Archive for October 24th, 2011
JustiaGate: The Obama Regime’s Latest Scandal Revealed
Obama Gladhands Moammar Gadhafi In Happier Times H/T SocialStudiesCanada
A valued Hillbuzz commentator noticed that terrorist and dictator deaths during the Obama Regime seem to occur when Teh Won most needs to distract the sheeple from his latest scandal.
Perhaps this week, it’s JustiaGate: apparently a deliberate attempt to make it difficult for journalists and voters to examine the issue of natural-born citizenship as it related to both Barack Hussein Obama and John McCain during the 2008 campaign.
As explained in this article from The Examiner,
Someone was incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public; searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) – to directly construe Article 2 Section 1′s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were citizens; a definition which excludes from eligibility both Barack Obama and John McCain.
Emphasis added. H/T Alert Reader cate007.
Will the scandals never end?
The Spoiled Brats of OWS
This was written by my friend Leah in Los Angeles. I think people will find it interesting and thought-provoking. Leah has a unique perspective as you will see in this excellent piece.
The spoiled brats of OWS.
There is always a moment when an image is like a punch in the stomach – leaving me amazed and gasping for air. The whole phenomenon of OWS has been disgusting, the hatred, the anti-Semitism – the dirty hippies who have multiple higher education degrees but no job is up to their standards.
What really got me was the image of a gay kid hugging another man while holding up a sign that said: Gay Kids, don’t kill yourselves, kill your parents.
There in a nutshell is everything I hate about Gay Inc. As the parent of a gay young man – this hits me extra hard. Of course I know that there are parents out there that won’t accept their gay children – some literally kick them out of the house, others won’t acknowledge the gayness of their child and simply ignore that subject. But in this day and age, they are a minority and if gay kids are having an issue with their parents – maybe it’s time they looked at themselves before they rush to accuse their parents of ‘not accepting’ their lifestyle.
I haven’t met a single person who didn’t grapple with coming out. Being gay is being different, no one wants to be different, especially not teenagers. So the gay person goes through a period of soul searching, is this it? Is this just a phase? Will I grow out of this? At some point they realize that yes, this is it, they are gay, and they come to accept this fact about themselves. Usually they share this info first with close friends, then maybe a sibling. The parents are rarely the first to know.
By the time the kid or young adult comes out to his/her parents he is comfortable with himself. For most parents, it’s a bombshell. The child often demands full and complete acceptance from the parents – never giving them the luxury of time he had. Most parents want to reach that point – but it takes time – to adjust – to accept that their dreams of the future have just been shattered. Yes, we want our children to marry and give us grandchildren – despite all the hype – this is still a rarity in the gay community.
So the parents try, they do the best they can, but here is where the gay child fails. In many cases, gay= immature, narcissistic and self absorbed. The last thing the child will do is give his parents a chance – the same chance he gave himself – to gradually accept the situation. Any reservation, any sorrow at this news will be viewed as rejection.
And so the resentment gets deeper, at some point the parents give up – especially if the child no longer lives at home and there isn’t daily interaction. And the gay child builds up a wonderful narrative about the victimhood of his life because his parents don’t accept him 100%. To be honest, this is a normal adolescent stage – most people outgrow it – especially when they have children of their own and realize how difficult parenthood is. But most gays will never have children – let alone a real relationship with another human that lasts more than a month. So they are stuck in perpetual adolescence – hating their parents and of course wearing the badge of victim proudly.
The story that really sticks in my mind is the parents who graciously accept their son and his partner in their home as equals to the straight siblings. Yet this ungrateful man can only complain that his parents don’t really love him – since they are Republicans, they haven’t changed in every way to mirror him – so they are deeply flawed.
We as humans will never be perfect, as parents it is impossible. Yet most parents try their best, they acknowledge their mistakes, they are more flexible than anyone else in coming to terms with the curve balls that life throws our way. If the other side is so intractable – so demanding of perfection from others that they never expect from themselves – then the result is the poster seen at OWS. Of course I’m sure that sentiment resonated with many of the spoiled brats who are showing us the true face of anarchy – they all are the perpetual child – demanding to remain infants – with the adults taking care of all their needs – while giving them all the resources and freedoms to live like savage animals in our parks and streets.
Yes, I’m being very harsh here about the gay community. I have the luxury of coming to know many incredible gay men and women. I would love to think they are the silent majority, maybe they are. But Gay Inc (leadership, hate mail, anti Mormon protests) has done a yeoman’s job is giving us the impression that they aren’t. The hatred directed towards Mary Cheney for living her parent’s values is proof enough. I can’t think of a better example of a parent then Dick Cheney – yet the hatred towards him is legend. They have called upon Mary to renounce her family and embrace ‘the gay family’ – which to all appearances is what we see in OWS – filth, the hatred, the rapes and the violence.
The parent child relationship isn’t a one way street – calling for killing of parents just doesn’t fit in with the message of love and acceptance that Gay Inc is demanding but clearly isn’t willing to take on themselves.
Leah In Los Angeles.
Posted by Penny4HB
I do not have a gay child but my daughter has a number of wonderful close friends who are gay men. Two of these men grew up in Southern California and in both cases, their family has totally accepted and embraced their sons’ gay life. [One of them has a mother who told me she always hoped her son would be gay.] It’s possible that growing up gay in Southern California conveys an easier acceptance than other areas of our country. I don’t know. This entire OWS phenomenon is bringing back very bad memories of the 60s protests while I was in college. The only difference seems to be that in the 60s they were basically protesting the Vietnam War (though it morphed into protests against other issues, resulting in a lot of hate being exhibited then too, like today’s protests). I think those protests in the 60s ushered in the beginning of a social degradation in our country, and it seems that generation of hippies is still around, and have raised more generations of ungrateful hippies.
