one minority mercilessly maligning another for intra-party Democrat amusement).
When Balof’s not denigrating his students and their families at Sidetrack or other gay venues around town, he also appears nude or nearly-nude as a male stripper for various celebrations and serves as an erotic entertainer at leather and fetish-themed events, where he’s costumed in everything from steel-studded jockstraps to dog collars and brightly colored thongs or g-strings. Balof has seemingly made no effort whatsoever to hide his adult activities from simple Google image searches and, in fact, both Sidetrack the Video Bar (one of his employers) and ChicagoPride.com (an entertainment site focused on life in Boystown) prominently feature many images of Balof stripping, strutting, and posing nearly-nude around town. Sidetrack, during its recently discontinued “Laugh Track” standup comedy nights, additionally hosted a great number of Balof’s “comedic” attacks on black people and the mocking of his specific students at Joseph Stockton Elementary in Chicago. Sidetrack maintains a video archive of all the “Laugh Track” comedy performances from the years 2010 to 2012, as Balof’s racist “comedy” making fun of his black students was recorded by Sidetrack’s video production team.
Note: If the Chicago Public Schools or Illinois State Board of Education subpoenaed those tapes, they’d have footage of Balof’s “comedy stylings” where poor black children at Joseph Stockton Elementary are the butts of his “jokes”. Shockingly, he’s smart enough not to maintain a YouTube channel with any videos of his standup routine…but I personally saw Sidetrack’s videographer taping Balof delivering these “Shaniqua” and “Loquisha” riffs during those Laugh Track events and know that as of this writing they are sitting in the video production booth at Sidetrack and have not ever been destroyed.
[ Click above to embiggen: Bradley Thomas Balof appears as "Brad Thomas" in the gay adult films Into It and Bowser Makes A Movie ]
Going by the name “Brad Thomas”, Balof has appeared in at least two low-budget pornographic movies and is featured in sexually-charged music videos that can easily be found posted to the web. In one of his films, titled Into It and manufactured by the adult entertainment company Hustlers in 2006, Balof stars as “Brett” and is featured on the back cover art of the video reclining nude in a position of sexual satisfaction. The erotic film involves male hustlers, heavy drug use, a “night of unbridled sex”, nudity, a sado-masochistic relationship, and other similar attractions geared towards a gay male audience. A “hustler”, for those who don’t know, is a low-rent male prostitute who picks up “Johns” on the street or in gay bars in a city such as Chicago.
In 2005′s Bowser Makes a Movie from erotic entertainer Hornbill Films, Balof inhabits the character of “Vincent Van Coq” in a story about a young gay man who decides “to pursue his life dream…making an adult film”. “Coq” is, obviously, a Gallic manipulation of “cock”‘…which is itself American for regular old “penis”. Balof, billed here as “Brad Thomas” once again, appears shirtless on the cover art for the film grabbing at his penis through his pants and can be spotted on the reverse in a scene where the title character Bowser indeed films the porno he’d dreamed of making. Dirty Bird Pictures seems to have continued the “Bowser” character into several sequels, which include Bowser Makes A Porn and Bowser Makes Another Porn, but it’s unclear if Balof’s character Vincent Van Coq was featured in these further sexual adventures (and none of these erotic features should be confused with the angry, testudine dragon that repeatedly kidnapped Princess Peach in the Super Mario Bros. video game series).
The music video “Joan Crawford Goes to Hell” by Chicago-based Joan Crawford-inspired punk band “The Joans” featured Balof (credited as Bradley Thomas yet again) gyrating provocatively (starting at the 2:40 second mark in the video above), dolled up as one of Satan’s barely-dressed imps in leather and soot as the Hell-bound, deceased actress is engulfed in CGI flames. Near the end of the video, Balof kneels before Joan Crawford and paws at her sexually…before gyrating his body some more in disco a-go-go special effects while a skeleton dances in rainbow lights behind him. The video closes with Joan Crawford pushing an eager Balof’s head down to a sexual position conducive for cunnilingus. According to the end credits, the video was filmed at gay leather fetish bar Jackhammer in the Andersonville neighborhood of Chicago.
[ Click above to embiggen: Balof as "Bradley Thomas", MC of the IML Leathermen fetish events ]
Memorial Day Weekend in Chicago is when the annual International Mr. Leather (aka, “IML”) fetish pageant is held in a hotel downtown. Through the years, Balof has served as master-of-ceremonies (MC) for this event, where he’s appeared on stage in various forms of fetish gear, underpants, jockstraps, leather briefs, or nude. Balof in fact proudly posts this adult entertainment experience on his own website, as featured on his “Resume” page, and can clearly be seen performing his MC duties at the “world’s largest annual Leathermen convention”. The term “Leathermen” refers to gay men who enjoy a fetish of leather outfits, gear, and the corresponding sexual stereotypes associated with the “leather community”. The IML convention hosts sexual orgy parties, a “beauty pageant” of sorts where a nearly-nude “Mr. Leather” is crowned each year, and an expo of sexual toys and fetish gear for the “leather community”. In addition to serving as the MC for the major events, Balof danced in his underwear, in jockstraps, and nude for the enjoyment of IML attendees.
[ Click above to embiggen: Balof as "Bradley Thomas", Sidetrack bartender, stripper, drag queen, and MC for special events ]
As an employee of Sidetrack the Video Bar, Balof regularly appears in his underwear, jockstraps, dolled up as Liza Minnelli, and nearly-nude at various events that owner Art Johnston hosts in his bar (in addition to Balof’s normal shifts as a Sidetrack underpants-clad bartender). Serving as master-of-ceremonies (MC) for these sexually charged events, Balof also seizes the opportunity to engage in polarizing and oftentimes hateful speech directed at Christians, such as the tirade he engaged in against Dan Cathy and the Chick-Fil-A restaurant chain at the Equality Illinois Pie Toss held at Sidetrack last year, where Balof berated a man dressed in a chicken costume as an effigy of Cathy and his company. Balof hosts the Sidetrack Mardi Gras, Halloween, and drag events…where he similarly revs up considerable hatred amongst Sidetrack employees and customers for Christians, conservatives in general, and others Balof labels “enemies of the gay community”. He encourages Sidetrack’s clientele and staff to hate Christians and Republicans and to take to the streets after events to punish and persecute those he and Sidetrack portray as “the enemy”. The net effect of all of this is quite similar to the exhortations against Emanuel Goldstein in George Orwell’s 1984, with Balof’s purposefully-chosen sexual-charged attire designed to get the maximum attention of the crowds for his rabid, anti-Christian and anti-conservative calls to arm.
When Balof lists himself as “an activist” on his resume, this is the sort of activity that he means.
You may also recall that Balof was one of the five hosts of the now-defunct Boystown tee-vee show “Only At Brunch”, which lasted just one episode back in the fall of 2011 and is today remembered primarily for the cruel bullying of special needs toddler Trig Palin by one of Balof’s co-hosts (while Balof himself laughed at these “jokes” and did nothing to stop them on camera) and misogynistic attacks on Congresswoman Michele Bachmann. Only At Brunch was promoted heavily at Sidetrack, where the show held its premiere episode-watching party with complimentary drinks provided by Art Johnston. Johnston, it should be noted, is constantly informed about this sort of activity continuing in his place of business but he elects never to put any stop to it. Similarly, it should also be noted that Johnston self-styles himself as “Chicago’s Harvey Milk” and the principal leader of the “gay community” in the state of Illinois.
Johnston has been inducted into the Chicago Gay & Lesbian Hall of Fame and has seemingly no understanding of the word “hypocrisy”, since his establishment Sidetrack is ground zero for the hatred revved up against Christians and conservatives in Chicago…but, yet, Johnston never turns down an opportunity to lambast Christians and conservatives as “bigots” or persecutors of the gay community. Johnston, following Alinsky Rules for Radicals to the letter, accuses his “enemies” of doing the very things he and his staff engage in at Sidetrack.
To promote his standup comedy appearances during “Queer Comedy at Zanies in Chicago”, Balof appeared on a YouTube talk show called TheQudotco, in which he spoke openly about his employment as a Chicago Public School teacher. Tony Soto, the host of “The Qu”, specifically asked Balof if any of his students were aware of his activities outside of school hours…and implicitly asked whether the minors he taught during the day understood what their teacher got up to at night. As you can see in the video, Soto is clearly amused by the idea that a public school teacher could lead Bradley Thomas Balof’s double life.
Balof gave a quick run-down of his career outside the classroom, by noting that he started off as a circus ringmaster, then got into MC-ing events, hosting drag performances, and ultimately serving as the Master-of-Ceremonies for the International Mr. Leather (IML) convention (which Balof described as “expanding his horizons every Memorial Day weekend”, giving the camera a wink at the double-entendre obvious to anyone with a concept of what sort of “expanding” happens to a man’s body during “IML” weekend in Chicago; it seems “horizons” is slang to Soto for “sphincter”).
At about the 1:35 mark in the video above, Balof talks about still trying to find “his performance voice” while Soto asks if any of his students have discovered his extracurricular activities online. Balof acknowledges that children have, in fact, found his “other life” online…and even acknowledges they could be watching this very video by admonishing them to “do their homework!”.
Balof states directly into the camera at about the 1:50 mark: “I approach it as this is something that I do and that everyone should follow their (sic) passion in life. And to be a role model and to be in front of students…to not also want to express this artistic side of myself and to entertain people which is just something that is innate to the core of my being would be to not practice what I am preaching”.
At the 2:09 minute mark, Soto asks Balof how much material for his comedy routines he gets from his job and Balof states that he gets: “as much material as any comic gets from their (sic) family or their (sic) job or whatever. Funny things happen on a daily basis, oh yah, sure. We all remember what it was like to be 13 and, yah, exactly”. Since Balof’s students are mostly black in a majority-minority school like Joseph Stockton Elementary, those “funny stories from work” are thus primarily about young black children whom Balof regularly lampoons with heavy racial stereotypes in his comedy routines.
Near the 4:00 minute mark, Soto asks Balof how he juggles being a public school teacher with working in a bar and doing comedy and Balof explains that he does most of his adult entertaining during the school breaks, including the three months in the summer that he has off every year as a Chicago Public Schools employee earning about $60,000 annually (plus benefits…and including a full pension for the rest of his life at his last level of salary when he retires).
Clearly, working in a public school as a teacher is a highly attractive day job for entertainers in the adult industry…since once they age out of porn, stripping, bartending, and fetish conventions they can retire in luxury on permanent pensions provided to them by the taxpayers of Illinois.
[ Click above to embiggen: Shawn Loftis, Kevin Hogan, Bradley Thomas Balof ]
Like Balof, other adult entertainers have also been enticed by the ridiculously-generous salaries and benefits packages in the public school system, including the union guarantee that they all maintain their level of pay at retirement for the rest of their natural lives.
The website Queerty (which describes itself as “Free of An Agenda. Except That Gay One”) recently ran the article “Adult Film Stars Who’ve Retired: Did They Have Happy Endings?” that profiled a handful of male pornographic actors and adult entertainers who are now “mainstreaming”.
Just like Bradley Thomas Balof, the porn stars Collin O’Neal (real name Shawn Loftis) and Hytch Cawke (real name Kevin Hogan) became public school teachers to qualify for the high salaries, lavish benefits, and guaranteed retirement funds that accompany teaching positions in most states. O’Neal/Loftis taught at Nautilus Middle School in Miami, Florida and Cawke/Hogan found a job at Mystic Valley Charter School in Massachusetts. This is around the time, coincidentally, that Bradley Thomas Balof also started working for the Chicago Public School system.
In 2010, the School Board fired Shawn Loftis for his porn past but the Teachers’ Commission forced his reinstatement in 2011, claiming that his career in the adult industry was over and that he was trying to start a fresh life and educate his students about the mistakes he made by becoming a porn star. It appears he continues to be left in charge of children in Miami-Dade County to this day.
