Archive for December 8th, 2009
Long Live the Queen
h/t our friend Wendy in Hawaii for emailing us this article
Long live the queen! And no, Dr. Utopia, you egomaniac, we are not talking about you (though, here in Boystown, we certainly understand why your ears prick up when queens are addressed).
This is an article out of San Diego noting a few things we like to talk about, namely that Hera on Mount Olympus seems to take particular delight in punishing all the terrible people who backstabbed the Clintons in 2008. John Edwards, Ted and Caroline Kennedy, Bill Richardson, Chris Dodd, Greg Craig, Tim Russert, Kathleen Sebelius, the list goes on and on. All have had falls from grace, terrible illnesses, or self-inflicted embarrassments on the national scene. Not saying the Clintons had anything to do with this. Not saying we are happy any of these bad things happened to people we find repugnant. Just noting it all happened.
AS IF SENT FROM ABOVE.
There are some of you who insist on concern trolling around here, saying things like, “Oh, I wish Hillary Clinton had remained in the Senate!”. Why, so she would have to vote on the garbage legislation the Senate is pushing? No thanks. We much prefer her at the State Department, with the whole eigth floor of Foggy Bottom and the best view in Washington in her office, from which she can do whatever she wants, go anywhere in the world she chooses to look presidential, and forever remove any doubt about her foreign policy or executive experience. She’s running the most high profile Cabinet department, neogiating with foreign leaders, and serving as the only grown-up in Dr. Utopia’s Unicorn Infested World of Make-Believe.
The article above believes the Clintons are plotting against Dr. Utopia, and that our champ will resign from state after the 2010 election to mount another campaign for president.
We believe Sarah Palin’s 2012 presidential run HELPS Hillary Clinton, because it will be further pressure for the DNC to dump Dr. Utopia and not allow him to seek a second term.
If Dr. Utopia’s approval rating is below 45% by February of 2011, we bet Clinton resigns and awakens her army to go another round.
We get asked a lot what we would do if Sarah Palin runs for president. We believe Sarah Palin is indeed running for president. We love Sarah Palin. We have told you already that we are willing and eager to work for her, would quit our jobs, and honest to goodness live out of suitcases for another two years and go on the road for Palin through the primaries and general election. GLADLY we would do this.
What would we do if Hillary Clinton reactivated her army, after resigning as Secretary of State, and launced another presidential bid? We would, of course, work for her instead.
BUT, we make this promise here and now and trust you will hold us to it: should Hillary Clinton go up against Sarah Palin, we will not say one negative word about Sarah Palin EVER, and will promote our candidate’s positives and work 24/7 for her, telling America why Hillary Clinton should be our first female president. We will NEVER attack Palin. We will never malign her in any way. We will work our hearts out to make it an election about issues, and about who is best for the country. We believe in a Hillary-Sarah race, that person is Hillary Clinton. We also believe in a Sarah-Anyone Else race, that person is Sarah. So, you will respect us if Sarah Palin remains our second choice. We pledged long ago to people who’ve passed on that we would do anything we could for Hillary Clinton…and that’s a promise we keep to them, and also a promise we stand by because we believe in HRC immensely.
Now, we also get asked what we would do if Hillary Clinton was made the 2012 VP candidate instead of Biden…with Biden claiming he was too sick to run, or wanted to spend more time eating ice cream or something. Honestly, we’d be torn on this one, because we don’t believe Dr. Utopia is a good president, to put it mildly. We do not want him to have a second term. Could we work for Clinton if it meant giving Dr. Utopia for more years? Honestly, we don’t know. Could we vote for Dr. Utopia if he had Clinton’s name under his as VP? As much as we love voting for Hillary Clinton, we don’t know if we could “hold our nose” and cast that vote for Dr. Utopia too.
We’re afraid our love of country would trump our love of Hillary Clinton in this instance. It would indeed be a Sophie’s Choice, and we’d agonize over that for years, probably. We might even skip voting over that, and might skip working on ANY campaigns that year. Come to think of it, that’s probably what would happen. We would just withdraw totally. We hope this site is still around in 2012, and so we would be covering whatever Clinton was doing, but we don’t think we’d be political activists and overtly involved in the election. Things can and do change, but that’s our gut response today, in the last days of 2009.
