Someone we know from Chicago, who works in the White House now, just leaked us this advance copy of the upcoming address Dr. Utopia’s going to make to school children on September 8th. Personally, we’re surprised it’s so subtle and understated, considering the egomaniac, cult-of-personality, Kim Jong Il-wannabe who’s delivering it:
****** Transcript of President Barack Obama’s Indoctrination Day Address to the nation’s youth, September 8th 2009 ******
President Obama:
Good morning children, my youngest, most precious, and most devoted followers.
You can see me here in the White House, and I can see you too. I know when you are sleeping. I know when you’ve been good. And I know who is listening intently right now, and who’s thinking about the Jonas Brothers. Yes, little Billy Franklin of Davenport, Iowa…caught you again (laughs fatherly). But, that’s okay, you can still grow up to be a Member of Congress, or even my Chief of Staff someday, no matter how much you think about the Jonas Brothers.
I am a forgiving and benevolent Leader.
I am, in fact, The Lightbringer.
As Oprah Winfrey often told your parents via her daily TV yawnfest, I am indeed “The One”. I was sent here from the sky to solve all the world’s problems, lower the oceans, fix all your broken souls, and provide free unicorns to everyone. But, before I do any of this, I must first destroy the American economy, replace its military with a civilian defense force loyal only to me, and convert the mainstream media into my own propaganda machine (laughs some more). That last part is a joke, since I did that like two years ago.
(laughs and laughs again…so pleased with himself)
The reason I am addressing the Obama Youth today is that this will, indeed, be seen as the greatest day of your young lives, since it is the day you are to be activated as the first wave of my Civilian Defense Force. I decided to speak to you today, while at school, so that your parents could not intrude on our discussion. I am a stranger none of you know, someone none of your parents know, who wanted to spend some time alone with young children like this, so of course the media had no problem with this whatsoever. But, I couldn’t say the things I wanted to say to you with your parents around. Parents just don’t understand, as my dear friend Will Smith used to rap back in the day, when he was the Fresh Prince of Bel Air and I was just a young communist working my way up the Chicago political ladder “community organizing” with domestic terrorists under the umbrella of nefarious organization ACORN.
(laughs some more) Oh, mercy, those were the days!
And I want all of you children to grow up to be just like me, to hate everything that has always made this country special, to work hard to demonize anyone who criticizes you and intimidate and bully all those who will try to stop your radicalism.
I want to teach you the Alinsky Methods that have served me so well.
I want to be the friend, teacher, and deity that the likes of William Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Henry Gates, Jeremiah Wright, and my favorite imams have been to me.
I am the Lightbringer. I know better than your parents what’s best for you. Your teachers, those that are still in the room, are cut largely from the same leftist cloth as me, so they will help bring you to me, and help you serve me.
After I conclude my remarks today, your teachers will help you write letters to me, telling me how much you love me, and how much you are going to do to see that I succeed in my dismantling of this nation so that I can rebuild it in my own likeness and image.
I am “The One”, as Oprah insists, and Oprah is a very wise monster indeed.
I need the help of small children because you children have wonderfully sharp ears. You hear the things your parents say that might displease me. You have wonderful little voices that sound so nice on the phone. Your teachers will help you call me whenever your parents say bad things about me. They will help you write down the nasty things your parents say and do, so that letters can be sent to me telling me all about it.
At night, I will send very special friends of mine to visit naughty parents and teach them how they should love me. How all must love me. How all must obey me.
(laughs again) Now, don’t get all wee-weed up out there. If any of you tykes have a problem with this, it’s because you are RAAAACIST! Your teachers will take you straight to the principal’s office and everyone will know what a RAAACIST! you are. Because anyone who ever disagrees with a black person, on anything, in this my Glorious Post-Racial Utopia, must indeed be a RAAACIST! There can be no criticism of me or anything that I do that’s not 100% racially motivated.
Your teachers will instruct you on how best to call your parents RAAACISTS! as well. I direct you to do this when the maximum number of strangers or church members are around…call your parents RAAACISTS! in public and tell everyone the bad things they have said about me, so the whole community can organize to bring your parents to the Light.
