Maureen Dowd is a crazy person.
Late at night, we imagine her sneaking into her neighbors’ crawl spaces, with a Ziplock bag full of tapioca pudding, a rusty flashlight, and an old double-cassette recorder in a strange attempt “to capture sleepers’ dreams”. This is, after all, the woman who hears things…things that are never said…things like “You boy!” whenever people, accurately, call the current president A LIAR.
Damn liar, is more like it.
Nuts, is what Dowd is.
But, is she also a RAAACIST! for calling Dr. Utopia “One-Term Obama” in this latest rambling of hers?
Everyone else on Earth, apparently, is RAAACIST! to the Left, including us, so why isn’t Dowd RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST! too for saying the following about “The Lightbringer”?
* Obama is a disappointment
* Obama is a faux-populist
* Obama is plastic and hidden
Most bizarre of all, Dowd goes where almost no one in the MSM ever goes…and you would totally miss it if you weren’t reading close at the end.
She actually GOES THERE and alludes to the strange relationship Dr. Utopia, a married man, has with Reggie Love, his “6-foot-5 body man”. Dowd did this in a bit about Scott Brown playing basketball with his daughter Ayla. Well, Obama has two daughters. The elder of which is more than capable of playing basketball with him, just as Ayla is of playing with her dad. Why did Dowd note Dr. Utopia would rather be spending time sweaty, in private, playing with Love instead?
Somewhere in the bowels of Man’s Country here in Chicago, we bet guys in towels having a steam are wondering what Dowd was hinting at.
Who are we kidding. No one reads Maureen Dowd. And no one in Man’s Country’s talking.
Reggie Love and Dr. Utopia aren’t playing basketball, either. That’s for damn sure.
January 27, 2010 at 5:28 am
That is the first I heard of Reggie Love and a body man ? So i checked it out http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reggie_love_barack_obamas_body_man/
Thanks HillBuzz for adding to my education.
January 27, 2010 at 5:31 am
Besides, do you think that Dr. Utopia would want to lose a game to Senator McAwesome?
Naw, me either.
January 27, 2010 at 6:33 am
Understand Maureen Dowd? Aw, you guys crack me up.
January 27, 2010 at 3:30 pm
I do speak Crazy, however that is not the language Ms. Dowd uses in her latest piece.
She is channeling Frustrated Horny Woman.
(see the following:)
“Why settle for Ivy League cool when we can have Cosmo hot?”
translation:
“I want to ride this man. Hard.”
That’s why she threw out the Reggie Love reference at the end. In her mental universe, it’s OK to out The Old One because she now fantasizes about a New One.
January 27, 2010 at 6:47 am
Reggie Love? This is new to me . . .
January 27, 2010 at 9:24 am
Check People mag archives. They profiled him a few months prior to the election. Fine lookin’ fella.
January 27, 2010 at 11:49 am
With all due respect…umm no.
January 27, 2010 at 6:48 am
And where is he now?
January 27, 2010 at 9:25 am
Allegedly in D.C. as The One’s “trainer.” Wonder how much we’re paying for that?
January 27, 2010 at 7:00 am
The Dowdy one? Now there is a bitter clinger…hanging on precariously to her Botox; her colorist appointments and her Pulitizer (I have envisioned her wearing it, on a large chain, rocking her inner FlavorFlav…)
If MoDo is off (here it comes….oh my is this eveh RAAACIST) the plantation…then The Won is really, really in trouble.
Maureen was giddily proUtopia early on. He was truly her Lightbringer…and now she’s hinting at him homphobically? Wow.
Bring the jelly, Barry is toast.
January 27, 2010 at 11:21 am
Oh M Q-C … this is Irrefutable proof that Armageddon is nigh.
January 27, 2010 at 7:29 am
Sister ate crazy for breakfast.
She sounds biiiiitter, like Obama pissed her off personally.
That said, she always does. Ms. Dowd has serious man issues. Heartache.
January 27, 2010 at 9:57 am
Oh, yeah, she’s always had Man Issues. I think part of the problem is her personality. Some women give off vibes that repel any eligible men who earn honest living and are mentally balanced.
January 27, 2010 at 10:20 am
Makes you wonder how many batteries she has worn out in that magnum gold plated dildo she uses.
January 27, 2010 at 10:51 am
I heard she hasn’t been ‘quite right’ since Michael Douglas dumped her, which must have been back in the Stone Age.
