Use this thread to update the latest on the races in Virginia, New Jersey, New York, Maine, and elsewhere.
Besides the gubernatorial contests in VA and NJ and the Congressional race in New York, tonight Maine’s voters are deciding if they want to treat gays and lesbians as human beings or if they want to tell us to get to the back of the bus. We hope after tonight we’ll be able to say “Remember Maine” and have it mean something altogether different, something intensely positive for the LGBTQ community.
Republicans, we are telling you, it is not politically astute to stand in the way of two guys or two women who want to have the same protections, rights, and benefits that Britney Spears was afforded to someone she legally entered into a spousal contract with in Las Vegas, but then annulled herself away from the next day, once sobered up.
And Hera knows we loves our Brit-Brit, but it’s true.
But, please notice folks, we did not use the word “marriage” in the context above. Deliberately.
“Marriage” is an emotionally charged word that we personally believe is keeping millions of people from having equal rights. As we get older around here, and we look at all of our straight friends who find someone they want to commit to and buy a house with and have a family and a dog and all sorts of other shades of stability with, we look at our own fabulous single lives and start to crave some of that stability. Especially when we realize how impossible it will be to have all the things we want in life as single guys.
But, we don’t insist on the word “marriage” because to us “marriage” involves a church with a steeple and inside scores of people. Insert various mumbo jumbo, some heinous flower arranging, precocious tots chucking petals into the air with glee, and mountains of taffuta and you’ve got yourselves a “marriage” — in the sense of the word that we were raised with and that’s indelibly part of our cultural fabric.
What we really and truly need in this country is a dramatic change for ALL Americans…a 21st Century leap forward in tandem with the invention of a cromulent new word for the joining of two people into a spousal contract that is completely in the hands of the state and not any church. ALL couples should have to go to City Hall for “spousage”…where the City would acknowledge a legally binding contract between them that makes them in the eyes of the law SPOUSES. It can be a man and a woman who are now spouses, like Britney and what’s-his-name from Lousiana in that church in Vegas. It can be two men who become spouses. It can be two women who become spouses. Everyone’s of legal age. Only two people are allowed to be in this spousal contract, with neither of them allowed to be the spouse of anyone else.
And religious people can then depart City Hall to head to a church to be married, just as they always have. The priest can don his finests reignments and gospel choirs can Hosannah on high as the whole damn town comes out to celebrate, just like they always have.
Meanwhile, after one of us leaves City Hall, he can head over to the roofdeck at Sidetracks or the garden atop the Center on Halsted with his husband and have a great big celebration of his own, with whatever traditions the two of them want to have. Miss Foozie can officiate it. The Chicago Spirit Brigade could rah-rah-sis-boom-bah. There could be strippers and drag queens and obscure B-movie actresses or pop princesses bused in for the occasion.
And think of all the money it would pump into local economies, ’cause ain’t NOBODY know how to throw a party better than the likes of us in Boystown. Hell, half of us are party planners to begin with.
We know few of you out there really understand our position on all of this, but we hope someday we’ll explain it in a way that really gels. We want to have everything we dream of in this life, including owning our own homes, having families, settling down, and ultimately phasing away from Boystown and the nonstop adventures and shenannigans and moving on, growing up, and doing all the things our straight friends get to do. Only, we don’t want a woman at our side for all of that. We’ll always have plenty of women as friends, and if you look at the masthead on this site you’ll see just one of the amazing women we’d go to absolute Hell and back for, but we like guys and won’t ever stop. And that should not mean we never get to be homeowners, never get to know security and financial stability, never get to become the best, most responsible, most established citizens we can be.
What’s standing in the way of that is the church, the temple, the mosque, the synagogue, the tinfoil space ship of Xenu. None of us want to traipse into any of those places and cause a ruckus.
We just want — when we find a nice guy — to be able to have all the things that a drunk pop star got to have one wild night taking solemn vows before an Elvis impersonating Justice of the Peace, but then was able to “take a mulligan on” the next day.
The semantics and religious connection of “marriage” is the problem…we’ve told you how we think it can be solved…and know we won’t ever see any progress as long as the Culture Wars rage on in this entrenched issue.
*****
UPDATE: It’s very early, but already Virginia’s being called for McConnell, who appears to be clobbering Obama supported Deeds. We don’t know how bad Deeds is losing yet, but it could be a very, very bad night for the Kool-Aid Gang.
UPDATE: Republicans take New Jersey and Virginia; Bloomberg might be in trouble in New York; still waiting on the NY-23 race, but it looks like ACORN shenannigans are making a difference there.
November 3, 2009 at 8:01 pm
Hat Tip to McNorman blog.
mcnorman
Seems that ACORN and gangbangers are working their magic today.
