Archive for June, 2010
RESEARCH NEEDED: Oil Lake in the Gulf and upcoming Hurricane Season
Yesterday, as we were reading more about the Gulf Oil Disaster the Obama Administration caused with its lax regulation and disregard for safety procedures, we caught a few lines about a massive 100 mile “lake” of oil that’s settled on the bottom of the Gulf. We can’t find the article we read this in, but it was an interview with a man who has written books on world petroleum reserves, including one about Saudi Arabia’s lies regarding just how much oil it really has (not as much as it claims).
In the article, the expert was talking about the Obama Administration’s failure to pump out this Lake of Oil that’s at the bottom of the Gulf. Apparently, in addition to being 100 miles wide, it’s three or four feet thick. That’s a lot of oil just sitting there that the Obama White House is pretending doesn’t exist, or is insisting is someone else’s responsibility.
The article called for BP to be removed from this situation completely, and for the US Navy to take up the operation….and to begin pumping that oil lake out of the water and into tankers…BEFORE HURRICANE SEASON.
This is the part that really caught our attention, because what’s going to happen in just a month or two will be much, much worse than Katrina…and we have to wonder if Obama’s either so incompetent he’ll let this happen because of his chronic dithering or if he actually WANTS this disaster to destroy the Gulf states, just because he likes watching the world burn.
Think about it: all of that oil in the deep water. Sitting there. Not moving.
Hurricane season rolls in. Even the deepest water is affected by that massive push of weather.
The Hurricane whirls and swirls and churns through the Gulf, raising that Oil Lake and pushing it towards the Gulf Coast.
If you think the oil washing up NOW is a problem, just wait until August and September. What if another Katrina hits this year, coupled with all that oil from Obama Lake that’s formed in the Gulf?
What happens then…and how will the Left blame Bush for this one?
We want to learn more about this Oil Lake, and figure out who the author of these petroleum books was so we can read more of his work and get a better handle on all of this.
It’s something that’s going to be an issue for many years to come, and one of the things the incoming Palin Administration is going to have to deal with in a big way once the Governor takes office in 2013. We hope we don’t have to wait that long to have someone who knows what she’s doing in charge of the Gulf cleanup, but if Obama’s fey dithering and blame-pointing is any indication of his intended ongoing behavior, this disaster sure seems like it’s going to get a lot worse before it gets any better.
QUESTION: Why is Bill Clinton campaigning for Harry Reid in Nevada?
Yesterday, some of you asked us why Bill Clinton is campaigning for Harry Reid in Nevada.
President Clinton does a lot of interesting things every day that we’re sure drive a great many people crazy…not the least, we’re sure, are his own wife and daughter.
We’ve met the man a great number of times and have seen him in action at campaign events large and small — he genuinely, more than anyone else we’ve ever known, loves campaigning. Whether it’s for himself, his wife, his friends, or people he doesn’t even really know…he loves giving speeches, shaking hands, posing for pictures, and being smiled and waived at.
That’s not a criticism, but an observation. His face lights up, he’s in the moment, and he seems to relish every second of this.
We’ve also very rarely ever heard of him turning down anyone’s request for help. Here in Chicago, just about any organization that asks him for assistance will get his consideration, and if he can work it into his schedule and squeeze it into his commitments for the Clinton Foundation, President Clinton will come to the rescue.
We think, aside from being a good person who helps people, he has a bit of a superman complex to him…in that he believes he’s often the only one who can save someone from the fire, and yank victory from the jaws of defeat.
So, in thinking about him campaigning for Harry Reid in Nevada, here are a few thoughts that cross our mind, concurrently:
(1) President Clinton was asked to help someone, so he’s on his way to help.
(2) President Clinton knows Harry Reid is going to lose no matter what happens, so this might be an excuse for him to go to Nevada, a state he likes.
(3) Just like with Blanche Lincoln, President Clinton knows Reid is going to lose, and Clinton thinks he can drag Reid over the finish line for a win, just for the challenge of it.
(4) President Clinton enjoys the fact Reid needs his help — because Reid worked against Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, so having to come to the Clintons for help must be humiliating for Reid, and gratifying for the Clintons.
(5) President Clinton might think saving Reid would earn a big chit for a Hillary 2016 presidential run, as Reid would owe his salvation to the Clintons.
(6) Sharon Angle might be a factor in this: because of her Scientology statements Clinton might believe Reid is now actually electable, and maybe he sees a chance to show himself as a superstar for rescuing Reid’s campaign…only investing himself in it now that he believes Reid is up against someone Clinton thinks is really beatable (we disagree with this, for the record, because though we wanted Sue Lowden as the nominee, we think Lowden, Danny Tarkanian, or Angle are all equally able to beat Reid).
(7) Clinton might be investing himself in doomed efforts he knows won’t matter much in the end…instead of applying himself to races in which he could make a real difference…because then he gets to appear to be doing something for the party, but in reality he knows he’s not saving anyone from their fates.
You could spend all day making yourselves crazy wondering why President Clinton does anything that he does.
What we default to is what we’ve observed of him with our own eyes in person: he is an incredibly smart and kind man who has a masterful perception of events around him. He is very much loved by the people who support the Clintons, and just seeing him in person is always a great joy. Part of going anywhere for him is being sort of the favorite uncle come to town for a visit, and we believe he enjoys this as much as we enjoy seeing him again whenever he’s around.