Now, the last scenario is the most unlikely, and most interesting. What if Joe Biden steps down BEFORE the 2012 election, and Hillary Clinton is made Vice President to replace him? Personally, we think this is the only way Clinton would agree to run under Utopia in 2012…if Biden leaves early and she gets to be VP, so no matter what happens in the election, she becomes the first female VP. This would be a smart move on the part of the DNC and White House, because it would blunt Palin’s thunder. Some voters might feel it’s less compelling to NEED to install a female president if we already have a female VP in the Naval Observatory. What would we do in this situation, where Clinton becomes the VP before Biden’s term is up…and then runs with Utopia in 2012?
We actually think this would make us LESS likely to even vote, let alone work for the campaign. We’d figure she’d already have that hunk of history, so what would running for the VP slot in 2012 serve but to give Dr. Utopia the second term he couldn’t win without her.
It’s imperative to us that Dr. Utopia does not win a second term. He needs to be denounced by voters like Carter before him for the Clintons and their supporters to be avenged. One term presidents are defined as failures, and exiled to years of shame for the party’s losses. In a way, it’s worse than being a Dukakis, Gore, or Kerry. CARTER is one of the worst insults a Democrat can be called.
In general though, we’ll go where Hillary Clinton leads because she’s our champ. We love the Clintons, and will always be loyal to them. We do not, however, any more or ever again, love Democrats or the DNC. If the Clintons aren’t in a race, we’re free agents to pick the best candidate available. We do not believe Dr. Utopia is the best choice for the job he’s in right now, and doubt we’ll think otherwise in 2012.
Unless, of course, the unimaginable happens and Dr. Utopia suddenly goes Bulworth, stands up to and destroys the Race Industry, drives the Liberals from Washington like snakes from Ireland, and completely changes who he is, abandons the global apology tour, and starts being the American president this country deserves. Who knows, maybe the ghosts of Lincoln, Washington, and Roosevelt (take your pick which one) will visit him this Christmas and make him change his radical ways. That’s the ONLY way we’d ever vote for this man…regardless of who is VP is.
To recap:
(1) If it’s Hillary for president versus anyone: we choose Hillary
(2) If it’s Sarah for president versus anyone but Hillary: we choose Sarah
(3) If it’s Dr. Utopia for president versus anyone: we choose anyone else
(4) If it’s Dr. Utopia for president with Hillary as VP: we still don’t think we could vote for him absent a complete 180 change of heart and action in this man
Open Secrets and Media Darlings
Here’s something for you ponder, as more and more comes out about Tiger Woods, including, at last report, the possibility that one of his many lovers has photographs of him naked that she’s selling to Playgirl (move over Levi Johnston, and his teensy weiner!).
Apparently, “everyone” knew about Tiger Woods’ affairs and his behavior off the course, but the MSM narrative was that Woods “is a hero” and the Woods brand was something the MSM protected at all costs — refusing to write negative stories about him, or tell the truth about any of his shennanigans. “Everyone” knew Woods was up to the things he got up to, but the MSM would not talk about it.
Here in Chicago, depending on what community you’re in, “everyone” knows things about Dr. Utopia too. Our current president, back when he was a “community organizer” for ACORN, a state senator, and an adjunct law professor, was indiscrete and up to all sorts of shennanigans by all accounts. He not only sat in the pews at Trinity United Church gleefully taking in all the hatred and paranoid delusions of Jeremiah Wright, but like many black men at Trinity he’d then find somewhere up north to “unwind” when fiery sermons couldn’t quench the same thirsts as, say, nights spent at the baths. In Chicago, guys in their late 40s and early 50s, who admit they used to go to bathhouses, love talking about a skinny black guy with big ears who said he was a “state rep”, whenever he’d go to Man’s Country to be serviced by white men there.
We’re in our 30s here and have never set foot in Man’s Country. But, go to Sidetracks on Showtunes nights, Little Jim’s or Northend on Halsted, or the Lucky Horseshoe at Belmont and talk to guys who’ve lived the scene, been there, done that, and will admit to being lifelong fans of Man’s Country.