My Light.
For I am the Lightbringer, and as of today, you are now all part of my Thousand Upon Thousands Strong Obama Youth Army.
(laughs)
Love the sound of that. Thought it up myself.
I am indeed a talented and inventive Living God.
As Chris Matthews, one of my most favorite pets, and the rest of the media can surely attest.
In coming days, I will continue to issue you new directives, but in closing, I want to reiterate how important it is for you to write lovely essays to me telling me how much you love me and how hard you are going to work to report any of your parents that disagree with me. I also would like glorious crayon drawings of myself running shirtless on the beach or bowing deeply to the King of Saudi Arabia, who is perhaps one of the few people in this world more glorious and dear to my heart than myself.
I am Obama.
I am your President.
I AM YOUR LIGHTBRINGER.
You are dear younglings. You are my treasures. YOU ARE MY ARMY.
Praise be…praise ME…and, now, SING. SING for me. SING ABOUT HOW YOU ALL LOVE AND ADORE ME!

September 4, 2009 at 3:15 pm
HB – This is hilarious! It is uber-snark! Great job! It added laughter to my afternoon! Thanks a bunch!
September 4, 2009 at 3:19 pm
me too.
September 4, 2009 at 3:20 pm
Very funny! I hope.
September 4, 2009 at 3:34 pm
SSNNNNNNARRRRRKK!
What’s hilarious is that the first sentence is actually believable.
September 4, 2009 at 11:13 pm
the best satire always has a ring of truth….You guys are on a roll. Thanks
September 4, 2009 at 3:37 pm
Why parents don’t trust the Educator-in-Chief and his comrades
“Obama served with Weather Underground terrorist and neighbor Bill Ayers on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge education initiative. Downplaying academic achievement in favor of left-wing radical activism in the public schools is rooted in Bill Ayers’ pedagogical philosophy. Obama served as the program’s first chairman of the board, while Ayers steered its curricular policy. The two oversaw grants to welfare rights enterprise ACORN and to avowed communist Michael Klonsky – a close pal of Ayers and member of the militant Students for a Democratic Society. SDS served as a precursor to the violent Weather Underground organization.
As investigative journalist Stanley Kurtz reported, Klonsky and Ayers teamed up on the so-called “small schools movement” to steer schoolchildren away from core academics to left-wing politicking on issues of “inequity, war, and violence.”
A cadre of like-minded educators and national service administrators across the country share the same core commitment to transforming themselves from imparters of knowledge to transformers of society. The “change” agenda trains students to think only about what they should do for Obama – and rarely to contemplate how his powers and ambitions should be limited and restrained.”
http://michellemalkin.com/2009/09/04/why-parents-don%E2%80%99t-trust-the-educator-in-chief-and-his-comrades/
September 4, 2009 at 4:07 pm
ditto. Like I said in another post- the school here is not showing his address – if they were – I would be there to hear exactly what the teacher said to the class after that.
September 4, 2009 at 4:23 pm
Thanks, I needed this!
September 4, 2009 at 4:33 pm
(MQ-C laughs nervously)…
HillBuzz is kidding right??? You are just pulling our legs right??? Right??? I mean…because this is soooo subtly narcisstic…that I could envision HIM addressing the tykes like this.
FWIW, I got to talk to our Superintendent today (total luck of draw…I think they were getting pounded with phone calls…they have even updated the SD webpage). My district is NOT showing the transmission live; they will tape it; review it (dept. heads, guidance counselors, appropriate teachers (history; AP classes; gov’t class; civics; school board members) and then decide if all of it; any of it; is deemed in accordance with their circulum. Any parents who does not want their student to view the presentation will be ‘opted out’ but WILL NOT be singled out (they will format some type of group viewing…if viewed at all)…so no one is made uncomfortable. He was reasonable and polite…will see what their decision is next week. My boys WILL NOT view the indoctrination…
September 4, 2009 at 4:59 pm
You are kidding, aren’t you Hillbuzz? It was the Oprah references that gave it away for me…. the rest seemed not so unbelievable when you think about it…Loved it. Brilliant snark job, boyz.
