In the furor over the current Administration’s callous buzzing of lower Manhattan for a “photo op” that essentially re-enacted the path of the commandeered jetliners that killed so many 8 years ago (this time with fighter jets racing along in tow, making New Yorkers especially believe they were under attack again), various Freedom of Information Act requests have been filed by private citizens across the country demanding release of the photographs from the current president’s reckless, thoughtless, and deranged $350,000 “practical joke”.
What HASN’T been talked about anywhere that we can see is the question of exactly WHO was on board that plane as it raced through the skies over Manhattan.
It occurred to us a stunt like this would be an EXCELLENT reward for high-level donors to the current president’s campaign.
Dr. Utopia’s most loyal followers would surely love a ride on Air Force One (technically, because Dr. Utopia and his unicorns were not aboard, it would be a Special Air Mission XXXXX-whatever flight, as the call signal AF1 is reserved only for flights the sitting president is on).
They would probably love this trip on a robin’s egg and creamy white 747 even more if it did things regular people can’t do, like fly right by the Statue of Liberty and buzz the skyscrapers of New York so close they can practically see the teeny people down below screaming in terror as they race for hidey-holes wherever they can find them.
Who was on the plane when the photo op happened?
Is there a passenger manifest list?
Where did the flight originate, and who was there when it took off?
We bet that was not an empty plane.
We also would be inclined to bet people like Penny Pritzker or other high-level donors to Dr. Utopia were aboard, as a thank you for their loyal service and millions of dollars.
Perhaps HRH Princess Caroline of Kennedy was on there, with her golden, bejeweled binoculars, straining at the window in her attempt to spot the mythical Jimmy Choos she’s long heard rumored to be SOMEWHERE near Battery Park, where only the most elite of the elite of the elite know the exact address (“Do you know who my father was? Do you know who my, like, you know, uncle is? I’ll find those Choos if I have to scare the Kennedy out of everyone in Manhattan to do it!”).
SOMEONE was on that plane.
There’s a story there. Not that we have a media to report on it or anything.
But maybe some of you out there can do some digging on your own.
UPDATE: Here’s one other theory we saw today that attempts to make sense of doing something to abysmally stupid, and then refusing to release photographs of this stunt that cost taxpayers $350,000 or so.
Here in Chicago, in addition to the donors-joyride theory (which IS common in fundraising circles, where people give big money to places like the Shedd Aquarium and then get to swim in any fishtank they want, regardless of what that will do to the animals, or how much sense it makes. ”Behind the scenes” tours and special treats like that not available to the general public are WHY people give large sums of money to variations efforts), another theory making the rounds is that Air Force One (or, aptly, the plane sometimes known as AF1), was used to test some sort of early warning system that’s been installed around New York.
The airspace AF1 flew in is restricted.
The theory goes that a large plane was needed to fly on a collision course with NYC’s landmarks to test whether or not new detection (or even defensive) equipment could accurately alert authorities or handle the situation on its own. The only plane the government could use to do this was AF1, under the lame “photo op” lie. Using a military transport plane to do this would have raised questions as to WHY that plane was flying so low, and someone would have to be disciplined for the “error”.
So, the theory is that they used AF1 instead, and were willing to accept whatever fallout for a “photo op” because they needed to test the defensive system.
That’s just a theory. An interesting one. We don’t know what to think or say, but as always are curious what you think.

May 6, 2009 at 8:38 am
My first gut reaction was that Obama was on the plane, or at least Biden. I haven’t yet seen or heard anyone come out and say that they weren’t, please correct me if I’m wrong. I’d love to know where they both were on that day.
May 6, 2009 at 8:49 am
By big donors, do you mean $ or personal appearance like Oprah’s that don’t translate into money but brought in the folks.
May 6, 2009 at 8:50 am
If Obama was on the plane or Biden or Oprah we will never find out, it will be ‘classified’.
May 6, 2009 at 11:50 am
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2009/04/28/2009-04-28_president_obama_calls_air_force_one_flyover_mistake_day_after_lowflying_plane_te.html
Photos of the plane flying over the Statue of Liberty were to be given out to family, friends or SUPPORTERS.
“The flyover — apparently ordered by the White House Office of Military Affairs so it would have souvenir photos of Air Force One with the Statue of Liberty in the background…”
http://www.poligazette.com/2009/04/29/feds-knew-ny-flyover-would-cause-panic-went-ahead-anyway/
May 6, 2009 at 12:06 pm
First of all, all they had to do was photo shop the plane into an existing photo(s) of the Statue of Liberty and NYC. Second of all, and more telling I think, giving away pictures of “AF1″ in the skyline of NYC is a pretty crappy souvenir if you ask me, so I don’t buy that line at all. It’s bull.
