Archive for July, 2010
QUESTION: What is gay-face and is it real?
Click to embiggen
We always like it when those of you out there chime in and let us know that a term we use is alien to you. We’re more than happy to clarify it, because here in Boystown we take for granted that you know what we’re talking about most of the time, even though a lot of our friends are go-go boys, drag queens, motorcycle-riding lesbians, circus people, failed sitcom stars, washed up musicians, and the like.
So, when we say someone like Lindsey Graham, Mark Kirk, Aaron Schock, or others have “gay-face”, we assume you know what we mean.
Here’s the Urban Dictionary’s (the very first place we always go when we don’t know a slang term someone is using) definition of “gay-face”:
We think gay-face (or gayface, depending on how you spell it), is nature’s way of warning observant women so that they don’t become Katie Holmes or Kelly Preston. We don’t think there’s a lesbian equivalent of this, but then again, we don’t know of many lesbians who try to trick straight men into marrying them, or who go around town with straight men pretending these are their boyfriends. In our experience, only gay men use beards, and we’re not talking the kind that qualify you for discounts at Touche or other leather bars.
Gay-face, we believe, is a guy’s soul betraying him through his eyes, mainly. He’s working so hard to fool the world, and in many cases is trying to keep his voice low in register, his hands from flipping about when he talks, all the while stifling the FABULOUSSSSSSS! that’s just bursting inside him, desperate to come out.
Gay-face is that pained look in a guy’s eyes that tells you he’d rather be talking about the Golden Girls or Buffy instead of pretending to enjoy whatever baseball game is on the television.
Gay-face is the betraying “something” just behind the eyes that says this guy would rather be having a St. Germaine on the rocks at Sidetrack in a tank top instead of attending whatever the heck function he’s stuck at over in the Cubby Bear, wearing a jacket and button-up shirt, pretending he’s a straight, confirmed-bachelor, Republican from Peoria.
Gay-face is so obvious to all of us, and to other gay guys in Boystown, that it’s second-nature to spot it. And, no, it’s not limited to just Republicans hiding in the closet like Graham, Kirk, and Schock. Rahm Emanuel has serious gay-face. So does the current “president”, Dr. Utopia. There’s a host of young male celebrities starting their careers in Gay-Face, following in the footsteps of older stars like Tom Cruise, John Travolta, Robin Williams, and Tab Hunter, Troy Donahue, Rock Hudson, James Dean, and others before that.
We can look at old sepia-toned photos from the Victorian era and detect Gay-Face. A lot of oil paintings from the days before photography have clear Gay-Face in them too. Perhaps Gay-Face is even present in tomb carvings and cave scribblings, for someone discerning enough to spot it.
As long as there have been gay dudes trying to pretend to be something they are not, and trying to trick people (especially women) into believing they are gung-ho, He-Men, heterosexuals there has probably been Gay-Face to even the odds and spare these women from heartache.
Some women, of course, choose to ignore the Gay-Face and marry these guys anyway (usually because they get some sort of a big pay day out of it, like becoming the First Lady of Florida…or the United States). Some, unbelievably, can’t even spot it, which tells us someone in the universe must hate them, because they end up as Ariana Huffington.
Can you spot Gay-Face, now that we’ve explained it?
Do you have any other good examples of this phenom?
If the Islamic Victory Mosque in New York is allowed, then what other insanely offensive buildings will Democrats green-light in the years ahead?
Click above to embiggen, and ask yourself if Democrats would allow this to happen too?
Democrats are supporting the construction of the 13-story Islamic Victory Mosque at Ground Zero in New York, to commemorate what Muslims call “a spectacular and historic attack upon the United States”, much like Muslims commemorated their siege of Europe by building a massive mosque complex in Cordoba, Spain. “Cordoba House”, not coincidentally, is the name the Saudi wahabbists have given to the shell corporation that bought land at Ground Zero for the construction of what will be North America’s largest mosque.
Democrats are aiding Muslims with the planning and construction of this Monument to Islamization.
We ask the question: if they are supporting this monstrosity, what other sick and twisted abominations would Democrats sign on to?
Where would they draw the line?
QUESTION: What do you know about Cedra Crenshaw, and how can we help her drive the Left crazy?
It's going to take a lot of Moms to clean up the mess the Oppressives are making in this country.
