We have it on very good authority here in Chicago that Chicago Tribune columnist Paul Richter gets his talking points directly from the current administration, and most likely from Rahm Emanuel himself. Richter, and the Tribune as a whole, is a propaganda tool of the current president, and has been since Dr. Utopia was just a candidate for said office.
Today, a very sharp friend of ours very familiar with both Richter and Chicago-style politics asked us to read this article in the Tribune that most people would miss entirely if they weren’t looking for it.
It’s called “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: What Will She Say Next?”
In it, Richter tries his best to make Clinton look crazy — but, of course, the problem is the article is not about Joe Biden who, in fact, actually might just be crazy and who truly deserves the question “What will he say next?”.
Richter does what the British often do when giving left-handed compliments: he starts off saying Clinton’s approach to being Secretary of State is full of candor, and that she has the guts to speak the truth and say what everyone in Washington is thinking, but what no one before her had the nerve to say.
So far, so good.
But, then Richter tries to make Clinton seem erratic, like she’s going off the reservation and making things up as she goes along, which is something Biden most certainly does, and what Dr. Utopia does when this teleprompter fails, but something Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton has never, ever done.
This woman is the most studious, prepared, resolute, and overly cautious person we have ever met.
We WISH she veered off the reservation during the primaries and was erratic and spontaneous, because we might have pulled out a win in places like Wisconsin, Missouri, or one of the other caucus states and Dr. Utopia wouldn’t be president today.
For the last 17 years, the MSM has driven the point deep into all of us that Hillary Clinton is the most calculating, methodical, and relentless plotters and schemers the world has ever known. It’s an unfair caricature, but one that’s actually rooted in her reserved, careful, studious nature.
And that does not jive with what Richter is suddenly trying to pull, painting her as an erratic woman off running her mouth without thinking.
No, that would be JOE BIDEN. The grown man who needs Cabinet-level officials to have weekly breakfasts with him to mitigate his chances for doing anything stupid that day (like revealing the top-secret secure and undisclosed location of the Vice President’s bunker…WHOOPS! Oh, that Joe Biden, he’s done it again!).
Read the article and then come back and post what you think about it, and about what Richter’s motivations are.
We’ve said this to you before, and have told you we think this is speculative and a little crazy, but our very good friend Wess says he hears a lot of chatter that Hillary Clinton will ultimately leave her position as Secretary of State to run for political office — and that she would leave in 2010 or 2011 or so. That might be for Governor of New York, or it might be for President in 2012 if Dr. Utopia indeed pulls an LBJ and claims he has health reasons (such as Parkinson’s) that prevent him from seeking a second term.
Maybe Richter’s hit piece on Clinton is somehow Pelosi-related, since the CIA is going to release more to embarrass Madame Speaker this week, so maybe Emanuel is doing Nancy a solid by encouraging Richter and the Tribune to take a whack at Clinton to start some sort of distraction to take the heat off Pelosi.
These machinations, or perceived machinations, and speculations have the potential to drive you crazy if you spend all day thinking about this stuff. So, we urge caution with the speculations.
But, the article IS WEIRD.
The person who clued us in on the weirdness is smart and well-connected, and knows what she is talking about (and only emails us this stuff when it is really, really important).
And it does fit with the chatter people like Wess are hearing that Clinton will have new projects in the political realm before we all know it..and that coincides nicely with a recently revamped www.NoLimits.org that’s mighty impressive, and seems to be running off a Facebook-like engine that will make a marvelous organizing tool for another Clinton run for higher office.
Read between the lines on this kind of stuff, but never get too carried away. You know how much we love Hillary Clinton, so we too enjoy fantasy world where she gets another crack at President in 2012, but we freely acknowledge the dangers of going off on that path.
HOWEVER, there is something fishy going on with articles like this…and we don’t believe Dr. Utopia will run in 2012 if he’s certain he will lose — because he will certainly think it is best to retire if he cannot beat his opponent. That’s totally keeping with his narcissistic MO, and an ideal setup for great and eternal sympathy because of whatever medical condition he uses as his excuse for retirement.
Can’t wait to see what comments look like on this one.

May 18, 2009 at 11:51 am
It IS a strange article and I wouldn’t put it past the Obama admin to play these kind of tricks. IMO it looks like the beginning of a campaign to make it look like she isn’t a team player, when she’s actually proven that she’s a patriot and doesn’t play these games. You start off with claims that she may be erratic when it comes to speaking with foreign leaders. Then you play to rumors that she’s going against the Obama administration’s overall message and is not getting along with other leaders in the administration, including the President.