He is also a man who does not ever forget a slight, and has a memory that’s beyond impressive. So, it’s always hard for us to believe either Bill or Hillary Clinton would ever do anything to help people who hurt them in any way. What’s presented on a TV screen or in an article is often much different from what’s really going on behind the scenes. We don’t believe President Clinton would ever try to save backstabbing Harry Reid without there being a bigger, obscured picture to what’s really going on.
That’s our take on it.
QUESTION: Has Susan Traversy joined the Taliban?
The latest Taliban advisor?
Yesterday, at least 50 of you emailed us links to this article about the Taliban taking used heroin needles and medical waste and building them into their roadside bombs, in hopes of giving US and Coalition soldiers AIDS when the bombs exploded.
This sounds suspiciously like what’s written to us in hatemail by Susan Traversy in New Hampshire, one of the trolls who feverishly wishes AIDS upon gay guys who don’t support the current “president” or what he’s doing to the country. It’s long been Traversy’s dream to “stick (us) with used hospital needles to give (us) AIDS” if ever we’d set foot in New Hampshire. We’ve called her out for this before, and though her emails have now stopped, we certainly can’t forget them.
And can’t help but wonder if she’s now joined the Taliban as some sort of munitions advisor, or if she’s just writing to them, the way she seems to write to all sorts of people globally, to tell them how to do a better job. One of her rants was to some restaurant she believes plots against her and hides things in their chicken pot pies, and that makes us wonder if she told the Taliban to hide things in their bombs, or if she complained the Taliban WASN’T hiding surprises in their bombs.
How do you even write to the Taliban?
Is that like a letter to Santa, where Susan could just scribble TALIBAN in crayon on an envelope and the postal service would deliver her ravings unto evil? What should you leave the Taliban if they decide to answer your letter with a visit? Santa gets cookies and milk — how about pig’s blood and saltines for those lunatics?
What’s really intriguing about all of this is just how backwards these Islamic fanatics really are.
First off, it’s like they believe they have a big bottle o’AIDS sitting somewhere that they can dip these needles and Legos in, then pile them into bombs so that when the bombs explode, all that AIDS will just puncture itself into the bodies of the soldiers.
AIDS can’t survive outside a human host for more than 20 minutes (sorry to disappoint you, Taliban…and Susan). So, believing you can stick someone with old hospital needles and give them AIDS is just childish.
WANTING to do something like this is, of course, evil…but a childish evil that really puts who we’re dealing with in perspective.
In both Afghanistan and the wilds of New Hampshire.
QUESTION: What is behind Obama's assault on the UK?
We’re haunted by a quote from Thomas Sowell the other day, in which he wondered if it was just gross incompetence that drives this “president”, or if something more malicious and hidden was at work with his agenda. Sowell speculated on whether or not it’s Obama’s intent to ruin America — and we wonder if that same agenda includes alienating and even provoking the UK into some sort of conflict with the US.
Obama keeps insisting on calling BP by its defunct former name “British Petroleum”.
In 1998, “British Petroleum” ceased to exist when that company merged with Amoco, becoming BP Amoco. In 2001, BP Amoco devoured rivals Arco and Burmah Castol, and changed its name officially to BP.
That was nine years ago.
In the US, “British Petroleum” was never a commonly used name for the company. In Cleveland, BP once kept its corporate headquarters in the BP building on Public Square (a large, controversial bowling-trophy/tombstone looking building that ruffled Clevelanders feathers in the 80s when it was constructed because original plans called for it to be taller than the city’s mascot skyscraper, The Terminal Tower…public outcry and mobs with pitchforks and torches shortened the building, preserving the Terminal Tower’s height supremecy for another five years or so before Key Tower was built dwarfing it). It was never called “the British Petroleum building”. Just BP.
So, it’s strange Dr. Utopia keeps saying “British Petroleum”.
Why?
We can think of a few reasons, with a little prodding from Sowell:
(1) Obama is so incompetent he doesn’t know the company in question is BP, and that there exists currently no legal entity named “British Petroleum”
(2) Obama calls BP “British Petroleum” because that’s what he grew up calling it in Indonesia; just as he says “Pock-ee-sta-han” instead of “Pack-is-tan” like Americans do, this is another example of Obama’s alien nature revealing itself in terms of his cultural DNA being so wildly different from Americans’.
(3) Obama is doing this deliberately, in reference to Sowell’s “hidden agenda”, to malign the British people for a calamity the Obama administration caused by waiving the safety procedures that would have kept the Deepwater Horizon project from exploding. Obama keeps emphasizing BRITISH because the likes of David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel (and possibly even George Soros) are telling him to…so that this is perceived as a BRITISH problem, branded as a BRITISH problem, and Obama can use this to stoke anti-BRITISH sentiment that deflects the disaster away from his own inherent incompetence.
It sure feels like that last one is what’s really going on here.
And it continues a string of weird slights and slings focused on the British:
(1) Obama sends the bust of Winston Churchill back to Great Britain, despite it being a post-9/11 gift of great esteem from the British people to America. Obama makes a political statement by replacing this bust with a statue of Martin Luther King, then instead of finding a new place in the White House for this Churchill bust, he has it packed up as quickly as possible and sent back to London.
