Archive for October 25th, 2011
Terrorist Bill Ayers Teaches Occupiers How to Protest
And this guy is Obama’s buddy. And visits the White House. Bill Ayers killed cops. And he is loving his resurgence of loserness. If you are thinking about voting for Obama, watch this video. Bill Ayers talks about non-violence. A cop killer.
The hypocrisy is deafening.
Obama Voters Show Their Idiocy
Wow. Stupidity abounds.
From RebelPundit.
A real test for the GOP candidates: who will show the most support to Ohio’s efforts to curtail the power of the public sector unions?
I need your help in monitoring the GOP presidential candidates’ support for Ohio’s efforts to curtail the power of the public sector unions.
Ohio is my home state, and though I will probably never live there again, I will always love it and do anything I can do in my career to help all efforts to bring jobs and prosperity back to the Buckeye State.
I watched the Unions destroy my home town of Cleveland; the Unions drove factories out of business and sent companies packing all through the 80s and 90s, leaving what had once been the 8th largest city in the country at the turn of the century (with the most beautiful street in the world, Euclid Avenue, at the time) an absolute ruin of its former self.
Ohio is in the shape it’s in because of the Unions and the Democrats who feed off Union contributions and rely on Unions as goon squads; the Unions, of course, funnel the tax dollars they loot from the Treasury back into the Democrat Party’s coffers. It is a vicious cycle that destroyed my home town and my home state.
The only chance this country has of bringing cities like Cleveland and states like Ohio back to life is the curtailing of Union power and the elimination of the Unions as a tool of the Democrat Party.
If a Republican does not want to take on the public sector unions — or like Mittens Romneycare, does not support other people’s efforts to take on the Unions — then I just can’t ever support that Republican for office.
I urge you to strongly consider the ramifications of backing any Republican who won’t take a stand against the Unions.
The only reason the Left gained control of this country is because the Cocktail Party GOP establishment was either too cowardly or too stupid to stand up to the Leftists (or, in another theory, too in league with the Left and too concerned with all the perks that come with Vichy-style quisling alignment with the Left). In 2008, the Cocktail Party foisted Leftist enabler John McCain as the GOP nominee; in 2012, the Cocktail Party is aggressively pushing Mittens Romneycare as the “it’s his turn!” candidate who intends to do absolutely nothing to challenge the public sector unions’ parasitic drain on state treasuries.
I strongly encourage you to decide, at this moment in time, to take a stand against both the Unions and the Cocktail Party GOP establishment that have allowed them to do so much damage to America.
We really need to pay close attention to what Herman Cain, Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich, Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, and Mittens Romneycare do in the next two weeks leading up to the important vote in Ohio to curtail the public sector unions’ power there.
Today, Mittens stood on the side of the Unions and refused to give his support to the effort to curb their power. I believe this disqualifies Mittens from the presidency. Permanently.
I want to see what the other candidates do — and if anyone of them join Mittens in siding with the Union against the reform efforts in Ohio led by Governor Kasich, then those candidates should be disqualified too.
It is THAT simple for me.
If you are pro-Union, then you should not be the Republican nominee.
If you are a candidate like Mittens Romneycare who flip-flops and forever endeavors to avoid taking any side, or offending anyone, or going on record as being against ANYTHING, then you should not be the Republican nominee.
The next president will have a herculean task in front of him…it is going to take a lot of tough and unpopular decisions to rescue this country from four years of ruin.
If a man like Mittens is not willing to stand up to the Unions in Ohio a year before the election, I don’t have any faith he’ll stand up to the Unions the day after his Inauguration either. Mittens will, of course, be too concerned with being re-elected to change his ways and start making the tough and unpopular (but correct for the country’s well-being) decisions he’s avoided his entire life. We just can’t trust this man in office — he is too much of a cephalopod slime ball…no backbone…all squishy mush…with tentacles stretched across both sides, pulling himself wherever he thinks is most advantageous for his own personal enrichment.
Can you help keep track of what the Republican candidates are saying and doing to aid the Union reform effort in Ohio?