“The officer, who’s name we are with holding, specifically heard the men discussing that he was a police officer and that they now know where he lives. The officer confronted the men and they took off. He contacted the local police who responded and caught up with them and about a dozen other men a few blocks away. According to the police report, the men were known criminals and when asked why they were in the neighborhood they stated they were “campaigning for the Democratic Party.”
Video.
http://mcnorman.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/look-gangbangers-campaigning-for-de
November 3, 2009 at 8:03 pm
FOX has data showing 64% to 35% in VA. A sound landslide, if it holds.
November 3, 2009 at 8:45 pm
With 73% of the vote counted, McDonnell still winning, with 61%
November 3, 2009 at 8:05 pm
Political analysts in Jersey, on the NJN online feed, are saying it’s going to be a long evening.(8:05 p.m. eastern)
November 3, 2009 at 8:07 pm
Interesting about NJ.
Tracking Turn-Out in New Jersey and Seeing Some Promise
Because I’m a cynic (at least about New Jersey), I tend to think New Jersey will either go to Democrats today, or be close enough to steal (especially considering they’re already amassing emergency ballots). Nonetheless, let’s look at the bright side for a moment. It’s that kind of day.
Jim Geraghty has turn-out numbers in morning voting that look better for Christie than Corzine:
A trusted source tells me that as of noon, total turnout in the GOP the swing districts in NJ is significantly outpacing turnout in Democrat districts. The turnout ratio is not quite two to one, but it’s not that far from it.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/11/tracking_turnout_in_new_jersey.asp
November 3, 2009 at 8:07 pm
“emergency ballots”?????
November 3, 2009 at 8:55 pm
This fascist nonsence needs to stop. I heard on Fox that the “black vote was Crucial” Who are the racists?
November 3, 2009 at 8:10 pm
Virginia–down-ticket went republican too
November 3, 2009 at 8:11 pm
Hey hey hey!
Ho ho ho!
All the criminals have got to GO!
November 3, 2009 at 8:25 pm
EARLY returns
54% = Christie
36% = Corzine
9% = Daggett
The analysts are saying that my home county, Bergen, is a bellwether for the state. As goes Bergen, so goes the state. It’s the most populous county, and there are many Repubs therein.
November 3, 2009 at 8:26 pm
Did you find any results for Bergen already?
November 3, 2009 at 8:28 pm
No. Watching NJN, and they haven’t broken down results by county yet. Too early. However, turn out in Bergen was HEAVY. Bodes well for Christie.
November 3, 2009 at 8:26 pm
I’m guessing that the missing 1% is divided among write-ins or misc minor-party candidates.
November 3, 2009 at 8:28 pm
or rounding error?
November 3, 2009 at 8:30 pm
I’d missed the minor Indy candidate. My bad…
November 3, 2009 at 8:29 pm
51-Christie
40-Corzine
8-Daggett
1-Petris (a minor Indy candidate)
November 3, 2009 at 8:30 pm
Ah.
That web site address you gave has some very nice graphics of the “exit poll” questions.
http://www.njn.net/newspublicaffairs/coverage/09governorrace/electionnight/exitpoll.html
November 3, 2009 at 8:32 pm
I wouldn’t know, since I have taken my eyes off the live broadcast. ;)
November 3, 2009 at 8:34 pm
Then again, am I missing the exit-poll graphics when I switch tabs to post here?
November 3, 2009 at 8:31 pm
This represents only 1% of the vote. Sigh. Will definitely take a break soon to watch “V”–yay!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 3, 2009 at 8:39 pm
OK, this beats all. A Hudson County assemblyman who is under indictment is WINNING the race for his district this far.
I’ve said it before, the Dem machine in Hudson County, NJ, is FILTHILY DISGUSTINGLY CORRUPT! Jaysus!
November 3, 2009 at 8:40 pm
*thus* far
November 3, 2009 at 8:41 pm
49% Christie
42% Corzine
8% Daggett
with 2% of the vote counted
November 3, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Vote count represents Monmouth (YAY!), Ocean, and Cape May counties. Jersey Shore rocks!
November 3, 2009 at 8:46 pm
55% Christie
38% Corzine
7% Daggett
5% of the vote counted
November 3, 2009 at 8:48 pm
Grrrr. Menendez, that LaRaza cheerleader, is on the tube. Can’t. Stand. Him. Part of the Hudson County Filth Machine.
November 3, 2009 at 8:50 pm
58% of Indy’s voted for Christie. That seems huge if ya ask me.
November 3, 2009 at 8:54 pm
It is. Though I don’t want to get excited until at least 55% of the votes are counted, and even then, it depends on whether the big Dem counties have been counted.
Taking a break now, to watch *V*.
November 3, 2009 at 8:58 pm
Yeah, but there are alot of dead New Jersians who are committed democrats.