They’ve got stories to tell, believe us.
The thing is, despite both Man’s Country and Steamworks (the two bathhouses in Chicago) being in business for DECADES, and doing fairly well, even in this economy, few people here will admit they’ve ever been there. Since they won’t admit they’ve gone there, they don’t want to be quoted talking about anyone else going there either. Absolutely none of them will go on record being the guy who talks about that skinny, effeminate, black “state rep” who liked having white men give him fellatio (but never reciprocated, the stories go).
They know what happened to Larry Sinclair regarding coming forward with those stories.
But, they sure talk in bars.
And that makes us think of Tiger Woods and all these affairs. It seems if you were in golf circles, you knew all about this…and probably know even more. But, no golfers ever exposed Woods. Even his mistresses didn’t rat him out until he brought himself down. Once the floodgates opened, however, the truth all spilled out.
The same is going to happen with our current president in several areas, SOMEDAY:
(1) How did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, as he details in the book William Ayers ghost wrote for him, when no US citizen was allowed in Pakistan with a US passport in 1981?
(2) He admits to doing a large amount of drugs while going to Occidental College in California, smoking dope in high school, and doing cocaine at Columbia — but did he sell drugs too?
(3) What, exactly, is the big secret with his college transcripts, birth certificate, adoption papers, medical records, and other documents he refuses to release?
(4) Does he have early stage Parkinson’s as many suspect?
(5) Did he patronize an establishment called Man’s Country in Chicago during the 1990s?
(6) Was he a member of a support group of men at Trinity United Church who also enjoyed frequenting places such as Man’s Country? If so, who were the other members and did Jeremiah Wright arrange those meetings for these married men with similar interests?
(7) Did he take a $10,000 pay-to-play bribe from Yesse Yehudah when he needed money after his failed congressional race against Bobby Rush?
There are people who know the answers to all of the above, and more questions that we haven’t listed…questions people in Chicago talk about all the time, without any prompting from us.
The MSM did not want the public to know any more about Dr. Utopia than the public knows about Tiger Woods. All that mattered was that these were highly marketable biracial men with “compelling life narratives” the MSM embraced to drive ratings and create phenomena. It took years for the truth to come out about Woods. Maybe the truth will never come out about Dr. Utopia.
Maybe he’ll serve his term, retire to Hawaii, and make billions of dollars delivering speeches and having William Ayers write more books for him.
Or, maybe, people will start talking not just in bars, but to the public itself…just like some started doing about Tiger Woods.
Sarah Palin featured in new supermarket magazine called "Historical Moments in Time"
UPDATE: Thanks to a reader for finding the magazine online at Books-a-Million, so people can get this from them if they don’t see it in their stores.
*******
If you go to your supermarket or drug store, there’s a magazine called “Historical Moments in Time”.
We’ve only seen this thing out three times so far: once for Dr. Utopia, once for Sarah Palin when she was made the VP nominee, and now for Palin as a presidential candidate for 2012.
There’s no publisher given, which is weird. It’s $7.99 and an interesting read: there’s transcript of the Oprah interview, notes on Palin’s appearance on Rush, and bits about Barbra Walters too. There’s a large article entitled “The Case for Sarah Palin”. There are many comparisons to Palin made, ranging from Reagan to Margaret Thatcher to Golda Meir.
The photos used of Palin are great; for example, shots of Palin in the Oprah interview show her smiling, not screengrabs of her talking that would have her with her mouth open or looking strange…those are the kinds of pictures used for Oprah in this magazine. They honestly make the Charybdis of Lake Michigan look like the monster we insist she really is. Haggard, toad-like, racist, vile…the Oprah Chicagoans know well.
There are bits on the Tea Party movement, an article on Palin choosing to have her undercover angel Trig knowing he had Downs, Palin’s support for the troops, then an entire section showing Palin as a world leader, in very Margaret Thatcher-esque poses.
Towards the end, there’s a section on Palin connecting with average people, and her use of Facebook to hurl ninja throwing stars at the current administration.