FOX News reporter Mike Beaudet ambushed Kevin Hogan back in 2011 on camera and confronted him about his gay-for-pay porn past; this is a term for a straight (and often married) male who performs in gay sex videos strictly for the money (most often with the wife’s approval). His wife, it turned out, was also a former porn star (so clearly she didn’t mind what her husband was up to). In 2011 Hogan was suspended with pay while the situation was investigated and finally in 2012 the School Board in Massachusetts decided to dismiss Hogan and not allow him to teach in the 2012-2013 academic year, citing the fact that he had previously performed in adult oriented videos and he’d highly embarrassed his school when word on this got out.
So, that makes one School Board in Democrat-controlled Miami, Florida that decided a gay man’s porn past has no relevancy to the appropriateness of his being a public school teacher…and one School Board in a slightly less Leftist area of Massachusetts that decided a public school was not the best place for a retired porn star to work during the day.
What’s interesting about the Matter of Bradley Thomas Balof is that he currently still works in the adult entertainment industry as a male stripper, erotic entertainer and MC at fetish events, dancer in music videos, and additionally delivers highly racist comedy routines in which he mocks his public school students. While it appears the last pornographic movie he appeared in was in 2005 or 2006, the rest of his adult-acitivities-moonlighting still continues (mostly during breaks in the school year). He was just nearly-naked again in public this weekend, as a matter of fact.
So, unlike porn stars Loftis and Hogan, Balof is still very much in the adult entertainment business…while simultaneously being employed as a Chicago Public School teacher.
This being Chicago, with Rahm Emanuel as our Mayor, Barbara Byrd-Bennett as CEO of the Chicago Public Schools system, and Karen Lewis as the President of the Chicago Teacher’s Union…what do you think the odds are of Bradley Thomas Balof continuing to teach the sixth grade by day in a shirt and tie while gyrating in bars and on public stages at night wearing not much more than some coconut oil and a smile?
Hope! Change! Adult entertainers for teachers everywhere!
QUESTION FOR COMMENTS: Do you think it’s appropriate for a Chicago Public School teacher to appear in porn, work as a male stripper, MC leather fetish events, and perform comedy routines in which he mocks his sixth grade students for their race and (in his opinion) lack of intelligence?
What would you do if you found out an adult entertainer was teaching in YOUR school district where you lived…and this teacher was not a “former adult entertainer”, but was someone who currently engages in this activity after he’s done teaching your children for the day?
Do you think that people employed with taxpayer funds in public schools should be forbidden to be part of the adult entertainment industry?
Read the rest of this entry »
How Barack Obama and Rock Hudson Are Alike (Hint: a complicit press worked a clear agenda to protect their secrets for years). Oh, and they’re also both gay as rainbows.
[ Click above to embiggen ]
I recently watched an episode of the series “The Will” that’s available on Amazon Instant Video right now, which investigates the controversies surrounding the settling of celebrity estates and trusts; the episode of note (Season 2, Episode 5: The Estate of Rock Hudson) was about what happened to Rock Hudson’s millions after he died in 1985 and the world finally “discovered” Rock was gay (shocker!)…and had purposefully never disclosed his HIV status to his live-in male lover at the time, Marc Christian MacGinnis. I’m 36 and was just a kid when Rock died…but I remember most people being shocked to learn that this famous Hollywood leading man was actually gay for all those many years of his career as a heterosexual heartthrob, having Pillow Talk with Doris Day, smooching Julie Andrews in some random movie, running around with Susan St. James as his pretend wife on the tee-vee, tangling with Elizabeth Taylor in Giant, bearding it up with Phyllis Gates as his pretend wife in real life, and finally freaking Linda Evans out by kissing her on “Dynasty” (back when people were largely ignorant of how HIV spreads and the poor woman thought for many months she’d caught the then-quickly-fatal disease (and not to mention cooties) from her on-screen lip lock with deeply closeted gay Rock Hudson).
As you’d see if you click the link above, the investigators on “The Will” spent a good amount of time explaining to the audience why so many people were so stunned to learn that Rock was gay…even though those who lived and worked in Hollywood knew about his romantic preferences and general antics for years. Looking back on the man and his career, it’s incredibly obvious that he was gay, was hosting fabulous pool parties for barely-dressed young bucks, and that he engaged in a sham marriage with a studio secretary (that would be Phyllis Gates) because he needed that playacting for his public image (to beard what he was doing in private).
In case you haven’t figured this part out, “beards” in this context aren’t the scruffy, manly thing actors Chris Pine and Ben Affleck look awesome sporting on their faces…but the opportunistic sort, of the female persuasion, that closeted male celebrities squire on their arms (to fool the rubes into believing they are He-Man, die-hard, heterosexuals). Actors have been doing this since the advent of Hollywood fame (if not before motion pictures even existed)…and somewhere along the line in recent decades the political world has followed suit. Maybe when the country elected a former actor to be president in the 1980s the Washington establishment decided the best way to manage political image was by cribbing notes from the honchos of the old studio system in California, which protected the “brand” of marketable gay-men-posing-as-straight by teaming them up with beards best suited for the role.
This, of course, makes Michelle Obama the most high-profile and powerful beard in history (even if it can’t get her to dress worth a damn (or find a convincingly realistic wig and stick with it), unlike the countless Hollywood beards that have sprouted up before her).
My good friend Justine who retired to Toluca Lake, California was in her 20s back in Rock’s promiscuous heyday and she well remembers his house in Beverly Hills, which he called “The Castle”. Back then, there was a club in Los Angeles named Studio One that attracted all sorts of celebrities of the mid-70s to the cleaner, less drug-hazed, and more vibrant version of New York’s Studio 54. While people like Andy Warhol, Bianca Jagger, and even Jackie Kennedy were buzzing down to the dank VIP pit in 54 (which was actually just a basement-cum-exclusive-lounge…no pun intended, I swear) to hold court amidst all that trademarked debauchery, the likes of Farrah Fawcett, Elizabeth Taylor, and Raquel Welch were dazzling Studio One with sporadic appearances where they were embraced and admired by “their gays”. In keeping with the natural laws of gay physics, wherever there are celebrated female divas there will always be an endless supply of hot, young gay guys in their retinue…since gay guys are attracted to these women by gravitational force (if never sexual chemistry) and the lure of their vicarious limelight.
Justine remembers Rock’s assistants and procurers coming “down the hill” from The Castle to invite the hottest, tallest, and blondest men back to the mansion to have a swim and meet Rock…since a closeted Hollywood movie star couldn’t come down to Studio One to pick up boys himself. It seemed to Justine that picking up studs for Rock Hudson was a full-time job that just about everyone in those circles knew about. “Nice work if you can get it, right?”, she told me, while explaining that the procurers weren’t at all subtle about what they were doing…and that they didn’t have to be, since most guys were closeted themselves and saw no benefit in talking to anyone about Rock Hudson having the modern equivalent of the Abercrombie & Fitch catalog’s models delivered to his “Castle” on a regular basis…as if the guy was ordering-in Kung Pao chicken or Orange Beef.
“The Will” confirmed Justine’s take on this, since all of the celebrity tabloids and media outlets of the time knew that Rock was gay but would never run any stories on it. In fact, the owners of those publications SPECIFICALLY and EMPHATICALLY refused to “out” major movie stars (even the ones who, unlike Rock, weren’t so discrete and were picking up boys of their own in person in the West Hollywood bars of the day). Sometimes entertainment writers in Photoplay magazine or whatever would make inside-jokes or drop clues and hints about what was really going on (much like Matt Drudge does here in 2013 on his Drudge Report regarding Barack Obama’s homosexuality), but that was more of a game they played with regular readers who were also in-the-know.
This is all echoed in how the media at-large operates to this day, where guys like Tom Cruise, John Travolta, Will Smith, Zac Ephron, Bradley Cooper, Leonardo DiCaprio, Lucas Haas, Billy Zane, Kevin Spacey, Kevin Kline, Kevin Connelly (geesh, what is it with gay Kevins?), Taylor Lautner, Jake Gyllenhaal, Tobey Maguire, Vin Diesel, and Ryan Seacrest have one beard or another on their arms almost at-all-times and engage in either sham marriages with willing, ambitious women or just cycle through a series of studio-manufactured “girlfriends” to keep people from gossiping about who they really wake up next to in the morning (hint: that person has morning stubble in addition to bed head).
If you are smart and savvy and can read between the lines in entertainment magazines (or get the straight truth on who’s gay in Hollywood from sites like WeHoConfidential or Blind Gossip, which are both regular reads for anyone who wants to discover the truth about celebrities the media pushes on us), you’ll know that reporters play along with the game of never outing a celebrity unless “The Powers That Be” (TPTB) want to destroy the guy for some reason. That rarely happens, though, because I think the papers fear a backlash against them for the outing…and they figure they can make more money in the long run by keeping quiet, blackmailing the celebrity for access, and eventually publishing everything they have in their files on the guy after he’s dead or comes out of the closet on his own (like Richard Chamberlain, Tab Hunter, Troy Donahue, and George Takei did eventually).
If you are wondering who constitutes “TPTB”, your guess is as good as mine…but since most companies are owned by other larger companies and a town like Hollywood is run by a handful of very wealthy and influential people who maintain their grips on power by channeling the Mount Olympus scenes from the original Clash of the Titans (or, to really gay things up to Great Merciful Zeus! level around here…the Olympian scenes in the Broadway stage production of “Xanadu”)…you can deduce that white-haired men somewhere who play Zeus decide which of the little clay figures transformed into dazzling stars will be forever protected and which ones will come crashing down in flames in the tabloids, once they’ve exhausted their usefulness.
Though I don’t believe the same exact “TPTB” in charge of Hollywood holds exclusive sway in Washington, I think that a lot of these people overlap…particularly when a Democrat is in the White House.
Now more than ever before, the worlds of politics and entertainment have merged…and closeted gay politicians of both parties are protected by a “studio system” equivalent that largely embargoes any stories that would “out” these men…until a time comes when Democrats need to nuke the guy to achieve some goal of the Left’s.
[ Click above to embiggen: the worst kept secret in Republican ranks in Illinois is that Aaron Schock is as gay as I am ]
For instance, right here in Chicago I’ve personally seen — with my own eyes — Congressman Aaron Schock of Peoria in the Chicago gay bar MiniBar caressing and kissing on some pretty hot guys before he won his Congressional seat and became a pinup model in Men’s Health magazine (and, oddly, a darling of the media who is trotted around, often shirtless, for tons of interviews in all sorts of glossy magazines). This was in 2008 and Schock was not at all secretive and had no fears of being recognized…since the odds of someone in a gay bar in Chicago geared towards twenty-somethings knowing who a Republican politician was were pretty slim. The Democrats who spotted Schock just smiled, no doubt complimented him on his taste in men and ability to pickup a buff soccer player or two…all the while knowing he’d forever be in their back pocket when they needed him in the future (since they’d blackmail him to vote their way whenever they’d want…lest they out Schock and reveal his taste for other men).
Conservative people are incredibly good and nice at heart…but are very naive by nature. I think that’s because they find it hard to understand the duplicity and relentlessly conniving nature of the political Left. One of the things that perplexes lifelong Republicans I know is that they don’t understand why Democrats are ready and willing to help Aaron Schock rise to even greater power in the future…and might even allow him to become a Senator or the Governor of Illinois someday; Democrats are obviously doing this since they know full well that they can always control Schock by threatening to out him if he ever strays from the plantation. And since they know they can control him, it’s advantageous to maneuver Schock higher up in Republican ranks, where he can be more useful to Democrats (and increasingly more vulnerable to blackmail). This way, even if Democrats lose a statewide office when Schock beats a Democrat who ran against him the Left still “wins”, technically, because Schock’s one of the Republicans that Democrats control through blackmail. It’s actually almost better for the Left that they maintain a few closeted gay Republicans on the blackmail roles like this, because whenever the Left needs “bipartisan support” for anything THESE are the guys that are rushed in front of the camera to help Democrats sell Americans another manure-sandwich and tell them how delicious (or, should that be how fabulous) it all is.