Poor MoDo…all that bile must leave a horrendous taste in her mouth.
January 27, 2010 at 3:42 pm
Douglas should have had better taste than Maureen Dowd…..!!!
January 27, 2010 at 7:36 am
Perhaps MoDo is a “Won Whore,” wishing to saddle up next to (or on top of) the latest hot male figure in power that comes along. Utopia isn’t flipping her switch anymore, so she’s turned to Hottie McAwesome.
This reminds me of Barbara Walters, who had a longterm affair with a Republican US Senator back in the 1970s. The Senator was married and black, so one can only imagine the tension that existed between the Senator and the Senator’s wife.
MoDo’s just wanting a piece of action, not unlike Barbara Walters back in the day.
January 27, 2010 at 7:42 am
Not to be PC police, but please don’t use the word “whore” when referring to women.
You can use it against men all you want, like Ben Nelson, because he is a whore.
But not against women. Not on our watch. Ever.
We know you didn’t mean harm and we’re not scolding, but think about it: whore is what women are called, most often by gay men here in Boystown, at the drop of a hat. Without them even thinking. If guys don’t like a woman, she’s a whore or a cunt or a bitch.
You can make your same point about Dowd without using any sexual references that forever link women to sex in a negative way.
Be more creative.
Dowd, to us, feels like a bobbysockser with a crush on Fabian one day, and then Tab Hunter the next.
Or, in our world, she’s totally into Chad Allen and has his tiger beat posters up, and then she HATES Chad Allen and is all about Jason Bateman all of a sudden.
See how we can communicate the whole being enamored with these men thing without it being sexual. Crushing is what she is doing, not engaging in sex acts.
That needs to stop being the go-to forever used against women.
January 27, 2010 at 8:51 am
I understand your point, Hillbuzz, but could we use it against Mary Landrieu? After all, she took money just like Ben Nelson did. ;-)
January 27, 2010 at 12:36 pm
I have no problem adding that to Katrina Mary’s resume.
January 27, 2010 at 10:25 am
Dowd is a woman????
January 27, 2010 at 10:46 am
Gotcha. I’m used to being called a whore and a bitch, so I suppose that’s why I didn’t see anything terribly wrong with it. But I am not a woman, so I wouldn’t know what that’s like. Thank you for the correction.
January 27, 2010 at 12:31 pm
Can we use “post- menapausal, dry as a bone, media wench”?
January 27, 2010 at 12:41 pm
Would you want male pattern baldness brought up against you?
If not, don’t go there with menopause.
No gender specific attacks.
Attack what she says and does, not the body she’s in.
January 27, 2010 at 2:21 pm
I’m from Louisiana, of course I speak crazy! What would you like translated? lol
January 27, 2010 at 2:41 pm
Fair enough, point taken.. for the record I have a great head of hair.. How is this one..”spurious,apocryphal courtesan”.
January 27, 2010 at 2:43 pm
courtesan is once again a gender based insult against women.
Lunatic.
Fool.
Incompetent.
Those are gender neutral hits on people who deserve it.
We’re telling you — you lose half your audience when you attack a woman with gender-baited coding. If you want to be most persuasive, NEVER go there. It would be nice if you didn’t even think it, but guys don’t always realize how offensive this stuff can be.
January 27, 2010 at 3:01 pm
“agamous, parthenogenetic antagonist”
January 27, 2010 at 4:00 pm
help I had to look up courtesan!!!!!
I think we use another name for the same kind of lady – “call call” ;-)
I do not think I have ever heard courtesan used in a gender specific denigration. :(
January 27, 2010 at 4:43 pm
Thanks Maggie, I didn’t think I was out of line on that one..
A courtesan was originally a woman courtier, which means a person who attends the court of a monarch or other powerful person
January 27, 2010 at 7:04 pm
Have we covered witch yet?
January 27, 2010 at 3:46 pm
Kyle that is not a good idea. It is insulting to other post-menopausal women.
January 27, 2010 at 7:43 pm
Yeah, I’m with Maggie. Diss the woman for being crazy, don’t diss her because she went through a normal part of female aging.
January 27, 2010 at 2:44 pm
I want to suggest the term `groupie’. It most accurately conveys the submissiviness and giggling giddiness Dowd gets in the presence of male authority figures.