I think after the news that her approval ratings are over 70%, they want to make sure she does not become TOO popular. Obama must ALWAYS be the top figure, ALWAYS.
It probably isn’t a massive plot to harm her credibility so that she never runs for anything ever again. I don’t think it’s that extreme. It’s most likely just a campaign to get the Obots annoyed enough with her so that she is not more popular (or even as popular) as the Golden One.
May 18, 2009 at 12:18 pm
I wasn’t thinking of the fact that in the polls she is more popular than he is. I was wondering why they will make it look like he is surrounded by those who are not able to do their jobs because it could be said that he is not able to select competent staff. But, wanting to be the most popular makes sense why he would try to make her look bad. (And, no matter what he does, she still outshines him.)
Of course, he doesn’t seem to remember that when you point at others you point three fingers back at yourself. Just reinforces what I keep saying – he is running the White House like he is trying to sit at the popular table in a high school cafeteria.
May 18, 2009 at 12:49 pm
That is exactly what I was thinking. Except, I think he is setting the ground work to trash her if she becomes too popular for his liking or if he needs someone to take a fall for him.
May 18, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Kei:
Correct. You win the big ass Panda.
May 18, 2009 at 6:11 pm
And a luxury space in a bunker in an undisclosed location, where you can wait out the end of the Reign of Obama in safety.
Need a valet? ;)
May 18, 2009 at 11:19 pm
OK Garlic,
but no bunker needed, just lots of beer, wine and margaritas. Heh heh, lets take the fight to them!
May 18, 2009 at 7:04 pm
good point!!!
Biden could have cost the taxpayer millions today. he gave away the location of where Dick Cheney was put after 9/11. the location was a secret, as if something terrible like this were to happen again, the VP would have to be put somewhere safe to manage the sisutation. but now everyone knows this location the Government will have to build a new bunker.
May 18, 2009 at 11:58 am
Well.. We know the media is in the tank for the president… pure propaganda really.
We know he uses the white house to collaborate with the media. Therefore we know we cannot trust this administration to tell the truth. I DO believe that any attack shots on anyone are approved first. I also believe HE threw Nancy under the bus. Now while I could care less about Pelosi, this media bliss against her is sort of suspect to me. I just know that nothing makes sense to me anymore.
May 18, 2009 at 12:08 pm
I just watched Mr. Smith Goes to Washington yesterday and there was a scene that reminded me of your post, Hillbuzz.
The reigning big-wig businessman who controlled the Senator in his state (and the Governor) suddenly found his power being threatened by the young upstart Senator, Jefferson Smith.
So, the powerful businessman uses his awesome influence and control of every single newspaper to destroy the Senator.
Man, that movie just captured every single issue that we are still dealing with today. Power and corruption, pure and simple.
May 18, 2009 at 2:44 pm
That’s one of Sarah Palin’s favorite movies.
May 18, 2009 at 12:31 pm
Hillary having information during her campaign knew full well what she was getting in to accepting anything from what now occupies the White House. One should never give their life to a political party.
May 18, 2009 at 6:18 pm
Yes, she did know *exactly* what she was getting into, and I have faith that she will whoop that clown’s azz before all is said in done.
HRC loves America and her citizens. She’s there for us, and I feel better knowing she was willing to make the sacrifice on *our* behalf.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: NEVER underestimate a Scorpio woman, especially an intelligent one.
May 18, 2009 at 1:13 pm
I wish there were more administration appointees that went “off the reservation”. Because I certainly don’t find much positive with the White House Reservation right now. I’d rather have Hillary do what she believes is best than being a mouthpiece for Dr Utopia and his Kumbayah Diplomacy.
May 18, 2009 at 6:18 pm
In a nutshell, KJA!
May 18, 2009 at 1:41 pm
I’m glad she’s SOS. She took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the U.S.
She did not take an oath to Obama or the DNC.
“Hillary having information during her campaign knew full well what she was getting in to accepting anything from what now occupies the White House. One should never give their life to a political party.”
May 18, 2009 at 2:18 pm
“She took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the U.S.
She did not take an oath to Obama or the DNC.”
HA! Beautiful, MissTickly.
May 18, 2009 at 3:08 pm
No offense, but Obummer controls her, she answers to him.
May 18, 2009 at 3:14 pm
No offense taken.
To a point, you’re right.