May 6, 2009 at 12:13 pm
Sojourner, you’ve got it.
You only need to take a REAL FLIGHT there with a REAL PLANE (instead of photo shopping it) if you are doing it for “supporters” on board that flight.
May 6, 2009 at 12:14 pm
Ok, here’s a second stab at this…this whole Swine Flu pandemic is a distraction, either from something that is happening now(either diplomatically or militarily) or something that already happened, like Obama on Air Force 1 (as AF1 is what was initially reported) doing a personal flyover of NYC. We all know that the MSM will bury any story that hurts Obama(never mind not even investigating one that has the potential) and they would equally try to manufacture a story to blow up as a smokescreen.
May 6, 2009 at 12:11 pm
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2009/04/28/2009-04-28_president_obama_calls_air_force_one_flyover_mistake_day_after_lowflying_plane_te.html
“Photos of the plane flying over the Statue of Liberty were to be given out to family, friends or SUPPORTERS.”
So it makes sense that SUPPORTERS were on the plane. The SUPPORTERS could take their own photos, and thus the Blight House & Gooberment would have not any photos of their own to show.
May 6, 2009 at 12:17 pm
The quote you used conflicts with what it seems you are trying to say. It says that photos were being taken for the act of distribution to whomever, including supporters. If the supporters were already on the plane to take their own photos, I think they would have said just that. At any rate, it’s a pile of crap. I think we both agree there are no photos.
May 6, 2009 at 12:43 pm
Blight House! I love it and will be stealing it!
May 6, 2009 at 6:43 pm
Fox has filed a “Freedom of Information Act” for the release of the photos.
May 6, 2009 at 7:52 pm
But didn’t you hear? He’s OUTRAGED!!
May 6, 2009 at 8:49 am
I really don’t know who was on the plane and can’t even guess.
I can tell you though, that I never believed it was a photo-op.
Now that the administration has classified the photos and refuses to allow the public to see them, I am even more certain of my original conviction.
Delle
May 6, 2009 at 8:54 am
I’m with you Delle, I don’t believe that it was a photo-op. I’ve always felt that there was someone “special” on that plane.
May 6, 2009 at 1:34 pm
Considering to whom he bowed on his overseas trip, perhaps some of those folks. Maybe getting a preview of what one day could be theirs??
May 6, 2009 at 10:05 pm
I think Barry did this as a sign of solidarity to his buddies in the socialist and One World Order crowd. Perhaps after his Bro handshake with Chavez, he was dared to do an outrageous stunt that only he has the power to pull off. And he probably had some of his foreign donors on board too to get a bigger bang out of his $350,000 buck (we all know how frugal he can be).
May 6, 2009 at 9:14 am
Why are these photos classified, but photos of deceased soldiers aren’t & the CIA interrogators aren’t? Could it be for political, self-serving reasons?
May 6, 2009 at 9:41 am
I believe it is because there are no photos.
May 6, 2009 at 11:39 am
BINGO! We have a winner!
May 6, 2009 at 8:50 am
I’ve been wondering who was on there—and speculating it was high-buck Dim contributors “special friends” or the like—since Day One. Glad to see others are beginning to ask the question. We need to know this!
May 6, 2009 at 9:19 am
There are just so many stories in the Obama administration that need investigating. With such a popular president in office, the minority of people must silently hold on to the notion of “suck it up” for another 1355 days. But, like the dissidents at Chrysler, it’s good to see people stand up to this bully in office. Obama is very scary and this NYC fly-over incident is a perfect example of this bully in action. Something’s gotta give and it’s not the press.
May 6, 2009 at 9:39 am
Great question HB! I was wondering the same thing. Why else make the photographs classified? I also don’t think anyone took pictures from within the plane. If they were to reveal the pictures, they would have to open the lid to reveal the scumbags that are inside the plane. If it turns out to be donors, then I want an investigation because this is an abuse of power issue. O’brainless thinks that because he’s POTUS, he owns this country, starting with the airspace and the AF-1.
May 6, 2009 at 9:55 am
Personally, I think someone was showing their power. The message is that a repeat can happen at someone’s will. Blackmail.