January 27, 2010 at 3:47 pm
I agree with using the term groupie…. it has all the necessary connotations that fits with MoDo
January 27, 2010 at 5:14 pm
Yeah, but then it leads to Plaster Caster and back of the tour bus images I don’t think we need in our heads right now.
January 27, 2010 at 11:58 am
Senator Edward Brooke … from Massachusetts. Now there was a handsome, elegant man a la James Earl Jones. Never could figure out what he saw in Baba Wawa.
January 27, 2010 at 12:07 pm
she has a rather large mouth.
January 29, 2010 at 7:26 pm
Well of course that’s it. I’ll never be able to look at her again without thinking of your astute clarification.
January 27, 2010 at 7:37 am
I’m so glad to see you bring up the point, that I’ve YET to have addressed on websites when I mention it….WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE WHO NOW DISLIKE OBAMA NOT RACIST???? I’ve spent the past 2+ yrs being called a racist, being told I’m in denial of my deep-seated racism, was told that IF Obama lost the election there could only be ONE reason. That nasty Janene Garofalo told us all that we had inferior limbic brain development and that the reason for the Tea Parties was because we couldn’t stand to see a black dude in the White House(while Keith O-blech-man nodded and looked all concerned).
Now, suddenly being anti-Obama is because of his record, his lies, his lack of experience? Hello? Where is the delicate and feminine Janene, telling them that they have finally gotten in touch with their inner hatred for 1/2 black folk? Yeah..I’m pissed, can you tell?
January 27, 2010 at 10:31 am
Don’t you understand you fool? Now Get this straight (sic)!!! I will not repeat this for you again!!!
When a Republican or Independant criticizes a black person, THAT IS RACISM! GET IT!!! PURE RAAAAACISSM!
When a Democrat does it, it is simply a loving reprimand of the fraternal kind. Understand!
Did you ever play Monopoly? For the Dems it is akin to owning an endless supply of Get Out Of Jail Free cards.
January 27, 2010 at 3:24 pm
Except for the fact the very first group of people that were continuosly attacked and called RAAACIST,for seeing Obama for all that he is(…or isn’t)were Dems. Bill and Hillary and all of Hillary’s supporters, us bitter clinging racists.
January 27, 2010 at 2:52 pm
What about Christopher Hitchens? There’s a guy who really makes me puke. His review of `Game Change’ was the most hypocritical, dishonest, covertly self-serving piece of crap he wrote in a while. Which is saying something. He thinks Bill Clinton was racist just for telling Teddy Kennedy that the only reason he was supporting Obama was because he was black. This even though back in early 08, Hitchens observed that a white guy with a resume’ as thin as Obama’s would have been laughed off the stage. Why does he still have a reputation for being a principled journalist?
January 27, 2010 at 3:50 pm
yet Bill never spoke a truer word… someone with so little experience in the real world is probably only good for serving coffee……..
January 27, 2010 at 7:56 pm
I think a thoughtful answer may be thus…When we were disliking Obama before the election, the perception was that he had not done anything to deserve the dislike. The dislike of him at that time seemed to be knee jerk reaction. You were (and are) a racist for PRE judinging him. We are not a racist, we did not PRE judge him, he failed and we judged that.
I am not saying I agree with that. I am trying to answer your question in the way a Liberal would if they were able to state their POV.
January 27, 2010 at 7:56 am
Titus2, the Gremlins at WordPress won’t let my phone ‘do’ full site this a.m. So I can’t ‘reply’ directly to you, but hope you read this (as your post made me think of):
A rare ‘funny’ made by the usually un-comic Wanda Sykes. Remarking at the pride in the First Black President(tm) she said ‘it will be great until he starts screwing up, then everybody will be like ‘who let the mulatto in here?”
January 27, 2010 at 8:17 am
LOL!!! I hadn’t heard that one before. I’m not a fan of hers(that’s being polite), but even a broken clock is right twice a day.
January 27, 2010 at 10:56 am
Wanda Sykes is a RAAAAAACCCISSSST!??
Who knew?
January 27, 2010 at 11:34 am
She’s also the one who likened BO to a big overwrapped, gawdy Christmas present that turned out to be underwear.
She’s missing her Clinton panties (she said).
January 27, 2010 at 11:40 am
I stand corrected!!!
Wanda has been funny….TWICE!!!
I may have to revisit MonsterInLaw for Wanda (and she was FUNNY in that)…there maybe hope for her yet :)
January 27, 2010 at 3:52 pm
I thought her racism was always obvious.
