What’s fascinating to us about the whole illegal alien situation with Mexico is that there seems to be absolutely no shame whatsoever in Mexico City that the country is so bad that millions of its people break the law to get away from it.
These are unskilled individuals, and more than a few criminals, Mexico does not want. Hence the lack of tears shed for their flight from the country.
They’re purging those they don’t want anymore, and resist every effort the United States makes in stemming this tide and sending them back.
Though we know this would never happen, we’d love to see Mexico’s response to a serious effort to seize Mexican oil wells in the Gulf as compensation for the millions, if not billions, that have spent either trying to control America’s borders or providing illegal Mexican aliens with health and public services once they cross into the US.
If Mexico faced a serious financial penalty for allowing its unwanted citizens to illegally enter and take root in the US, we bet Mexico would, suddenly, MAGICALLY, stop these people from crossing into the US illegally.
Why doesn’t the US act like the global power it is, and teach Mexico there are consequences for Mexico City’s deliberate purging of its unwanted across the US border?
Take that oil, and watch Mexico take action against these illegal aliens.
Imagine that.
April 29, 2010 at 3:34 pm
There has never been a serious effort, because there is a tactic agreement between the oligarchy that runs Mexico and the big corporations here.
Tysons openly operates recruitment stations in Mexico, and brings them here, supplies them with false docs, etc. When they get too “demanding”, they turn over a certain percentage to ICE for raids/deportation.
It’s a sickening and cynical cycle of exploitation.
There was a show trial where they put some managers on trial, and they got away with it. The courts have also stated that ID theft is not a “real crime” if the purpose is solely to work. Try telling that to someone who has had their identity stolen to benefit illegal aliens and their big business employers.
It won’t end until “the people” demand it end, and that includes boycotts and marches. We also need to support people like Kris Kobach who has been at the forefront of this battle for quite some time.
Having my eyes opened up about how Tysons, etc operates made me more committed to supporting small local farmers, esp for our meat.
April 29, 2010 at 3:36 pm
A “tacit” agreement. Sorry (just drank two Makers Mark whiskey sours…).
April 29, 2010 at 3:44 pm
thanks, i’m an all-thumbs typist!
April 29, 2010 at 6:57 pm
I’m home now – did you want to share?? Haven’t had a whiskey sour in years! Although a hot toddy is probably more appropriate – it’s snowing to beat all right now out here. Grrrrr.
April 29, 2010 at 7:33 pm
Snowing? WTH?
I just returned from a week of downing mojitos — yum, yum, yum… here’s one 4U
April 29, 2010 at 8:43 pm
Hey, you caught it yourself. Well done.
April 29, 2010 at 3:35 pm
I’m all for it.
In addition, I say we seize the assets of all illegals doing their banking in the United States.
Let’s start with Bank of America, who panders to illegals in Nevada. Saw it with my own eyes and couldn’t find a teller who speaks ENGLISH!
April 29, 2010 at 3:50 pm
Actually, I don’t have a problem with anyone keeping the money that they have earned.
One of the issues I have with the whole illegal conundrum is the exploitation of them. If you are in America, and working, you deserve to be treated with dignity and respect.
My ire resides with the employers, who knowingly exploit them, including the Latte Liberals who like their cheap domestic help (how many cabinet appointees had to withdraw because of domestic help issues? I’ve lost count), and our politicians, who pander to big business at our expense.
If they were serious about it, they would expel all of Mexico’s diplomatic staff and close their consulates for meddling in US domestic affairs.
THAT would send a message.
April 29, 2010 at 6:01 pm
Oh, I don’t sanction KEEPING someone else’s money, even if illegals don’t really have a RIGHT to be earning money here. What I intend is actually to FREEZE–not seize–the assets, as a means of IDing the illegals, and holding the money until said illegals return home and have been there say for a year.
Thanks for calling the distinction to light!
April 29, 2010 at 6:01 pm
P.S. Though I like your ideas, too!
April 29, 2010 at 6:05 pm
GNH:
I feel and echo your frustration.
Ending the illegal problem here is a win/win situation, because it puts pressure on Mexico for real reform THERE.
Are you aware that the head of the teacher’s union diverts money for the schools to herself to fund a yacht in San Diego and a home in France? And not a peep from the MSM.
Sometimes you have to enact tough love.
That must be our approach to illegal immigration — actions and choices have consequences.
