We keep telling you that Al Sharpton, Henry Gates, Jesse Jackson, Eric Holder, and the rest of the grand poo-bahs of the Race Industry in this country may be disgusting, self-promoting, America-hating slugs, but they are damn good at what they do.  No one on Earth can grievance monger or fudge their diapers better than these “men”.  What they are MOST adroit at is weaponizing certain words, or magically making other words RAAACIST! that were never intended to be…whatever serves their grievance mongering at the moment.  They can race-charge just about anything, and believe every fourth word out of anyone’s mouth is “race code”. 

We need to learn from the Race Industry and start using their tactics for our own good — and to further the interests, in particular, of women we support like Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, two women who are routinely attacked with the code word “polarizing” by the MSM. 

At the risk of being blunt, “polarizing” is what the MSM writes when it wants to tell the public they think a woman is “a f***ing b****”.  This really is code word play, unlike all the times the Race Industry reads too much into things (or, if you are Maureen Dowd working in service of the Race Industry, just makes up quotes that aren’t real and imagines hearing words never said). When the media calls a woman “polarizing” they are telling Americans to “hate that b****”.  

“Polarizing” should, thus, be taken as a misogynistic, sexist, pejorative…because that is certainly how it is meant, as weaponized as it is against women. 

Today’s question, or challenge, of the day is to think of ways we can beat back against this.  Whether you support Hillary or Palin or you’re a fan of Sue Lowden, Meg Whitman, Barbara Mikulski, or, Hera forbid, Claire Bear McCaskill, you have to remember instances when these women were all called “polarizing” in efforts by the MSM to diminish, degrade, downplay, and marginalize them.  

Concern trolls, in particular, gleefully employ this word:  ”Oh, you know I like Hillary and everything, but she’s just so polarizing.  She’ll never win a general election”.  That’s what the Utopians were spreading around Iowa before the caucus…claiming Hillary was “polarizing”, which gave haters an excuse to lash out at her under that pejorative.  We see this being done to Palin now that the Left deems her a legitimate and likely 2012 threat (and we think, the only person on the field who can beat Dr. Utopia in the general election…though there’s also a certain woman we love who could whip his effeminate butt in the primaries). 

How do we stop it?

How do we, Race Industry style, hit back at the MSM and the liberal journalists and force them to stop using the word “polarizing”?  

The Race Industry has the ultimate liberal kryptonite:  shouts of RAAACISM!  There is no more certain way to stop a liberal in his tracks than to call him a RAAACIST.  Perseus was less effective holding Medusa’s acid-dripping severed head up to enemies, turning them instantly to stone.  Call a liberal a RAAACIST and not only freeze him in place, but kill his soul a little too, and possibly make him wet his pants.  

Calling liberals misogynists, sexists, or homophones doesn’t have the same weight or punch.  They might not even know what those words mean.  

But, we are throwing this out there because “polarizing” has to be taken out of their arsenal, though we don’t, yet, know how to do it. 

What think you?