The trouble is that everyone sees whites as racists and they do not see the same thing among the ethnics…. the Indians, Chinese, Vietnamese, Greeks, Italians…. they all have racist tendencies.
January 27, 2010 at 8:12 am
Uh… that you tube video is CREEPY.
January 27, 2010 at 9:38 am
Here is a side by side comparison of what Dowd calls Obama and what she thinks of her new crush.
January 27, 2010 at 10:35 am
you forgot……. fashion disaster of a teleTUBBY hubby versus elegant TV ancorwoman wife.
January 27, 2010 at 3:55 pm
and she still makes the error about “professor”. The man was never a professor and he has no papers published in his name
January 27, 2010 at 11:19 am
She is just having Post-Obama-Mania Trauma!
She should take a Blue pill and get over it…there will be more Marxists to come along and she can sign up for the propagandist team once again!
January 27, 2010 at 11:31 am
This is the third piece I know of where MD has been negative out BO. I think she’s been over him for a bit.
And yeah, it’s interesting isn’t it…a man with two little girls who would just love time with daddy and instead, daddy is off with his friend boy.
January 27, 2010 at 7:01 pm
Maybe Mo’s brother has finally gotten through to her.
January 27, 2010 at 11:32 am
I just think it’s LOL-funny that this is the video to accompany a Maureen Dowd entry.
January 27, 2010 at 11:37 am
A little off topic–but the Health Care Bill is still not dead, and the arm twisting of Snowe, Collins and Lieberman has been ratcheted up
we need to bombard the Senators again , CNN poll has approval for this bill down 20 points.
January 27, 2010 at 3:56 pm
this is dangerous because Kirk the jerk is still hanging around.
January 27, 2010 at 11:56 am
[...] What do I expect from the State of the Union tonight? There is a wide array of areas that may come across TOTUS. The Anchoress has a nice round-up of the potential topics, with a side of religion, that is essential reading prior to the event: Politics & Religion until you puke. Gateway Pundit has an analysis on the next administration-agenda-item-to-be-mishandled: Obama’s Socialist Advisers Are Behind His Push For Immigration Reform. TOTUS may even give a shout-out to the newly-identified Ellie Light! Perhaps Maureen Dowd will have some clever analysis, too! [...]
January 27, 2010 at 1:01 pm
It’s a good thing I am a cold-hearted conservative with no compassion for the down-trodden or I would find myself utterly worried about the creeper in the apartment. Is she crazy or just homeless and hungry? Is there a follow-up? Wait, two things (A) I’m cold-hearted and I really need to remember that before I work myself into a frenzy and (B) that wasn’t exactly the point of the video, was it?
These people worshipping at the alter of Brown are starting to worry me. I hope it fades with the next election. The last thing we need is another Obama. UGH. Even if he is a conservative—sort of.
January 27, 2010 at 2:36 pm
Hill Buzz, I have someone in Chicago you might want to try and speak to, and know where you can find them.
January 27, 2010 at 2:39 pm
HillBuzz@gmail.com
January 27, 2010 at 3:14 pm
Check your email
January 27, 2010 at 3:00 pm
“agamous, parthenogenetic antagonist”
wow that’s a mouthful
January 27, 2010 at 4:11 pm
I’m completely LOST …. what does that video have to do w/ anything? I mean I am lost!!
January 27, 2010 at 10:52 pm
Well it comes down to this… Reggie Love is Obamas “Power Bottom”… Obama, well he’s a “twink”…. ask any homo, they’ll explain the terms for you.
January 29, 2010 at 4:41 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kathleen Hanover, Not Maureen Dowd. Not Maureen Dowd said: LOL! RT @KathleenHanover Do you speak crazy? Can you translate what Maureen Dowd is babbling about now? http://bit.ly/cpdEbu [...]
February 6, 2010 at 6:41 pm
Maureen is letting the “cat” out of the bag about BO’s real self. Look up Mr. Love. Bill Clinton told BO that (BO) was “light on his toes”. What do you think that comment is doublespeak for? Look it up.
With respect to Maureen, I don’t believe in personally attacking anyone – let alone a woman – disparging the messenger does not futher the dialogue. Either the hint is true – or not. The truth speaks for itself. Resorting to ad hominem attacks (and attacking the messenger’s spelling – which no doubt someone will do with this post – does not further the dialogue.