(2) The Obamas humiliate Gordon Brown by giving him discounted DVDs from Best Buy that are not even playable on British DVD players, when Brown is a blind man who can’t watch television, and Brown brought to the White House elaborate and thoughtful gifts from the British people to the American “president”. Michelle Obama gave Mrs. Brown, the Prime Minister’s wife, toy helicopters from the White House gift shop. She also specifically wore one of her ugliest dresses to meet Mrs. Brown (though, who can tell if there was malice aforethought in that, or if it was just “Tuesday”).
(3) The Obamas gave 84-year old Queen Elizabeth II an iPod with recordings of Obama speaking and Michelle making various barnyard noises (“on accident”, of course). The Queen already had an iPod, and is not an insomniac requiring any of Obama’s speeches to help her get to sleep at night.
(4) When Brown next visited the US as Prime Minister, Obama refused to have dinner with him, and instead apparently hunkered down with Kal Penn to get up to whatever those two would do together when he was still working in the White House as “Assistant Director of Important Things Requiring A Hollywood Actor’s Constant Presence Near the President”, or whatever his title was. Maybe they didn’t want to share their White Castle with Brown. Apparently, some people out there really, really love those little square patties (and Obama seems the type to drool over those buns).
We believe you have to look at everything this White House does from the perspective of David Axelrod, because all moves this administration makes are 100% in keeping with what Axelrod’s consulting company used to do for both political campaigns and corporations in trouble. He is a brand-manager. He astroturfs for a living. He has been a very successful guerilla marketer and opinion manipulator.
The White House wants to brand this disaster as a BRITISH problem, partly because Obama characteristically wants to deflect the problem onto someone else, the way he does everything else, and partly because it seems both Obamas appear to have a natural hatred and contempt for all things British.
Rational thought and competence are wholly lacking at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue right now.
Have you, too, detected anything resembling an anti-British agenda at work in what Obama is doing?
QUESTION: Is Barack Obama responsible for the murder of a Peruvian girl?
Our good friend Jocelyn lives in Aruba for part of the year, and knows all the players involved in the Joren van der Sloot/Natalie Holloway mystery…which, we admit, we’ve never been particularly interested in because it’s always been clear to us the little psycho killed this girl and fed her body to sharks on the dark side of the island.
The way Jocelyn’s described Aruba to us, 95% of the place is surrounded by bathtub-clear, warm, water that sharks don’t particularly like…except for this one little rocky cove that’s opaque, chilled, and sharkolicious. We don’t know why van der Sloot killed this girl, but we’re pretty sure that’s where she ended up, since the island is so small and the islanders so nosy that burying her anywhere she wouldn’t have been found by now would have been impossible.
Jocelyn’s been on a tear the last few days about “president” Obama being responsible for the murder of a girl in Peru, because Obama’s FBI supposedly gave van der Sloot $10,000 to leave Aruba…for Peru…where he killed the Peruvian girl in his hotel room.
If not for Obama’s FBI, that girl would still be alive, Joceyln argues, because van der Sloot only left Aruba because of the FBI’s failed sting operation.
Apparently, Obama’s FBI was trying to trick van der Sloot into admitting he killed Natalie Holloway. The $10,000 they gave him was part of some play-acting Obama’s FBI was doing, in which during a round of charades or maybe even Boggle, van der Sloot was supposed to confess to the murder. Since Dr. Utopia has shown zero interest in meeting with BP CEO Tony Hayward or taking charge of the operation to save the Gulf, we can only imagine him hiding under the bed in an Aruban hotel room, giggling, perhaps snacking on Whole Foods gluten-free cookies, enthralled with this sting operation. He has to be doing SOMETHING all day, until the next cocktail party is scheduled, right? If he’s not in the Oval or on a Navy ship supervising Gulf operations, why shouldn’t we believe he’s Jessica Fletchering himself in Aruba with his bumbling Justice Department’s crack team of losers?
The buck never stops with this “president” on anything, so we told Jocelyn she’s wasting her breath pointing out the fact that if not for the bad decisions of this administration, on many levels, that Peruvian girl would be alive today.
We don’t know WHY Obama’s FBI allowed van der Sloot to leave Aruba with all that money and head for Peru.
BUT we can guess it had something to do with the fact that the people Obama has installed to run almost every branch of our government have absolutely no idea what they are doing, have zero executive, business, or administrative experience, and truly do believe that “hope” is a strategy for solving all crises in front of them.
See how well this is working out in the Gulf.
See how well it worked out with van der Sloot and his latest murder victim.
Obama can giggle and eat all the Whole Foods he wants while watching Harold & Kumar for the 1,000th time on DVD, but every day it’s increasingly clear this country needs a grown-up in the White House with a team of people who can get stuff done.
Thursday Open Thread: June 10th, 2010
What’s on your minds this Thursday?
What are people talking about in your part of the country?
*******************************************************
Last night, the Blackhawks won the Stanley Cup…which is great for Chicago, and a chance for another fun anecdote here in Boystown.
We’ve got Disney on the brain this past week because of our adventures in Florida, but we’ve also always thought of Chicago in terms of a big theme park, with each neighborhood being a distinct “land”. There’s Boystown, of course, which is like a gay Fantasy Land, and a place we’ve described well to you for the last two years. But just one street west there’s Clark and Wrigleyville, with a bunch of sports bars all lined up next to one another, with little tee shirt shops and souvenir places tossed in, much like the Main Street Victorian shopping mall that Disney has right at its entrance. A street east of Boystown is Broadway, with lots of shops and restaurants, and a diluted gay feel that’s also more family-friendly than Halsted itself in the heart of Boystown. We could easily describe all the other neighborhoods in Chicago like this too, with each one being distinct and different and having their own charms.