But as DMorris points out in the clip below- when the gold plate starts rubbing off and everyone sees the cheap plastic messiah for what he is, expect Hillary to start cutting up this moron.
May 18, 2009 at 6:22 pm
Don’t believe everything you think. Wait–that came out wrong.
How about this: things are not always what they appear to be on the surface. Some people operate in a methodical way that might make no sense to us at the outset but turns out to be a brilliant plan in the long run.
May 18, 2009 at 11:53 pm
That’s ludicrous. No One controls Hillary but Hillary. Of course for those who do not understand her you are missing out.
May 18, 2009 at 2:23 pm
You have hinted at Obama not running for re-election because of health (Parkinsons), is this just an example or is there some thought that he indeed suffers from that disease?
May 18, 2009 at 2:47 pm
Here in Chicago, people have been talking about him having Parkinson’s since 2007. There were many books on Parkinson’s in his house, and Parkinson’s is linked directly to cocaine abuse….20 years after heavy cocaine usage, chances of Parkinson’s increase dramatically. Do the math on what was written in Dreams of My Father and Audacity of Hope and see if those books in his study weren’t there just for show.
May 18, 2009 at 3:11 pm
Huh…all this time, thought it was “The Perspicacity of a Dope”. Thanks for clearing that up, HB.
May 18, 2009 at 4:09 pm
He’s also an unrepentant smoker. In middle aged African-American males, this brings up the double threat of heart disease and cancer.
I’ll take Hillbuzz’s word on Parkinsons, as I haven’t looked into that.
May 18, 2009 at 6:26 pm
But he’s only half black. So take smoking risk and divide by two, add to Parkinsons risk. Divide risky same-gender sex by two and add that to the mix:
Debilitating heart attack before 2012.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch: Joe Biden will at the same time have another aneurysm render him incapable of serving. Pisslosi will have already been booted, and her replacement, Steny Hoyer, will have stepped back in favor of Hillary.
Sounds good to me.
May 18, 2009 at 6:29 pm
P.S. If I left out any steps in the process, I predict Divine Intervention will take care of them.
May 18, 2009 at 2:47 pm
I don’t know is anyone else has posted about this, or has seen the interview, but I thought I would share…
Dick Morris was on Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin Zone last week. I know, not everyone is a fan of Mr. Morris; however, Morris believes that the esteemed Mrs. Clinton will challenge Obama in 2012 – especially if The Bamster becomes as toxic as Morris predicts. Interesting… I hope she clobbers him!
May 18, 2009 at 3:15 pm
my version is quicker.biden resigns .
Hillary is V.P.
bo,steps down.much quicker..can happen before the year is up..
May 18, 2009 at 4:21 pm
Hate to end your dream, but Pelosi would be V.P. if Biden resigned or left the position open for whatever reason. The succession goes like this:
V.P.
Speaker
Pres. Pro Tem of the Senate
Secretary of State
Secretary of the Treasury
Secretary of Defense
Attorney General
Secretary of the Interior
Secretary of Agriculture
Secretary of Commerce
Secretary of Labor
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Secretary of Transportation
Secretary of Energy
Secretary of Education
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Secretary of Homeland Security
This order was set forth in the 25th Amendment in 1967
May 18, 2009 at 4:51 pm
That’s not true. Succession doesn’t work that way. When Spiro Agnew stepped down, Gerald Ford was brought in as VEEP. Then Nixon left, making Ford president and Rockefeller became VP. The only way Pelosi becomes President is if both POTUS and VPOTUS kick it at the same time.
May 18, 2009 at 2:56 pm
from your mouth to…….that is a dream come true!!!!!!
I just know that she will continue to do the right thing….
May 18, 2009 at 3:06 pm
You are aware that Hillary has no real power as Sec. of State? Obummer made sure all foreign policy is untimately handled by the W.H. and the real power lies in National Security Advisor who reports directly to him. Samantha Powers in her position has more pull than Hillary. Just look at his foreign policy, especially in regards to Israel. It’s the Samantha Powers doctrine. People, please wake up.
Maybe they are afraid Hillary will leave her post because of the direction of their foreign policy? Put out a story saying she’s a wacko, and you discredit her before she can make her move.
May 18, 2009 at 3:41 pm
After everything she has already been put through, I find it hard to believe they could discredit her more. Yet, she has higher approval ratings than ‘the won’. She’ll leave when something goes awry, threw no fault of her own, and state the truth. She was unable to conduct the job of SoS because of O’s poliicies (S.Powers et al.) She will watch his numbers plummet and decide what to do then.