May 6, 2009 at 10:00 am
That story about it being a “photo op” was fishy from the start. F-16s aren’t camera planes. Updating stock photos? I’m sure someone in the White House has heard of PhotoShop.
And, yesterday, the most transparent administration evah(!) classified the photos. CIA memos are open to every Tom, Dick and Ahmed on the planet, but “updated” photos of Scare Force One are classified?
Very fishy, indeed.
May 6, 2009 at 10:08 am
I have been wondering how photos could be taken from planes traveling behind SF1 of it in front of the Statue of Liberty. After reading your comment it dawned on me that wouldn’t the best way to get the picture would be to have photographers on the ground set up to take photos from the view of the Statue of Liberty looking upward into the sky and not from the sky looking down at the Statue of Liberty!
May 6, 2009 at 4:08 pm
OR They could have had Photographers in some of the taller building in NYC or NJ that have a good view of the Statue of Liberty, altho with out the fighter jets chasing the plane it might not have terrified as many people, so where’s the fun in that?
May 6, 2009 at 12:18 pm
RE: “F-16s aren’t camera planes.”
But if you had very important, fat cat supporters on board (can you say maybe even foreign supporters?) then that would justify a military F-16 escort to protect those very important supporters.
May 6, 2009 at 4:10 pm
Mrs. Bucket: Exactly. That’s why the photo-op story is such nonsense. If that’s all it was, New Yorkers would have been notified in advance.
As it is, the NY officials who *were* told of it, were specifically told not to say anything about it.
The question is, “why?”
I hope some FOIA’s are being filed, and I hope they get some answers.
May 6, 2009 at 6:47 pm
Fox filed it.
May 6, 2009 at 7:56 pm
Does the FIA allow the public to know who was on the plane? Apparently they are going to release the photos taken from the plane. How about photos taken within the cabin.
May 6, 2009 at 10:22 am
If this was a “photo-op” then who was taking the photos? And from where?
You can’t tell me who the photographer(s) was is classified. And you sure as hell can’t say that the location on the ground where they were taking their photos from is somehow vital to national security.
If we really had a free press instead of lapdogs, these questions would be asked instead of reports about how the 0bamas walk and hold hands, eat burgers, etc.
A FOIA request for the White House expenditures for political items might show a one-time payment to some individual about that time. If it was a photo-op.
Get a list of the private jets that flew into DC the day of and the day before then cross-reference those with the list of the ones that flew out that day or the day after. Those that match both should be crossed with a list of 0bama donors.
There’s your answer.
Easy to get if there was someone out there who’s job was something like, oh, I don’t know, asking questions. We could call this person a “journalist” because they would work for some sort of publication, a journal perhaps; or a “reporter” because they would “report” things.
May 6, 2009 at 10:32 am
J, you wild dreamer you. Imagine people doing a job like that. They would have to be hard nosed and interested in pursuing a story wherever it leads. They would have to have real ethics and a dedication to the truth. They would die of shame if they were put on a beat where all they had to report on was fluff like the puppy dogs of power, or the purple shoes of leaders’ wives. It would be so humiliating for them.
May 6, 2009 at 12:20 pm
BINGO!
That’s what I say too J Says!
Do some groundwork indexing donors and whereabouts during that time.
May 6, 2009 at 12:35 pm
AND Obama and Biden’ whereabouts, don’t forget them. I haven’t seen anything that proves that they were not on the plane. If Mrs. Bucket could continue with the White House talking points and provide this proof, I’d appreciate it.
May 6, 2009 at 10:23 am
I’ve been wondering if it was Michelle.
May 6, 2009 at 7:58 pm
Yeah, maybe her and oprah, BFF’s.
May 7, 2009 at 2:04 am
Or her mother.
May 6, 2009 at 10:44 am
texasdarling has a good description of Tavistock Psychological Profiling:
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/national-sovereignty-and-the-obama-administration-part-i/#more-7640
I believe that’s what’s happening here.
Delle
May 6, 2009 at 10:57 am
My guess is it is high paying donors, or someone like his good buddy Jay Z BUT http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/06/obamas-transparency-policy-dont-let-the-sunshine-in/
Michelle Malkin filed a freedom of information act April 27
….This will make for an interesting response to my Freedom of Information Act requests. After the bizarre mission caused distress and panic among countless New York City residents who were intentionally left in the dark about the photo-op stunt, I filed two public records requests with the Office of the Secretary of Defense and Joint Staff FOIA Requester Service Center. The first one requests any and all communication — including e-mail and other public records and including any and all correspondence between the White House Military Office, Department of Defense, and other agencies — related to the planned federal aerial mission over New York City on April 27, 2009. Specifically, I requested all public records related to and including the flight manifests, and related to the origin of the request for the mission. The second filing requests any and all photos taken during the planned federal aerial mission approved by the White House Military Office”…
May 6, 2009 at 8:00 pm
Good for her! I want to see the manifest.