What’s really funny is that something can be happening in Boystown — like the Oscar parties or the season finale of Glee or something — and Wrigleyville won’t pay any notice. Should stragglers from Clark wander into Boystown, they’d have no idea why people are dressed up and cheering. They don’t know whether it’s Whitney Houston’s birthday or a pre-pre-Pride party, or whatever.
Likewise, when something sports-related happens in Wrigleyville, most in Boystown are clueless why people are driving around honking their horns and screaming.
Last night, at about 1030 or so when the Blackhawks won the Stanley Cup, Chicago just exploded into cheers and honking and drunken screaming. We weren’t anywhere near Clark, but could hear the commotion in the bars there. To be on the street must have been deafening. There were so many people who drove down to Wrigleyville to scream and cheer that it spilled over into Boystown, and we had people honking their horns and waving flags all down Halsted — it looked like scenes in movies where some banana republic was overthrown in a Latin American coup, and all the idiots come out to form impromptu parades cheering the anarchy.
Most guys in Boystown were clueless as to what the cheering was about — they just thought these people had done lost their minds.
Some of us here played hockey in high school and college and we all end up taking in at least one Blackhawks and Cubs game a year, but we don’t follow any sports teams and have never understood the cheering and screaming on their behalf. If we knew someone playing, that would be different, because we’d be cheering for him, the way we do when anyone we know is in a volleyball or soccer game or whatever and we watch them play. But, cheering for strangers is an alien concept to us, especially when those people are multi-millionaires. They sure don’t need our cheers or encouragement, when their salaries should be more than enough incentive to play a great game.
Now, we do love cheering for political events though, and we LOVED the results and debate watch parties we held for Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin in 2008. We also loved cheering and screaming when Hottie McAwesome Scott Brown took “the Kennedy seat” back for the people of Massachusetts from that drunken family of spiders who’d horded it in their Hyannis Port web for more than half a century.
We don’t know Hillary, the Governor, or Hottie personally, but we cheered our hearts out for them, after pouring our hearts into their campaigns.
So, last night we tried to understand the straight world a little more…and tried to appreciate the joy they were feeling in Wrigleyville because the Blackhawks won.
Today, we don’t know how much the world has changed with them winning, because next year the hockey season will just start all over again. The losing team will not be executed or thrown to lions or anything, so it’s not that people are happy the Hawks avoided some extreme punishment by winning. And they didn’t really win a prize that will impact the lives of all Chicagoans. So, we don’t know how ultimately last night’s victory affects everyone.
Not in the way the right candidate winning an election can change the course of history and save America from destruction.
Last night, we closed our eyes to block out the Hawks jerseys and logos and imagined it was November 2012 and people were cheering Obama’s defeat, and the election of President Palin and her team who’d get to work the very next day prepping everything that needed to be done to put America back on track.
THAT would be something worth assembling a makeshift parade and carrying on well into the next morning cheering ourselves hoarse over.
Glad the Hawks won, glad Wrigleyville had fun, but we just can’t help reserving that level of excitement for something we think is much more important.
QUESTION: If you aren't Jewish, why do you love Israel so much?
Here’s a reader question we received yesterday that we’d like to address: “If you aren’t Jewish, why do you love Israel so much?”.
Most of us here grew up Catholic (with Panda being something like a Unitarian, though when he says it, it sounds more like “Utilitarian”, which we don’t think is a real thing), and all of us went to private schools — so we weren’t subjected to any Leftist anti-Israel propaganda until college (though we are well aware it exists in the Chicago Public School system, where pictures of Yassir Arafat and Malcolm X are proudly displayed on classroom walls).
One of us did go to a Catholic high school where the pastor made Jew jokes every once in a while, at retreats and other small events, never in the gym for the big 1,500 person masses. Fr. Keller used to say things like, “If you’re ever in New York, make sure you have a lot of spare change in your pockets, in case Jews chase you, because then just throw the coins on the ground and the Jews will stop and pick them up and you can get away”. And then he’d laugh, because everyone in Cleveland is an unfunny comedian cursing Hollywood for not giving them their own show. We’ve said this before, but many people in Cleveland are like the Connor family from Roseanne, but without professional writers or the ability to be funny in the least (to anyone but themselves). There’s just something in the water – and there are so many things wrong with Fr. Keller’s “jokes” that we don’t even know where to begin, but let us assure you that no one laughed at them but him. First off, why would Jews chase you? If Keller is right and they are attracted to money, why carry the spare change to begin with? Isn’t that what attracted them? Why did Keller get away with jokes about throwing change on the ground but didn’t feel the need to “joke” about hurling watermelons or fried chicken around if chased by other minorities? Because Jews were an acceptable target for inappropriate “humor” because the Media and Left have always proclaimed that so.
Keller was a big time Liberal, we knew that. But it wasn’t until recently that we’ve come to realize just how much the Left hates Jews — which is bizarre, because Jews in America are Liberal before they are Jewish, and blind vote Democrat against their own economic interests (which goes against Keller and the Left’s longtime jokes about Jews loving only money).