April 29, 2010 at 8:56 pm
Good idea, garlic.
the gov’t could even keep the interest earned on the money while it sits for a year, and apply it to the deficit.
April 29, 2010 at 3:45 pm
It’s not ours.
April 29, 2010 at 4:23 pm
That’s the point— just like the money (MINE) that goes to feed-clothe-shelter-provide medical care for Mexican citizens here without invites isn’t THEIRS!
April 29, 2010 at 5:00 pm
Yes, but it’s still theft.
I’m all for my government no longer violating my property rights to fund these entitlements. But they’re not stealing from me directly; if they were, that’d be different.
April 29, 2010 at 5:25 pm
+1
I won’t advocate stealing from someone who has legitimately earned their pay.
Not liking the situation is a separate issue from basic fairness.
April 29, 2010 at 6:04 pm
Ah, but the operative word is “legitimately.” If you’re here ILLEGALLY, how is anything you’ve amassed legitimately yours?
It’s not. Even so, I’d still advocate FREEZING IT, until after said ILLEGAL has returned to his/her home country for at least a year. If they ever return, then it’s the firing squad for them, and seizing of their assets.
Money talks, does it not?
April 29, 2010 at 9:44 pm
“If you’re here ILLEGALLY, how is anything you’ve amassed legitimately yours?”
It’s still the fruit of their labor. I’m sorry, I just don’t understand how something I’ve fought, sweat and bled for (or carried a tray of drinks for) isn’t mine once it’s in my hands via nonviolent means
When I pull a salary, that money is mine. If that salary is obtained through less than legal means, it’s STILL mine, because it passed, without violent action from my employer’s hands to my hands. My legal status should have nothing to do with my right to own property (money and resources). One can make the argument that owning land would be different.
April 29, 2010 at 11:54 pm
The thing of it is, they ARE stealing from you. You are ripped off every time you have to pay higher hospital costs because illegals use the emergency room as their “primary care physician” without paying. You are being mugged every time your property taxes go up to pay for the illegal children to go to school. Every time that an illegal, unlicensed driver hits someone and runs – you are being assaulted by higher auto insurance costs.
You – and I – and every other legal citizen of this country are being assaulted and stolen from by every illegal alien who comes here.
And that doesn’t even begin to get into the drug question.
April 29, 2010 at 3:48 pm
Michael Savage did, a number of years ago – a barrel of oil for each illegal.
I remember hearing that and howling with laughter when illegal aliens were not nearly the problem they are now.
Now it seems like a pretty darned good idea!
April 29, 2010 at 3:49 pm
I see the cleverness of your point, however at least some Mexican citizens believe California is theirs anyways. Because of that thinkg, it also makes the idea of being illegal entering California offensive to them.
April 29, 2010 at 4:29 pm
Alessandro, the Mexican nationals (and even Americans of Mex descent) I’ve encountered while living in TX, NV, and AZ believe that Cauliflowerfornia, AZ, NV, TX, and New Mex are ALL theirs.
As I’ve said elsewhere, I’ve responded to them that we’ll be happy to refight the Mex-American war.
Their resentful claims ARE the crux of the problem. They do not want to be American. They do NOT want to assimilate. We “stole” their land.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh!
Let’s refight the war and solve this once and for all!
Ready…aim…FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
April 29, 2010 at 5:42 pm
Why don’t they protest Spain? Spain and the Catholic Church are who destroyed the Axtec and the native culture.
I wonder how many Mexicans know how Mexican Texans (tejanos) fought against Santa Anna and wanted to be part of Texas and later the U.S?
Do they think they’d be Catholic if not for the Catholic Church and Spain? They’d still be sacrificing their young up on mountains to the Sun God.
April 29, 2010 at 6:06 pm
Good points, all, kcfromtx!
And you remind me that I am livid, yet again, with the Catholic Church and their pandering to immigrants. Guess the churches would be empty without these holy, God-fearing, law abiding
criminals populating them.
Catholic Church: STFU, BUTT OUT (NO PUN INTENDED), AND CLEAN UP YOUR OWN PEDERAST MESS!
April 29, 2010 at 6:07 pm
Yes, this is something I never quite puzzled out.
Spain was a horrid oppressor of the Native American population in Mexico and Latin America. Absolutely horrid.
And yet, they persist on marginalizing themselves and continuing to speak Spanish.