We have to admit we know very little about Cedra Crenshaw, but have promised some good friends, who are big supporters of hers, that we’ll use this weekend to learn as much as we can about her. Our friend Althea is wild about Cedra, and actually knows her personally. If Althea likes you, you’re usually gold in our book, so more likely than not after reading up on her we’ll be all about Cedra, too.
But, we need your help to do the research on her so that we can in good conscience recommend her to others…and see what we can do for her on the ground here in Illinois. If the Democrat Machine wanted to Alice Palmer this candidate off the ballot (the way Obama did to his opponents back in 1996), then there must be something Democrats fear about this woman.
It actually puts us in mind of what Democrats would do if Althea herself was on the ballot: a smart, witty, sharp on her feet, gorgeous black woman who does not back the Race Industry and Democrat Machine in Chicago. That’s a bigger nightmare for these Lefties than a group of gay guys in Boystown beating down the Left with ever fiber in their being.
When Democrats’ bloc-voting, demographically-separated, favorite pets start turning against them like this, all Hell’s in danger of breaking loose.
Give us your take on Cedra Crenshaw in this post and tell us if you think her campaign is strategically worth putting some of our ground game time into.
*******************
Check this video of Cedra out. Like we said before, Althea is not wrong about people: she says Cedra is the real deal and has asked us to go all-in for her. We need more Moms in office, and more Mama Grizzlies out there to kick the Left’s can nine ways to Sunday.
Looks like a Senator Crenshaw would do just that.
Our thoughts on Hottie McAwesome, Senator Scott Brown – July 2010 update
Click above to embiggen
For those of you who have some sort of short-term amnesia, we went all-in to elect Scott Brown Senator from Massachusetts back in January.
We decided to do this for two reasons:
(1) To take “The Kennedy Seat” back for the people of Massachusetts
(2) To put the living fear of God into Democrats nationwide, since “The Kennedy Seat” was considered the most safe elected position in the nation. If “The Kennedy Seat” could be captured, Liberalism itself, as a pseudo-religion, would be proved fallible. It would be like destroying Mecca or Medina to Muslims, the absolute most unthinkable, impossible thing these fanatics could imagine.
What prompted us to go all-in for Brown was the December 24th, 2009 vote in the Senate where every single Democrat voted for passage of Obamacare, without a single damn one of them reading the bill or understanding its ramifications. That was the day we permanently broke with the Democrat Party — when we realized that having Democrats in office is a bad thing for this country.
We were warned by Democrats in Chicago that backing Scott Brown would have consequences for us on a personal level, since the Left had been itching to take a direct swipe at us for being a thorn in their side for so long. We were also told we were vulnerable, on a personal level, because of the December 2009 actions of Fran Eaton at Illinois Review — who, acting at the urging of a man calling himself “The Prophet” here in Chicago — published one of our real names and photograph on her site, deliberately outing us and giving the Left a means of attack.
Eaton knew what she was doing. This was retaliation for us turning over evidence against “The Prophet” to a political candidate “The Prophet” was trying to undermine. We stopped that from happening, “The Prophet” knew it was us, and so “The Prophet” had Fran Eaton run a story that outed one of us, essentially handing him over to the Left for them to ruin his life. Such is politics in Chicago.
Incidentally, for her service, we’re told Fran Eaton got a large cake. Chocolate, we think it was. That’s all it took. Cake. Not even from a bakery either, just from Dominicks’ grocery store, the kind of cake in the white cardboard boxes with the clear plastic window, ready-made to have “Thanks for outing him, Fran” written on it in orange frosting with little flourishes and curly-qs. A cake that, when presented to Fran Eaton, lasted about as long in her possession as fish heads dropped into Oprah’s feeding pool at Harpo Studios.
After Fran Eaton exposed one of us like this, rendering him vulnerable, we were told to not make waves with Scott Brown, to stop revving people up to help him, and to no longer fundraise for him — because it was too high profile a race and the Hottie McAwesome schtick we were running was too effectively countering the attacks the Left was trying to make regarding the Cosmo centerfold Brown posed for while he was in law school.
We’ve never let bullies shut us down before, and we wanted to see Brown retake “The Kennedy Seat” for the people of Massachusetts. So, Fran Eaton, Illinois Review, “The Prophet”, and the Left be damned…we went all-in for Brown, and we’ve never once regretted that.