[ Click above to embiggen. Though I can't do anything about getting the Kim Carnes' out of your head now. ]
That’s how Democrats have controlled Lindsey Graham for years…and why he’s always racing to support things like amnesty for Mexican criminals in this country so he can be “that bipartisan voice” that comes out to call conservatives unreasonable whenever Republicans are actually taking an important stand on something that matters. If Graham doesn’t do what his masters on the Left tell him to do, they will out him in spectacular and embarrassing fashion…the way they did to Senator Larry Craig and Congressman Mark Foley (the former was labeled “the bathroom toe-tapper” and the latter was the creep chasing after Congressional pages back in 2006…though both of their outings were timed perfectly to help Democrats gain momentum in the upcoming Congressional races, which allowed the Left to take back the House). In case you’re keeping score, that means the Left strategically burned two of its blackmailable closet-case Republicans in order to complete the chess move that handed the Speaker’s gavel over to Nancy Pelosi.
While the Left is playing master chess like this using closeted gay Republicans as pawns, conservatives are off playing checkers on their porch…or not even aware they should be playing anything.
Another great example of all this is former Governor Charlie Crist in Florida, who is not only gay but who used to dress up in drag and go by the name “Sweet Charlotte” when heading to the Green Iguana gay bar in Tampa for alcohol-fueled romps with men. Crist is just so shamelessly opportunistic and pitiful that I swear he’s part lizard, but Democrats keep doing everything they can to reward his service to the Left…and might even succeed in electing him to statewide office in the future. ”Chameleon Charlie” currently has a beard that’s less believable than any of Tom Cruise’s three former wives; she’s the former Carole Rome, who is heiress to a family fortune made from selling novelty products like whoopee cushions and plastic dog vomit. When the two of them are photographed together in public awkwardly holding hands and pretending to be physically attracted to one another, somewhere the ghosts of Rock Hudson and Phyllis Gates chuckle in the summer lands of the afterlife…before turning their incorporeal heads and craning their phantom necks to both gape at Montgomery Clift, James Dean, Rudolph Valentino, and all the other eternally handsome men up in Heaven. Carole Crist, meanwhile, must really love being the wife of a former governor and national joke who leaves orange stains on any furniture he sits in.
Crist should fascinate everyone reading this because, of all the gay Republicans out there, reporters have come closest to outing him and talking about the obvious: that the man is gayer than a pocketful of rainbows at a Ricky Martin concert. Even the Huffington Post has written about Crist’s “alleged” homosexuality (which is about as “alleged” as my own, I laugh out loud), because last summer they ran a piece on Crist paying men to pretend they never slept with him (since Crist wants to make a political comeback in Florida and Democrats are eager to help him with that). The only thing surprising or startling about that HuffPo piece is that it was even written…since HuffPo tends to facilitate the Left’s agenda and I thought the memo was still clear on everyone pretending Charlie Crist was straight because that hurts Republicans. Sometimes, though, a politician is just too flamboyant and his beard is too absurd and hard-to-swallow that even the hacks working at HuffPo can’t carry any more water for Chameleon Charlie.
As for the GOP at large, I still don’t understand why they just don’t out Crist and expose him as the shameless liar that he is (and let’s be clear: it very much is in fact a big lie to hide your homosexuality when it’s clear that Democrats use a lie like that to affect how a politician votes in office or the decisions he makes when in an executive role)…but I’ve been told repeatedly through the years by people within the RNC that a Republican can never talk about anyone being gay for fear of the Left unleashing the Gaystapo goon squad on them…calling them bigots or homophobes because they are outing a shameless liar (who is being blackmailed by Democrats). In addition to being naive a lot of the time and playing checkers while Democrats play chess, conservatives also have a weird habit of digging their feet in on a very bad idea…and this one in particular is that they enjoy saying “I don’t care who someone sleeps with and I won’t listen to this” because I think it makes them feel good about themselves to say that “sexuality shouldn’t matter”. I think it’s nice and everything that they say they feel this way, but they’re foolish because it CERTAINLY DOES MATTER that Democrats have an easy way to blackmail someone because he’s watching select scenes from Magic Mike all day, just waiting for the Left to tell him how to vote (lest they out him as punishment).
Great Merciful Zeus that was an awesome movie. You should watch it, like a lot. It’s fabulous.
Where was I? Oh, yah…you might not care who movie stars really go to bed with at night (because there’s something wrong with you), but you do actually need to speak up about Republican politicians (or, former Republicans, in Chameleon Charlie’s case) being closeted because these men are ruthlessly used and controlled by Democrats (lest their secrets spill out).
I’ve never said this before because I was never sure and I don’t have any proof of it, but I really think that John McCain might be secretly gay too…because at the end of his career he’s still trotting out to help the Left whenever Democrats demand it. A former presidential candidate in his last term who knows he will never be a real national leader again doesn’t need to do the things that McCain just keeps doing to push the Left’s agenda under the “maverick bipartisan” banner. Back in 2000, before George Bush won the Republican nomination, I felt in my gut that Democrats were getting ready to out McCain and that they were laying the groundwork by having John Grisham write the book “The Brethren”…because the main character in the book is clearly based on McCain, but he actually becomes the Republican presidential nominee in the story instead of losing to Bush; in “The Brethren”, the McCain character carries on a flirtation with who he thinks is a teenaged boy…and it just gets so specifically creepy that I wonder if someone fed Grisham intel on McCain and told him to create a “novel” out of it. I am sure you are aware this happens all the time with writers, both in books and on TV shows and in movies; political operatives feed stories to creative people all the time so that dirt on an opponent can get out in creative ways and become part of the cultural landscape before Democrats need to launch the actual attack via MSNBC and CNN. I have a hard time believing that “The Brethren” featured a very McCain-like closeted gay presidential candidate in the VERY SAME YEAR that some thought McCain would become the Republican nominee; you may have never even heard of this book, but I bet you would have if Bush had lost in the primaries. McCain is one of those men who just set off my gaydar but I’ve never heard any stories about him doing anything with guys…though his energetic rushes to help the Left whenever Democrats call always make me think he’s protecting himself by selling out his Republican constituents on issue after issue.
Stupidly, Republicans keep electing guys like John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Aaron Schock and sending them to Washington to represent conservative constituents…but on important votes these guys will ALWAYS betray the people who trust them because Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi will pick up the phone and say in no uncertain terms “Vote with us or we out your sorry ass on national tee-vee tomorrow, Mary”. When that phone rings, you’d think it was Zac Ephron calling the way Graham and Schock in particular leap to their feet to do whatever Reid or Pelosi want them to do…because lying about who they really are and keeping their liaisons with men a secret is such an important part of their lives at this point that they just can’t imagine functioning without Democrats pulling their strings like this. I honestly don’t think these guys would even know what to do anymore if they didn’t have Democrats always at the ready to tell them how to vote…or else. Like with Stockholm Syndrome, I think these guys learn to love their arrangements. I’m going to start calling it Lindsey Graham Syndrome, since he’s the most obvious face of this behavior (or the Bette Davis eyes of it, anyway).
Though it’s rare, closeted gay Democrats are also in some danger of being outed by a Reid-Pelosi blackmail maneuver…as we saw with former Congressman Eric Massa, whom Nancy Pelosi personally outed when he would not go along with her orders on voting to enact Obamacare. Do you remember this man? He’s a porcine and disgusting little cretin whom Rahm Emanuel actually chased naked into the Congressional showers to scream at him to do what he was told and vote for Obamacare in the House back in the early days of the Golden Age of Hope and Change that is the Obama presidency. How on Earth could you forget that? This was a rare occasion when I can’t honestly tell you which of the two people involved in an encounter deserves to be screamed at naked more, Massa or the truly repugnant Rahm Emanuel. Pass the popcorn and the shower shoes, Mary.
Shortly after that encounter when Massa would not back down (since his constituents did not want Obamacare), Pelosi picked up the phone and ordered the release of information that Massa was under investigation for sexually harassing male staffers, keeping young men as essentially houseboy slaves in his Washington home, and generally making Barney Frank look like a fine and upstanding citizen in comparison. “Release the Kraken, it’s time to destroy Massa and tell the whole world there’s glitter in all of his pockets,” I imagine Pelosi snarling to whoever it is who answers that hot-pink emergency phone that’s used to out prominent, closeted gay dudes.
That phone’s usually dusty, though, because it’s rare for Democrats to ever out other Democrats…since someone needs to really cross a line on something important to receive that “release the Kraken” directive from Pelosi.
If you are a closeted gay politician of either party and the Democrat Party does not want you outed, the press will never say a thing about your proclivities (or the fact that you’re a gay Republican like Graham, Schock, Crist, or the more-I-think-of-it-it-just-makes-too-much-sense McCain who is being blackmailed by Democrats on a regular basis). I don’t know why so many conservatives have such a hard time understanding this, but the media in our country really is an Orwellian Ministry of Truth that exists to elect Democrats and keep the Democrat Party in control. So whenever I find an email from someone that asks me “Why don’t reporters tell the truth about this?” I feel like I’m opening a heartfelt letter from a sweet kid asking me how Santa Claus gets to all those homes all over the world in one night. A lot of conservatives live in the world of “Should” instead of the reality we actually occupy, since they believe that reporters “should” tell the truth in stories and “should” let someone know which politicians are lying and pretending to be straight when they aren’t. These same trusting people also think that reporters “should” let everyone know what secrets Democrats keep…so if no one is talking then there must be no secrets at all, or the good reporters “would” tell us important information like they “should”.
Yes, Virginia there indeed is a Santa Claus…but, NO (in all CAPS and BOLDED FOR EMPHASIS), reporters will never tell the truth about any Democrats…and will only speak the truth about Republicans when that’s what Democrats want the media to do. Life will be so much simpler and logical for you if you just accept the reality that every person you see speaking on tee-vee is reading from a script prepared by the Democrat Party (even the people on FOX, to a large extent). Just about the only people in this world who appear regularly in the media whom I trust to tell the truth these days are Rush Limbaugh, Rush Limbaugh, and Rush Limbaugh. Thomas Sowell, Mark Steyn, Jerome Corsi and more often than not Ann Coulter too (depending on which version of her shows up for work that day). Everyone else lies to protect Democrats, because that is what they were taught to do in journalism school, that is what they are expected to do by their editors at work, and that’s what they need to keep doing if they want to advance in their careers as political writers or tee-vee personalities.
This is all especially true in 2013 while the sitting president is not only a magical black man who the media must protect from all criticisms because of his race…but also because he’s a closeted, on-the-down-low gay man who additionally happens to be a raging drug addict.
So, Great Merciful Zeus anyone who talks about ANY of that mess is just going to be pummeled by every hand on deck at the Ministry of Truth.
[ Click above to embiggen: and send your hatemail to Newsweek, not me, because they said it…"The First Gay President" ]
The studio system in Hollywood that protected Rock Hudson’s secret gay life (and his HIV infection) for so long has absolutely nothing on the well-coordinated and disciplined operation hiding Barack Obama’s own secrets. Just like Rock, Barack is indeed gay…and just like Rock, Barack has a beard of a wife who enjoys her role and relishes all the perks it brings her. This is something very common in the black community, for a woman to serve as a beard for a closeted gay black man who is “on the down low” or “DL-ing it”, as the slang goes. Black women have no qualms at all about being a beard for gay black men, because homosexuality is such a hated “condition” in the black community and these women see opportunities for personal advancement by hitching their trains to some gay man’s star. Even straight black women who are successful in their own right and don’t need a man to give them money or make them powerful marry gay black guys or maintain longterm bizarre “dating” arrangements with them…just like Oprah Winfrey, Toni Morrison, and Star Jones all did.