May 18, 2009 at 5:07 pm
No one controls Hillary.She does not take bullshit from anyone,but Bill.I do not hear or read of her complaining of what is going on about her job.She is not a whiner.She damn well knew what she was doing when she became SOS and she did it with a smile.
May 18, 2009 at 3:09 pm
Hillbuzz,
Thank you for bringing this Chicago Tribune hit-piece/propaganda to our attention. We in the Blogosphere must continue to do everything we can to expose media malpractice, and to be vigilant when we suspect that mainstream media are serving as mouthpieces for the White House.
I do agree that the article is suspicious. What sources were interviewed besides Rahm himself?
I think everyone reading this should send the Tribune feedback, and demand accountability in journalism.
Thanks again, Hillbuzz. I will link your post on my blog.
May 18, 2009 at 3:17 pm
journalism died in 08.in the U,S,A,
May 18, 2009 at 4:03 pm
Hillary is trustworthy. As a conservative, I may disagree with her policies but I think she’s trustworthy, unlike Dr.Utopia who gives me nightmares in daytime. I don’t put it past him to start neutering her now that he use for him is over. He has co-opted most of her machine, he reckons he can do without her.
May 18, 2009 at 5:40 pm
She is trustworthy and daggone it she’s demonstrated that time and again for at least 20 years now in the public realm. You can trust her!
She’s a politico without question but she’s one that has to fight a different kind of fight than just about every other politico out there.
She was slammed for not leaving Bill. She remained loyal to her husband and her family.
She was then slammed for being an interloper in NY and that the only reason she won was b/c she had “instant” name recognition.
Whatever this woman does some male, black or white or green or red, boxes her in.
When in the hell will people give her credit for what she’s done and how meticulously she has managed it. Show me even one person who is equal to her. There is no one. And that is why 0bama is leaking this kind of crap. To discredit her once again.
He’s threatened by her, period. Her ratings are in the 70′s and remember she was just given an Honorary Doctorate by NYU this weekend. 0 was rejected by AZ state. He also sucked up the joy felt by the graduates at Notre Dame by steadfastly agreeing to being their commencement speaker. Heaven forbid he give the mantle to the graduates, oh no, it had to be about him.
C’mon, this article is all about sending a message to her to say lower the temperature, my friend…lower the temperature.
May 18, 2009 at 6:31 pm
I’ll bet he reckons wrong.
May 18, 2009 at 4:19 pm
I sometimes tend to worry too much…… but if the people in Chicago are as devious as they seem to be, if they are using the Tribune to brainwash “the people”, will HillBuzz come under the wrong kind of scrutiny?
May 18, 2009 at 6:59 pm
I think they’ll (wrongly) underestimate its influence. Besides, they’re probably too busy trying to silence Larry Sinclair and find more innocent people from Trinity United to kill off.
If they EVER try any shit against HB, we will eff them up royally. We’ll mount a massive publicity campaign and enlist every blog on the PUMA and Sarah spheres.
Nobody backs HillBaby into a corner!
May 19, 2009 at 10:30 am
I wouldn’t worry too much about it. With newspapers falling along the wayside one after the other, who cares what some numbnut at the Tribune thinks? And, given the state of newspapers these days, and assuming Obama is influencing their reporters, that doesn’t make the president very bright, now does it? Isn’t that like trying to influence the staff on the Titanic?
May 18, 2009 at 5:01 pm
I’m going to keep an eye on this. I don’t trust Obama and his minions any further than I can throw them. I also got an email from a friend of mine who is supposedly “in the know” with regards to the Chicago machine and he says Obama’s behind what’s happening to Pelosi. Here’s the link the story on my blog. But basically, his premise is that Obama is trying to cull the herd of Dems to the left of him. So, yeah, it wouldn’t surprise me if they’ve got it out for HRC as well.
May 18, 2009 at 6:44 pm
Nice blog! Sheesh–how’d I miss you while I was still in NV? Musta been the north-south divide. Were you part of the 18 Million Voices movement? I was part of it downstate and still wear my PUMA writsband.
May 18, 2009 at 6:44 pm
Hillary is most definitely not to the left of Obama. They want her out because she doesn’t agree with most of the bullshit he is pulling.
May 18, 2009 at 7:01 pm
…or the way in which he’s pulling it. Unlike Hillary, the man does not walk his talk.
