H/t Katie

We have less than two years to eliminate the use of the word “polarizing” as an attack against female candidates.

This has been the primary MSM-approved first attack against Hillary Clinton for almost 20 years now.  It was the first thing out of people’s mouths when we campaigned for Clinton in Iowa in 2007, leading up to the Caucus.  ”She’s so polarizing”, people would parrot.  When pressed as to what they meant, they’d hem and haw, drool a little, and occasionally admit, with the candor of children, “Well, the TV said it, and I listen to the TV”.

Honestly — a man in Clinton, Iowa, of all places, ironically enough, really did say that.  It was stunning.  ”The TV said it” is a lot more common than you’d think.  Especially in Iowa.  Just wait for the HillBuzz book — there’s a whole chapter on Iowa and all the inane things that we encountered there.  The “polarizing MSM-propaganda regurgitations” are just the tip of the iceberg…where “iceberg” is a stand in for “colossal pile of nonsense”.

Sarah Palin is running for president, people.  If there’s any luck in the world, Hillary Clinton will be running in 2012 as well.  The same “polarizing” garbage will be used against both of them.  In the worst, and most bizarre, scenario, where neither runs in 2012, the “polarizing” garbage will be used against the next woman to run for president — whether that’s Michelle Bachmann, Liz Cheney, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, Condoleezza Rice, or whomever else you can imagine.

“Polarizing” should be as unacceptable an adjective to use against a female candidate as “faggy” is to use against a gay man, or “negro” is against a black candidate.

We need to think of a way to take this word away from the MSM, so it becomes a fireable offense at the networks and newsrooms whenever it is used…just as “faggy” and “negro” would be.

One of the things we try to communicate to all of you is just how important words are to branding.  Words have great power.  The MSM has invested heavily in the term “polarizing”…it is the billion dollar stealth bomber in an arsenal, used whenever a woman needs to be taken down and “taught her place”.  It is employed against Democrats and Republicans alike, but only against the people the Left doesn’t like (such as Hillary and Sarah Palin).  It is never, ever used against Leftist figures.  Just try to find an instance where someone like Michelle Obama, Bernadine Dohrn, Cindy Sheehan, Janeane Garafolo, and other Leftists are called “polarizing”. If it’s happened, we’ve never seen it.

Similar to what we tried to do for Scott Brown in removing the Cosmo pics as a weapon the Left could use against him, we’d like to take the word “polarizing” from them, so that it can’t be used against Sarah Palin’s 2012 presidential run.

We have two ideas on how we can achieve this:

(1) Start calling every Leftist female “polarizing”, every day, so that the word is over-saturated in the public’s mind, and it loses all meaning…since the lines between conservatives, moderates, and leftists will have been blurred to the extent that every female is “polarizing”

(2) Extend the use of the word “polarizing” to men, animals, inanimate objects, cities, tissue paper, and various vegetables too.  Call everything under the sun “polarizing”.  Just like the word “genius”, which lost all meaning in the 80s when everyone’s child was declared a genius in some way, calling everything on Earth “polarizing” for the next two years will mean that by 2012, nothing will be polarizing any more.

We’re trying to think of a third scenario where Sarah Palin just comes out and embraces the word “polarizing” and turns it into a good thing.  Maybe you can help with that.

What we want to achieve is this:  in December of 2011, when we are on the ground in Iowa campaigning for Palin in Dubuque, Des Moines, or wherever, we want to knock on doors and NOT have the residents say, “Oh, she’s too polarizing, I can’t vote for her” and close the door in our faces.  It would be ideal if we could somehow turn this whole thing around and have them say, “Oh, I can’t wait to vote for that polarizing woman.  You look cold dear, have some of these polarizing cookies I just baked, with a steaming hot cup of polarizing tea to go with it.  And don’t mind that polarizing dog of ours, God love her, she’s just so polarizing, but doesn’t mean any harm.  Scratch her polarizing ears and you’ll be her polarizing friend for life.  Polarizing”.

There’s enough time to achieve this, but we need a game plan. We want to do the same thing to the word “racist” as well…to permanently take that away from the Left as its favorite weapon of choice to hit anyone who does not agree with them.

There is a way to take both of these words away from them, and it’s our job to find it.

What think you?