Can you find Pamela Geller’s expose on Rick Perry defending Islamization in public schools?
Does anyone have time to do some quick research?
We need Pamela Geller’s expose on Rick Perry defending the Islamization going on in public schools.
I don’t know when she wrote this, and am still having computer trouble that’s limiting my time online, so I can’t search for this myself.
I know Islamists have been aggressively pushing Islam in public school text books, and that Texas text books are more often than not used coast to coast…so Texas should be a line in the sand to prevent the Saudi Wahabbists and other Islamists from sneaking the glorification of Islam into public school text books.
Islam is not a religion of peace — it is not a religion at all– and should not be treated as such. Islam is a militarized, medievalist death cult committed to global conquest and the destruction of all who oppose it. To achieve this, Islam is structured with specific goals and strategies to undermine societies opposing Islam, often from within, and turn their tolerance of other cultures politically correct stupidity against them.
If Rick Perry has really defended Islamization then people need to know about it.
While we are at it, in this same thread, can someone pull up Pamela Geller’s work related to Chris Christie and his support for the Ground Zero Victory Mosque?
People need to know where all the candidates stand on Islam since Islam itself is committed to the West’s destruction. If Perry and Christie are pro-Islamization or even Islamization-accepting, the two of them are like Charles Lindbergh running for the presidency in the 1930s in an alternate universe while sympathizing with the people actively trying to destroy America in his own time.
The next president just can’t be someone who thinks Islam is the “religion of peace”. No way, no how…no Perry, no Christie, no Romney if any of these guys believe this garbage.
© 2011, Kevin DuJan. All rights reserved.
Also Recommended:
- QUESTION: What are your issues with Rick Perry?
- RESEARCH: How far lost is Sweden to Islamization and how did the problem start there?
- QUESTION: What does the Cocktail Party GOP establishment think of Rick Perry?
- ACTION ITEM: Keep track of the media’s attacks on Rick Perry…a perfect case study in how the media works overtime to help Democrats
- They are really really really scared of Rick Perry.
Latest Buzz:
Help HillBuzz by Shopping Amazon
"Bee" Advised!
I look forward to your comments. Please follow these simple guidelines:
- Please do not complain about your comment not yet showing up
- Stay on topic of the article ("This is OT, but..." = bad!)
- I will STING if you troll, spam, bait, swear or attack someone
I think this is what you're looking for.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/perrys_pro…
Here's the other one.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2…
You may be referring to
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/perrys_pro…
It's another hit piece by the liberals. It's not true. He's my governor.
Perry thought he could imitate Bush. But the Bushes are YANKEES not rednecks. The Bushes were loved in the North and in the South.
Ughhhhh….That article is SUCH incredible CRAP and has been debunked over and over and over again…if anyone is going to believe that nonsense, I will come back with all of the truth and fact about it. Perry is the most wonderful, biggest supporter of JEWS AND ISRAEL. He is AGAINST Islam. I stopped reading anything from Geller because of her hysteria, lies and shoddy reporting on this Perry thing. It was reckless, and she took a hit piece from SALON, a liberal rag, and ran with it. The Perry bashing BS has to stop. He is the BEST WE HAVE and I can't believe the nonsense I read. I live in California, but Dallas is my home. I have known Perry for 10 years. The BS being spread is disgusting.
BettySueLA —
Can you give any specifics on what Geller is wrong about? I really want to know. These articles must have come out when I was in the hospital because I am just hearing about them now. Why does Geller think Perry is pro Islam?
I really appreciate your help filling this in.
Having computer trouble and am not able to get any links to open and won’t have a properly working computer for some time so I really need your help in refuting Geller with any specifics you think I need to know.
Thanks!
PS — Nice to hear from you, too. Have missed you. Hope G. is doing great too.
The short version is all the "quotes" are dowdified to take out the "Islam believes" or "Islam teaches" before the statement of what Islam teaches.
It's the equivalent of saying "Christianity teaches that Jesus was resurected" and claiming that the person saying it believes in the resurection. (just as an example to show the difference, not here to argue Christianity")
Please refer to what Ace of Spades wrote on this. Geller went off the Reservation over Perry on this. She didn't even bother checking her facts on the matter. His teaching material was very straightforward about Islam(in other words, HIGHLY critical). She flat-out lied about what Perry did.
I used to like her, but I lost all respect for her over this.
You should email Ace directly, he would probably be happy to give you the full story. ( He and Geller are not friendlies.)
kas –
Can you or someone do me a HUGE favor. I can’t open links on this computer…can you give me like 3 things that Geller said that were wrong and how Ace refuted them?