Michelle Obama is a beard, too, but she needed to ride Barack Obama’s coattails to power (partly to get away from Jesse Jackson, on whom her family depended for many years). This arrangement is no different than Rock Hudson’s with his beard of a wife Phyllis Gates…and no different from Mimi Rogers, Nicole Kidman, Katie Holmes, Kelly Preston, Jada Pinkett Smith, Zoe Saldana, Selena Gomez, Juliann Hough, Vanessa Hudgens, and all the women who beard it up for gay guys who want to be movie stars or other incarnations of celebrity. Being the pretend wife to an upwardly mobile gay guy is both fun and profitable…and there’s no reason these woman can’t have studs of their own on the side while their husbands-on-paper-and-in-the-press-only spend time “with the guys” playing basketball, golfing, or whatever else they do when they disappear off the record for long stretches of time (that staffers in the White House in particular claim are “irrelevant” and “not something the public needs to know about”).
Democrats have an extreme and vested interest in protecting the “Obama brand” at all costs, since the Left’s hold on power depends on Americans deluding themselves into believing the first black First Family is like the Huxtable clan from the beloved “The Cosby Show” (when in reality, the Obamas are actually strikingly similar to Will and Jada Pinkett Smitth…who have a mutually-beneficial marriage that’s produced children like the Obamas, but Will’s most often off cavorting with boyfriend Duane Martin like Barack’s screwing around with his longtime Love, first name Reggie…and the most delicious irony of all is that in the next few years Will and Jada will portray Barack and Michelle in some hyped-up movie…and Hollywood will give them both Academy Awards for the roles, you just watch).
Of course, reporters know that Barack Obama does drugs in the White House and is often so incapacitated that staffers scramble to think up increasingly more bizarre lies for where he was when something important was happening in the country. They sure can’t tell the American public the truth, that while the phone was ringing off the hook over the murder of the American Ambassador to Libya that the President of the United States was out of his mind high on cocaine…or that when other people were suffering or dying in name-the-tragedy the current president was naked and sweaty with Reggie, Kal Penn, or Hera-Only-Knows-Who wherever there was a door that would close and a light switch to flip off as the two of them got it on.
Naive people have a weird belief that the Secret Service exists to watch the president and make sure he doesn’t do anything bad to himself or others…but that’s not their mission or role. Those praetorians are strictly there to keep external forces from harming the president and the other people under their protective umbrella…but the Secret Service does not prevent the president from acquiring or abusing drugs while in office and Secret Service officers will not reveal to the public what they observe regarding presidential drug use, gay sex, or whatever else Barack Obama gets up to. If they were snitches, then presidents would keep them at arms-length…which would place lives in jeopardy. Think back to Rock Hudson’s staffers heading down to Studio One to acquire boys for the movie star and remember how none of these people ever spilled the beans about Rock being gay…and now flash to the year 2013 and realize that the Secret Service serves the same purpose for Barack Obama.
When you think about it, this current president’s recreational drug use and his gay sexcapades make the recent conduct of the Secret Service all the more understandable. If you wondered why the Secret Service agents engaged in activity with prostitutes thought they could get away with what they were doing while on trips abroad with the current president you need to think about what they’ve observed Barack Obama himself doing, either abroad or in the White House itself. I’m sure you’ve noticed that the behavior of any staff is directly related to the tone and professionalism of the “Big Boss” of that organization. This sort of Secret Service debauchery did not happen when George W. Bush, Bush Sr., or Ronald Reagan were presidents…but we did hear a few things during the Clinton years and we’re still witnessing the sexcapades and debauchery that the Secret Service engages in during the Golden Age of Hope and Change with Obama as president. The praetorians are following the example that their “Big Boss” sets…whose Secret Service codename is “Renegade”, by the way. And it was chosen for a reason. The man is out of control, the Secret Service knows it, but agents are forbidden from (and perhaps even scared of) speaking out about what Barack Obama does when he’s in private.
Because we are friends like this, I hope that you and I together live to see the day when everything about Barack and Michelle Obama is revealed to the public. I don’t think this will happen for many, many years though…if we use the Kennedy secrets as any guide for how long it will take for reporters to get around to admitting what was happening in the White House. When I was a kid in the mid-80s, it was still hush-hush whispered that JFK “may have had an affair with Marilyn Monroe” and that the Kennedy family was “allegedly behind killing her”. We still haven’t reached the point where people just state the obvious and agree that, YES, the Kennedys killed this woman…but here in 2013 it’s widely accepted that JFK was cheating on Jackie with the unbalanced Hollywood bombshell. Surprisingly — and I never thought THIS would happen — we’re actually far enough away from “Camelot” that Jackie is no longer “St. Jacqueline of Grace”…and we’re learning that she herself cheated on her husband during their marriage, was more than a little racist sometimes, adored conspiracy theories, and probably went to her grave believing that Lyndon Johnson was behind the assassination (while I think it was indeed Fidel Castro, by the way, in case you were wondering…since I think it was Castro’s chess move after the death of the Diem Brothers).
Honestly, I believe the future is going to look something like this in terms of what the public eventually learns about “Renegade” Barack Obama:
2013 to 2017: the Ministry of Truth will mock anyone who insists that Barack Obama does cocaine in the White House, that he’s gay, that Reggie Love is his boyfriend, and that he’s an avowed Marxist and is Muslim at heart.
2017: Obama leaves office…and six or seven months later, depending on which party is now in the White House, we hear a little bit here and there about Obama having been unstable during some of the crises of recent years
2020s: A shocking revelation will emerge that Obama was still doing drugs while in office (but you’ve known this since 2009 if you’ve been paying attention)
2030s: People will finally comment on the fact that Obama was a Marxist…and possibly the Left will be openly admitting he was a Muslim, with Obama possibly revealing this himself and becoming a devote Muslim as the biggest F-U to the American people he can think of
Early 2040s: Barack Obama passes away at the age of 70-something from some degenerative disease that was caused by either his drug use or his sexcapades with men. By that time, Barack and Reggie have probably lived together for years the way Cary Grant and Randolph Scott did or the way Raymond Burr (tee-vee’s Perry Mason) lived with Robert Benevides…who were all, it should be noted, “just very good friends” until the more famous one died…and then people admitted they were as gay as rainbows the whole damn time. Well, duh.
Mid-2040s: People finally start realizing that Obama was not just our first Muslim president, but was actually our first actively gay president too. It will be a gradual acceptance of this, kind of like today is the first day that I allowed myself to put the pieces together on John McCain…even though my gaydar’s been pinging on McCain since 2000 when that Grisham book came out.
2050s: It is widely established that Barack Obama was a drug addict, a Marxist, a Muslim, and a homosexual. So, basically, it’s going to take about 35 years or so for the world to catch up with everything that you and I know right here in 2013. What else is new?
Now, I’m basing this timeline on the Kennedy example…and also factoring in the reality that everyone working in the Ministry of Truth today or currently in journalism classes in college or high school is being taught that Barack Obama is a magical black man who must be protected at all costs, even if history needs to be rewritten on a daily basis to make whatever he’s currently doing look better. It’s going to take a long time for us to progress away from the emotional commitment that people in the media have to this man. That void in their hearts that normally is filled by religion in most people is instead dedicated to hero-worship in Barack Obama’s personality cult…and just about everyone working in the media today is afflicted by this. Until the current crop of “news leaders” retires and the next generation of similar Obama devotees expires, we’re not going to see much interest at all in anyone openly talking about Barack Obama’s drug use and his gay sexual appetite. People remain terrified to speak candidly about any of this, for fear of becoming the next Larry Sinclair (who had his life turned upside down, threatened, and largely ruined because he dared speak the truth about his past encounters with Barack Obama in Chicago); other men, like Donald Young, were murdered to prevent them from revealing Obama’s homosexuality. Jerome Corsi, who writes on this topic often, is berated regularly on tee-vee by Rachel Maddow (who apparently just had a foaming, crazed fit over him a week or two ago live on the air at MSNB-See How Much We Protect Obama!).
These are steps that the old Hollywood studio system never even took to protect guys like Rock Hudson who made The Powers That Be a lot of money. Clearly, so much exponentially more is invested in the Obama brand that an Orwellian level of rigid protection, enemy-destruction (hello, IRS Intimidation Scandal), and secret-guarding is required to provide the expected return on the Left’s investment in this gay presidential coke head.
Yah, I said it.
The current President of the United States is a gay coke head…and I’m not talking about the kind that came in the silver can that Whitney Houston used to sing about in the 80s on the tee-vee, but the kind that ended up drowning the poor woman in Beverly Hills last year.
I’m not afraid in the least to talk about it, because it’s the truth…even if I am ahead of my time in doing this in 2013 instead of safely waiting until 2048 or whatever to call a gay coke head a “gay coke head”.
Because he is.
You know it too, I think, in your heart…even if you might be ready to put all the pieces together for yourself. But, really, it’s the one and only solution that makes sense of every oddball thing about the Obama Regime and the Golden Age of Hope and Change.
QUESTION FOR COMMENTS: Do you think Barack Obama is a gay presidential coke head? Are you afraid of the IRS or Homeland Security coming for you it you say it out loud? What do you think will happen if millions of us all call this would-be pharaoh a gay presidential coke head as often as possible from now on?
[ Click above to embiggen ]
I’m betting few people reading this ever watched the show “The New Normal” on NBC, which lasted just one season and was canceled due to abysmal ratings (even by NBC’s lowered standards); this was a half-hour sitcom featuring a gay couple (one of them a handsome obstetrician played by Justin Bartha and the other a funny-looking, flamboyant flake who was based on Ryan Murphy, the creator of “Glee” and “American Horror Story”) who lived in LA and came in constant conflict with a conservative Christian real estate broker from Ohio played by Ellen Barkin (whose character was a GREAT-GRANDMOTHER on this show…which is hilarious for anyone who knows how vain and nasty Ellen Barkin has behaved on sound stages for decades; just about the only good thing about the show for a lot of people was that Ellen Barkin now looks old enough to play someone’s GREAT-GRANDMOTHER). ”The New Normal” was NBC’s attempt at recapturing the spirit of “All in the Family”, but inverting everything: so instead of arch-conservative and crotchety Archie Bunker the show centered around an unyieldingly-closed-minded gay couple who embodied everything the Left represents in 2013 (with the guys going to bed every night with a picture of Barack Obama next to their alarm clock and waking up the next day to twist every conversation into an opportunity to bash, malign, and ridicule those with differing political beliefs).
I actually thought the show was funny and enjoyed it because — surprisingly — “The New Normal” was pretty much equal-opportunity in its political humor. While the lead gay characters mocked Ellen Barkin’s conservative GREAT-GRANDMOTHER (I just can’t get enough of the fact that they cast her for this part!) from Ohio, she more often than not made them look foolish, naive, and delusional for all of the Lefty talking points they regularly spouted. In fact, I think at the end of an episode the Left looked more ridiculous than ever, because nine times out of ten the gay guys could not articulate a sound reason behind the things they were saying, just that because they heard them on MSNBC so it must be true. This is probably why the show tanked on NBC (a network that the Left trusts to provide a steady stream of Democrat propaganda, like it does on Saturday Night Live, Jimmy Fallon, and everything NBC News broadcasts), since the Left always wants to be perceived as the smartest people in any room…and they don’t like anyone seeing that they mostly have no idea what they are talking about and rely heavily on canned sound bytes they parrot from the tee-vee.