One of the first things I would do if I were an oppressed minority would be to ditch the langa franca of my oppressors.
English, a polyglot, is the language of commerce, worldwide.
Just askin’.
April 29, 2010 at 9:22 pm
Excuse me, but the Catholic church did NOT destroy Aztec culture, the Spaniards did.
Many priests and nuns in the Church did nothing but work selflessly to help the natives and stop the slave trade by European countries.
That said, I don’t think there’s much of Aztec culture I’d care to keep. They practiced torture and human sacrifice, not to mention cannibalism. I don’t consider those “cultural activities” worth saving.
April 29, 2010 at 9:24 pm
garlic:
I agree about the Church pandering to illegals and socialist policies, however I do take exception to the allegation that the Church “destroyed” Aztec culture. Any culture that practices human sacrifice deserves to go by way of the dodo bird.
April 29, 2010 at 8:55 pm
definitely seems they need a reminder of who won the war. It seems Mexico needs us to take over Mexico since they are doing such a crappy job of running their cesspool of a country. Hell yeah take the oil.
April 29, 2010 at 9:26 pm
Rush made an excellent point:
Why does Obama side with the Palestinians since, according to him (and the leftards), the Hebrews lost the land to them in the diaspora, yet sides with the illegal Mexicans who lost land to the US? Same difference.
April 29, 2010 at 4:35 pm
Cuz, gee, we don’t want to offend anyone who is here illegally! So if I decide that my neighbors house is actually mine, it’s not a crime if I just move in?
April 29, 2010 at 5:44 pm
I live in South Texas and many think they are mowing their own lawn.
April 29, 2010 at 6:22 pm
Yes, yes! That is precisely the attitude! WELL SUMMARIZED!
April 29, 2010 at 6:23 pm
Which reminds me. It (conflict, strife, discord, anger) is really never about skin pigment but rather about *attitude*.
April 29, 2010 at 6:25 pm
garlicnosedho Says: … I am livid, yet again, with the Catholic Church and their pandering to immigrants …
_____
My state representative speaking at a Catholic church said: “the Knight of Columbus and this church will see that immigration reform takes place.”
Somewhere I thought I heard we had separation of church and state. Nahhh.
April 29, 2010 at 3:59 pm
It would certainly get Mexico’s attention. We could suddenly get very serious about tackling the drug trade as well. That would get the Mexican politicians’ attention.
April 29, 2010 at 4:07 pm
Well, we invaded Iraq allegedly for our own security purposes, and to bring democracy and stability to that country, round up insurgents and criminals threatening the homeland, as well as safeguard the Iraqi oilfields and international shipping lanes, then why should Mexico be any different?
Just sayin’.
April 29, 2010 at 4:35 pm
really good point
April 29, 2010 at 6:24 pm
Ditto! Good point, indeed!
April 29, 2010 at 8:56 pm
The Mexicans obviously would give anything for us to take over Mexico, since they hate Mexico so much and love America.
April 29, 2010 at 4:10 pm
If the gov’t sold some of the drug seizures, they could pay for all the illegals and their medical costs.
The CIC could become the Dealer in Chief.
April 29, 2010 at 5:37 pm
if they sold the stuff that they had seized then the druggie-in-chief would have to go without his supplies!!!!
April 29, 2010 at 5:41 pm
LOL aussie, so that explains:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/04/29/obama-helped-kill-immigration-reform-2007-will-media-remember
I love it when stuff like this comes back to bite the DIC (druggie-in-chief) in the arse.
April 29, 2010 at 7:35 pm
“druggie in chief”
love it.
anyone have any current pix on his cocaine veins (in the forehead).
not that I’m suggesting anything…
April 29, 2010 at 4:12 pm
Sounds like a plan! :D
April 29, 2010 at 4:30 pm
Legalize it, for Christ’s sake!
April 29, 2010 at 4:44 pm
Seconded. You want to take the financial wind right out of the sails of these muderous cartels? Eliminate the artificially enormous profits they derive from the black market on drugs.
The WOD has been going on for the best part of half a century, and it has not achieved one goal that it set out to accomplish. It’s only made things worse…just like its forerunner, Prohibition.
But at least when Prohibition was passed, it was done Constitutionally. The same can’t be said about Federal drug laws.