I am trying to play catchup on stuff that happened when I was in the hospital, and I totally missed this whole Geller thing with Perry and Islam.
THANKS!
K
Kevin, I emailed you Pam's entire expose.
P.S. Ace is a sexist pig. He comments on the size of Pam's breasts.
Ace of Spades and now Redstate….I.don't go there, anymore.
Ace may be a pig but it doesn't change the fact that Geller edited the story on Perry to alter the meaning. Geller seems to have some agenda she want to push with him and it's completely off-putting and Ace called her on it. Plain and simple.
Part 2:
Sounds good. But Perry has been sucked into the propaganda vortex, and is now wielding his enormous power to influence changes in the schoolrooms and in the curricula to reflect a sharia compliant version of Islam. He is a friend of the Aga Khan, the multimillionaire head of the Ismailis, a Shi'ite sect of Islam that today proclaims its nonviolence but in ages past was the sect that gave rise to the Assassins. Perry has concluded at least two cooperation agreements between the state of Texas and the Ismailis, including a comprehensive program to feed children in Texas public schools and taqiyya nonsense about how Islam is a religion of peace. Another agreement stipulates that Texas officials will work with the Ismailis in the "fields of education, health sciences, natural disaster preparedness and recovery, culture and the environment." Perry let on that this was all about whitewashing Islam's bloody historical and modern-day record: "traditional Western education speaks little of the influence of Muslim scientists, scholars, throughout history, and for that matter the cultural treasures that stand today in testament to their wisdom."
Part 3:
It gets worse. Last March, Perry gave a speech in Dallas in the company of Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform. Norquist was close to George W. Bush, and Perry's anti-tax, anti-Big Government rhetoric sounds like it's right out of Norquist's playbook. But there is a dark side to Norquist as well: Norquist's ties to Islamic supremacists and jihadists have been known for years. He and his Palestinian wife, Samah Alrayyes — who was director of communications for his Islamic Free Market Institute until they married in 2005 — are very active in "Muslim outreach." Six weeks after 9/11, The New Republic ran an exposé explaining how Norquist arranged for George W. Bush to meet with fifteen Islamic supremacists at the White House on September 26, 2001 — to show how Muslims rejected terrorism.
The only problem was that the ones with Bush didn't. To Bush's left sat Dr. Yahya Basha, president of the American Muslim Council, an organization whose leaders have repeatedly called Hamas "freedom fighters." Also in attendance was Salam Al-Marayati, executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, who on the afternoon of September 11 told a Los Angeles public radio audience that "we should put the State of Israel on the suspect list." And sitting right next to President Bush was Muzammil Siddiqi, president of the Hamas-linked Islamic Society of North America, who once told a Muslim crowd chanting pro-Hezbollah slogans that "America has to learn if you remain on the side of injustice, the wrath of God will come."
Part 4:
It was Norquist who ushered these silver-tongued jihadists into the Oval Office of an incurious president after the worst attack ever on American soil. Yet in December 2003, David Horowitz wrote that Norquist "has formed alliances with prominent Islamic radicals who have ties to the Saudis and to Libya and to Palestine Islamic Jihad, and who are now under indictment by U.S. authorities. Equally troubling is that the arrests of these individuals and their exposure as agents of terrorism have not resulted in noticeable second thoughts on Grover's part or any meaningful effort to dissociate himself from his unsavory friends." Nor has Norquist changed course since then.
Grover Norquist was on the Islamic payroll before and after the carnage of September 11. Gaffney revealed Norquist's close ties to Abdurahman Alamoudi, who is now serving time in prison for financing jihad activity. In 2000, Alamoudi said at a rally, "I have been labeled by the media in New York to be a supporter of Hamas. Anybody support Hamas here? … Hear that, Bill Clinton? We are all supporters of Hamas. I wished they added that I am also a supporter of Hezb'allah." Alamoudi was at that time head of the now-defunct "moderate" group known as American Muslim Council (AMC), and he was active in other Muslim groups in the U.S. that showed sympathy to or support for jihadists. And Alamoudi gave $50,000 to the lobbying group Janus-Merritt Strategies, which Norquist co-founded. Alamoudi also helped found Norquist's Islamic Institute with a $10,000 loan and a gift of another $10,000.
It was bad enough that Bush was close to Norquist. There is no way the GOP can again nominate anyone who is so completely and utterly clueless about the fifth column within. Ten years after 9/11, can't we nominate someone who can speak to the ominous threat posed by Islamic supremacists in this country? There are no secrets here, even if the stealth jihad is covert and sneaky. We know what they are doing. See their whole plan, and how to fight it, in my new book Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance.