Probably the most memorable thing the show did was to address the issue of gays in the Boy Scouts (in Episode 20: About A Boy Scout)…but I disagree with the take “The New Normal” had on this, since it insisted that a gay former scout should naturally progress into being a gay scout master after he ages out of Boy Scouts…which I think is an inappropriate role for an adult gay man. But, I also don’t think that lesbians should be coaches of girls’ basketball and volleyball programs in high school…though I don’t think I’ve ever met a heterosexual woman who coached either of those sports (and I’ve only known a few who’ve even played them).
I have no reservations with gay guys being troop leaders for the Girl Scouts…and for lesbians being scout masters for Boy Scouts. I actually think this arrangement would be pretty fabulous, because if you made gay guys in charge of flailing Girl Scout troops they’d stage cookie-selling production numbers that would put Troop Beverly Hills to shame. Similarly, the crafty, frugal, outdoorsy, and always-practical lesbians of the world would be able to teach little boys survival skills and how to rebuild a carburetor or two (no joke: lesbians are amazing, like these magical Valkyries that can swoop in and fix anything…and do it all under budget!).
I would think it was inappropriate to have a straight man lead a Girl Scout troop, though…regardless of his best intentions. I wouldn’t be as automatically opposed to a straight woman leading a bunch of Boy Scouts, if she was a mom and not a predatory “cougar” who enjoys the company of younger men. There’s just a bad energy about straight guys being in charge of little girls…and I think that same energy is there if gay guys would be Scout Masters to little boys. Let’s remove that sort of energy entirely by not creating situations that naturally feel inappropriate like this. If you are an adult who is sexually attracted to other males, then impressionable young boys shouldn’t be under your direction ever; if you are an adult female who is sexually attracted to other females, then young girls should not be under your direction either. For heterosexuals, it should be the opposite situation, with adults never exclusively in charge of opposite-sex youngsters.
Personally, as a gay man I am suspicious of any other gay guy who makes a stink and demands to be put in charge of a bunch of little boys…as some are doing in pressuring the Boy Scouts to allow gay scoutmasters. I think the organization should fold and close up shop before they’d allow this to happen. If you spend any time in the gay community you will know that there indeed exist predatory older gays who hunt younger guys (called “chicken” in gay slang); these older men are “chicken-hawks” who are typically in their 50s and 60s and seem to be attempting to reclaim their own youth by fixating on the barely-legal “trade” that flows through the bars. I also feel like they are attempting to be youth-vampires and at the end of their lives they want to be around as much bare, young flesh as possible in hopes of rejuvenating themselves.
A really easy place to scope out this behavior is in a bar like The Lucky Horseshoe, where guys who look like they could be grandfathers (or great-grandfathers) blow their whole social security checks by stuffing singles into the jocks of the young, buff dancers at “The Shoe”. A lot of married, straight men also seem to be attracted to young guys who could be the ages of their own sons; there in fact is a very vocal and active subset of the gay community that fetishizes over “Daddy/Son” relationships…and one very common fantasy is that of a scoutmaster seducing a boy scout in a pup tent. This is so prevalent that at Halloween most of the young gay “twinks” (under 25 and slim of build) will dress up as boy scouts if they can’t think of anything more creative for Halloween costumes…since they know the outfit will appeal to enough older guys to guarantee they won’t buy a single drink in any bar that night.
[ Bradley Thomas Balof when he's at his day job, teaching at Chicago's public Joseph Stockton Elementary School on Beacon Street ]
The pictures at the top of this article are from Sidetrack the Video Bar’s website, showing Bradley Thomas Balof ( a Chicago Public school teacher at Stockton Elementary no less) moonlighting as the MC of Sidetrack’s Halloween costume contest last year, dolled up as…a Boy Scout. His “comedy stylings” during this event included lots of sexual jokes about being a randy Boy Scout and provocative dancing/flirting with the contestants as a stereotypical “gay Boy Scout”. Balof is pushing 40 but has worn this Boy Scout costume repeatedly through the years…so it appears to be a favorite in his fetish closet (note the “hickeys” he painted all over his neck for his costume, which he purposefully did to emphasize that he was supposed to be a highly sexualized Boy Scout). Balof is very much not alone in the gay community in his attraction to the Boy Scout motif; a good number of gay men find Boy Scouts sexy in the way that straight women lust after strippers dressed up as Navy officers, firemen, and the rest of the cast of Magic Mike.
Boy Scouts are right up there with Cowboys, Policemen, and Superheroes as sexual fetish objects for gay guys.
Based on my observations of the gay community since I came out at 18, I think allowing gays to be scoutmasters is like putting Otis the town drunk in charge of your bar’s liquor inventory. It’s just a situation that could end so horribly (even if Otis swears he never meant any harm)…so why on Earth would you do this when other people are available to run your bar? The fact that Otis is so eager to have that job just automatically makes me wonder what he intends to do when no one is looking. He’s an alcoholic…but he wants to work in a bar even though there are other jobs he could be doing where he wouldn’t be tempted to do bad things; that’s like Oprah suddenly deciding she wants to work in a bakery, even though she clearly doesn’t need to be doing that for the money (so you need to realize she just loves being around the delicious, delicious cakes). If every alarm bell is not going off in your head over an oddity like that, then something’s wrong with you. Get real!
It’s a whole different story when it comes to young gay boys who want to be part of the scouting experience, though. These boys might realize they are gay but aren’t sexualized yet..and aren’t joining scouts for sexual experiences. At that tender young age, they more likely than not just find other boys to be fascinating and intriguing…in ways they can’t yet process mentally as sexual feelings. I don’t think a boy under the age of 18 should be denied membership in a scouting group because he’s openly gay (or suspected of being gay, if adults can pick up on this about him even if he has not realized it yet himself)…but I think that scoutmasters should keep an eye on him…just as they should be keeping an eye on all the boys to make sure that no hazing, inappropriate conduct, or anything sexual is ever happening on those scouting trips.
Once a guy is 18, if he’s gay then he needs to understand that his role in scouting is over…unless he wants to become a fundraiser and support a troop in an administrative capacity. But, it’s just not appropriate for him to be a scoutmaster and be left alone with a group of boys. I think it is just common sense for a gay man to automatically avoid any situation where he could ever even be remotely accused of doing anything bad to a little boy…unless that guy really is a chicken-hawk who maneuvered himself into that position to take advantage of his role. I have a hard time believing that a gay guy who is insisting on becoming a scoutmaster ISN’T up to something ulterior in doing that, when nothing is stopping him from graduating from scouting and helping the organization in other administrative ways. Or just moving on with his life and finding adult interests to pursue…like 90% of the rest of guys do when they age out of scouting.
I know the Left screams that these gay men should be allowed to become scoutmasters if they want…but I think we need to get real and see that there’s something wrong with a person who can’t leave childhood behind and wants to continue being a part of a Boy Scout troop into his twenties and thirties (and beyond). Grow up! Join an adult-league sports team or get a job with the US Forest Service if you really love this stuff so much and want to make a career of it (or if you have Peter Pan syndrome and can’t graduate from childhood). But, leave the scoutmaster role to straight men who hopefully have sons of their own and allow those guys to have that experience…and you can create a role of your own as a fundraiser, administrative support person, or something else appropriate that allows you to continue helping the organization you loved as a boy…but in a new role unique to you now that you are a grown-ass man.
Even better: channel Shelley Long and seek out that struggling Girl Scout troop and coach them into winning their cookie drive or help them with their arts and crafts…and leave being a Boy Scout troop leader to the straight men…or to lesbians (who, frankly, would do a better job at this than anyone anyway).
QUESTION FOR COMMENTS: Do you think there’s something inherently wrong with a gay man who won’t move on with his life and still wants to be part of Boy Scouts when he’s over 18? I am a 36 year old gay man telling you that I think there is something wrong with the gay guys who insist on being scoutmasters…so it is completely appropriate if you feel this way too.
What: House IRS Scandal Hearing
When: 5/22/13, 12 noon
I ended up tuning into this late, but it’s absolutely RIVETING.
I started watching when what looks like “Mr. Skulman” was talking; his name is really “Shulman”, but the glare from the lights on his nameplate make it look like he’s “Skulman”…which suits him.
One thing you should know right up front is that Republicans on this House committee came to ask questions…but Democrats came with prepared statements to make and asked minimal questions. This part of the hearings was the end, where the Congress Critters were allowed five minutes each to speak.
Around 1215pm CST or so — Congressman Welch (D) gives his speech, talking about equal enforcement of the law and the infringement on First Amendment rights. He says that America deserves answers as to what the IRS was doing. Largely, Welch wanted to give a speech on how terrible he thinks the SCOTUS Citizens United decision was.
Next came Congressman Gowdy…who really let into Skulman. He really got him by saying that there were inappropriate and dangerous things going on, but Skulman didn’t stop them. He asks if Skulman would have stopped someone with a knife in the building or if he would have waited for an Inspector General to write a report on someone with a knife being in the building. Skulman just smirked, squirmed, and said he would wait for the Inspector General to tell him what to do because that is procedure. Skulman will not answer YES or NO questions, and instead equivocates and rambles. Gowdy gets angry and says that Skulman is not allowing information to be given and is being evasive.
1245pm CST — Congressman Cardenas (D) from Nevada questions “Skulman”. He by and large just goes on and on, reading what he brought with him. There’s an IRS man named “Mr. George” who also speaks, alongside Mr. Skulman. Mr. George has an eloquent, Caribbean feel to him…like he could play a villain in one of the late-70s Bond movies.
1248pm CST — Congressman Farenthold (R ), from Texas, asks Mr. George what happened to the lists of donors that were collected by the IRS. Did anyone snap photos of those lists and distribute them to other groups to create “enemies lists”. Mr. George said he didn’t know nothing about nothing and that “it could be”. Farenthold then asked why Barack Obama’s brother or whomever got a 501c(3) approved lickety-split, but conservative groups languished in the approval process for years. Mr. George says that the standard for approval is 101 days for processing (one day for each dalmatian, apparently) but that due to incompetence this usually takes around 500-and some days. Mr. Farenthold asks why there are no procedures that alert higher-up people that things aren’t being completed quickly.
Farenthold then starts talking about a flow chart that he has that illustrates a rigid chain of command…with managers and supervisors and higher-ups who should be managing this. He says it is unfathomable that there would be such delays in processing applications…and that higher-ups wouldn’t know about the delays and ask why. Farenthold says that if people don’t file their tax returns that it won’t just “fall through the cracks” and be ignored for three years. Shouldn’t there be a command structure that would catch an outrageous situation like this?
A man from the IRS named Mr. Wolin talks for a bit, saying that “there’s someone new in charge now and maybe things will be better”.
1254pm CST — Congressman Woodal from Georgia speaks now. He gets Mr. George to establish that 65,000 applications for 501C(3) and C(4) status are received by IRS each year and are all processed through the Cincinnati IRS office. Woodal talks about a law he wants to pass that would take us to a consumption tax, not an income tax, and he says that clearly this is too much work for the IRS to handle. So he gives himself a little plug there. 100% of the applications were processed in this one office in Cincinnati…asks Mr. Skulman who he talked to when the question came up that something bad was happening in this office. Who did he speak to in order to get assurances that people weren’t being targeted for political reasons.
Skulman is very slimy and condescending…and he will not give names of anyone he spoke to. His strategy today is to not give up any names, apparently, and to apparently make himself look really stupid. He won’t admit there was targeting of conservative groups and he won’t even admit that this was all happening in the lead up to the presidential election. Congressman Woodal mocks Skulman…says “you contacted no one before saying to Congress that there was no targeting, but it’s clear there was targeting”. Whatever the truth is, we will bring it out…but we will not stand for people trying to keep the truth from coming out. You asked no one anything…you had no information and decided to keep it that way. You asked no one what was going on. You were derelict in finding out what the truth was when you were aware that people were saying there was political targeting going on in your office. That’s troubling.