What do you think?
Where does the Left get the idea that Republicans want to “round up gays” and put us in camps?
Here’s something I’d like to accomplish this week — to research where the lie originates that Republicans want to “round up” gays, lock us in camps, and kill us.
Go ahead and laugh, but I swear I see this lie repeated over and over again in the gay community. It’s something the Gaystapo goon squad uses to bully gays to never consider voting conservative or for a Republican candidate.
This “Republicans are evil and want to round us up!” trope is rolled out not only in the low-information circles of Facebook, but in many gay publications that claim to be at least somewhat credible.
I’d love to work up a dissection of where this lie comes from, who originates it, and why the Left feels it’s so effective at keeping gay voters on the Democrat reservation (where they blindly vote against their own economic best interests because the DNC keeps telling them that if you are gay you must vote Democrat — since, according to the lie, Republicans are evil and want to murder gays).
The 2012 election is going to be the nastiest and most emotionally-charged in our lifetime. The Left currently enjoys power like never before, and will not give it up without an epic fight.
I really want to do something to prohibit the Left from using this “Republicans want to round you up and kill you” lie in the gay community in the year ahead…and taking this Alinsky cudgel away from the Left requires a solid look at where this lie comes from, who spreads it, and why the Left needs to rely so heavily on it.
Thoughts?
The attacks on Herman Cain are being deliberately coordinated by the Left using the Gaystapo goon squad
I’ve noticed a sustained and orchestrated attack on Herman Cain developing in all of the gay publications and websites the Left typically uses as a test kitchen for poisonous attacks against conservatives to be rolled out nationwide.
Previously, the Left had percolated these sorts of attacks against Michele Bachmann…but the gay publications — like The Windy City Times and ChicagoPride.com here in Boystown — are now completely ignoring her. This is a strong indication the Left no longer believes Bachmann poses Obama any sort of threat in the 2012 election. Either the Gaystapo believes she’s been completely marginalized by the attacks lobbed against her, or her campaign’s imploded to the point where revovery’s deemed impossible.
Either way, the Alinsky Machine is now turned towards Herman Cain.
I’ve been monitoring Facebook all weekend, where I’ve seen attacks on Herman Cain put forth with increasing steam by the “trendsetters” in gay circles.
There’s a reason why you should be interested in and care about this: it’s because the Left consistently uses the gay publications to rev up attacks and implement the DNC’s strategy against particular conservatives. If you pay attention to what the gay publications are doing politically, and if you watch how aggressively the attacks are rebroadcast across platforms like Facebook and Twitter, you’ll see the Left’s strategies are almost always telegraphed well in advance.
Republicans have always been so foolish not to pay more attention to this. The gay publications are almost completely ignored by GOP consultants…probably because so many of them want never to be caught looking at sites with hot guys in speedos plastered all over them.
I freely admit 90% of what’s on a site like ChicagoPride.com is junk (or photographs of various strangers’ barely-concealed junk), but there are valuable insights into the Left’s attack plans obvious in the gay publications’ political pages.
Herman Cain is a very interesting case, in that he was completely absent from the Left’s radar until just a few weeks ago.
That means it’s easy to look back over the last month and chart the attacks rolled out against him, and where they originated.
I believe looking at how the Left gins up hatred against a specific conservative — like Herman Cain — is important because the only way to defeat the Alinsky Machine is to develop a strategic plan to thwart most of these attacks before they are allowed to really take hold.
The Cocktail Party GOP establishment’s myriad consultants have either incompetently or deliberately forever allowed the Left’s Alinsky Methods to work — in election after election.
Haven’t you had enough of seeing this junk repeated unchallenged against every new face who emerges on the conservative scene?
God vs. Allah
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7qjsAy4EPA&feature=player_embedded
During yesterday’s mass at St. Peter’s in Vatican City, a man climbed out onto the balcony and yelled to the crowd below “Pope, where is Christ?” just before he lit a Bible on fire. He then threw the burning Bible to the crowd below. Pope Benedict’s bodyguards were able to talk the man back to safety and the mass went on as scheduled. The incident took only about 2 minutes and everyone seemed unfazed…including the Pope. I bet things like this happen all the time at the Vatican.
But…what would have happened if this man had been in Mecca during a Friday prayer and had decided to burn a Quran? Surely he would not be alive today. He would either have been beheaded or stoned to death on the spot.
I hate it when people say that Allah and God are the same. It is true that Muslims believe that their Allah is the same God that is in our Bible but most Christians do not believe that Allah is the same. Allah and God command very different things….so how could they be the same? Allah condemns non-believers to Hell while the God of the Bible is loving and forgiving. A Muslim cleric would have ordered this Bible-burning man to be executed if he had burned a Quran but Pope Benedict did not condemn him at all. In fact…I bet Pope Benedict prayed for this man.
I am definitely not an expert on religion but it is obvious to me that comparing Allah to God is like comparing apples to oranges.
Allah is non-tolerant and unforgiving….while our God is very tolerant and loving and forgiving.
So I’ll ask again….how could they be the same?
Hillbuzz Open Thread: October 24, 2011
[ Something fun above to start the week...an amazing advance in technology that's captivating Europe in outdoor displays that's sure to be incorporated into advertisements in the US very soon...could be something important we see something of during the 2012 elections]
What’s happening in your world today?
Are your friends and family paying attention to the 2012 election yet?
Do they know about Solyndra? Fast & Furious? Violations of the War Powers Act?
Do they know that the Pee Party is funded by America-hating Marxists, just like our president?
What are people talking about?