It’s funny, because this is EXACTLY the paradigm the Left tries to convince gays exists, in terms of gays not supporting conservatives unless they are self-hating gays. When we were campaigning for McCain/Palin in 2008, we were told all the time that we couldn’t be gay and vote for Republicans, because the Republicans hated us. Very often, commenters at Ace of Spades, Redstate, and even at Conservatives4Palin seem to prove that to be true — because as much as we do everything we can to help good Republican candidates out there, and as much as we support Sarah Palin, there are still nuts in Republican circles who insist on attacking us for being gay (by saying things like, “We don’t want or need your help”). Which is insane, and falls right into the Left’s Alinsky playbook of permanently driving a wedge between certain demographics of voters and their own economic best interests. We might be gay, and that’s never going to change, people, but for us to have the best lives possible we need people who understand sensible fiscal policy running this country. For the lights to stay on in Boystown, and for us to keep having our adventures and keep enjoying life in Chicago, we need people in government to cut spending, lower taxes, get us off foreign oil, make us energy independent, and create more jobs.
We knew Obama couldn’t do any of that, even if he wanted to, so we backed McCain/Palin when Hillary suspended her presidential campaign.
We see clearly that Governor Palin is a take-no-prisoners, tough-as-nails, badass who will get things done and put this country back on a fiscally responsible and prudent track, so she’s got 100% of our support and we all intend to do everything we can to keep the Left, the DNC, the Media, and the RNC from doing to her what the Left, DNC, and Media did to Hillary Clinton in 2008. If some of Palin’s supporters don’t like us working for her because we are gay, then they need to get over that right quick because we aren’t going anywhere. If you don’t want our help in making her the next president, then you better get off your sorry butt and work harder than all five of us combined because we’re not quitting until she’s got everything she needs to save America.
Unlike most Jews in America, we don’t buy the Left’s line that Republicans are evil, and we certainly don’t listen to, or tolerate, the Left’s lies and attacks on the Governor. When we look out into the undulating sea of American politics, we spot little islands of courage and pluck that we’ve set our course towards…and all of those are chock full of red, white, and blue moose for the foreseeable future. Palin is the real deal folks, and she loves Israel with all her heart too and as president will do everything she can to defend it. Which is why we support her with all our own hearts.
We don’t know what keeps Jews voting Democrat even though the Left hates Israel and loves Muslims so much — despite the fact that Islam treats women like dogs, executes gay men for being themselves, and has vowed to destroy Israel and kill all Jews. Supposedly, women, gays, and Jews are important building blocs in the Democrat coalition…yet, perversely, the Leftist-controlled Democrat party goes out of its way to back Islam, even though the would-be Global Caliphate intends to persecute large numbers of Democrats, by definition of what Islam stands for, if Islam would ever gain control of America the way it controls Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Somalia, Nigeria, and increasingly controls the Netherlands, France and Great Britain.
That’s a real head-scratcher we just can’t understand…but the Media’s partly to blame because, at least in the gay community, it convinces low-information voters and other idiots that “Republicans are evil!” when the real evil in the world is, in fact, Islam and all of Islam’s enablers (which, it’s becoming increasingly clear, includes the current Democrat Party).
So, part of why we love Israel so much is because, as guys living in Boystown, we know that gays worldwide are hated by Muslims as much as Jews are. So, there’s a kinship there, knowing that Israel sits on the Hellmouth, right in the heart of Islam, and stands her ground the way we ourselves face down all attacks on us because we happen to date guys and some out there have a problem with it.
Going to Gay Days at Disney World this year, we actually had a big revelation about Israel, if you can believe it. Waiting in line to ride Space Mountain, of all things, we looked out at Tomorrow Land and saw a sea of red tee shirts — with all those gay people assembled together in one place, becoming more of a community than we ever really achieve in Boystown. It was a pretty wonderful and emotional thing, and we realized how important Israel is to Jewish people. This one place on Earth where they have come together, after being hated for no good reason by so many everywhere else.
Israel, a land that was once just unwanted desert, that the Jews worked so hard to build up into something desirable. We remembered learning about the teams of Jews that tamed the desert, built irrigation ditches, worked day and night to create cities out of dust and rubble and to make a home for themselves. Meanwhile, Muslims just sat on their butts and watched, amazed the Jews were working so hard, since they’d never seen anyone work so hard in all their lives. As Israel grew and developed, the Muslims got jealous and wanted it for themselves — land that was Judea, land that has ALWAYS been occupied by Jews, the Muslims suddenly wanted back as a mythical place called “Palestine” that’s as real as Fantasy Land at Disney, a manufactured concept conceived by the Left as an excuse to adopt “Palestinians” as their mascots in the neverending quest to persecute Jews and take away what they worked hard for.
This feels a lot like what’s going on in Boystown these days, where our little gay neighborhood is under siege not only by the thugs who are attracted to the area to commit crimes against gays, but by the Liberal yuppies who move into Boystown and want to take it over and change it by closing all the gay bars, eliminating the gay stores, demanding noise curfews for street parties and shennanigans and generally conquering something other people worked hard to build up from nothing.
Sounds a lot like what Muslims do whenever they move anywhere — they know where they have moved to, know what it was like before they arrived, but once they get there they decide they need to impose their wants, desires, and beliefs on everyone else and subjugate all before them.
To hell with that.
We love that Israelis fight back.
We love that even young, teenaged Jews are strong and brave enough to march deep into a crowd of raging Muslims and Leftists and wave the Israeli flag proudly.