Great Merciful Zeus. Mark your calendars…today will be looked on as the day Mittens Romneycare officially lost the Republican nomination by siding with the Labor Unions in Ohio
[ Mittens Romneycare: the Cocktail Party GOP establishment's "it's his turn candidate" who intends to do absolutely nothing to combat the public sector unions in this country...a soggy cucumber and mayonnaise sandwich if ever there was one ]
Oddly enough, today I was working on a longer essay on why, exactly, I can never bring myself to support Mittens Romneycare in any capacity. I think my list had about 14 items to begin with, before Mittens delivered #15 today when he sided with the Labor Unions in Ohio against public sector employee reform that’s much needed to save my home state from financial ruin.
I didn’t like Mittens Romneycare earlier today…but I have to say I really and truly can’t stand this man now.
While at a GOP call center in Ohio where volunteers were working hard to support Governor Kasich’s effort to rein in the out of control public sector unions, Mittens refused to support the Governor’s efforts.
Every Republican coast to coast should be supporting the decertification of the Unions, particularly those working for taxpayers.
Even Steve Jobs believed the teachers’ unions, specifically, should be annihilated.
The Unions — for decades now — have been nothing more than a funding source for the Democrat Party, where tax dollars are funneled from taxpayers into the DNC’s coffers. Democrats then vote aggressively to channel more tax dollars into union hands, so even more money goes into the DNC.
This is why almost every “blue state” controlled by the Democrat-Union coalition is bankrupt.
I have said repeatedly on this site that the Cocktail Party GOP establishment is pushing Mittens Romneycare towards the Republican nomination, but that the Left and its agenda-driven media enablers are also pushing Mittens to be the Republican nominee as well. The reason for this is simple: both the permanent political class (on either side of the aisle) and the media know that if elected Mittens would do absolutely nothing to dismantle the status quo that’s bankrupted this country.
Mittens is only interested in being president for the perks and to get his name in the history books because his father wanted to be president before him; Mittens is much like Obama in this regard, and much like Obama Mittens will do nothing to combat the public sector unions or rescue this country from bankruptcy.
I truly believe the people supporting Mittens in the current polls are those who personally benefit from the status quo and don’t want to see anything change in the way our government currently does business.
If you are someone who is fed up with the wasteful spending, the capitulation to the Unions, and the Left’s dominance of this country, then there is just no logical explanation for you ever voting for Mittens Romneycare.
He truly is “the Republican Michael Dukakis” and “Obama-Lite”.
I sincerely detest his cowardice.
He is a shamelessly self-serving and feckless Cocktail Party establishment “it’s my turn!” candidate who will do none of the things so desperately needed to turn this country around.
A vote for Mittens Romneycare is truly a vote for Obama-lite…and, as we’ve seen today, a vote for the public sector unions.
Disgusting.
Is even Massachusetts sick of Romneycare? Repeal effort is underway
[ There's a reason Americans don't want Obamacare...and it's because Obamacare is based on Romneycare, which the people of Massachusetts don't even want]
Dear HillBuzz,
Just letting you know that even blue, blue MA is fed up with Mittens RomneyCare: in fact, there’s a repeal effort going on.
Boston Globe coverage: http://articles.boston.com/2011-10-06/business/30253044_1_repeal-health-care-larger-risk-pool
Website: www.repeal-romneycare.com
It’s a great effort and something that can really influence the national election.
~Bridget L. Fay
Massachusetts
Iowa Grassroots Activists: Ron Paul Would Beat Mitt Romney & Win Iowa Caucuses
Things are looking grim for Mittens Romneycare and the Cocktail Party GOP Establishment in Iowa.
GOP Frontrunner Ron Paul beats Mittens Romneycare in this 15th edition of the Iowa 2012 Power Rankings, which has the top tier candidates listed as:
- Ron Paul
- Mittens Romneycare
- Herman Cain
- Rick “I Heart Illegals” Perry
- Rick Santorum
In a story published at IowaIndependent.com, a panel of politicos that included grassroots activists, state political reporters, consultants, and various political wonks has concluded that GOP Frontrunner Ron Paul would win the Iowa Caucuses if they were held today (today being October 17, 2011, when the story was published.)
The author of the story seems less than thrilled with this outcome, which I get used to, as a Ron Paul voter.
The Texas congressman surges to the top of our rankings for the first time, but not without caution. “If the caucuses were held today, [Paul] would win because he’s the only candidate with an excited base and an excellent organization,” a panelist noted.