September 4, 2009 at 6:00 pm
I was told it would not be shown that day either but that it would be reviewed. Our
principal’s note said they believed the address was there to encourage education and that they would tape it and review it for possible viewing later. I sent a response to the principal as follows (my kids go to parochial school — hence, the 2nd paragraph). Sorry, it’s kind of long.
“I would prefer my children to not see the video regardless of how it is perceived by the teachers. I suspect the content will be innocuous, overall, especially in light of the concern it has generated. However, if you are familiar with the initial itinerary proposed for teachers by our government, there was language in it that asked students to write themselves a letter stating how they can help their president. The language was changed by the Dept of Education on Wed, Sep 2, to say write a letter stating how they can achieve their short and long term education goals. This is likely because the initial itinerary can easily be construed to be a form of coerced adulation. If we are going to incorporate the government in our children’s education, I would prefer a review of the Constitution and our founding fathers’ divine inspiration from God in creating it.
I have many concerns about our president and all of his associations. I find it odd how he ignores National Prayer Day and throws a large
celebration for Ramadan. He had the symbol of Christ covered up in a black shroud when he visited Georgetown University this spring. The University of Notre Dame created outrage from alumni and Catholics across the nation when they allowed him to speak there and offered him an honorary degree at their institution. Remember, he was one of the only Senators in the legislature who wholeheartedly supported partial birth abortion. This is a euphemism for infanticide.
For the above reasons and MANY more, I will find it an outrage if my child is subjected to watching this video and discussing it. I really do not understand why this is even being considered as acceptable. Why is it not acceptable for parents and teachers to challenge our children to work hard? Do you feel they need to hear it from the president in order to do it? Please help me understand if you find it necessary to in any way involve (our school).
Respecfully,”
Me
September 4, 2009 at 6:34 pm
Cyber high five, C Mill…outstanding letter!
September 7, 2009 at 7:40 am
My daughter is a 1st grade teacher. She teaches in a predominately black school. She said she didn’t have the permission slips in time to hand out to her students on friday…so she threw them away. Oooops!
My grandchildren came home with permission slips in their backpacks.
I asked her did she receive the after-indoctrination lesson plan..and she said not yet.
September 4, 2009 at 4:34 pm
Our Hillbuzz boyz are feeling scrappy today! First the Birther article, now this. Thanks for the laughs.
September 4, 2009 at 5:04 pm
LOL! Love the snark!
September 4, 2009 at 5:25 pm
By paragraph number three I’d figured out it wasn’t legit because he hadn’t said “let me be perfectly clean” six times. Baring that, you almost had me. Brilliant, gentlemen, absolutely brilliant.
September 4, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Duh …”perfectly CLEAR… Clean is Biden’s word.
September 4, 2009 at 6:15 pm
Belly up to the bar boys, er children.
All the free Kool-Aid we can force down your throat.
September 4, 2009 at 6:21 pm
What is the country in which a president decides to intervene in every school, for fifteen minutes, on the same day, at the same time, thanks to a televised message addressed to every little kid ?
http://europumas.over-blog.com/article-35691721.html
September 4, 2009 at 6:30 pm
Yes, the Hill Buzz Men are on a roll!
Thanks for all the hard work Men.
Here’s your reward.
http://www.benjerry.com/hubbyhubby/
September 8, 2009 at 1:56 pm
“Purple Koolaid”
September 4, 2009 at 6:30 pm
This is hilarious, but at the same time, scary since it has a ring of truth! When I first started reading, I thought you really did have an advance copy and I was getting angry. But then I realized it was a joke!!
Good work!
September 5, 2009 at 1:59 pm
DITTO!!!