May 6, 2009 at 9:16 pm
MichL: I’m in agreement with you – Unless it’s a photograph of those onboard, I don’t care if the W.H releases a single token photo or not. We’ve seen amateur pics and videos of the president’s low-flying Boeing VC-25 buzzing lower Manhattan accompanied by an F-16 fighter jet; now, I want to see the flight manifest. I want to read the names of those who were on that flight.
May 6, 2009 at 11:38 am
No doubt about it!
It was as special “freebie” reward for big Obama contributors (and probably not contributors to his campaign I think).
The Obama Administration admitted it as for photo taking for friends, families, and “sponsors!” Sometimes you’ve got to believe what your eyes see before you.
Of course some Obama administration official admitted that before they knew how upset everyone was. So now they’re busy scrubbing and backtracking with their lies.
May 6, 2009 at 12:16 pm
The “testing a new secret defense system” doesn’t work for me either.
No matter who was on board, or what the reason for the flight was, it was a stupid, boneheaded, thoughtless idea. I hope whoever came up with the idea learns a lesson and never does anything so dumb again. An HONEST admission of guilt and genuine apology is in order.
If it was payback for donors, the DNC or Obama campaign needs to reimburse the taxpayers for the expenses.
We need to focus on much more serious transgressions. ACORN, for instance. Let’s not major in the minors.
May 6, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Maybe some members of the Saudi Royal Family needed to get a surreal feel for 9/11. With Obama so eager to bow to their needs…
May 6, 2009 at 12:40 pm
It’s unlikely that it was a joyride for contributors. That would not explain one of the most telling parts of the escapade: that police ect. on the ground were forced to keep it secret as it was happening.
May 6, 2009 at 9:14 pm
But my thoughts were that the reason they insisted it be kept secret, was because they knew if it were made public, the outcry would prevent them from being able to do it. In other words, I think there’s a possibility they kept it secret, simply so they could do it. (they only cared about outrage if it kept them from their plan, afterwards, who cares!)
May 6, 2009 at 12:41 pm
No one was taking photos.
He meant to use Alinsky fear-tactics to terrorize and distract from his insane spending and other crazy policies. If we study from his playbook (Alinsky) we can anticipate better when this Administration is targeting and f*cking over American citizens/VOTERS and EXPOSE them EVERY SINGLE TIME.
Everything Obama does is to create a society of socialist obot-voters that will be obligated to support his policies and/or vote for him. He does this through nationalizing businesses and creating more govt-owned jobs that people will want to secure and protect with their vote. We have a huge advantage to counter this BECAUSE he is ALSO an easily provable liar about EVERYTHING, and EVERYONE hates liars.
Keep exposing the lies and he will eventually fail. Don’t get caught up in policy arguments. For example: an obot I know tried to defend socialism the other day (“What’s wrong with Europe, it’s not so bad there”)…I told him, “What socialism? Obama ridiculed anyone suggesting he was socialist during the general election. They refused to give interviews to a station in Florida because they claimed their questions about socialism were outrageous and rude. Anyway, socialism is not an issue for me personally, but you are ok with LIARS? I have higher standards. Don’t you think it’s right that people get to know if they are voting for a socialist or not? If not, that sounds like we’re heading for something more ominous than just socialism.” The argument then just turned to how they are all liars and that I am right about that. There, argument won. Obama’s not an agent of hope and change, his twinkle less-bright.
Obama also enforces his message/power through ridiculing republicans. His goal is not just beating them in elections, it’s clear he seeks to destroy the party forever through media ridicule. It’s become obvious that they are also being targeted and ridiculed via the DHS painting them as domestic terrorists. These are his tactics. And, eventually it won’t just be republicans. Through vague language like in the recent DHS reports, all dissenting opinions will eventually be singled out targeted. One-by-one in order of popularity.
The media is a tool he uses to not only ridicule but to create the illusion that he is somehow well liked and heartily approved of. He also keeps people in line through confusion and fear-mongering.