1pm CST — Congressman Issa…speaking to Mr. George. Reads him quotes about the IRS issuing a press statement on May 10th…talking about Lois Lerner planting a question in a press event….Mr. George says he had no inkling this would occur. Issa says that there may be criminal activity in what Lerner did. Asks George if he will research this and find out what happened with that press conference of Lerner’s. Question to Skulman: the 5 year term you received is statutory, so you are appointed by a President to be a non-partisan term-appointee…someone who should transcend one term and be nonpartisan. You are required to have management skills and not be a political hack, right? You are supposed to possess management skills, correct? You are not supposed to be a political actor…you are supposed to be a manager. You are supposed to be a Commissioner for five years. Were you selected for your management skills? Skulman says he was selected for his management skills.
Congresswoman Lummus asks questions now. Issa was just using her time until she got there (she was in the bathroom and came back to the dais looking disheveled for some reason, wearing a red jacket that makes her look like an usher at an old time movie theater). Lummus asks Wolin about how quickly the IRS acts when there’s talk of something bad happening and there is an Inspector General. The offending activity is ongoing.
Issa interrupts Lummus and asks her to yield her time. Issa says that people are still in limbo and have not been approved. Wolin says that the IRS will get around to adjudicating the remaining applications that are still in limbo. Issa says “what the heck appropriate timeline should we expect”…can you give us a timeline on these people waiting, when they have already waited for years. Mr. George, people have been waiting for 3 years and now you say that it will take 30 days before you even know what you are going to do and have a plan…none of these commissioners knew anything or asked any questions so having a new commissioner shouldn’t make any difference. Mr. George says he can’t come up with a timeline or date for the IRS to begin acting appropriately and effectively.
Congresswoman Lummus is speaking again. She says that trust in the IRS has been destroyed. People believe the federal government is out to get them. Watergate was a battle of titans, with the powerful going after the powerful. This is now the federal government going after regular people who had trusted the IRS not to target and terrorize them. I have no idea how we can restore the trust. The IRS has let down the people and has turned against them. It is on a stack of other concerns where they believe the federal government has turned against them. People hire and empower Goliath, and Goliath has turned against those very people. It is moms and dads at kitchen tables who want to have a Tea Party patriot organization…and their own government says it will not allow them to organize their patriotism in this way. This is far worse than Watergate because it is government turned against the very people who hired them.
Yields back to Issa.
113pm CST – Congressman Hastings from Washington. Speaks to Mr. Wolin, asks him what he knew and when. Asks him if he knew about people writing to Congress to tell them they were being harassed by the IRS. Wolin says he didn’t know nothing about nothing and had no curiosity to know anything. Hastings says that when Wolin gets a letter from members of Congress that those letters would go directly to him, and Wolin says “I don’t know where letters go, they go to lots of people”. Hastings says that Congressman Kemp wrote to the IRS in June of 2011 writing about the Tea Party being targeted. Skulman says he doesn’t remember anything about June of 2011. Hastings asks Skulman how he prepared for this testimony before Congress…asking about his testimony in front of the Ways and Means Committee. Skulman says he doesn’t remember any of that, it was so long ago. Hastings asks if he remembers a conversation with “Mr. Lynch” that happened earlier today. Hastings asks why Skulman said in that testimony that there was no targeting going on. Skulman squirms, and says “My understanding at the time was, uh, was…” and Hastings interrupts to ask who he was having conversations with to determine there was no targeting. Essentially, he’s saying Skulman was lying without flat-out saying it. Mr. Skulman says that his memory is bad. But finally says he talked to Nicole Miller, “Somebody Flax”, other people on my staff. My Chief of Staff, but they don’t have knowledge of anything. Hastings asked if he prepared for these hearings and familiarized himself with things for the hearing. Hastings: when you gave assurance there was no targeting going on, you had discussions with Mr. Destani (sp?) that led you to say that, and it’s clearly wrong and you have given no apologies for being wrong, giving non-answers, or vague answers. You respond to questions here by being vague. There is something missing here and this Committee will find the answers but you are trying to leave us in the dark.
120pm CST — Issa puts some sort of document into the record, which shows that Mr. Skulman is stupid and doesn’t know much of anything. Issa just embarrassed Skulman because whatever document that was proves that Skulman was lying when he said that budget cuts are the reason his office is so incompetent…since budget cuts did not happen in the years that Skulman was complaining about.
121pm CST — Congressman Clay asks about Lois Lerner and her attempt to get out of an audit by having that question planted during the conference she was giving. Clay, by the way, speaks like a cartoon frog. It’s hard to take him seriously. He’s asking Mr. George if it was a surprise that Lerner did what she did. Remember that Lerner refused to speak today because she took the Fifth. George says that there are criminal penalties for releasing taxpayer information without taxpayer permission. Clay has the White House was “responsible” since they got a draft Inspector General report on April 24th. Clay, if you have not guessed, is a black Democrat so he seems to be here to defend the White House. He says “those IGs they have up in there on these rare occasions they are there for a reason, I am asking the witness this, do you agree with the chairman?”. Mr. George has no idea what Clay is talking about and asks him to re-ask his question. Clay instead gives a bad impression of Bill Cosby doing a Jell-O pudding commercial from the mid-1980s. He has trouble saying “IRS”…and stumbles when he gets to the “R” part. He then thanks Mr. George for working so hard.
ISSA: trying to establish a timeline of when people at the IRS knew that the IRS was targeting Tea Party and conservative groups for harassment. George decided on May 30th, 2012 that this was happening. On June 4th, 2012 the General Counsel at Treasury was aware that these groups were being targeted. Asks Wolin if he was aware this conclusion was there by June 4th. Wolin says he didn’t know nothing about nothing. Issa shoots back and says that NO, the IG just testified that by June 4th these people were informed of this back in 2012 (before the election). Mr. George now says he wants to clarify. He says he had a meeting on June 4th and he made people aware of an audit and he now can’t remember if he had any notes from that meeting. He says he did not have any findings back then. Issa says that they indeed reached a conclusion that the IRS was targeting Tea Party, patriots, and conservatives in 2012. Mr. George says that he was “looking at issues” but did not have final determination at that time. ”I had no idea this issue would later come up in this matter so I don’t much remember what was happening back then”.
The IRS really comes off as a bunch of incompetents who don’t know anything, don’t remember things, and have no idea what is going on. That is a marked difference from the way they act when they are auditing Americans.
130pm CST — Congressman Massie, questioning Skulman. Skulman still won’t answer yes or no. He says he will not accept responsibility for the behavior of the IRS. Massie asks Mr. George if there was gross mismanagement in the Cincinnati office. He says YES. ”Do you accept responsibility for the mismanagement at the IRS?”. Skulman says he will not accept any responsibility. ”Mr. George, there were lists called Be On the Look Out lists (BOLO)…my constituents are being asked if they were audited because of lists”. Asks Skulman if he can guarantee that there were no audits triggered by BOLO lists. Skulman squirms and says he can’t guarantee that people were not audited for being on an BOLO list. Mr. George says that he can’t confirm that the IRS hasn’t been leaking confidential matters. Says he doesn’t know if people’s private information is being released by the IRS for political reason. Massie: we need more hearings, we need to fire people at the IRS, we have a diseased and bloated government that has become self serving. Skulman says he can’t be responsible for 90,000 employees. Congress created this monster. We have 70,000 page of tax code and 90,000 bureaucrats. This is ripe for corruption and abuse. We need to restore public trust and Congress needs to shrink the IRS, simplify the tax code, and restore public trust.
137pm CST — Congresswoman Grissam — people want steps to make sure this never happens again. She is deeply troubled, but she wants to talk about 501c(4) status. She says that one key reason this exists is between the original statute and the regulation by Treasury. She’s here to give a speech. Going back to 1959 talking about changes to the “social welfare activities” related to being a 501c(4).
ISSA eventually interrupts and starts talking about the difference between 501C(4)s and 501C(3)s. Grissam is not asking any questions of anyone, but says she wants to know the donors and the activities of groups. I think her goal is to try to run cover for Democrats on this…because she seems to be trying to say that nothing is wrong in what the IRS did because she says that the government needs to know who the donors to things are. I’ve never heard of this woman before, but she comes across like a Barbara Boxer or Nancy Pelosi type of person…shrill, with an agenda, and no interest at all in finding the truth (only what helps her agenda).
143pm CST — Congressman Meadows — May 29th 2012, says Mr. George was briefed there was a criteria being used to target Tea Party groups. On May 30th, the day after, you briefed Mr. Shulman and others about the criteria being used against Tea Parties. Mr. George huffs and puffs…and he says he only knew that the allegations had merit but he didn’t have all the information the time. George does not want to give YES or NO answers. Meadows says they have notes that say that there was a separate criteria being used for Tea Party groups. On June the 4th you briefed the General Counsel in the Treasury Department…this was well over a year ago. This didn’t all just happen. Mr. George says that he has experts in the room usually and he doesn’t know these things himself. He looks like a bumbling idiot. He says this was just a courtesy call to the General Counsel. Meadows asks why Lois Lerner knew about all the interviews and things going on. George says he is not privy to anything and doesn’t know things. Meadows asks about Holly Paz (sp?) being in all these meetings, someone from the IRS in those meetings. George fumbles and bumbles. He says it was because of collective bargaining units. Someone is talking to George in his ear, his lawyer, and says that Holly was asked to leave but she wouldn’t and they were afraid to tell her to go. Meadows is incredulous. ”This is in the documents you gave us!”. George says he doesn’t know nothing about no documents, no way. Geroge fumbles and bumbles, saying ‘Many people are in Washington, but some are not”. Meadows says that this was not isolated to people in Cincinnati but there were many people in DC involved in this.
152pm CST — Congressman Cardenas. But it’s a different man than from before, as the first man who seemed to be Cardenas was black. THIS Cardenas is clearly Hispanic, so that other guy was just sitting in the wrong chair I think. He’s every soft spoken and just asks George and Shulman and Wolin if they are going to help find answers. Softball questions. For some reason, Cardenas speaks like an Indian chief in an old movie. He has that soft, singsongy kind of voice.
158pm CST — Congressman Bentivoulo (sp?) asks Shulman if he ever felt uncomfortable today…the way that the IRS made his constituents feel uncomfortable. Says that it’s unacceptable that the IRS is harassing people for teaching the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Do IRS take a class on the Constitution and Bill of Rights? Do they teach ethics training? Shulman says he does not know. ”Given their power to destroy businesses and audit people, shouldn’t they understand the concept of government restraint created at our founding?”. Asks Shulman if he understands the Constitution…says that he went to law school and had Constitutional law but is not an expert. Asks him about the amendments, the 19th amendment. Shulman says he does not have the Constitution memorized. He rolls his eyes and says he can’t recite the Constitution. Do you now what TEA in Tea Party stands for? Taxed Enough Already. The IRS wants to tax as much as possible.
ISSA — we had a transcribed interview yesterday I want to put into the record. When we asked Holly Paz (sp?) if she accompanied anyone to interviews, she said yes. But the arrangement we had with the union I would leave at the end of the interview so they could ask people questions later. This appears to be a big sticking point. TIKTA (sp?) seems to be the union. Issa reads from this transcript…and directs questions at George, asking about the target of an investigation being allowed to sit in and know the questions being asked even though she is being investigated? The IRS called this an “audit” instead of an investigation and seems to have allowed this woman Holly Paz to sit in on things when people below her talked about what she was up to…which seems to have been a way to intimidate these people into being quiet.