“However, the caucuses being held January 3 could hurt him because a lot of his young voters will still be on Christmas break.”
The panelists have given props to the Paul organization for some time, and there is no denying that the Texan has a core group of supporters that are incredibly loyal and excited. The question, at least for our panelists, has always been if there were enough supporters to compete against a candidate that drew large swaths of social conservatives (i.e., Huckabee in 2008).
A couple of very interesting observations.
First of all, I thought Barack Hussein Obama owned the youth vote. Hasn’t the Democrat-Controlled Media told us for years that only greedy old rich people vote GOP?
Ron Paul at the Univ. of Iowa
Not according to University of Iowa senior John Twillman, chairman of the College Republicans. Last week, 1,000 college kids skipped Homecoming to attend a standing-room-only Ron Paul rally at the University of Iowa.
Twillman, who attends appearances by all Republican presidential candidates, noted,
“I think the Paul supporters — at least those I’ve seen — are much more passionate. They definitely have seen what almost four years of Barack Obama has done, and I think they will be more involved. I think they can see the real-life impacts of the policies that the President makes … So, I really think that college kids and young people in general will continue to support Ron Paul even more so than last time. I think they are already organized and I think they will get even more so and really turn out people for the caucus.”
Here’s the other interesting point.
“The biggest problem Romney has had in Iowa is the group of social conservatives that find him uniquely undesirable,” wrote a panelist. “Whether that is because of his religion or for other reasons, it doesn’t really matter because these are individuals who won’t simply not support him, but individuals who will actively pursue a strategy to prevent him from exiting Iowa with a victory. In the past that has meant some supporting a candidate they otherwise would not, just because they see an opportunity to elevate someone ahead of Romney.”
The grassroots can’t stand Mittens Romneycare. We (the grassroots) know it. The Cocktail Party GOP knows it. The Democrat-controlled media knows it. This is the first report I’ve seen that there are people actually working against Mittens on the ground in Iowa.
I know most of the people reading this are not libertarians. Most don’t believe that Ron Paul can win the nomination. But I would like to point out that candidates like Ron Paul keep the conversation focused where it is supposed to be (if you call yourself a conservative or Tea Party voter). If it weren’t for Ron Paul, would Cocktail Party GOP candidates be talking about throwing out the entire tax code? Would they be talking about the deficits? Would they be talking about the gold standard or sound money? Would they be talking about the Constitution or the 10th Amendment? Would they be talking about the Federal Reserve?
Of course not.
If you’re a conservative or Tea Party voter, you don’t have to vote for Ron Paul. But it’s better for all of us if he stays in the race if only to keep RINOs like Romneycare and Perry focused on what’s important.
NBC executives confident Obama will lose in 2012
You need to read between the lines on this one, but it’s pretty clear NBC executives are confident Obama will lose the 2012 election and that a Republican First Family will be living in the White House come January 2013.
Jon Lovett is one of Obama’s former speech writers – who left the Obama White House to write for sitcoms in Hollywood.
He just sold NBC an idea for a show about “a dysfunctional First Family” living in the White House; NBC made the unusual step of purchasing this pitch with a guaranteed commitment that the pilot will indeed air (or else NBC will have to pay Lovett a hefty penalty).
It’s unreasonable that Lovett has created a comedy show about a Democrat in the White House or that the show will be about a First Family bearing any similarities to the Obamas. Guys like Lovett, who are just starting their careers, do not make enemies in Democrat ranks by creating shows that lampoon Democrats. The Obamas seem to be especially grudge-holding by nature — and we all saw the Alinsky lengths Obama went to in 2008 to win office — so it’s ludicrous to believe Lovett would write a show that in any way contained characters resembling the Obamas.
This, to me, means Lovett and NBC are gearing up to mock the incoming 45th President and his family…who will be Republicans, and thus fair game for NBC to feature as dysfunctional in a sitcom.
The pilot commitment would not have been paid if NBC didn’t feel the next First Family would be Republican…since the show would begin airing presumably in the Fall of 2012, right around the time the new Republican president is elected.
NBC is clearly betting on Obama’s loss and trying to get this show in development so it can capitalize on the political change that’s coming…and also give the Left something to watch where NBC will make fun of the incoming administration so that Leftists don’t feel so bad about Obama’s loss.
Do you have another take on this?