April 29, 2010 at 5:37 pm
I am against those drugs, but I agree that if they are legalized then you take away the incentive for the black market.
April 29, 2010 at 5:48 pm
The drug companies want to control our addictions, or it would have been legalize years ago.
A big argument for NOT legalizing marijuana is the “it’s a gateway drug” meme.
It sure is…..look what else your “dealer” wants to sell you!
Make weed OTC and safe, you put a lot of creeps out of business. It’s no more dangerous than alcohol, and think of the TAX FAIRY….Yay!
April 29, 2010 at 6:11 pm
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! For whomever marijuana is a “gateway drug,” I contend that such people have a problem that has nothing to do with marijuana but with their own shortcomings.
No legalization of pot? Then make alcohol illegal once again. We’ll see how fast the alcoholics get on board.
April 29, 2010 at 10:49 pm
The argument that pot is “the” gateway drug is simply ignorant. Can anyone here say they know or know of a single person who uses hard drugs (heroin, coke, etc.) who started with pot but who *did not* use alcohol or cigs before that? No, of course not. At any rate, weed is so different from the other drugs. It’s simply an argument that’s part cultural and part asinine.
April 29, 2010 at 6:09 pm
+1
You’re not going to change human behavior.
At the very least, legalize it, tax it, regulate and try to make it somewhat safe, and chase the criminals from the market.
April 29, 2010 at 6:12 pm
Yay! We’re in synch! :) :)
April 29, 2010 at 7:36 pm
GNH:
to you.
None of us ever have to be totally in sync w/each other all the time ….
how boring …
it would be like, um, being married to yourself ! lolz
April 29, 2010 at 7:36 pm
I put a hugz in there but it didn’t come out in the post.
Pout. ;(
April 29, 2010 at 9:27 pm
I don’t want to see government control growing over anything.
I have no problem with decriminalizing pot, but legalizing it? No thanks, it’s just another way for government to grow.
April 29, 2010 at 4:50 pm
The idea of sealing up the borders has always been something I supported, and I still do, but that’s only half the issue. The other half is what makes America so valued that people risk their lives, sometimes times to cross the boarder. That is jobs, Governme mutilple nt handouts, and government complacency. Even if you did have Mexico trying to stop people at the border, you still have those three factors causing people to come over. If we really want to have reform, we must address also the people offering jobs (and the taxes from Washington that make them want to do so), handouts (government biased. Not being cruel like turning away people at the ER, but instead holding them accountable for their debt, like helping pay for the services they use, maybe a tax, flat or fair tax?) and government complacency (not being able to call ICE, the things that the Arizona bill addressed.)
I think it was a quote I saw here but it said something along the lines that free movement across borders cannot happen with government [subsiding things] (can remember the exact word that goes there.
Hope ya’ll are safe :D
April 29, 2010 at 5:51 pm
Great points toki !
My concern in this post 9-11 world, we definitely need to secure our borders. For our safety and the safety of all immigrants who are here LEGALLY !
April 29, 2010 at 5:08 pm
Yes, Michael Savage.
April 29, 2010 at 5:54 pm
Is Michael Savage the guy who was banned in England?
If so, I caught him on the car radio, and I had to pull over I was laughing so hard…..he was playing tapes of hate voice mails to him (BObots on vodka laced kool aid) and he responded to them. I love him!
April 29, 2010 at 9:03 pm
Yep. That’s him. He’s awesome. Borders, Language, Culture. I totally agree.
April 29, 2010 at 5:14 pm
My husband has always said that to solve the illegal immigration problem with Mexico we should invade it and make it a state.Think about all the other dangerous countries we have taken over.Mexico would be a cake walk.
April 29, 2010 at 5:46 pm
We’re accused on being imperialists, yet we live peacefully between Mexico and Canada. So I’ve always thought we had nothing to lose if we rolled into Mexico and annexed it. I bet the locals would be happy and we could take over their corrupt oil business and make it profitable.
April 29, 2010 at 10:53 pm
And Mexico has some serious natural resources! Arable land, oil, minerals, coastline, tourism, meat, labor….
April 29, 2010 at 5:26 pm
The Federal government wants the illegals in the USA, and would make them legal as soon as possible. Those already working under the table would be paying taxes, including social security and medicare/medicaid taxes. We Americans don’t have enough kids anymore to support the entitlement burden that exists now. Just wait until all of us boomers are retired, but still living.