It looks like something a presidential campaign would hand out.
It reads like Palin herself wrote it.
When we bought a copy at the CVS on Broadway in Boystown, the sales clerk, a woman in her 50s looked at it, smiled, checked that no one could hear her, and said, “I like her too”.
The magazine is on the table next to us as we write this. The photo of Palin is staring at us in the face. It sure feels like she’ll be the 2012 nominee and the next president.
If you can, get a copy…we’re sure there’s one in the White House with the teeth all blacked in and making the circles as a joke. Probably the “intellectuals” there now are putting it on their chairs, farting on it, and laughing and laughing, high-fiving each other like frat animals. Let them keep doing that.
Because there sure isn’t any magazine about Mitt Romney, Charlie Crist, Jon Huntsman, or Tim Pawlenty being passed around.
Got that GOP?
If you need work, US Census is hiring NOW. Could be $18.25 an hour.
If you are looking for work, go apply for a job with the US Census.
We’ve heard they are paying $18.25 an hour in some places, for up to 40 hours a week of work. These are temp jobs, obviously, and will finish some time in 2010, but that’s really good money while you are looking for permanent work.
In Chicago, Census jobs are being advertised with the following information. We think this works for the whole country:
Toll free jobs line: 1-866-861-2010
FedRelay: 1-800-877-8339 TTY
www.2010CensusJobs.gov
If anyone applies and gets hired, or has other information, let us know in comments. It seems like a good way to make some extra money, or to float you until you find a permanent gig…and we bet the people you meet through this would be interesting.
Also, we think it would be good to have conservatives, moderates, and independents in the mix…and not just the Liberal leftists this White House is trying to stock the Census Team with.
MUST READ ASSAULT ON PRIESTHOOD OF GLOBAL WARMING: TORQUEMADA IN EAST ANGLIA
Please read this excellent assault on the Priesthood of Global Warming, Torquedmada in East Anglia
Cliff’s notes:
* there’s been no temperature increases since 1998, unlike what Al Gore threatened would happen
* every time a Global Warming Priest pounds his fist into a desk screaming “The science is settled!” people realize how crazy these hysterics are. Science is never settled. That’s why it’s SCIENCE.
* Freudian psychology: the Priests of Global Warming say temperature increases are the result of Anthropogenic Global Warming, but they claim decreases are also the result of AGW. They want everything to be AGW, whether it is or not.
* if you graph sunspot activity since 1860 and then graph world ocean temperatures, the two will match perfectly. As Sister Francis Borgia taught us back in second grade, THE SUN CAUSES EARTH’S WEATHER AND AFFECTS OUR CLIMATE.
* if the AGW Priests are so against fossil fuels, why aren’t they promoting nuclear energy, which is the cleanest and safest energy production known to man?
* in the 1970s, this same Priesthood claimed we were going to be destroyed by an Ice Age before the year 2000. Whoops.
Would the New Republic ever caption a photo "Black people on the way to a watermelon patch"?
The Anchoress has a sharp find up today — about racism directed at former President George W. Bush and the unveiling of the plans for his Texas presidential library and museum (which are beautiful, by the way).
In a highly unprofessional turn, the New Republic had to slip in a nasty little racist jab by captioning one of the photos, “White people, perhaps on their way to an editorial meeting of The Wall Street Journal”. Here’s a screengrab before someone removes that caption, which we’re sure they will.
For starters, there would be no editorial meeting of The Wall Street Journal at the Bush presidential library, so the caption could never in our imagination be accurate. If this was a drawing of a generic office building in New York or Washington, maybe that caption could be true…because we imagine Wall Street Journal editorial meetings happen in buildings like that. But, the captioner could never be correct in the case of the Bush Library. It was a stab at humor that used a racist joke against white people and Bush that we don’t think would have been tolerated if blacks were the subject of the caption.
Just imagine the furor that would have erupted if the caption said, “Black people, perhaps on their way to a basketball game” or “Black people, perhaps on their way to a meeting at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago” or “Black people, perhaps on their way to the watermelon patch”.