September 4, 2009 at 6:46 pm
To Mary and others above whose school district is being so cooperative with the parents on this issue. I must say this is a big, big, win on the part of parents and a huge blow to Obama. The lefty school system seems to be a bit leary of this type of thing, and that says an awful lot if you ask me. The schools may be a bit fearful of the whole thing, or they are actually listening to you. Or both. So great job everyone!
September 4, 2009 at 7:30 pm
This is the same thing I was thinking…for those who think it’s silly that people were getting so upset about this…what do you think it says about this president? He was heralded as the second coming just 9 months ago and now the majority of people in this country don’t even want their kids to hear a speech on education from him? Why? Because in the past 9 months he has put the Constitution through the shredder and betrayed any miniscule amount of trust he had on Jan. 20th.
It just shows that we are not going to let him get away with it under our noses while we sleep.
September 4, 2009 at 7:13 pm
The lucky children that did not get killed in their mother’s womb!
September 4, 2009 at 7:15 pm
Vintage HillBuzz! This is an awesome piece! Thanks guys!
September 4, 2009 at 8:01 pm
At least six States School districts to boycott Obama cult of personality Video.
(AP REPORTS)
September 4, 2009 at 9:18 pm
Was anyone here aware that Sept. 8, by some miraculous coincidence, is also the same day Judge David Carter will hear Alan Keyes’ challenge to BHO’s eligibility – on the merits?
FNC reportedly plans to have cameras in the courtroom to televise the the proceedings (anyone know if that’s credible?).
More info, FWIW: http://tinyurl.com/kredop
September 4, 2009 at 9:41 pm
To all of you fellow, kindred spirits, denizens of the web, citizen journalists, and HillBuzzians…a new ‘er’ has been added to the cyber lexicon.
According to NBC (Nothing But Crap?) those of ‘us’ (anybody who is not THEM is an US) who actually want to make a ‘choice’ as to who our children listen too…are now…(drum roll) SPEECHERS!!!
Yes, in the Gibbsian ’silly season’ (which is when any one, any where questions his boss, or his motivations) there is now a new breed of ‘dissenter.’ The SPEECHER!!! Neighbor of the BIRTHER…neice or nephew of the crazy Uncle TRUTHER.
I oppose Health Care as well…sooooo does that make me a ‘HEALTHER’ or a ‘CARER?’
September 4, 2009 at 10:11 pm
While I am thankful that I don’t have a school aged child, and I have reservations about this broadcast to our school aged children, I’m having a bit of a hard time working up a lot of fury about it. Mainly because he is on television nearly nonstop, be it through speeches or media talk, and then there are the nonstop PSA’s he gives. It’s hard to shield anyone from it…sigh
It boils down to teaching our children to be strong enough and educated enough to understand what is right and what is wrong, and while we are at it, we should be working on any delussional friends and family members.
Agreed that the snark by our guys was off the charts, so very glad you’ve made time to keep us all informed and entertained!!
September 4, 2009 at 10:48 pm
Sure you can keep your children from it even though he is on the tele non-stop…it’s called power off or change the chanel…that’s what we do anyhow.
September 5, 2009 at 10:21 pm
I don’t have school age children either but if I did, I’d pull them out of school for the day. I totally understand why parents are upset. The man has slammed the US all over europe, made up history and apoligized for things that didn’t happen. Not an example of what I want my child to see. He is an embarrasment at the very least to America and it’s citizens. Let’s not forget the numerous times of “mispeaking” through his teeth. He has falt out lied, called citizens nasty names and let his own party label Aericans as Una American for speaking their mind-which is in direct disagreement with him. I can’t think of a worse example of what I don’t want my kids to think is OK
Catch them early in education is not just the Nazi way. It is the marxist way and the Ayers way. That is how you brainwash an entire generation. Even now Gibbs is chastizing parents for having the gaul to make decisions about their own kids and what they want them exposed to! There is a clear undercurrnet of “we know better than you, even though it’s your child”
September 8, 2009 at 2:02 pm
I have a 9 year old daughter who was singled out today by her teacher when she gave her the letter I wrote asking that she be excused from the speech. What a shame to have such narrow minded biased teachers in our classrooms…….