May 18, 2009 at 5:19 pm
The FIRST thing that any good dictator does is clean his own house of ANYONE that poses a threat to his power … All the “great” dictators did this to their political allies upon gaining power … “Long-Knives” and such …
First Pelosi, now Hillary … Ried and Biden are absolute idiots (and everyone knows it) – so they are not threats. Besides, the 0bamessiah still needs someone to throw under that double-decker of his when his policies fail …
Does anyone think The 0bamessiah is going to share power – or credit – or the spotlight ???
May 18, 2009 at 7:21 pm
outstanding historical perspective, BP- was it Lenin that got rid of Trotsky?
May 18, 2009 at 8:32 pm
I’m sure that Lenin couldn’t stand sharing recognition with Trotsky.
But I was thinking about Trotksy’s expulsion from the communist party (as well as his subsequent exile and murder) by Uncle Jo Stalin.
Also, Chairman Mao’s purge of top Chinese leaders that began The Cultural Revolution.
And, of course, good ole Adolf’s “Night of the Long Knives” purge of political rivals.
I wouldn’t put it past a Chicago-machine pol to literally “purge” ANYONE, but I think a willing MSM pounding accomplishes the same goals of paranoid Uncle Jo, The Little Corporal, and the Good Chairman.
In today’s lighting-fast information age, one bad news article, followed up by a MSNBCCNNABCCBSNBC dead-horse-beating means instant political death … just ask Nancy …
May 19, 2009 at 7:13 am
Ah- it was Unka Joe. Thanks.
May 18, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Obama’s henchman, Rhambo, continues to do damage for Da Boss, by blaming everyone else. This is how he got into office, and it worked, so why would they change tactics? He will continue to blame all the problems with the mess we are in on everyone else, because he believes in pass the buck, not the buck stops here.
I heard Newt make a great statement on Medved’s radio show today: “People voted for change they could believe in but not changing their beliefs”.
As for the Trib. At least they still have John Kass. If everyone in the country had bothered to read his columns before the election, we would not be stuck with this buffoon and his goons in the White House.
May 18, 2009 at 6:16 pm
First, thank you keparker for posting the Morris clip. I saw/heard that. Like many, I neither like nor trust Morris, but I hope he is right although I do like foxyladi’s plan – which is similar to mine.
Now to this article, Rahm and the Trib: I have to defer to your source in whom you appear to have trust. If the back story is so, then the barbs must be originating from the Frat House at 1600. Thing is, Hillary is doing a superb job, and it seems people LIKE her pared down commentary.
Last year and the year before, there were scads of negative you tubes, articles, and nasty photoshopped pics of Hillary circulating all over the web. Still, 18,000,000 voted for her.
I think Morris is right. Obama will become radioactive, but Hillary will not. I do think she will run for office again – largely because of the way NoLimits.org is developing – that is not for nothing. I think it will be national office.
I just hope WE learned enough not to let happen what happened last year – not from the first through the last primary.
May 18, 2009 at 7:02 pm
With the help of Beck and the Acorn 8, we’ll see no such repeat.
May 18, 2009 at 6:46 pm
does anyone know what Sarah’s approval rating is in Alaska now? I cannot find that information anywhere. I do know that another 2 charges of ethics violation charges were dismissed. Imagine – an ethics violation for wearing a jacket that bears the name of a popular snow machine! I wish she could file charges against these people for nuisance suits.
May 18, 2009 at 7:18 pm
it is around 55-60%, depending on the poll.
She Twitters when an ethics complaint is dropped. So far 2/3rds have been dropped. There are still some pending.
May 18, 2009 at 7:09 pm
I liked this part of the article:
“John Bolton, known for blunt talk as the Bush administration’s UN ambassador, said Clinton’s comments on human rights may have given Beijing a signal that it could ignore any U.S. pressure on the issue.
‘Whether it made sense for her to say it publicly — in effect giving away the issue without getting anything in return — is very much open to question,’ said Bolton.
***Bolton said it is hard to judge because she may have goals that aren’t apparent.***”
See, he thinks similarly: no one really knows what she has up her sleeve.
Anyhow, this part of the article is even better:
“A State Department official contended that Clinton’s strong denunciation of Islamabad led to *greater cooperation* from Pakistan.
‘They weren’t doing anything before she said that. Then after she said it, they suddenly were taking it pretty seriously, and met with greater success,’ said the official, who declined to be identified because of diplomatic sensitivity. ‘I think she got their attention.’”
Sometimes, you just have to call them like you see them.