Some of you out there, however, are infected with the Leftist-manufactured, Media-spread Republican disease known as “purism”. One of the side effects of this debilitating illness is the inability to see how easily you are played by the Media. ”Purists” have an irrational perception of what a Republican in office should be, though this standard is never applied equally to all Republicans out there. While we find the “Weird Sisters” of Maine to be frustrating at times, we understand that Maine Republicans are different from Republicans in other more conservative states…so sometimes Senators Collins and Snowe need to vote with Democrats on certain issues to keep the Democrats in their state from using a lockstep GOP voting record against them the next time they are up for re-election. As much as we don’t like it when the Sisters do this, we like having them in the Senate more than we’d like having Democrats in their place. To keep those two Maine seats in GOP hands, compromise must be understood and accepted every now and again.
Now, we hear constant attacks made on the Weird Sisters for doing the things they do to largely cover their butts in anticipation of their next election. We very rarely, if ever, hear Republicans complain about Lindsey Graham in South Carolina, who is from a conservative state, but who votes with Democrats on issues conservatives want him to vote against. Graham does this because he is a closeted homosexual whom the Left is blackmailing into voting the way they want him to. It’s as plain as day, and Graham has the most obvious case of gay-face of any man who is not Mark Kirk or Aaron Schock.
Yet, Graham gets a free pass. The Weird Sisters don’t. And neither does Scott Brown, for having to vote the way his constituents want him to in certain areas.
The Media is very clearly driving the “purist” attacks against Brown, while making sure no rebellion against Democrat-controlled gay puppets like Graham ever forms. The Left wants Brown out of the Senate at the first available opportunity, because the Left insists that is “The Kennedy Seat” and intends to go to all-out war to take it back. On a daily basis, the Left tries to alienate Scott Brown from his support base by driving constant wedges in his constituency with every vote he casts. The man cannot win, no matter what he does.
If he votes with the GOP on an issue, he’s depicted as a radical by the Media, in hopes that will drive away moderates and independents who supported him over Martha Coakley.
If he votes with Democrats on an issue, because THAT’S WHAT HIS CONSTITUENTS WANT, he’s cast as a traitor to the conservatives who supported him nationwide, and the Media prints reams of paper with a “Toldja So!” bent, trying to convince Brown supporters they were duped and betrayed by the former centerfold.
If any of you believe a Republican Senator from Massachusetts was meant to be the most stalwart conservative in the Senate, then you need to have your medication adjusted and check yourself back into the sporks-only group home where you’ll never be allowed anything sharp again. You’ve missed your nap time, now hurry home. There are horse tranquilizers and electric shock therapies with your names on them.
Scott Brown remains Hottie McAwesome to us because he’s serving precisely the purpose we thought he’d serve: his mere existence is a psychological thorn in Democrats’ sides. The fact a Republican is now sitting in Ted Kennedy’s old chair, using his old desk, and looking out his old window every day keeps many Leftists in bed all day, moaning. It’s a wonderful, wonderful thing. We have it on good authority the Kennedy Family itself, at various events, uses language to describe Scott Brown that would make sailors blush. HRH Princess Caroline of Kennedy has thrown rocks glasses full of various beverages at walls when his name has come up. Imagining Princess losing it like this, knowing a Republican has taken back “her family’s seat”, is like Christmas coming every single day.
Scott Brown, from everything we’ve heard from people who’ve met him, is a very nice guy. He is exactly what we expected him to be, and he’s working hard in the Senate for his constituents. If you don’t live in Massachusetts, and if you aren’t communicating with him as a resident of his state, then you shouldn’t be angry with the man for working hard on behalf of the people who sent him to Washington.
If Brown votes even ONCE in a way that Martha Coakley wouldn’t have, it’s a win for everyone nationally.
His mere presence in the Senate alters the calculus for what Democrats can and can’t do. He is a monkey wrench in all of their plans. He forces them to augment all of their crazy plans, because they cannot count on an automatic YES vote from what used to be “The Kennedy Seat”.
If Republicans want to pull their “purist” obsession out, you need to direct that at guys like Lindsey Graham, who are deserving of it.
Graham has NO EXCUSE for not toeing the GOP line on every vote. He’s from a conservative state, and is never in danger of losing his seat for being conservative. And, yet, more often than not, when the Democrats need a Republican to cave on something, they look to Graham, dangle proof of his secret flaming gay life in front of him, then issue him his marching orders…which Graham happily skips to.
Why Graham gets this break from people who seem to thrive on attacking Brown is just beyond us.
Maybe you could all shed some light on this in the comments below. We’d really like a fuller explanation of this.
Friday Open Thread: July 23rd, 2010
What’s on your minds this Friday?