Whenever we’re attacked by the Left, either for speaking out about things that go on in Boystown or for supporting candidates like McCain, Palin, or Scott Brown in Massachusetts, we think about what Israelis go through every single day being victimized by Muslims in the home they built from nothing in a desert no one wanted until Israel made it livable.
People sometimes ask us why we support and love Sarah Palin so much, and it’s also because of this — the woman fights back, takes gruff from no one, tells it like it is, and never backs down.
Do you see a trend here?
We gravitate towards people with backbone who can take punches and give as good as they get.
We like people who stand up for the underdog, the little guy, and when they themselves end up being the underdog and little guy never give up and never surrender, no matter what’s coming at them in opposition.
Part of our support for Israel comes from us being gay, and knowing that Islam preaches death for gays all over the world, wherever Islam is in control of a nation. Death to Jews, Death to Gays, Death to all who oppose Islam. So, we’re in this together with Israel, now and forever, because Muslims actively hate us as much as they do Jews — which makes us natural allies.
Another part of this support comes from our love of America, and our realization that Israel is America’s greatest friend, and soul mate, in fact. At Disney World, walking around Frontier Land and Liberty Square, we saw depictions of Americans forging this nation out of hostile wilderness, building a great country out of nothing. That’s exactly what Israel has done. There was a time when the great powers of the world tried to destroy the colonies, to crush them, to prevent them from becoming an independent nation. The Muslim World tried to destroy Israel repeatedly — and Israel won, time and again. That same never quit, never surrender spirit that we celebrate in America exists in Israel — so, yet again, we are natural allies.
And then we get to the very personal level: we know some awesome Jews who are great friends of ours. Some of them are guys we’ve dated, who we’d do anything for. Some are people out there like Laura Rosen Cohen or Ray George who we met through HillBuzz itself, and who have helped us achieve a deeper understanding of Israel. Others are people we don’t know who always chime in and thank us for supporting Israel in any way that we can. So, we feel a kinship and connection to these friends and allies who are Jewish, and we will not allow them or Israel itself to be bashed on our watch — just as we hope they’ll always stick up for us when the Left declares its own fatwas in their neverending quest to destroy us.
So, the above is all the long answer on why we love Israel so much, despite not being Jewish.
The short answer to why we love Israel, however, is much simpler:
Israel exists.
Period.
So, we love it.
In the face of all odds stacked against it, this plucky little country exists, challenging evil, standing up to Islam, holding its ground.
We love that.
Though we’ve never visited Israel, we all hope to some day. We want to tell Israelis they have many friends in America, no matter what the Media says, or what the Left wants people to believe.
The Left is 20% of the country. At most.
The other 80% of us aren’t having any attacks on Israel, and refuse to sit quietly by and let the Left malign her.
There’s a reason Helen Thomas had to resign so suddenly on Monday, and it’s not because the Left believed she did something wrong. It’s because her employers realized she’d let her troll mask slip, and that there would be major Hell to pay from many fronts for giving the game away and being too obviously antisemitic on a national stage.
It’s like with that jerk Fr. Keller back in high school — he’d make his Jew jokes in private, thinking he was surrounded by fellow Liberals who thought they were so funny. But, he would never be bold enough to show his heart on a big stage, in front of too many people, because he was afraid of exposing his true antisemitic comedy stylings to too big of a spotlight. Liberals know their hatred of Jews is wrong and is not shared by the majority of Americans. It’s what partly drives the Left, but the Left can never be too overt about it. As Thomas’ example proves, when someone does give the game away, that person has to be removed, so the anti-Israel agenda can continue in quiet behind the scenes.
We don’t know about you, but we’ve dedicated ourselves to taking down the Left and exposing these thugs for who they really are. Hopefully, ALL of them, not just Helen Thomas, will have their masks torn off some day.
We just don’t see how any decent American could NOT love Israel, when siding against Israel means you align yourself with the Leftists and Islam.
Just what does that make you?
The Clintons are clearly trying to save the Democrat Party, probably with an eye towards Hillary '16. This is something we just can't help them do.
Yesterday, Blanche Lincoln squeaked her way to a win in the Democrat primary for the Arkansas Senate nomination.
She only won because of two things:
(1) Bill Clinton personally campaigned for her on behalf of the Clinton brand
(2) Lincoln campaigned against the Obama administration and pretty much all that it stands for and has been up to
The Left threw everything that it had against Lincoln, including all the goblin might Daily Kos and the other Soros-funded thug factories could muster. The Unions wasted $10 million of member dues to try to punish Lincoln for her kabuki performance in “standing up to the Left”, and the Unions failed big (as they fail at most things).
We say kabuki because Blanche Lincoln voted, on Christmas Eve, for the Obamacare bill that she didn’t bother to read and still doesn’t understand. No one in the Senate actually understands it. All Democrats voted for it anyway. Therefore, our opinion remains that ALL Democrats in the Senate deserve to be booted from office with immense prejudice. We would say the same thing about Hillary Clinton if she cast her vote this way too, if she had still been a Senator when this vote was taken. Every last one of these clowns completely nullified their entire careers on Christmas Eve.
It’s very similar to how the world feels about Helen Thomas right now, actually: her bout of rabid, deranged antisemitism caught on tape is the coda to her decades long career. Nothing else really matters at this point for us when it comes to her. We don’t give a damn that she was a trailblazer or thorn in the side of so many administrations. We don’t think it’s particularly important or relevant that she was indulged for so many years with the first questions at every press event. When she said Jews should go back to Poland and Germany and leave the mythical, imaginarium of “Palestine”, that was it for her. TOAST.