205pm — Congressman Cummings (D). He asks about why someone was allowed to sit there and listen to testimony when she is the target of the “audit”, and she shouldn’t have been sitting there. Apparently, the lie and excuse given for this is that the union required she be allowed to sit there. Mr. George fumbles and bumbles and says he doesn’t know why anything happened. He says having that woman Holly in the room was good because she was there to “click the memory” of the other people. He says in hindsight this looks unusual. Cummings says that Ms. Paz felt she had to be in the room to defend herself or the agency based on what may have been said or gathered in the interview. That seems to go against what George said. George said hindsight is 20/20.
207pm CST — Congresman Desantis says it is startling that Lois Lerner invoked her Fifth Amendment rights and would not testify in an investigation into whether people’s constitutional rights were violated by the IRS. Desantis asks Shulman about conversations he’s had with Obama….and Shulman says he remembers being in the White House taking pictures and being at a party with Obama and maybe talking to him about taxes in general…and Desantis says he should remember all the times he speaks to a President, since he’s been at the White House hundreds of times according to the visitor logs. It’s listed that healthcare was the topic of him going there. Shulman says that IRS is tasked with implementing Obamacare and that’s why they were going there. Desantis says he worries about the IRS being involved with Obamacare and that the IRS should focus on tax collection not healthcare. A new intrusive burden on Americans to give the IRS power over healthcare. Shulman says that the IRS does more than taxes, and that Congress loads the tax code with many different functions for the IRS…in that the IRS does what Congress asks it to do.
Last five minutes for each side.
Cummings (gives Democrats’ take): There is a law and there are standards. Some organizations in general might not meet the tax exempt status in theory. Lemme tell ya what I am concerned about. I am concerned that all of this might have a chilling effect on employees who say, hey wait, we look at criteria fairly but UH OH I better be letting this go because UH OH the audits and I might be called in and tell people to do things properly, you know what i am saying, are you following me? (Honestly, he’s making no sense).
George: Oh, I am following you. The IRS is afraid to be too aggressive.
Cummings: How we strike that balance? We need to make sure the law is clear and there are guidelines consistent with fairness. We have to have that balance so that employees are not shaking like a leaf on a windy day believing that they are failing to do what they are supposed to do, but they also have to know what their guidelines are. You said you are going to conversate with Mr. Awful, the new commissioner, and I am trying to figure out what I just said and take it into consideration. How we create an atmosphere where employees do what they want to do and not feel threatened. Does that make sense?
George: It makes sense.
Cummings: Mr. Wolin, what you think?
Wolin: The employees need the confidence to do their job and I guess there should be a culture and policies that things don’t happen again. This is a process and we will move to focus on.
Cummings: This is about trust and truth. This is an ongoing process. I want us never to forget that it’s not enough to investigate but we need reform and there are moments in life when incidents happen because the moment tells us we need to change things in a different way and if we let the moment pass then things will get worse and you all need to know that I hope that we keep things in mind and the ‘Murica people are very concerned about these things up in here.
Meadows (or someone sitting in his chair, gives the Republican side of closing): Shulman, do you have no idea what is going on below you? Do you know about things happening with Sarah Hall who is now over healthcare? Do you know who Ms. Marx is?
Shulman: I don’t know. I know nothing.
Meadows: Either this is a coverup or its an extreme lack of curiosity on your part.
Congressman Jordan from Ohio: Wants to talk about the timeline. March 8th, meeting with Oversight. Then they do an audit…March 8th 2012. May 29th they brief the IRS. May 30th preliminary findings about we are doing an audit and by the way that Tea Party groups were targeted for audits. June 4th they give the heads up to Treasury General Counsel. Why didn’t they give Congress the heads up.
George: March 1st my office was contacted but this committee to look into the matter.
Jordan: But a few months later you saw that Tea Party groups were targeted and you didn’t tell Congress that. All we knew was that you were doing an audit. You told the IRS and the Treasury about initial findings but the first time we’ve heard about this was a few weeks ago and they were told back in 2012.
George: You need to look at the timeline and see we did say some thing.
Jordan: You gave a heads up to the Democrat administration but not the oversight committee. You don’t give us the same heads up. Isn’t that unusual in an election year?
George: I was not at these briefings and I don’t now.
Jordan: You tell them but not us?
George: I am exhausted and can’t communicate well.
Jordan: Did you ever communicate with anyone on the oversight committee?
George: People on my staff said things, I guess.
ISSA: We will work on an analysis of the timeline of the initial audit period and come up with guidelines on when an audit should turn into an investigation. It is a consideration of this Chair that there was a time when the knowledge of the primary activities should have converted the audit into an investigation that would have changed procedures we have discussed today. We need to put this together into a package and not limit into a preliminary timelines. There are criminal matters involved as well.
At the beginning of this hearing, Ms. Lois Lerner arrived via a subpoena She stated that she will invoke her Fifth Amendment right. Lerner chose to make an opening statement and made assertions under oath in terms of testimony. It was brought up by Mr. Gowdy that in his opinion Ms. Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights by addressing issues. Though I excused Ms. Lerner I will look into recalling her in light of this waiver. This hearing stands in recess, not adjourned.
NOTE: That last part is the most important one, because it looks like that Lois Lerner character is going to be dragged back to the hearing room and forced to testify about the bad things she did. I think they tricked her into saying enough in that room already to require her to come back and answer questions. If that happens, that will be Must See Tee-Vee because she will try to claim she doesn’t know anything or can’t answer…and I think that Issa will rip her to shreds.
SCARY THOUGHT: Did “Project Orca” Cost Romney the Election by Diverting Resources to Failing Computer Program?
One of the big differences between Democrats and Republicans is that when Republicans lose an election, the knives come out and they eat their own. We’ll be seeing this for the next few years — much like we did after the McCain campaign — with Cocktail Party GOP operatives lashing out at various members of the Romney staff, blaming them for the loss in order to elevate themselves and get exposure for their own careers on tee-vee. Steve Schmidt, McCain’s campaign manager, is a classic example of this. He jumps at every opportunity to badmouth Republicans and would appear on MSNBC every day to do so, if they had him.
Today, Breitbart.com’s running a shocking article about “Project Orca”, which was billed as the most technologically advanced Republican GOTV effort ever. Democrats were genuinely terrified of this project, and it was part of the reason that it seemed Mitt Romney would win this election in a big way. If you believed that Americans were eager to defeat Obama to prevent Obamacare from taking effect and that the Romney guys had an advanced tool to turn out the vote, then it was hard to see how Romney would lose.
We don’t know the name (or the motives) of the “Romney insider” who’s telling Breitbart that Project Orca was technologically flawed and crashed on election day, but anecdotal reports throughout the day do show that people had trouble using the system, activating their pin numbers, etc. The “Romney insider” could be telling the truth when he says that Orca diverted 40,000 Romney volunteers to a failing computer program instead of having them do traditional GOTV efforts…or this guy could be positioning himself to be the next Steve Schmidt by pushing a story like this just to sink knives into the Romney campaign. We won’t know the reality for a while.
I’m always suspicious of campaign operatives in Republican ranks because I’d think they wouldn’t reveal something like this and give Democrats the satisfaction of knowing Project Orca flopped (if that’s what happened). It’s like during the Cold War…the US and the Soviets never told each other what really happened when some new vehicle or weapons system failed.
So why come out and reveal what happened with Project Orca so that Democrats can benefit from it? That seems strange. Unless, of course, the guy doing this wants to become the next Steve Schmidt and land a seat on the talk show circuit revealing more and more about the Romney campaign’s failures.
I’m shocked to read this, though, because the big selling point about having Romney be the nominee was that he’d been working on his campaign for over 6 years and he had the best and the brightest that money could buy in terms of loyal advisors and brash young turks who would do things with GOTV that no Republican had ever succeeded in doing before.
Romney and his senior staff were legitimately shellshocked on Election Day as the first set of polls started to close, because they really thought they were winning until vote totals started coming in. Obama and his supporters seemed resigned to losing in the weeks before election day…and all throughout November 6th the talking heads on MSNBC kept talking about “voter suppression” being the only explanation for Obama’s loss, really setting the stage to push that narrative when Romney won. Everything pointed to a Romney win that never came.
If people really were counting on Project Orca to deliver the turnouts needed — and everyone assumed it would work — then maybe it’s failure is part of why Democrats ended up with the (D+7) electorate they needed to win Obama a second term.
It’s still hard to believe we really do need to suffer through four more years of Leftist control of this country…but in those four years I hope we can finally break the ugly cycle where Democrats constantly have a vaunted “turnout advantage”. Surely there is something that can be done in Republican ranks between now and 2016 to avoid another “Project Orca” failure or to allow Democrats to keep having a better “GOTV ground game”.
It’s mind-numbing and soul-killing that the Romney guys would have failed in this, because the Romney guys were supposed to be better at this stuff than anyone (better than Democrats at it, even).
I haven’t seen anyone ask this yet, so I will: did the Ron Paul Revolution stay home last night?
Mitt Romney won 3 million votes less than McCain while Obama lost 10 million votes of his own from 2008.
Where did those 3 million McCain voters go?
The main part of why I believed Romney would win this time because I knew the 10 million Obama supporters would sit home…but never in my worst nightmares did I imagine McCain voters would sit home. I counted on them to show up and bring friends this time to boot Obama out.
The only thing I can think of is this:
* Ron Paul supporters sat the election out because Dr. Paul because the conflict regarding the convention and the other delegate issues
* Evangelicals went through with their threat to sit home because Romney is a member of the LDS Church
And these two groups thought allowing Obama to have a second term was worth sitting home.
Is that what happened?
I never thought that was a realistic possibility because I can’t imagine ever allowing the Left to not just maintain power but actually expand their reach…but that’s what happened last night.
Have you seen anyone crunching numbers to explain this today?
The Ministry of Truth will say “oh, it was all about Hispanics!” but that is a red herring. That doesn’t explain dropping three million votes below McCain and a total of five million votes from Bush in 2004.
Ron Paul supporters seem to explain that first drop from Bush’s 2004 numbers, sitting out to the tune of 2 million when McCain ran in 2008…and then sitting out even more this time; perhaps it’s a combination of Ron Paul people and Evangelicals who sat home “to teach everyone a lesson”.
That’s an expensive lesson if this is right.
The Media Won’t Admit the Magical Black Man Failed — but voters have no trouble at all firing Barack Obama
I’m often asked why the Ministry of Truth that is our national media is populated with Obama cultists who have put their careers and reputations at risk doing everything they can to lie about this election “being close!”, when in reality Mitt Romney is going to wipe the floor with Barack Obama today. Even formerly reputable people like Scott Rasmussen have been in on this fraud…largely because they know there will be no professional consequences for lying about Bathhouse Barry’s chances today. In fact, since Gallup was threatened with a Justice Department investigation if they didn’t start producing numbers the White House liked, all the polling outfits have jumped at every chance to work as propagandists for the Obama campaign.
Some people in conservative ranks don’t understand any of this…and that’s because Republicans have such a hard time understanding just how paramount race is to everything on the Left. Do you know how some straight guys go on and on about bacon, which appears to be their absolute favorite thing in the world? There’s even bacon-flavored milkshakes at some restaurants and bacon-themed boxer shorts and bedsheets because straight guys love bacon…while the Ministry of Truth (Minitru for short) just loves RACISM and RACE-RELATED news coverage. Everything is about race to these people, because their lefty professors in college taught them all to obsess over race and use RACISM as the soul of every story they write about Republicans (whom these professors also taught there students were perpetual enemies that need to be destroyed, Alinsky-style).
In 2008, the members of Minitru colluded via networks like the infamous “JournoList” group to maneuver a magical black man of their choosing into the White House because most of these guys wanted to live in a real life Will Smith movie. You know the guy: always smiling, prone to dancing around and shaking his butt, has a love of catchphrases and saying “Aw Hell Naw!” a lot as he mugs for the camera and turns even the most serious of conversations into a joke. Smith is a 21st Century one-man-minstrel-show, but he’s beloved by the Left as “the number one black action star”…who just happens to star in movie after movie where he plays a magical black man who mysteriously appears out of nowhere when white people need him to solve all their problems. Those white people on the screen then feel really good about themselves for allowing themselves to put their trust in a black man…and the lefties who write these scripts or whose butts fill those theater seats feel marvelous because they’re “supporting the number one black action star” by buying tickets to see these flicks.