Here are a few Alinsky-tactics that outline what happened in NYC (my commentary in the parenthesis):
• “Wherever possible go outside the experience of the enemy.(New Yorkers fear of another attack by ‘Muslim extremists’) Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.”
• “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose. (Uh, 9/11, NYC)
And
• “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.” (Media coverage of panic in the streets that turns out to be a big joke on poor unsuspecting people)
• “A good tactic is one that your people enjoy. If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.” (I am sure joy-riding on AF1 makes for a lovely afternoon)
• “The threat is generally more terrifying than the thing itself.” (People thought they were being attacked, turns out it was only a harmless ‘photo shoot.’But they keep it uncertain, they don’t release the photos.)
• “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. One of the criteria for picking the target is the target’s vulnerability … the other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a personification, not something general and abstract. The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”
(Doing this kind of flyby in NYC IS probably the ONLY city this would have caused panic in. My city is fairly close the airport so I probably wouldn’t have even glanced up at a low flying plane).
I am certain of one thing: if you are seeing polls and hearing news that Obama’s popularity is strong OR if there is a whiff of the more-than-usual media fawning, you can bet their internals are telling them they are slumping. Media coverage directly relates to Obama’s message because it’s his tool. We have a thousand examples of that now. He has manipulated the media and is well on his way to owning them.
What else can we do?
Fight fire with fire. I am not suggesting we sink to their levels BUT we can learn something from the Obama version of Alinsky.
We need to act now before acceptance of govt. oppression becomes too widespread and dissent becomes more dangerous.
We must start a FULL ON assault against the MSM (including CNN, MSNBC & FOX) consisting of daily ridicule. We have to destroy the MSM. If the govt. wants to own the media make it impotent. Take their weapon away. Ridicule anchor people’s hair, lifestyle, intelligence AND have a gratuitous laugh. Look at obots for tips on how to ridicule BUT be careful not to be racist or sexist and for god’s sake be smart, witty AND funny about it. Do it every chance you get.
We MUST take away this very important tool.
Furthermore, citizen/blogger journalists need to become ROCKSTARS. Hear me HILLBUZZ? Those that have the nerve and think they can handle it need to start putting their faces with their names because we need to see you to know you. You don’t have to be attractive (look at Obama) but you have got to personalize things. Make that connection with your audience. Be a face we want to see more of. As a marketing professional, I can tell you this is important and it works. So many citizen/journalist bloggers have much more enlightened and attractive messages than the Obama crew. And there are some funny enlightened bloggers out there that could trump “Uh, uhm uh…uh” every time. Bloggers need to market themselves on the internet and also through alternative news outlets as well as….yes, TV advertising. They need to start asking for donations to market their blogs. TAKE BACK THE MEDIA.
And we the people need to praise them like we should.
We need to accomplish this or lose more rights. There needs to be a complete media blackout and ‘MSM news organizations’ must be brought to their knees.
May 6, 2009 at 12:59 pm
I couldn’t agree more. Great post.
May 6, 2009 at 1:11 pm
Incredible post.
MSM must die.
May 6, 2009 at 1:18 pm
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm……..
Sounds just like Karl Rove’s tactics….
But after all Obama and Rahm aren’t
nearly has handsome as big bopper Karl Rove!
AMEN!
May 6, 2009 at 1:24 pm
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm…………
Sounds like the tactics of
Karl Rove.
However, Obama and Rahm aren’t
handsome like Karl Rove!
May 6, 2009 at 2:15 pm
Let me add this too: counter the race-baiting by pointing out each and every time an obot denigrates a woman. Examples are not hard to find these days, especially with the whole Carrie Prejean, topless photos news. I’ve read “b*tch, wh*re & trollop” today alone.
Point out the hypocrisy, misogyny and intolerance while they are preaching about homophobia and tolerance. Remind them that violence against women is ON THE RISE and 1 out of 4 women will be sexually assaulted and raped. Don’t be afraid to ask if they have daughters and a mother they love. Regardless of your opinion, stay away from arguing about the issue of gay-marriage and stick to exposing the hate speech. RIDICULE THE HYPOCRISY AND TAKE AWAY THEIR CREDIBILITY. This is what they do.
You can always get the last word by saying that comments that seek to denigrate ALL women reveal the hate and intolerance brewing in the democratic party. I am always sure to throw in something about ageism and their superior attitudes at the expense of the disabled, too.