Al Sharpton and the rest of the Race Industry would have been on the next plane to wherever that captioner works, ready to protest. Henry Gates would have been rolling on the ground in epileptic fits from shouting RAAACISM! so loudly (but, of course, coming around fast enough to scold, “Don’t forget to photograph me from my good side, only!” when the media arrived, professional that he is).
Part of the reason the Race Industry still exists is that white people don’t stand up to entities like The New Republic when they make race jokes like this — so there’s forever this beating down of white people for their “whiteness” while simultaneously making white people paranoid of ever disagreeing with a black person about anything.
We don’t think the joke made by New Republic was funny, appropriate, or even plausible. No more so than we’d think one made about blacks and basketball, Trinity United, or watermelon patches would have been funny, appropriate, or plausible.
Why bring race into a sketch of a building?
Why not talk about the merits of the architecture on display?
Isn’t the point of the article supposed to be a review of the presidential library’s design — and not some weird commentary on race?
If a new design came out for the Martin Luther King memorial that’s being built in Washington would we be treated to those watermelon patch comments by New Republic, seeing as we bet the people used to illustrate scale in those architectural drawings would be majority black?
When did New Republic become such a racist laughfest?
Question of the Day: How do we take the word "polarizing" away from the MSM so it can not be weaponized against women?
We keep telling you that Al Sharpton, Henry Gates, Jesse Jackson, Eric Holder, and the rest of the grand poo-bahs of the Race Industry in this country may be disgusting, self-promoting, America-hating slugs, but they are damn good at what they do. No one on Earth can grievance monger or fudge their diapers better than these “men”. What they are MOST adroit at is weaponizing certain words, or magically making other words RAAACIST! that were never intended to be…whatever serves their grievance mongering at the moment. They can race-charge just about anything, and believe every fourth word out of anyone’s mouth is “race code”.
We need to learn from the Race Industry and start using their tactics for our own good — and to further the interests, in particular, of women we support like Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, two women who are routinely attacked with the code word “polarizing” by the MSM.
At the risk of being blunt, “polarizing” is what the MSM writes when it wants to tell the public they think a woman is “a f***ing b****”. This really is code word play, unlike all the times the Race Industry reads too much into things (or, if you are Maureen Dowd working in service of the Race Industry, just makes up quotes that aren’t real and imagines hearing words never said). When the media calls a woman “polarizing” they are telling Americans to “hate that b****”.
“Polarizing” should, thus, be taken as a misogynistic, sexist, pejorative…because that is certainly how it is meant, as weaponized as it is against women.
Today’s question, or challenge, of the day is to think of ways we can beat back against this. Whether you support Hillary or Palin or you’re a fan of Sue Lowden, Meg Whitman, Barbara Mikulski, or, Hera forbid, Claire Bear McCaskill, you have to remember instances when these women were all called “polarizing” in efforts by the MSM to diminish, degrade, downplay, and marginalize them.
Concern trolls, in particular, gleefully employ this word: ”Oh, you know I like Hillary and everything, but she’s just so polarizing. She’ll never win a general election”. That’s what the Utopians were spreading around Iowa before the caucus…claiming Hillary was “polarizing”, which gave haters an excuse to lash out at her under that pejorative. We see this being done to Palin now that the Left deems her a legitimate and likely 2012 threat (and we think, the only person on the field who can beat Dr. Utopia in the general election…though there’s also a certain woman we love who could whip his effeminate butt in the primaries).
How do we stop it?
How do we, Race Industry style, hit back at the MSM and the liberal journalists and force them to stop using the word “polarizing”?
The Race Industry has the ultimate liberal kryptonite: shouts of RAAACISM! There is no more certain way to stop a liberal in his tracks than to call him a RAAACIST. Perseus was less effective holding Medusa’s acid-dripping severed head up to enemies, turning them instantly to stone. Call a liberal a RAAACIST and not only freeze him in place, but kill his soul a little too, and possibly make him wet his pants.
Calling liberals misogynists, sexists, or homophones doesn’t have the same weight or punch. They might not even know what those words mean.
But, we are throwing this out there because “polarizing” has to be taken out of their arsenal, though we don’t, yet, know how to do it.
What think you?