September 8, 2009 at 3:03 pm
ashleigh, that is just wrong on the teacher’s part. Were I you, I would have a little talk with that teacher. There’s no excuse for singling out a child in front of her class for ANY reason. That teacher needs training in sensitivity and how to be a better teacher.
September 4, 2009 at 11:13 pm
Just…..creepy.
September 5, 2009 at 12:05 am
*LOL* That was great.
September 5, 2009 at 6:12 am
Congratulations!
Jon Favreau could not have done better. Perhaps you should submit a resume.
September 5, 2009 at 6:59 am
LOL!!!
You got me!!
Thanks for bring back the “Singing Video”.
Would you or anyone here have the video where they feature, Axelrod as the controlling force behind Obama’s rise to power. I believe they are marching along according to plan. Too bad for them; but great for us the American people, are comging out of their collective “COMA’s”!!!
September 5, 2009 at 6:59 am
OOpppss… coming
September 5, 2009 at 9:14 am
One of the many reasons I look forward to reading this site. Thanks, again.
September 5, 2009 at 9:30 am
I find it appalling that so many in the public and even in the media do not understand what the original intent of this indoctrination of the children of this country is and was and what a dangerous precedent it is (nay sayers will remind us that Bush, Sr spoke to all the school children…the difference is that he was straight up with his message…stay in school and don’t do drugs…nothing political at all!) It is the start of a subtle brainwashing for support of Obama (One of the leaders of the Marxist party said: if you have the children, you have the votes). This is just wrong on so many levels. First, party-directed politics should not be allowed in schools. Second, the parents should have been consulted beforehand (they are not Obama’s children, so he shouldn’t have a say in it) and third, all of those who think this little exercise is/was harmless should realize that this speech was to be followed by curriculum changes by Obama.
This is more than just frightening…it is an affront to democracy and challenge to the freedoms this country affords all of us.
September 5, 2009 at 9:30 am
Hillbuzz, you forgot to add the paragraphs where Dr. Utopia tells the kids the world will explode if global warming is not stopped by passing the super duper crap and tax bill. Also the part about anyone that doesn’t want deathcare passed is a selfish meanie that should be demonized. Thinking only of themselves and their kids and not “taking one for the team”
September 5, 2009 at 1:20 pm
Why Sept 8?? Why has Obama chosen Sept 8 to give his speech to school children? Why not the 9th or the 10th or the 11th, to make sure all children are back at school by then? Know why he chose the 8th? Obama chose the 8th to give his teleprompter speech to school children in an attempt at distraction. Here’s what he wants desperately to deflect attention away from: On Sept 8, at the very time Obama will be reading off his teleprompter, there will be a court hearing in Santa Ana, CA, to review evidence that Obama is not a natural born citizen, and therefore not eligible to be president. In review will also be evidence that he and Michelle have in their possession some 39 different Social Security numbers, one of which Obama used to apply to and attend college. That particular SS number belonged to a deceased man who was born 119 years ago!! Also during that court hearing will be a review of the authenticity of an Obama Kenyan birth certificate that has surfaced. This court hearing is very significant in that, to date, no judge has had the balls to go forward with the case, even though the first of many lawsuits on this issue was filed in Oct, 2008 – well before the election – with numerous lawsuits filed since then.
September 5, 2009 at 10:40 pm
Very interesting on several levels. Do you have a source for the social security number thing? And how fitting the hearing is in California.
September 6, 2009 at 6:40 pm
This is a good site for info:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103918
Please sign the petition at this link:
http://www.wnd.com/obama_petition
and then, send it around to everyone in your address book. It’s gathered nearly half a million signatures so far.
The young man who allegedly obtained Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate (Lucas Daniel Smith) has signed a declaration under penalty of perjury to be presented at the court hearing on Sept 8.(!!!) (see below).