While we’ve never liked Helen Thomas and thought she should have retired in the 1980s (or, better yet, at age 5, when her talent peaked), we did like Blanche Lincoln for many years and know she’s a friend of the Clintons. But, we just won’t ever forget or forgive what Democrats in the Senate did on December 24th, 2009.
That vote they took, in as much secrecy as possible, rushing through an economy-killing piece of legislation that none of them even read, let alone comprehended, was the “Go back to Poland!” moment for every Democrat in office. They showed their true worth, abilities, and colors that day. Not a single one of them deserves to be in elected office.
So, this is an area where we have to break from the Clintons, whom we’ve supported and admired our entire political lives.
The Clintons, clearly, are trying to save the Democrat Party by propping up Democrats like Lincoln, and other moderates across the country. In the midst of the Democrat Civil War, the Clinton and the DLC are trying to save these Clintonian/Jacksonian Dems from not just angry voters, but the vitriol thrown at them by the Left.
It’s a continuation of what the Left started in 2008, actually, where Donna Brazile, Howard Dean, and others in the DNC hatched their plan to purge the party of moderates. They deliberately have alienated working class, rural, and conservative Democrats (now former Democrats) to drive the party squarely to the Left, putting radical Leftists in the nation’s driver’s seat for the first time in history.
The results speak for themselves.
The Clintons know a shellacking is coming in November. It’s sad and hilarious the Left doesn’t realize this, and keeps insisting the problem is that the Left just isn’t communicating its ideas better. No — the problem is that the Left’s ideas and agenda are insane and destructive, and that the tactics they employ to advance their pet projects are rooted in base thuggery, intimidation, fraud, and all things un-American. The electorate is having a visceral reaction to all of this, and just as Democrats purged the Clinton Coalition from the party in 2008, American voters are poised to purge Leftists from office in the fall.
And the problem for the DNC is that they rebranded ALL Democrats as Leftists in 2008. Proudly so.
The Clintons are trying to mitigate the damages to the party and save people like Lincoln, in the hopes that after the Obama Democrats fall, the Clintons can take back the party, move it back to the middle, rebuild it, and then probably try to run Hillary Clinton again in 2016 once Americans see Democrats as centrists again.
We just don’t think this will work.
We believe the Democrat Party is a dead man walking.
The Obama people did so much damage to the Democrat brand in this the Golden Age of Hope and Change that we don’t see any way for even the best Madison Avenue agencies to repackage the party and make it palatable enough for a Democrat to be trusted enough by the public to occupy the Oval Office again for another generation.
Normally, when a brand is damaged this badly, someone has sense enough to realize it and pull the plug. There used to be a restaurant chain called Chi-Chi’s that went out of business after a green onion salmonella outbreak in the 2000s. In the Midwest, a Chi-Chi’s bustled in every mall until that brand was linked to making people sick from salmonella. Once enough focus groups and polling was done to determine there was no way for Chi-Chi’s to recover customer trust, the parent company just shuttered the entire chain, cutting their losses.
We believe Obama is the Democrats’ salmonella, only the Media, in full cheerleading mode, is keeping many in the party (but not all) from realizing they’re in a Chi-Chi’s situation here.
We don’t believe the Clintons are doing what they are doing because they love the Democrat Party with all their hearts — how could they, after what the party did to them in 2008? We think they spend a lot of time laughing at every foolish mistake this administration makes, and Hillary’s thrilled she wasn’t forced to vote for any of the madness Harry Reid has forced through the Senate. We’re thrilled with that last bit too, because if she had voted for any of this, we’d be in the heartbreaking position of having to actively work against her, because we’d find ourselves in a Sophie’s choice between the country we love and a woman we have always known would make a great president.
We always choose America, over everyone and everything else. Always.
And in that spirit, we just don’t believe a Democrat should be president in 2012.
We just don’t see a way the Clintons could successfully take back and rebuild the party in just two years, and repair all the damage Obama has done. We don’t believe the Clintons could successfully purge the party of the Left, even if they wanted to, because the Clintons know Democrats need the Left as a base to win nationally.
The Clintons also know Democrats need not only a large chunk of Independents to win, but they also need enough conservatives to play stupid purist games and sit out the elections, or idiotically throw votes to a third party spoiler, for Democrats to triumph.
So, we believe every move the two of them make has three parts to it:
(1) To save moderate Democrats so that they can be used to rebuild the party under the DLC after the 2010 debacle
(2) To not alienate the Left completely, so that when the Obama people are gone the Left has to accept the Clintons as the better alternative to indefinite Republican rule
(3) To make independents believe Democrats have returned to their senses and gone back to the middle, with the old Clinton Coalition back in place
We don’t believe there is any way for them to succeed with (3) above, so the other two points are moot.
The reason we feel this way is that we think Obama didn’t just let the Democrats’ mask slip, he yanked it off completely and revealed the true horrors that may have always lurked unbeknownst to us in this party.
Before 2008, we never believe Democrats were capable of any of the things they did with ACORN, the SEIU, the Black Panthers, and other thugs to commit voter fraud, intimidation, race-baiting, and every other tactic used to snag the nomination for Obama.