Rick Perry must not be the Republican nominee. Rick Perry must not be President. Have we not had enough of this systemic sedition?
i am liking herman cain more and more.
I keep coming back to see if the people who said that Geller is full of bull, have any evidence. I was hoping they could provide some, because I haven't found it. Wasn't it Obama who said " judge me by the people I surround myself with"? It sounds like him..
Isn't Perry for the two state solution?
And the NAFTA super highway land grab
And Exec. Orders for Gardasil
And—-I'm still waiting for Palin
Part 1
This was written a couple of months ago before “the Perry implosion,” when Perry was riding high in the polls; before Palin, Christie, and Cain bowed out. But since it’s really not over until it’s over, I wanted to respond to this to get it off my chest mainly, and then just to get it on the record. Better late than never! Please keep this in mind as you read.
I also have continued to come back to this thread to see if anyone would indeed come back to delineate Ace’s “debunking” of Pamela Geller’s expose on Perry’s ties to Islam and the whitewashing of Islam in the Texas educational system. Kevin asked for three points that Geller made that were debunked by Ace.
And before I go any further, I will also say, this is not an anti-Ace of Spades, RedState (well, except maybe some anti-RedState because he bugs me), Pajamas Media, etc. comment as I enjoy reading all of these blogs daily. This is also notwithstanding Ace’s occasional Palin digs, which, up until now, I have chosen to overlook because I really do like his irreverent style. I just think we don’t have to agree on 100% of everything and I will vote for Palin again this time around if she is in the running no matter what he says. He is right on most things, as I have said before, just not on this one.
Even one of my absolute faves, Weasel Zippers, jumped onto the Ace bandwagon to bash Pamela, but I still love the Weasel and I promise I will never stop reading his blog because it is awesome in a million different ways and, well, I just love it. Bottom line, my comments are all made in good faith with the rest of my conservative friends and colleagues and our hope for the future of our country.
I have already expressed my concerns regarding Perry’s views on immigration as I have witnessed personally in my family some of the consequences of poor immigration policy. I admit I come into this biased on the immigration issue and decided early I couldn’t support him as my choice in the primaries for that reason. (And basically because I was all Palin to begin with anyway.)
But I was really freaked out when Perry earned the much-coveted CAIR endorsement earlier this year. Why weren’t more of us worried about that? Surely this is something that should capture the attention of any conservative concerned about the rise of radical Islam in America and throughout the world.
So, without just posting links, I will do my best to explain why, after reading all of Ace’s postings, and all relevant writings from Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs, Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch, Justin Elliott from Salon, David Stein from Counter Contempt, Dave Reaboi from PajamasMedia, Moe Lane at RedState, Alana Goodman from Commentary, Tancredo on the Daily Caller, and many others, I have come to the conclusion that Governor Perry owes us an explanation. I do demand a serious explanation.
Part 2
I have also come to the conclusion we should not accept a lackadaisical answer. I believe we are at a critical juncture in our country and should accept nothing less than a 100 percent protective position of America, politics be damned.
So, if “going off the reservation,” as some of my fellow Hillbuzzers have referred to Pamela and her “believers”, means that we are thinking outside the box and totally for ourselves, then count me in. If this means we are taking in every single bit of information we can, mulling it over and dissecting it into a million little pieces because we care about the future of this country that we love? Then yes, I must confess I have also veered crazy “off the reservation” toward independent thinking.
First, just from a credibility standpoint, isn’t it clear to most that Pamela Geller is one of the foremost experts on the subject of Islam in America and around the world? She dedicates her entire life to this issue, compared to some that may dabble on the surface with occasional blog posts. I’m pretty sure she will forget more than most will ever bother to know on the subject, but that’s just my opinion.
What we all do know for sure is that after 9/11 we should never cower in our concern about the substantive issue of stealth Islamization of our country and, frankly, I am really sick and tired of my conservative colleagues treating us as if we are “crazy” as Chris Christie says, or giving us the “spooky” connotation as some of the other bloggers do just for raising the question.
Seriously…don’t we all just want to know the truth???
Questions should be asked and answered:
Will Perry denounce the whitewashing of Islam in our public school systems that he facilitated in Texas, as it appears he did, with the support and sponsorship he offered to the curriculum created with Aga Khan, created at Harvard and finalized by the University of Austin?
Will Perry denounce Sharia law in any court of the United States of America?
That’s it. Ask it and let him answer it.