One day — just watch — Will Smith will play Barack Obama in a movie (and he’ll be given an Oscar for the role)…so the circle will be complete; the man who got to be president because he reminded people of the magical black men that Will Smith plays on the screen will then be portrayed on film by Will Smith in the ultimate magical black man role. It’s all very meta.
The Left believes in the fantasy of magical black men so much that they’ll never admit Obama was a failure. They love having a black man as president, but unfortunately they picked a grossly incompetent and drug-addled one…instead of waiting for someone awesome and extraordinary like Allen West to emerge on the scene. For four years, the Left has worked overtime attempting to make Obama great when he’s really, at heart, mediocre. This is the man who scored Cs and Ds all through college (with many incompletes) and accomplished nothing of worth as either an Illinois state senator or in the United States Senate. Now of that mattered to Columbia or Harvard back when he was in school because of his skin color…and this mendacity was irrelevant to the Left as they pushed him for president too.
Barack Obama sure looked and sounded like a Will Smith character: he was slim and smiled a lot. He said goofy things and talked with a booming voice that would seem great up on a big screen. He even has big ears and a closeted attraction to other men…just like Will Smith! He was pitch-perfect for the part the Left always wanted a magical black man to play in American politics…and they’ve worked the last four years to “make him a success”.
This is very important for you to understand because at the very beginning of the Obama presidency, in fact on Election Night in 2008, Chris Matthews on MSNBC said it was now his job to ensure that Barack Obama succeeds in all he does after he was elected president. This was an open declaration that MSNBC would not serve as news media during the Obama Regime, but would play the role of a Ministry of Truth.
I think history will show that MSNBC really led the charge with this, and that other networks, newspapers, radio hosts, and ultimately the pollsters all followed suit. Everyone affiliated with news or entertainment (“infotainment” in newspeak) pledged their undying loyalty to Barack Obama and decided to echo Chris Matthews’ promise to guarantee his success. They decided to fall on their swords (or pens and microphones) for him no matter what happened, because it was their near-religious duty to ensure the magical black man in the White House never failed. They felt so good about themselves for supporting someone with a lot of melanin in his skin during his presidency that they all decided long ago that they’d lie, cheat, and actively deceive the public wherever necessary to make sure he got two terms in office…since they knew that even Minitru could not spin a one-term presidency as a success.
THAT is really why these people are so convinced Obama will be reelected; it’s unthinkable to him that anyone could see him as a failure, since Minitru has loved everything Obama did in office. Everyone who has opposed Obama was branded a virulent, despicable racist…so the only way the members of Minitru could conceive of Obama winning was if the nation was comprised entirely of racists who would boot the magical black man from power. Since Will Smith never gets removed from the scree in any of his movies and always gets as many sequels as he wants…Minitru just assumes that Barack Obama will be president for as long as he wants, too.
The catch to all of this is that none of these people will suffer any professional consequences for shilling for Obama so shamelessly all these years…or for freaking you out of your mind today telling you that “Obama’s winning!”. Tomorrow, after Obama’s lost, Minitru will begin damage control by saying that “racists turned up at the polls to vote with RACIST-ISM!” or that “Republicans stole the election somehow!” or some other such nonsense. This is their way of claiming that “if only the election had been fair, Obama would have won!”…and then in the weeks and months ahead someone at MSNBC, the New York Times, HuffPo, and Daily Beast will be assigned to start rewriting history and removing a lot of content that Minitru put out there as Obama propaganda over the years. A decade from now, these people will pretend that they never sacrificed their reputations by becoming propagandists for Obama.
They’re also counting on all of YOU being so euphoric that Obama is booted from power that you’re going to forget all of this. Minitru believes that its viewers and readers have no other options so they will just keep staring at their tee-vees and reading their ink-smudged newspapers, believing all the lies forever. Since Republicans tend to be amnesiacs and don’t remember what happened in the last election (when Minitru freaked you out right before the Midterms and told you Democrats would GAIN more power then…and look what really happened instead!), these people believe that there will be no professional consequences for them.
I have another plan in mind, and I hope you join me in this, because we are friends like this. I want to take down Minitru and help bring down MSNBC so that it no longer even exists as a network in five years. I’d like to see the New York Times go out of business for its propaganda efforts on behalf of Obama…and I’d love to see most other newspapers retired as well. I WANT these people to have professional and personal consequences for being the equivalent of Saddam Hussein’s Minister of Information (Baghdad Bob) for all these years.
Minitru won’t admit the magical black man failed because Minitru linked its fate inextricably to this man…and when he loses reelection today that opens the door for us to bring Minitru down…and these guys know it.
Voters don’t care about any of this and are just of the mindset today that they gave Barack Obama a chance in 2008, in much the same way that they bought tickets to what ended up being a real sinker of a Will Smith movie. But they felt good about themselves for supporting the black man in this…though they draw the line at signing up for a sequel.
Today Americans are going to fire Barack Obama, just like they avoided Men in Black III last summer. There will be no hard feelings and no anger…just the reality that though Americans love giving magical black guys a chance, they aren’t stupid enough to keep spending their time and money backing stinkers. And a second term for Obama would be very stinky indeed…no matter how matter how much everyone in Minitru would insist it smelled of roses and ambrosia.
Do you think you have any time today that you could spend outside in a high traffic area holding up a VOTE ROMNEY sign on a street corner?
Maybe you could also hold an empty chair too?
This might sound silly to you, but it’s actually a big thing: people driving around who see VOTE ROMNEY will get excited…because they know they are not alone and they will see your presence as encouragement that your area is “Romney country”. Conversely, Obama voters will see the VOTE ROMNEY sign and be demoralized, thinking “Why even bother going to vote. Romney’s going to win”. And then they will just head to Pizza Hut or wherever (the place I think they’ve been keeping Oprah the Hutt lately, since that woman seems to have disappeared off the face of the planet. Whatever happened to Oprah Winfrey anyway?).
You don’t need a fancy sign…just go down to the drugstore and get a sturdy poster board and use a red marker to write VOTE ROMNEY in big letters…and then take a black marker and outline it so that people can read it well from far away. Don’t try to write anything else on it, because people need to read it quickly. VOTE ROMNEY works best.
And then, spend any time you can outside holding up the sign at an intersection you see with a lot of traffic. If you only have 30 minutes to spare, well, that’s 30 minutes that there wouldn’t have been a sign if you weren’t out there! I know people who make this a family event and they bring hot cocoa and go out for an hour of so…and then head back home to watch the election results come in or go off to vote themselves.
So, not only can this be a way to provide visibility for Romney/Ryan today…but you could also be making a great family memory that you’ll cherish forever. ”Remember mom when you took us and we held up that sign and everyone honked and gave us thumbs-up? That was so fun when we did that,” they’ll say, many years from now. What a great memory of the 2012 election!
If you don’t have the time to spare to hold up a sign, you can also provide visibility by wearing a Romney button or tee shirt today wherever you go. I know some people who like to face-paint and are putting VOTE under one eye and ROMNEY on the other, like they were football players…and others who are going to walk around with ROMNEY on one side of their face and RYAN on the other. That’s not for everyone, but people who don’t have to work and are just going out and about in the world (and who have bold personalities) can get away with this.
We’re all different, so you tailor all this to suit your level of comfort. You know what’s best for you.
But, I hope you can do something to provide visibility for Romney/Ryan today so that your personal touch can encourage others in your community to go out and vote…since the visibility you provide will kick everyone’s energy up into a higher gear!
I just know you’re going to do something great to help today…and I thank you in advance for doing it!
Don’t Miss Your Chance to Be Part of Mitt Romney’s Big Win Tomorrow: do something in your own way to finish strong!
Have you ever heard of the American Girls dolls? They’re a big thing here in Chicago, with a giant store on Michigan Avenue that’s a tourist trap and is always crowded. Apparently, there’s a doll styled after a character from every period of American history (rumor has it that Barack Obama collects them all).
The other day I was downtown and walked by the shop and thought about the people who were there for different important days in our history…the ones who were just regular people who never made it into any books and aren’t celebrated as individuals today. Those “American Girl” dolls aren’t supposed to be famous people…but just regular girls who lived in important time periods.
You’re living during an important moment in our nation’s history, because tomorrow’s the day that the American people choose to restore our prosperity and destiny instead of siding with the Left in its push to make this a European socialist style country. Perhaps some day there will even be a doll based on you (that an elderly Bathhouse Barry can eagerly anticipate collecting in his hot-pink nursing home room).
I really hope you are doing something in your own way to help Mitt Romney win big tomorrow, because I want you to be able to look back on these next two days many years from now and be proud of your part in making it all happen. Please don’t miss this opportunity to join Americans coast to coast in booting Barack Obama from the White House (along with all the Chicago thugs who came to Washington with him). This is like being there during the Revolutionary War…the day before Gettysburg…or being in Times Square for VE Day. What’s going to happen tomorrow will be epic…and YOU are going to not just witness it as a bystander, but be an active participant in it…in your own unique way.
Here are FIVE WAYS YOU CAN HELP MITT ROMNEY WIN BIG by using your individual talents in a way that you are comfortable with today and tomorrow:
5. Print out and distribute palm cards in your neighborhood or walk around taping them onto doors so that people know about “The Hope and the Change” being available to watch on Hulu.com today. Getting as many people to see this movie as possible is a great way to drive votes to Mitt Romney. Today — Monday 11/5/2012 — is really the last day to be able to spread the word like this and have people watch the movie. For palm cards you can print out, click HERE.
4. Call up all your friends and family and personally ask them to vote for Mitt Romney. Make sure they have the nudge they need to go to the polls tomorrow.
3. Go get a big piece of sturdy poster board and make a sign that says VOTE ROMNEY. Just like that. Keep it simple. Use a white poster board with bright RED letters so that it is easy to see. Outline the letters in black so they stand out. When you have the sign finished, go somewhere near you that’s safe to stand on a corner and show the sign to the cars that are passing by on the intersection. You can do this tonight or tomorrow. If you are free tomorrow in the morning, you can hold up the sign while people are driving to work…or you can do it after work if you get off in the afternoon. But tonight and tomorrow morning are the best times to hold signs. You might at first think this is silly, but seeing someone out there in the cold holding up a big homemade ROMNEY sign is a huge psychological push to go out and vote Romney. It tells the people in your neighborhood that “Wow! There’s excitement. I better do my part!”. This can be a BIG DEAL. It’s scary to go outside and hold up a sign for some people, so don’t do anything you aren’t comfortable doing…but if it’s not too cold out then spending a few hours outside with your family cheering for Romney and hearing the cars honk in support could be a memory you will have for a lifetime. Your kids will be in their 40s and you’ll be a grandparent and you’ll all say “Remember when we made that sign and held it up for the cars to honk back in 2012 when President Romney was first running…and I think we really helped win that election!”.
2. Do you like talking to strangers on the phone? Can you make some calls from home to help Mitt Romney get out the vote?
1. This might be obvious but….GET OUT THERE AND VOTE!
Whatever you choose to do…and however you can use your talents to help Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan today and tomorrow…I thank you from the bottom of my heart as an American. I think there are people out there right now who are doing incredible things to restore freedom and prosperity to this country. I think everyone who is part of the Resistance and is working to unseat the would-be tyrant Obama and his Leftist goons are real American heroes right up alongside those who were there in the past when America needed them most.
Thank you…God Bless…and keep up the great work through tomorrow!