What are people talking about in your part of the country?
*******************************************************
H/t AceofSpades for this awesomeness:
MUST WATCH: Pat Condell on stopping the Islamic Victory Mosque at Ground Zero
Living in Britain, Pat Condell has watched the Islamization of Europe for the last 30 or so years. It’s too late to save the Old World, which Leftists have handed over to Islam…but there’s still a chance to save America. That starts with stopping this Islamic Victory Mosque from being built at Ground Zero.
It’s a big task, since Democrats want this Islamic Victory Mosque built, and Democrats control the government right now.
But, conservatives, independents, and moderates vastly outnumber the Leftists.
We just need to mobilize all these people against the Islamic Victory Mosque, and against the Left in general.
You need to listen to Pat Condell…and then you need to start speaking up the way he does. Whether people want to listen or not, they need to hear this.
A Class vs. Crass for the Race Industry: help us name it
We have an idea for a series we’d like to ultimately turn into TV commercials, possibly using actors or maybe just animating somehow.
In the 1930s/40s Superman was used to great effect to takedown the Ku Klux Klan by making the klansmen seem as ridiculous as possible, while using the readily identifiable Superman character as the bridge to get average Americans to pay attention to how ridiculous the Klan really was. Prior to this, the Klan was feared, and allowed largely to operate in the shadows, terrifying people, both white and black alike.
It’s high time someone gave the Race Industry the same treatment — with the end result being that Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Henry Gates, Eric Holder, Spike Lee, James Clyburne, John Lewis, Donna Brazile, and the rest of this nation’s most notorious race-baiters get laughed out of any room they enter, just like a Grand Dragon or an Exalted Cyclops would in the year 2010.
The Race Industry employs the same threats, intimidation, hit lists, and fear mongering the Ku Klux Klan used to get what it wanted for so long — until the public saw those lunatics for what they were, stopped being afraid of them, stopped giving them “protection money”, and started pointing and laughing whenever any of their leaders appeared in public to rant, rave, and carry on like usual.
We’ve been using the Goofus & Gallant-inspired “Class vs. Crass” series to highlight the ridiculous things the current First Lady does, in contrast to the way former occupants of that unelected office comported themselves.
We’d like to do something similar, with a different name, to showcase things the Race Industry declares RAAACIST! that normal people see as just happenstance in life. When some black people fail a test, they call the test RAAACIST! while normal people would just admit they didn’t study hard enough to pass it. When people like Henry Gates make it to a counter, and they’re out of doughnuts, Gates screams RAAACISM! while normal people just realize they should have gotten their lazy butts up an hour earlier and they would have had some Krispy Kremes left. When Al Sharpton gets rained on, he screams RAAACIST! at the clouds high above (even though they, too, are black) instead of admitting he should have taken his damn umbrella with him.
We believe, to a large extent, that the only real racism committed in this country for the last several decades has been perpetrated by black people, against whites, Hispanics, and the other minorities that blacks compete with for jobs and public benefits. Wailing and screeching about RAAACISM! has become, for the black community, similar to an infant in a crib crying for a bottle. People like Sharpton, Jackson, and Gates have purposefully made the black community dependent on the government for so much, and have trained black people to screech RAAACISM! whenever they want something, that they’ve infantilized an entire segment of the population (much to Democrats’ joy, because that makes blacks all the easier for the DNC to keep as pets…to trot out in force on election day, then ignore in the back yard the rest of the year until they are useful again).
Taking the screeches of RAAACISM! away from Democrats will cause the Race Industry to collapse, and without the Race Industry to keep black people as pets and/or perpetual children, the black community will at last have a chance to wise up, step up, and start to join the entrepreneurial and professional classes by working hard, not expecting handouts from the government, and not looking to Democrats to send pork and freebies their way.
What’s a good name, in the Goofus/Gallant and Class vs. Crass vein, for a series of compare/contrast photo essays that will highlight the ridiculousness of the Race Industry’s constant RAAACISM! cries?
Start brainstorming…and include any ideas you have for installments of the series as well.
********************
UPDATE: So far, our favorite suggestion has come from EricP, who brought up the idea of “Pride & Prejudice” for the series.
We could actually twist that a few different ways:
(1) Pride vs. Prejudice
(2) Pride & Prejudice
(3) Pride in Prejudice
The pride side would have black leaders behaving properly…the prejudice side would showcase the Race Industry at its worst.