Filed with Court Declaration of Lucas Daniel Smith and a copy of Kenyan hospital Birth Certificate for Barack Hussein Obama
Below are:
~signed statement by Mr. Smith re: Kenyan bc under penalty of perjury
~copy of Kenyan bc with baby Barack’s foot print
~Orly’s idea
~Orly’s pledge
~email from Norton R. Nowlin
(Ten, I’ll send you the link to these docs, they won’t cut and paste into this space.)
September 6, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Ten, also there are several others on this blog that I’m responding to, so be sure and look around at the nearby posts for more info that I’ve provided.
September 7, 2009 at 1:27 am
see my reply to # 19 above
September 6, 2009 at 7:32 am
WOW!!
The “SS#” thing is news to me…WOW!!!
BTW:
I believe the “1st” Lawsuit was Aug 2008,
by Phil Berg in PA-”Pre” Convention!!
Shame on the Democratic party for NOT investigating!!
September 6, 2009 at 9:29 am
Yes. Unfortunately Berg also had the discrediting quality of having been a 9/11 “Truther” – thus the “Birther” meme was born.
If the SS# isn’t a red herrirng, then by all indications, Hillary’s people must have had that info. If so, then the fact that she didn’t burn BHO with it during the primaries indicates that the DNC wanted to preserve his credibility for a future candidacy. This would make perfect sense in the overall DNC strategy.
Assuming the above, then it seems clear now, based on BHO’s flailing Keystone Cops operation, that the DNC braintrust’s original plan to push him toward the WH was accelerated by at least 4 years for some reason.
September 6, 2009 at 6:47 pm
You are correct about Berg and the “birth” of the “birther” tag. I know Hillary started up this birth certificate thing (of course, the left blames the right for it) during the campaign, and I don’t know why she dropped the ball on it – I haven’t read anything about that. I’m wondering if she decided to back off, knowing that it would come out if Barry got elected…and then she’d step in with another run for Pres.(?). Maybe she thought that was the quickest route to the Oval Office. What do you think?
September 6, 2009 at 6:30 pm
Please sign the petition at this link:
http://www.wnd.com/obama_petition
and, then send it around to everyone in your address book. It’s gathered nearly half a million signatures so far!
Here’s the order for the Sept 8 hearing and how it shows on the docket. The public is invited to be in the courtroom, to provide support for Dr. Taitz.
August 22nd, 2009
08/21/2009 44 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER SETTING SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 HEARING ON MOTIONS: (See document for details.) In summary, the Court sets for hearing at 8:00 a.m. on September 8, 2009, (1) the Discovery Motion, (2) the Service Notice, and (3) the Ex Parte Application. All parties are ordered to be present. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla) (Entered: 08/21/2009)
The word needs to get out to those that will attend the hearing for discovery with regard to Obama’s eligibility:
Judge: David O. Carter
Time/Date: 8:00 AM Pacific
Tuesday, September 8th 2009
Location: Federal Court building in Santa Ana, CA
Hearing: Motion for Discovery of records showing relevance to eligibility
Send this info to your Congressman/Governors, and/or those that you believe would be interested in knowing about or attending this hearing. It is a critical matter of critical importance. The Constitution and requirements for eligibility should be upheld .. no one should get a free pass .. no one is above the Constitution or above the Law.
This hearing, if motion is granted, would see to it that, by court-order, demanding pertinent records from places that have them, including Occidental College, Columbia U., State of Hawaii and so on.
September 7, 2009 at 1:26 am
See my reply to # 19 above.
September 5, 2009 at 3:15 pm
(elizabethrc sez: “…nay sayers will remind us that Bush, Sr spoke to all the school children…the difference is that he was straight up with his message…stay in school and don’t do drugs…”————I agree, but it goes further. Parents don’t want Obama talking to their kids because of what we know about him. We never, ever suspected that Bush Sr would slip in anything anti-American or pro-socialism/Marxism. Maybe something corny, but never, for instance, pro-Muslim. With Obama, we think he’ll do that, and more. We still think he agrees with Rev. Wright and Ayers, plus he bans Christianity yet promotes Ramadan, plus the communist views of his czars that he’s hired, plus he’s created another ACORN-like group of thugs called Organizing For America to do his fraud dirty work including census and voter fraud, plus who knows what else he’s paying mega-bucks to lawyers to hide in his background, and it just goes on and on with him. This is why, when others whine, “but Bush Sr talked to kids and we were okay with it”, I just want to scream, yeah, but Bush Sr is in a whole ‘nother category than Obama when it comes to being trusted with America’s best interests. Therefore, we want Obama to stay the hell away from our kids. Besides all this, his upcoming teleprompter speech to children is just a precursor to his next teleprompter speech to them, when he will ask them to put on brown shirts.