Tell them they will eventually fail with their attitudes about women, the elderly and the disabled and that nothing good can come from hate.
That’s essentially what they are doing to everyone else, only they are using gay-marriage as their weapon of choice. Push back.
May 7, 2009 at 12:01 pm
Miss Tickly,
Sexism (misogyny), homophobia, and racism go hand in hand. Where you see one, the others are also there lurking.
The core problem of the Obama-nation Obots is that they “are” racists. They know in their souls they have said, thought and/or done many racist things to people of color and others in their personal pasts.
That is why they overcompensate by blindly idolizing Obama and everything he says. They have guilty consciences and think their idolatry of Obama will make all their past “sins” A-Ok.
They’re like the misogynistic, frat boys (and may are actually the same ones) who in the Reagan 80’s make Jackie Gleason’s Honeymooners popular on cable TV. Those misogynistic guys liked it because it was all about the misogyny. “To the moon, Alice!”
May 6, 2009 at 1:23 pm
It’s easy to “turn off” the media and to not buy their publications.
May 6, 2009 at 3:19 pm
It is easy for us to ignore the media.
But trying to convince everyone to do it is almost impossible.
That’s where the problem lies.
May 6, 2009 at 5:28 pm
“But trying to convince everyone to do it is almost impossible.”
But it’s happening. Why do you think all these newspapers are folding? (pun intended). I think people have stopped buying because they see beyond the “enchanted” shrill. Viewer numbers at CNN, MSNBC (et al) are at their lowest levels in 3 decades – while Fox is up.
The media IS hurting, which means it’s time to REALLY twist the screws to these retards.
May 7, 2009 at 12:04 pm
absolutely watchfulraven!
You’ve heard that Newsweek is kaput?
Oh they say they’re going to re-design themselves as a very very uppity upper class richie rich news magazine.
cough cough
I bet they’ll be like all those business that put up “Closed for Redecorating” signs in their windows, and then NEVER re-Open!
May 6, 2009 at 1:25 pm
RE: Miss Tickley
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm…………
Sounds just like the tactics of
Karl Rove.
However, Obama and Rahm aren’t anywhere handsome like Karl Rove!
May 6, 2009 at 1:57 pm
The fact that no one (except police and FAA) was notified in advance was the fear of some some nut with a stinger missile going to the top of a building and shooting down the aircraft.
The theory of testing a “early warning system” does not work either. An aircraft traveling at 400 mph covers ground so quickly – it makes a warning system useless. By the time the system detects the aircraft is not following an approved arrival/departure profile – the plane has already hit a building.
May 6, 2009 at 2:52 pm
So we’re back to the
“Reward your Pimps” theory.
May 6, 2009 at 3:49 pm
Yep. The main purpose for the two VC-25A aircraft (beside the normal transportation duties to and from political functions)is to get the President the hell out of D.C. in case of extreme danger.
The safest place is in the air – that’s what the Secret Service did with Bush during 9/11.
A mid-level bureaucrat could not decide one day to take the 747 for a spin (for whatever purpose) hoping the President would not find out. I guarantee there is a document in Rahm Emanuel’s filing cabinet with Obama’s signature on it authorizing this buzzing of New York.
The most logical explanation is true: Obama wanted to treat his big donors with a flight on the President’s 747.
May 6, 2009 at 4:23 pm
At least Rahm Emanual had to know about it if not the President. This little stunt was incredibly stupid not only from a scare the crap out of New Yorkers stanpoint, but also from a national security standpoint. Taking Air Force One out for a joyride… Really??
May 6, 2009 at 4:41 pm
“It occurred to us a stunt like this would be an EXCELLENT reward for high-level donors to the current president’s campaign.”
Best explanation I’ve heard. I think you guess right, Hillbuzz. Wonder what else they were promised.
May 6, 2009 at 5:29 pm
Movie and popcorn with Rahm?
May 7, 2009 at 5:01 am
Eeeeuuuuw! Probably.
May 7, 2009 at 12:33 pm
This fly-by incident is just the kinda thing that is eventually going to bring Obama DOWN. He is a one-term president, for sure.
May 7, 2009 at 12:59 pm
[...] Who Was Aboard Air Force One For the “Photo Op”? Who was aboard Air Force One as it re-enacted 9/11 to terrorize New Yorkers? [...]
May 7, 2009 at 2:37 pm
This might interest people:
http://patdollard.com/2009/05/another-conspiracy-as-if-we-needed-one/
Makes some sense, who knows?