November 3, 2009 at 9:02 pm
Go vote for Sarah!!!
http://www.billoreilly.com/
November 3, 2009 at 10:03 pm
Done!
November 3, 2009 at 9:24 pm
With 36% of precincts reporting:
Christie 447,960 52%
Corzine 356,974 42%
Daggett 47,101 5%
November 3, 2009 at 9:39 pm
With 53% reporting, the race is now 4 points apart, Christie 49, Corzine 45.
November 3, 2009 at 9:47 pm
60% in
Christie 50%
Corzine 44%
November 3, 2009 at 9:55 pm
Anything new in NY23? Worried about what I see on Fox.
November 3, 2009 at 10:08 pm
CNN’s results are strange, the table shows the Dem (Owens) winning, but the blurb underneath says Hoffmann is winning. Only 2% reporting. Can’t find anything about it on Fox’s website.
November 3, 2009 at 10:13 pm
via Politico, with 20% in, Ownens is leading Hoffman 51 to 44. Scozzafava has 5%.
November 3, 2009 at 10:13 pm
The polls in NY 23 just closed an hour ago.
November 4, 2009 at 12:06 am
I have this gut feeling that Hoffman will pull this out. Reality aside. One or two districts will not report until tomorrow morning. Should be time that we win one in delayed vote counting. Have a good evening, and either way, it is how you treat your family that really matters. And good wine.
November 3, 2009 at 10:14 pm
74% of the vote in:
Christie-50%
Corzine-44%
However, analysts saying we might not get final results until tomorrow. I’m going to watch DWTS on the biggish TV, away from computer. Will go to bed hoping for the best.
For all the Repubs who’ve won and will win:
YOU HAD BETTER HAVE INTEGRITY! Don’t let us down! Don’t cheat on your spouses! Don’t go back on your word. Keep your hands CLEAN!
November 3, 2009 at 10:15 pm
Amen!
November 3, 2009 at 10:16 pm
With 74% of precincts reporting, NJ.com is now calling New Jersey for Christie with 49.7% to Corzine’s 44%.
November 3, 2009 at 10:21 pm
Fox called it for Christie
November 3, 2009 at 10:23 pm
NY-23 has a number of snags where votes will be coming in slowly. The rural parts will come in last, so it may be a good sign for a strong finsih by Hoffman.
November 3, 2009 at 10:29 pm
Exactly. About 8% or so just reported and Hoffman went from 7% down to just 4.5% down. We won’t know for awhile on that race.
November 3, 2009 at 10:57 pm
Praying for Hoffman!
November 3, 2009 at 10:32 pm
Also significant is that Republican Lt. Gov won re-election and Republican Ken Cuccinelli won in the Attorney General race in VA. The first time the GOP has held all three spots since 1997
November 3, 2009 at 10:56 pm
I feel like dancing, yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 3, 2009 at 11:04 pm
Hot Air had that there were machine malfunctions in one county, votes won’t be known until the morning.
November 3, 2009 at 11:13 pm
I think it was 2 counties, actually. And I think they were Hoffman leaners, too.
November 3, 2009 at 11:18 pm
the Christie crowd in NJ is chanting,
“Yes. We. Did. . . Yes. We. Did.”
too cool.
November 3, 2009 at 11:38 pm
Hoffman is only down 2000 in NY23, however, some voting machines have been impounded by court order.
We won’t know the result tonight.
http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20091103/NEWS09/911039947
November 4, 2009 at 12:17 am
According to Fox News Owens is projected the winner over Hoffman. Hopefully they’re wrong, but we’ll see.
November 4, 2009 at 12:59 am
He conceded…think he should have waited until after tomorrow..but..they will blame it on Sarah..and Beck and Rush…
November 4, 2009 at 7:24 am
The NY race is the one that REALLY mattered!! There’s another vote for whatever Egobama, Pelousy, and dirty Harry want. That’s a loss that’s gonna hurt. Thanks DeDe, you trader.
November 4, 2009 at 8:25 am
It doesn’t matter what you call it. Marriage, Civil Unions, or whatever. The issue is they hate us. They don’t want us to exist, and if we have to exist they want us in the closet.
November 4, 2009 at 10:09 am
I don’t hate you or anyone else. But if asked to vote up or down on (fill in the blank) marriage I vote NO!
The reason is simple. We are a nation of laws that are derived from one simple law: Man has unalienable rights endowed by his creator. Marriage statutes are simple codifications of marriage as defined by the same creator, which in all cases defines marriage as a union of a man and a woman.
Should a civil partnership have equal rights with respect to property, benefits and succession. Absolutely. With two major caveats: 1) that is not marriage as defined by the creator, 2) US government should have no role in property rights, benefits or succession in the first place.
November 4, 2009 at 1:09 pm
Separate, but equal ain’t equal