September 5, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Education played a very important part in Nazi Germany in trying to cultivate a loyal following for Hitler and the Nazis. The Nazis were aware that education would create loyal Nazis by the time they reached adulthood. The Hitler Youth had been created for post-school activities and schools were to play a critical part in developing a loyal following for Hitler – indoctrination and the use of propaganda were to be a common practice in Nazi schools and the education system.
Enforcing a Nazi curriculum on schools depended on the teachers delivering it. All teachers had to be vetted by local Nazi officials. Any teacher considered disloyal was sacked. Many attended classes during school holidays in which the Nazi curriculum was spelled out and 97% of all teachers joined the Nazi Teachers’ Association. All teachers had to be careful about what they said as children were encouraged to inform the authorities if a teacher said something that did not fit in with the Nazi’s curriculum for schools.
Subjects underwent a major change in schools. Some of the most affected were History and Biology.
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/Nazis_Education.htm
September 6, 2009 at 6:30 pm
[...] [...]
September 6, 2009 at 6:52 pm
It’ll be very interesting to see if Obama’s goons vacate the deployment orders of this flight surgeon, Captain Dr. Connie Rhodes, in order to avoid court proceedings on Sept i. This is the tactic they took with Major Cook, another officer who was ordered to deploy and who petitioned the court on the legality of his orders. Obama scooted out from under that lawsuit by saying, “Oh well, nevermind, Major Cook doesn’t have to deploy after all”, which of course, caused the judge to drop the case because then it was moot.
The SS numbers are referenced in # 8. (I will post a link to the court exhibit docs, since they won’t transfer onto this space.)
(
September 6, 2009 at 6:54 pm
Oooops, typo. I meant “…in order to avoid court proceedings on Sept 8…”
September 7, 2009 at 7:45 am
We need to get the word out that “eyes” should be on what is happening in the Courtroom in California on tuesday the 8th.
Go Orly…our prayers are with you.
September 7, 2009 at 12:21 pm
I knew Obama’s lawyer goons would come up with something at the 11th hour – late on a Friday, holiday weekend, courts are closed on Monday, and Orly’s court date is Tuesday at 8 a.m……I knew it. They and Holder and Obama are such total scrotum bags.
Here’s the link to the article below:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/0909/DOJ_to_judge_dump_birthers_suit.html
The Justice Department is urging a federal court to toss out a lawsuit in which prominent birthers’ attorney Orly Taitz is challenging President Barack Obama’s Constitutional qualifications to be president.
In a motion filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, Calif., government lawyers did not directly rebut the conspiracy theory Taitz propounds that Obama was not born in Hawaii as he claims and as asserted by Hawaiian officials as well as contemporary newspaper birth notices. Instead, the federal attorneys argued that the suit is inherently flawed because such disputes can’t be resolved in court and because the dozens of plaintiffs can’t show they are directly injured by Obama’s presence in office.
“It is clear, from the text of the Constitution, and the relevant statutory law implementing the Constitution’s textual commitments, that challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for President can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress,” Assistant United States Attorneys Roger West and David DeJute wrote. “Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch.”
The birthers’ suit claims that Obama is a citizen of Indonesia and “possibly still citizen of Kenya, usurping the position of the President of the United States of America and the Commander-in-Chief.”
Lieutenant Jason Freese and some other plaintiffs in the case claim they have a real injury because they are serving in the military commander by Obama, the alleged usurper. However, West and DeJute say that argument is too speculative.