May 18, 2009 at 7:19 pm
Anita Montcrief is on O’Reilly tonight
May 18, 2009 at 7:20 pm
It will air again at 11pm eastern
May 18, 2009 at 8:09 pm
This might have been posted already, but I found it very interesting.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22681.html
It is about asking Sarah Palin’s PAC to retire Hillary Clinton’s debt.
May 18, 2009 at 8:19 pm
I have had a feeling for a long time that Hillary would leave year 3. I know it might sound crazy but I think Hillary took the job to get up close & learn about the evil cabal, how they think & operate in their little circle. I think when she has learned what she came to find out she will leave & possibley run in 2012.
The owner of The Trib has a pathological hatred for Hillary Clinton. He has publicly called her cunts & bitches.
I will write the Tribune, not that they will pay attention to me but hopefully enough Hillary supporters will hit them hard & fast so they can see it won’t as easy this time slinging mud as before.
May 18, 2009 at 8:41 pm
If this is the worst criticism anyone can come up with about Hillary, she MUST be doing a bang-up job. I wouldn’t even worry about this article.
Also, no one her should pay Dick Morris any mind. He’s never right about HRC because he’s so blinded by hatred of her. She’s not challenging Obama in 2012.
May 18, 2009 at 10:06 pm
Actually, I think the SOS is the most powerful person in the world. Hillary really is in a good position if she wanted to use it to her advantage. I mean we know she is keeping score, she would have to be.. I would be willing to bet that Bill, Chelsea, and herself have many family conversations that start with ” what the hell is he doing?” I mean after all, Obama makes Bill Clinton look like a conservative.
Personally I think if she stays focused on her job and in the background so to speak, she will have quite a bit of amunition to use against him… I just do not see Obama winning another election, I mean even a reasonable person that voted for him had know idea about the trillions in spending, not on that scope even though Sarah tried to tell the electorate.
May 18, 2009 at 10:37 pm
To be honest, I didn’t see much problem with the article, except for the implication that she is “erratic” which is crap. It points out, and I agree, that her criticism of Packistan probably led to action on the Packistani army’s side. This is about the first time they have moved so fast and are kicking a** in the Swat. I think it is refreshing to see some one being spontaneous and outspoken, if that is what she is doing. I have heard her be more assertive than she has been in the past, and I think it is good. Of course, we should be on the alert at all times, ever vigilant for disinformation.
May 18, 2009 at 10:38 pm
woops, that’s “Pockeestan”
May 19, 2009 at 12:46 am
People will be confused by this Tribune article because, like Hillary or not, people KNOW Hillary is not someone who is erratic. The writer must be DESPERATE for a story. I wonder how much Rahm paid the writer to spin a hardly believable STORY.
Hillary’s got it going on and America knows it. She received an honary “Doctor of Law” degree before a cheering crowd at the new Yankee stadium.
The writer is trying to twist and spin the real facts and truth and we ain’t buying it. People are NOT as stupid as the Chicago thugs think.
Hillary does not make things up. Obama does. What’s he expect. He picked Hillary and she’ll continue being Hillary, a public servant, and not Washington’s servant. It’s obvious that the world likes and trusts her. Check out the crowd at NYU Commencement. I bet for many it was their first time hearing Hillary speak and they were cheering their heads off. It’s too late to try and spin the ‘Hillary is erratic’ thingy.
It’s as bogus as the originator of this concocted story.
Oh and she also spoke at Barnard College. No one protested. :lol:
New York, NY – At Barnard College’s 117th Commencement ceremony on May 18th, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will address approximately 585 members of the Class of 2009 and receive the Barnard Medal of Distinction, the College’s highest honor, alongside three other remarkable women
Goooooo Hillary!
http://www.barnard.edu/commencement/2009/index.html
May 19, 2009 at 1:32 am
“In her historic campaign for the 2008 presidential nomination, she won more primaries and delegates than any other female candidate in American history.”
Um, she won more primary votes in history than any male candidate, as well.
May 19, 2009 at 9:27 am
That article was a real piece! Also, checked out the Politico article on Palin and Clinton. My view was that they managed to belittle both women in one article. Always bringing up Hillary’s “huge debt” (ha) and getting some digs in about Palin, as well. These people are definitely being told what to write. Hardly any positive articles are written about Hillary or Sarah and when they are mentioned on CNN, it’s usually in a very negative manner. Maddening, indeed! I guess the White House feels threatened by both. Go, girls!!!