The sheer brutality of the Left’s attacks against Hillary’s supporters is what permanently alienated us from the DNC. It’s not that Hillary didn’t get the nomination and isn’t president now — it’s that the DNC used its attack machine against its own people, and those of us on the receiving end of that brutality won’t ever forget or forgive it.
We want the DNC to get a big taste of its own medicine, and work every day to do all that we can to make sure that happens.
The whole party can just go to Hell. The Clintons are straining to stop that from happening, and to save Democrats — but we believe only because they know Hillary Clinton won’t ever be president if the party is destroyed. They need that infrastructure, so that’s why they are in rescue mode.
But, we believe things are so bad under Obama that even by 2016 Americans won’t be ready to trust someone with a (D) after their name in the Oval. We also believe President Palin will win re-election handily in 2016, because every day she proves to us more and more that she has just what this country needs, right when she needs it.
It breaks our hearts to have to face this reality, but it does not appear likely that Hillary Clinton will ever be president. By 2020, we don’t think she’d want to throw herself into another race, one to succeed Palin as the 46th US President.
The Left kept a great woman from being the first female president in 2008, and we will always be haunted by the fact that we didn’t come up with a way to stop them from pushing Obama onto the country.
All we can do now, instead of looking back at the mistakes of the past, is to make sure Governor Palin has all the support she needs to win in 2012 and rebuild the country during her presidency.
We would love to see President Palin support Hillary to become UN Secretary General in the future, becoming the first female and first American in that position, while depriving Obama of what we believe is his ultimate goal and prize. And as much as we love the Clintons, we just don’t want them to succeed in saving the Democrat Party. Let it fracture into pieces, with a Far Left party, a Leftist Party, and a Left of Center party emerging, all of which can be run by crazies of various stripes, while sane people either go Independent or establish a new American Party in the middle.
We know we will never be Republicans so long as people like Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, John Thune, Mitch Daniels, and the rest of the cucumbers-and-mayonnaise gang are Republican standard bearers. No thanks. We’re jeans and tee shirt guys, not khaki pants and blue blazers. We’d much prefer a barbeque outside to any cocktail party. We’re a lot more like Todd Palin than anything else, really…guys who aren’t Republicans, but support great Republicans like Sarah Palin, Michele Bachman, Jan Brewer, Nikki Haley, and other awesome Americans.
It’s our sincere hope that Sarah Palin’s emerging “pioneer feminism” sweeps the country, washes over the GOP, and drowns the Romneys and Pawlentys completely, creating a better Republican Party than has ever existed in our lifetimes. We think we’d still end up as Independents in the end, but who knows what will happen when Governor Palin is in charge.
But Democrats, for all intents and purposes, are indeed dead to us at this point.
Thomas Sowell delivers one of the best quotes on the Obama administration ever
“Whether Barack Obama is simply incompetent as president or has some hidden agenda to undermine this country, at home and abroad, he has nearly everything he needs to ruin America, including a fool for a vice president” — Thomas Sowell, in a column for RealClearPolitics, 6/8/10
What do you think of this bit from Sowell?
Pretty damn accurate, if you ask us.
Especially considering that last bit:
RESEARCH: Who has "president" Obama met with in the last 52 days (since he's refused to meet with BP CEO Tony Hayward)?
Here’s an interesting bit of research that would make a great graphic. We need your help to pull it off though. The idea is this: we want to show all the people the current president, Dr. Utopia, has met with in all of his fancy dinners, cocktail parties, vacations, and other adventures during the last 52 days, instead of meeting with BP CEO Tony Hayward. We’d like to visually represent this somehow….maybe the way we do the “Who’s Dressed Better?” comparisons, with all the people Obama’s met with on one side of an oily line (perhaps with a barrel of oil leaking it from the top), and then Tony Hayward off to the side, ignored, unconsulted, and kept as far away from this president as possible.
Being from Chicago, we recognize what’s going on. This is very much a Daley trick, patented in the Chicago machine.
Obama does not want to meet with Hayward because he does not want to be photographed with Hayward because he erroneously believes doing this would indelibly link him to the disaster, and Obama above all else is a self-promoter who leaps great distances to take full great for any successes, and would shove his own grandmother under the bus to avoid taking blame for anything.
And, he actually did just that during the 2008 campaign (with the “typical white person” comment he made about her).
So, the reason Obama has refused to meet with Hayward is because Obama believes doing so would then make the Gulf Spill Disaster his responsibility. This is a man who has avoided all responsibility his entire life, and has never actually done any of the jobs he was elected to, seeing them as mere stepping stones to something bigger. In his mind, UN Secretary General is sort of “President of Earth”, and that’s what we believe Obama’s real end game is. He wants to take Secretary Moon’s place in the next UN election, and doesn’t care about this country any more than he cared about the shambles of a district he represented in the Illinois state senate, or the state of Illinois itself in the US Senate, when he briefly served there (while running for higher office starting the day after he was sworn in).
We know that in the last few weeks, he’s spent time with Paul McCartney and the singer Beyonce.
Who else has he taken time to meet, while refusing to meet with BP CEO Tony Haywood?
Seems like a great opportunity not only to embarrass this White House, but also to draw further attention to just how much this president spends on lavish parties, getaways, concerts, and the like while regular Americans struggle every day to pay their rent and eat dinner once in a while.
Can you help us dig back 52 days and identify everyone Dr. Utopia’s deigned to meet with during this crisis — what other celebrities, in particular, have been to the White House during this time?