“The injuries alleged by Plaintiff Freese and the other military Plaintiffs herein, are not particularized as to them, but, rather, would be shared by all members of the military and is an inadequate basis on which to establish standing,” the government lawyers wrote.
Another plaintiff in the suit, Alan Keyes, is a three-time, longshot presidential candidate who ran most recently in 2008. Yet another is Gail Lightfoot, an ultra-longshot vice presidential candidate in 2008. The DOJ argues that they were not directly aggrieved by Obama’s election because they never had a mathematical chance of winning.
September 8, 2009 at 3:35 pm
Here’s a rebuttal to the motion to dismiss that either Orly or one of her lawyer assistants wrote yesterday. It looks like it adequately addresses the points they made.
It is no coincidence that this motion to dismiss came from the DOJ, instead of Obama’s private team of lawyers. The DOJ wants to intimidate Judge Carter into kowtowing, and they felt Obama’s lawyer goons wouldn’t have sufficient weight. Here’s an interesting point whoever wrote this rebuttal made: since the motion to dismiss came from the DOJ and Holder, they wrote that the defendant in question (Obama) appointed the AG (Holder) who is petitioning to dismiss the case!! It looks to be a mistake on their part to use the DOJ this time to try to induce fear into the presiding judge. Here’s the intro to what they wrote, followed by the link to the doc:
After reviewing the latest motion to dismiss against Dr. Taitz we have looked at it and found that the arguments [made by] the Department of Justice are not supported by the case law they cite and that the premise of their objections is clearly seen that the Attorney General is advocating a suspension of our Constitutional Republic with no recourse to the courts.
http://birthers.org/misc/DOJreply.htm
September 8, 2009 at 6:49 pm
But things concluded some time ago.
The bottom line is this:
THE CASE GOES FORWARD!!!!!!!!!!! and Markham and Wiley were reinstated with the attorney they requested, Gary Kreep.
Posted 2009-09-08 3:26 PM (#22208 – in reply to #22206) By: EternalVigilance
September 9, 2009 at 2:42 am
Tuesday, September 8, 2009 5:35 PM
From:
“Jeff Schwilk”
To:
Undisclosed-Recipient@yahoo.com
The expedited trial has been set for Jan. 26, 2010, just 4 1/2 months from now!
I and many other concerned veterans and citizens attended the hearing today in Federal Court in Santa Ana in the lawsuit against Barack Obama to determine his eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief. About 150 people showed up, almost all in support of the lawsuit to demand that Obama release his birth certificate and other records that he has hidden from the American people.
Judge David Carter refused to hear Obama’s request for dismissal today, instead setting a hearing date for Oct. 5, since Obama’s attorneys had just filed the motion on Friday. He indicated there was almost no chance that this case would be dismissed. Obama is arguing this lawsuit was filed in the wrong court if you can believe that. I guess Obama would prefer a “kangaroo court” instead of a Federal court! Assuming Judge Carter denies Obama’s motion for dismissal, he will likely then order expedited discovery which will force Obama to release his birth certificate in a timely manner (if he has one).
The judge, who is a former U.S. Marine, repeated several times that this is a very serious case which must be resolved quickly so that the troops know that their Commander in Chief is eligible to hold that position and issue lawful orders to our military in this time of war. He basically said Obama must prove his eligibility to the court! He said Americans deserve to know the truth about their President!
The two U.S. Attorneys representing Barack Obama tried everything they could to sway the judge that this case was frivolous, but Carter would have none of it and cut them off several times. Obama’s attorneys left the courtroom after about the 90 minute hearing looking defeated and nervous.
Great day in America for the U.S. Constitution!!! The truth about Barack Obama’s eligibility will be known fairly soon – Judge Carter practically guaranteed it!
Video from the press conference after the hearing coming soon. Congratulations to plaintiffs attorney Dr. Orly Taitz! She did a great job and won some huge victories today. She was fearless!
Jeff Schwilk, Founder
http://www.SanDiegoMinutemen.com
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109242