April 29, 2010 at 5:31 pm
Do we send any form of aid to Mexico ?
I’ve always thought that whatever immigrant that enters the U.S. illegally, we should simply deduct that from their country’s aid !
I love America for reaching out to the tired and poor, but let’s be reasonable and not punish our own citizens in the effort.
Gov Brewer said the problem with the illegals, 87% are criminals ! Mexico doesn’t want them back and why they hate Arizona right now!!
April 29, 2010 at 5:48 pm
They get billions of dollars in US aid each year.
Most of it ends up in the cartels hands and paying for weapons and automobile, that is, the ones they don’t steal and send over the border.
April 29, 2010 at 6:04 pm
kcfromtx ~ BILLIONS ! We give Mexico BILLIONS in foreign aid?
I am vexed.
And we cut funding to NASA. And arts and PE in our public schools. Oh, and villify Arizona.
:facepalm:
April 29, 2010 at 6:15 pm
Not only do we give their corrupt govt billions, it costs us several hundred billion in freebies, to the detriment of Americans who are (say it with me) dependent through no fault of their own.
Muck Fexico!!!!
We need to write a letter to Calderone, telling him we’re coming by the millions, and we want our federale aid. Imagine if such a letter were composed and signed by a million Americans.
heh
April 29, 2010 at 6:46 pm
So basically we’re paying to terrorize, kidnap, rape, and murder ourselves using Mexico as a proxy? Gotcha!
Oh yeah, Arizona is wrong for standing up and protecting itself. What a screwed up, upside down world we live in.
April 29, 2010 at 10:42 pm
Not only that, but every time we buy gas we are lining the Saudi’s pockets while they turn around and use that money to fund Wahabbism and terrorism, killing our soldiers!
April 29, 2010 at 5:42 pm
back in the 1930s or 40s or was it the 50s, Mexico had a civil war, just like the Spanish civil war.
When the war happened they hunted down the Catholic priests and murdered them.
The elite have been in control of Mexico for a very long time. They have done nothing to help the population who are generally very poor.
It should be obvious that the Communists in charge in Mexico have always been destroying that country.
No wonder people try to cross the border into the USA.
The Mexican-American war happened a very long time ago. It is absurd that these Mexicans claim California and the other states as their territory. They lost that war fair and square –
Remember the Alamo.
April 29, 2010 at 5:49 pm
Damn straight!
Remember the Alamo.
Mexicans needs to remember also that Sam Houston did not allow the Mexican Army to kill Santa Anna.
April 29, 2010 at 6:16 pm
AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!! Let’s start reminding them!!!!!!!!!!
April 29, 2010 at 6:18 pm
Aussie, I just love how interested you are in the United States and, in particular, our current dilemma.
I know I’m gonna sound like a kiss-azz, but I love Australia and the many Australian kids’ book authors I’ve worked with.
I wish the sitch here weren’t so dire. It would free up time to get to know more about the good folks Down Under.
So, just want to say thanks, and love you.
April 29, 2010 at 7:21 pm
Hillboyz, I love your idea. I don’t think the politicos in Washington will because that would require common sense, something that I don’t think any of our politicians possess (at least not recently).
What’s even more galling is that Mexico is a big, fat hypocrite in this debate. I mean, not only do they treat their southern neighbors with contempt (the kidnapping, the raping, and the theft leaves one speechless) but they also treat their indigenous population like they’re lower life forms. I agree that the open borders situation benefits Mexico more than the US or the US taxpayer because it allows them to push out those they can no longer support, namely, the poor, unskilled, criminals, etc.
I’d go one step further and cut off their foreign aid and that includes the billions of dollars we’ve funnelled to help Mexico eradicate the drug cartels and trade. It’s time to finally recognize what’s in front of us, especially those of us, like myself, who live in the Southwest: Mexico is a narcostate. Just like Afghanistan. Any “hint” that there is a democracy disguises the ugliness of what really is going on in Mexico. The cartels are the shadow government in Mexico and they have insidious tentacles in all levels of government and the military/police.
Mexicans are the ones who’ve been disingenous about this issue. It’s time to cut them off. Just like we should with Afghanistan.
On a personal note: I know for certain that I’m living in a suburban development here in Colorado which illegals built and are still building. I see work crews when I take my dogs for a walk and they’re mostly either Mexican/Central American speaking Spanish with a white foreman overseeing them. The illegal work trade here in Colorado is a open secret and ugly fact of life that big business employs to lower their labor costs due to the taxation and regulation they face. Thank you federal government.