Already, the issue of Sharia law is haunting us in at least 23 cases across this country and it is creating problems in Texas. Although the issues in other states are significant, just the simple problem of halal in Texas is problematic. On the one hand, halal, is the law of the land; on the other, who gets to decide what is halal food? Unless one let’s Sharia dictate, there is no good answer.
Part 3
Let’s get back to the blogger attacks:
Ace was parroting the comments of David Stein, who essentially reviewed the lesson plans of one of 83 teachers that taught the curriculum created. It was not the actual curriculum.
Per Stein/Ace: “The lesson plan was written by Ronald Wiltse. Mr. Wiltse is a retired history teacher in San Antonio. He graduated from Pepperdine University in 1966, and received his MA from Middlebury College in 1982. For several decades, he taught world history at Edison High School, in San Antonio. He is a Christian, and an ardent and vocal supporter of Israel. “
Wow, this is all good, right? Unfortunately, again, it was not the actual curriculum or training created for the entire school system; it was one teacher’s lesson plan. The curriculum itself, copied into Pamela’s blog (all links and cache’s have since been deleted except for what she was finally able to screen-capture), reflects a much different story. They are too long to post here. The bottom line is, the curriculum was created at Harvard, fine-tuned at Austin State University, and plays a totally different tune. It is truly a whitewashing of Islam that is being presented to our children in Texas. The links have already been provided earlier in this comment thread. They are lengthy, but I challenge all interested in the subject to become informed.
We recently witnessed a similar situation in Atlanta, Georgia, so is it really so far-fetched that a similar track would be pursued in Texas?
And may I ask why the links and caches have been deleted from the internet? And who is doing the deleting? Who stands to gain and who stands to lose? Shouldn’t that bother anyone that has any interest whatsoever in this question; that as soon as Pamela starts digging the links begin to disappear? Why would anyone delete something that is supposedly worthy of praise? I’m just thankful Pamela was able to capture them and copy them directly into her blog.
So folks, I do think this is a serious problem.
When Stein tried to gain access to Pamela’s confidential contacts that had informed her of their concerns regarding the curriculum, a family in Texas who was concerned for their children (much like the family in Georgia), she rightly refused. Stein did not seem to want to acknowledge all the facts Pamela presented before him that showed the official curriculum different than the lesson plan he was relying upon. Why not? There is an extended e-mail exchange between Pamela and Stein that reflects the obvious dilemma.
At the end of the day, at least in my mind, there is no question the curriculum presented a clear whitewashing of Islam in the Texas school system. Read it for yourself.
Part 4
In further attempting to discredit Pamela, Stein also mentions he considers Robert Spencer the true authority on Islam: “With all great respect to Pamela Geller, I consider Robert Spencer to be THE foremost authority on who is, and who isn’t, a terrorist or a sponsor and supporter of terrorism. If Spencer agrees that the Ismailis are philanthropical and nonviolent, I’ll take his word for it. Although maybe I’m just blind to Mr. Spencer’s “dhimmitude.””
This is all sarcastically good except for one small problem. Robert Spencer himself has come away with the clear conclusion in his own writings that Pamela was correct in her assessment of the curriculum implemented by Perry and that she was being unjustly attacked by bloggers on the right. Hmm. The plot thickens.
Okay, so then there is David Horowitz who doesn't quite agree with Robert Spencer. Why? Because David Horowitz believes this one sect is considered “moderate muslim,” despite all the signs that seem to suggest otherwise in the specific individuals involved here. There are multiple essays to explain these discrepancies and then the circular arguments begin.
In the end, it seemed pretty clear to me there was some debunking going on here folks, but it wasn’t being done by Stein or Ace.
Putting all the in-fighting aside for now, I remain concerned about this issue and worried about Perry.
We already have a president that was not vetted properly. I would like Perry to give me a response that tells me that the Islamization of our country is not enabled by his policies. I would like him to tell me that he has a zero tolerance for the whitewashing of Islam to our children, in school or otherwise. I would like to know that he believes Sharia law is not acceptable, in Texas or anywhere in America. I would like him to explain his close ties to the Islamic community and CAIR’s public endorsement of his campaign.
If this makes me crazy, so be it.
And one more important thing: If Perry is the nominee for the Republican Party, I will vote for him and will ask God to help him make the right decisions for our country.
We are indeed entering what I consider to be the last days in the history of this world. How can we do anything less than at least try to delay the inevitable? Shame on us if we do not vet our next president with anything other than absolute due diligence, and with all the information that is before us. At this point in the history of our country, we cannot afford to take any one thing for granted. We must absolutely hold our candidates to higher standards and must never be rightly accused of “looking the other way” when a substantive issue is presented and clearly within our rights to dissect.
Just my 2 cents.