List of offensive things that would not be allowed to be built next to each other
Can you help us think of buildings that would be considered offensive if built next to one another, but would be allowed to be constructed in another part of town?
This can be in any realm, such as a strip club not being allowed next to an elementary school because of the negative influence it would have on the children.
Or, it can be like a new landfill being forbidden on land adjacent to a reservoir, because of the pollution that dump would cause to the drinking supply.
Christian buildings are not allowed ANYWHERE in Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations.
What other buildings are prevented because they would offend, damage, pollute, or inconvenience the neighborhoods someone wants to build them in?
We’re going to use these ideas in some graphics we have planned to help stop the Islamic Victory Mosque at Ground Zero, so we’d appreciate not only you putting on your thinking caps and getting creative on this one, but also reaching out to your Facebook and email lists and helping us come up with as large a list as possible here.
We need to stir public sentiment up against building this Victory Mosque at the location Islam wants it…and one of the ways we can make this happen is to show just how commonplace it is for communities to refuse to allow a certain kind of building at a certain kind of location because of the harm that building would do to a community.
********************
Some favorites so far:
(1) Day Care Center next to Dingo Wildlife Preserve
(2) Robert K. Byrd Klan Memorial next to Martin Luther King Jr. Center and Burial Place
(3) Pork Processing Plant next to Any Random Mosque
(4) Westboro Baptist Church next to VFW Hall
(5) Ted Kennedy Memorial next to A Driving School, Bar, or Women’s Shelter
(6) Obama Campaign Office next to Man’s Country in Andersonville
(7) The Elizabeth K. Christie Foundation HQ next to A Boy Scout Jamboree
(8) Dairy Queen next to a Weight Watcher’s
(9) Fast Food Restaurants that were kept out of “village square” setups in small towns, because the locals did not like their aesthetics and they would hamper small businesses
Our experience with Journolist member (and committed Obama operative) Ben Smith during the 2008 general election
It was interesting to see Ben Smith, from Politico.com, listed as a member of Journolist — the committed Obama operatives in the Media who banded together to make sure negative stories about their Lightbringer were quashed while attacks were coordinated to label anyone opposing Obama “RAAACIST” during the 2008 campaign.
We had a brief encounter with Smith during September and October of 2008, where he repeatedly refused to run a story we were involved in that would have damaged Obama and drawn closer attention to his continued and longstanding ties to terrorist bomber William Ayers.
Here in Chicago, we’re friends with a woman who used to give the Obama girls swimming lessons. She, and others who worked in the Obama/Rezko Mansion for various projects and assignments, was a source for a lot of what we know about The Lightbringer personally (his affinity for men, his Parkinson’s disease, his chain-smoking and continued drug use, etc.). Between people who’d worked for the City with Michelle, people who attended Trinity United with the Obamas, and people who lived and worked in Hyde Park near the Obama/Rezko Mansion, we collected many anecdotes that raised a lot of questions about the man the Media was pushing to be our next president…if any journalist wanted to follow any of these leads.
The McCain campaign approached us with a story they had on Obama, which needed a second source to confirm. They had found a young woman in Hyde Park who had played with the older Obama girl on occasion, and knew about babysitting William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn did for the Obama girls. The young woman was the daughter of a McCain supporter in Hyde Park (probably the only McCain supporter in Hyde Park), and was barely a teenager. The McCain camp went to Ben Smith with this story, but he refused to look into it because the only witness to the Ayers/Dohrn babysitting operation was a teenaged girl who happened to be the daughter of a McCain supporter.
We were charged with finding someone else who could verify that Ayers/Dohrn babysat the Obama girls. We brought their old swimming instructor up, and Ben Smith shot that person (now a respected advertising executive) down because she, too, was a Republican and a McCain supporter. So, Ben Smith refused to do a write-up on the Ayers/Dorhn babysitting…despite getting two different people who didn’t know each other to verify that this happened on more than one occasion.
When you look at a map of the Hyde Park area, you see Louis Farrakhan, the Obama/Rezko Mansion, and the William Ayers residence in very close proximity to one another…about as close to each other as The Gap, Banana Republic, and Express are to each other in a typical suburban mall. Walking distance. So close, young children could easily walk between the houses without parents worrying about them.
It was impossible to prod the Media into doing any sort of investigative story on Obama, in any way, shape, or form. Ben Smith was not the only reporter we went to with this story. But, he’s the most memorable because he kept playing games with us. ”Get me someone else, someone more important, someone who is not a Republican, and I’ll do the story,” he said. Which made us waste a great deal of time running through contacts and leads trying to do the work of actual reporters, trying to flesh out this story.