April 29, 2010 at 8:54 pm
Let me put on my professional hat here…
Strategically, it would me a good option. You are attacking the Mexican Government (IIRC, the Mexican oil company is government-owned) in its wallet, but not getting a lot of people killed or burning their homes. And you are exploiting our overwhelming advantage in seapower and special operations. Pitting strength against weakness is always good strategy.
Operationally, it’s harder. You want the wells functioning, so it means a SEAL assault. The number of SEALS available would be a serious limit, I suspect.
My assessment? Good strategy, but operationally marginal. I’d look at interdicting the tankers shipping the oil as a primary option, with seizure of the wells as a backup.
April 29, 2010 at 9:03 pm
Blasted computer are my comment!
Anyway, my professional opinion is that the strategy is sound, but the tactic is not optimal.
Seizing moneymaking assets hits the Mexican Government in the pocketbook, but does not get a lot of people killed or bun down houses. And this sort of thing exploits our advantages in seapower and special operations to the fullest – which is always a good idea.
On the other hand, seizing an oil platform without damaging it too much is work for SEALs. And there is a limited supply of them. Probably too few to conduct a simultaneous seizure.
A better option would be to implement a blockade of Mexico. Seize the tankers that ship the oil. There are fewer of them, and they aren’t hard to track.
I don’t think the Mexican government really understands how close the United States is to declaring war over illegal immigration.
April 29, 2010 at 9:47 pm
“I don’t think the Mexican government really understands how close the United States is to declaring war over illegal immigration.”
Er. I don’t think I understand how close we are to declaring war over illegal immigration. Where are you from, what are people in your area/your social circles saying that makes you think violence is imminent?
This is a serious question, no snark is intended.
April 29, 2010 at 10:44 pm
Maybe he was speaking metaphorically rather than literally?
April 29, 2010 at 9:45 pm
I’m for whatever it takes but I think for anything to happen, the situation has to get pretty dire here for the average American. Of course noone wants that, but it’s very possible and some people are predicting it.
Just one example is Gerald Celente who does Trends Research and predicted the housing crash among other things. He is predicting a depression for the US (based on the government printing money backed by nothing). He thinks NYC will look like Mexico City crime-wise, and that the backlash against the illegal situation in this country is going to be pretty big.
April 29, 2010 at 10:55 pm
I’ve heard Celente interviewed on my local talk (i.e., “hate” radio, lol) — KSFO 560 a.m., where Savage got his start, and man, he knows his stuff.
April 29, 2010 at 11:25 pm
Michelle Malkin has an excellent post on the topic:
http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/28/police-state-how-mexico-treats-illegal-aliens/
April 30, 2010 at 7:35 am
Have you heard of the “Five generals plan?” This plan uses Mexico’s corruption to our advantage. There are five Mexican military generals that have responsibility for a section of the border with the US. The plan calls for us to deposit one million dollars in an account for each of them. Each time we catch an illegal on our side of the border, we subtract $10,000 from the account of the general that has that part of the border. At the end of the year, we give the balance to that general and start over again.
Five million dollars a year would be an extremely cheap way to solve the problem.
April 30, 2010 at 9:51 am
Hillbuzz guys maybe you could put your sleuths on this. Years ago in Chicago suburbs actually one of the guys was trying to give one of our Mexican girlfriends a cheap shot. It was about the discovery of oil in Mexico and/or off shore. He said something to the effect about “all you Mexicans are going to get rich” she said, No,all the wealth in Mexico is owned by the upper 1 per cent of the country(politicians) and regular people are going to get nothing. She was 5th generation American (Mexican by extraction) and very politically savvy-both countries. Most of the Mexican people we knew were either natural born or naturalized but the families would keep the villas in Mexico and visit friends and relatives when they could due to work so they were always clued in.
April 30, 2010 at 10:40 am
great idea.
May 1, 2010 at 8:42 am
Yes. Michael Savage has been saying that for the years I have been listening to him. He say a barrel of oil for every illegal from Mexico.
May 1, 2010 at 3:46 pm
[...] Question: Has anyone ever proposed seizing Mexico’s Gulf oil to pay for all of the Mexican cit… [...]