To this day, the majority of people in Chicago won’t talk about the Obamas, for fear of their careers being ruined. The Left is vindictive and irrational. Anyone seen as working against Dr. Utopia, The Lightbringer, must be taken out. People are afraid to talk, and will probably remain that way until Obama leaves office. At which time, we expect all the flood gates to open. Secrets can’t be hidden forever.
Ultimately, every “journalist” involved with Journolist or who otherwise served as an Obama operative in 2008 will be exposed, and their careers will be ruined.
We hope the public makes the connection that absent the Journolist members and the support they gave Obama, perhaps he would not have been elected and then maybe many in the public would still have gainful employment in an economy that was not deliberately ruined so our wealth could be redistributed.
We hope the public’s ire is turned full-blast at people like Ben Smith. That’s long overdue.
QUESTION: Who are the Oppressive "journalists" identified as Obama operatives in the Journolist Scandal?
Do you know what's really creepy? Rahm Emanuel actually looks BETTER as a space lizard than he does as the closet case, sallow, Chief of Staff he usually is.
This whole “Journolist” scandal reminds us of the early 1980s miniseries V, and the way the lizard people from the planet Repton co-opted the news media to do their bidding, including choosing select members of the Media to be their spokespeople (and, kind of, pets). The Media betrayed not only their oath to journalism, if there is such a thing, but their own countries and the human race in general, by becoming puppets for the aliens’ cause.
They may not have been snacking on hamsters and parakeets themselves, but they made sure those who were stayed in power. The cult of personality the Vs created for themselves (with Media help) maintained its sway over the public because these “journalists” sold out, and in doing so sold their readers and viewers down the river.
The Media we have in this country today is revolting. It’s high time Americans revolted against it. Identifying which members of the Media were full-time Obama operatives and members of Journolist during the 2008 campaign is the first step towards taking back the airwaves from the White House’s propaganda department.
The list of known members to date of the left-wing now-defunct JournoList listserv.
Spread the word. www.facebook.com/note.php
1. Ezra Klein
2. Dave Weigel
3. Matthew Yglesias
4. David Dayen
5. Spencer Ackerman
6. Jeffrey Toobin
7. Eric Alterman
8. Paul Krugman
9. John Judis
10. Eve Fairbanks
11. Mike Allen
12. Ben Smith
13. Lisa Lerer
14. Joe Klein
15. Brad DeLong
16. Chris Hayes
17. Matt Duss
18. Jonathan Chait
19. Jesse Singal
20. Michael Cohen
21. Isaac Chotiner
22. Katha Pollitt
23. Alyssa Rosenberg
24. Rick Perlstein
25. Alex Rossmiller
26. Ed Kilgore
27. Walter Shapiro
28. Noam Scheiber
29. Michael Tomasky
30. Rich Yesels
31. Tim Fernholz
32. Dana Goldstein
33. Jonathan Cohn
34. Scott Winship
35. David Roberts
36. Luke Mitchell
37. John Blevins
38. Moira Whelan
39. Henry Farrell
40. Josh Bearman
41. Alec McGillis
42. Greg Anrig
43. Adele Stan
44. Steven Teles
45. Harold Pollack
46. Adam Serwer
47. Ryan Donmoyer
48. Seth Michaels
49. Kate Steadman
50. Matt Duss
51. Laura Rozen
52. Jesse Taylor
53. Michael Hirsh
54. Daniel Davies
55. Jonathan Zasloff
56. Richard Kim
57. Thomas Schaller
58. Jared Bernstein
59. Holly Yeager
60. Joe Conason
61. David Greenberg
62. Todd Gitlin
63. Mark Schmitt
64. Kevin Drum
65. Sarah Spitz
Sources: (http://www.politicsdaily.com/… (http://www.politico.com/news/… (http://yglesias.thinkprogress… (http://hotair.com/archives/20… (http://www.slate.com/blogs/bl… (http://justoneminute.typepad…. (http://www.guardian.co.uk/com… (http://www.frumforum.com/the-… (http://twitter.com/TimFernhol… (http://twitter.com/DanaGoldst… (http://www.talkleft.com/story… (http://www.frumforum.com/resp… (http://dailycaller.com/2010/0… (http://dailycaller.com/2010/0… (http://dailycaller.com/2010/0… Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/40072_Page2.html#ixzz0uS0Ydlm8
