Looking back on the general election, of all the bizarre experiences we collectively had, in many states, on many campaign related adventures that involved far too much Iowa for any one lifetime, the one that still haunts us is the Chicago Gay Pride Parade on June 29th, 2008. We had spent two weeks trying to get the Democrats’ presumed nominee to attend his first-ever Pride Parade, right here in his hometown, but instead he decided to get his hair cut and play basketball at the tony East Bank Club downtown (because, Heaven knows, there are no hairdressers or rugged, athletic, shirtless basketball types who could have helped a candidate out anywhere NEAR Boystown on the last Sunday of June, in the middle of the largest Gay Pride Parade between New York and San Francisco…where it’s almost guarateed said haircutting and/or basketball playing would automatically result in a water and/or tickle fight of some kind, scored to the Weather Girls blaring off Rahm Emanuel’s strawberry-pink boombox).
We were watching the parade slink by Sidetrack’s in Boystown, camped out at a choice air-conditioned spot by the big floor-to-ceiling windows, as our friend Jorge flaked on us to chase after a pastry chef he’d been after for a while (there are so many bakery-themed cruller, hot buns, and buttered rolls jokes we could do here, you have no idea). Left to our own devices, in Team Hillary rainbow-bedazzled shirts, we found ourselves in the company of a 50-something Republican and his 20-something “friend”, as the case typically is at Sidetrack’s. This was very early in our Democrats for McCain efforts, and we were still, at the time, suppressing with great difficulty our indoctrinated impulses to run screaming from the room at the sight of any Republican (“Vampires. That’s what they are. Vampires. Run, run and never look back,” the primitive, partisan, medulaoblongomacrat center of our brain egged on).
“I voted for Hillary, you know. I never thought I would say that, and I never thought I would like the woman, but man alive, did she fight. She undid years of everything I thought about her and I see her as a real person now. We all do. Even Rush likes her. Sort of,” the Republican in front of us said, basking in the rainbow-sparkling Hillary tees dazzling before him, which, to be honest, are as 100% effective in warding off unfavorable remarks about our champ as garlic and Holy water are at fending off real vampires. It’s hard to imagine anyone giving us a hard time about Clinton when we’re geared up with her big smiling face on our sparkly chests.
But, it was even harder for us to imagine what the Republican said next…and it still leaves us stunned.
He told us that while he would have preferred Hillary Clinton to the Democrats’ eventual nominee, Dr. Utopia, there was no way he was going to vote for John McCain, because McCain was too moderate. He wasn’t going to vote for Dr. Utopia (though he might have voted for Clinton), so he was going to skip the first election in his adult life. He just wasn’t going to vote, and launched into a long and still, to this day, head-scratching explanation of why he thought 4 years of economy-destroying, malaise-inducing, Carteresque buffoonary was better than electing John McCain the 44th President of the United States.
“Because then we get a new Reagan after the new Carter,” he said, taking a long sip off his even longer Island ice tea, like a cat that had just finished doing something especially vile in secret somewhere, savoring every last drop of schemaliciousness.
And his little friend, still in college, agreed with every word he said, before asking for a pair of twenties to buy another round, then cruising every last Aberzombie he passed en Byzantine route to the bar.
The Republican said a lot more, but he might as well have been talking underwater because we were too stunned to hear most of it, on top of the distractions of the parade and a busy bar in general. By the time the massive Sidetrack’s float passed by the windows and the place really got loud with cheers for the rainbow-speedo-clad bartenders turned Pride Parade go-go boys on the bar’s sponsored float, a few more Log Cabin Republicans had joined us, including one whose name we never remember because he’s a dead-ringer for a young Troy Donahue (but we call him Tab Hunter, since that’s more fun to say, and most people we know don’t have a clue who we’re talking about anyway).
Tab Hunter agreed with the first Republican, saying it was the opinion of Log Cabins at large that having 4 years of national acid reflux with Carter Redux was far more appealing than a one-term moderate presidency for John McCain (who very few ever expected to run again in 2012).
We’ll never forget their faces, as the young “friend” returned with the round of drinks (but, conveniently, not any change) and everyone stared blankly at the floats passing by, firm in their belief that everything they knew would happen to the deficit, to inflation, to increased government graft and corruption, to an empowered and better-funded ACORN, in the four years Dr. Utopia would have in Washington would be markedly preferable to four years with a moderate Repubican in office.
It was a parade of fools.
And the lot of us in that bar, crossing the aisle for the first time in our lives, realized we were working much, much harder to elect McCain than REPUBLICANS were, and that was the scariest and craziest thing any of us had experienced in a long, long while.
It still doesn’t make any damn sense, to be honest. Maybe it will in 2012.
But, the video above of Schumer is no accident: it is part of a very well-orchestrated plan hatched at the DNC to use the MSM and every available platform to push a weak Republican candidate to face Dr. Utopia in the next election, to guarantee him a second term. Schumer’s saying the GOP is too conservative, and needs to be moderate, but moderate is what cost the GOP the 2008 race. That’s like Oprah waking up one day and realizing little chocolate doughnuts, so delicious, are the cause of most of her girth and problems, yet deciding to order two vanloads of them today instead of her usual delivery. If something is a problem, you need more of it. We have always been at war with Eastasia. This strategy is indeed doubleplusgood.
Bobby Jindal is repeatedly pushed as the Webster to Dr. Utopia’s Arnold, the Deep Impact to his Armageddon, the Bug’s Life to his Antz. Jindal is a fatally flawed national candidate who will be excoriated by the media once he’d become the Republican nominee. It’s the same with Charlie Crist, who the media also pushes, much to the GOP’s detriment. Crist and Jindal should never have a slot on a national ticket. Because the MSM will indeed protect a Democrat from anything embarassing in his past (like his myriad latenight adventures in Chicago nightlife), but they will NOT extend the same ass-covering courtesy (literally) for someone with an R at the end of his name (or a Bob Mackie, Cher-inspired, sequined original in his closet, as the case may be).
Mitt Romney has too much of a gooey center as well. Though, if you listen to Schumer, you’d think he’d be just the candidate Republicans need, or at least just the candidate Democrats advise the Republicans they need, the same way the Washington Generals dutifully listen to every pointer Globetrotters like Schumer give them.
Tab Hunter and the rest of the Log Cabin pride crowd aren’t going to get revved up for Romney any more than they were mad for McCain. “Let him have another term, and then in 2016, we can have a new Reagan, or even a new Bush, after eight years of Clinton, unless Clinton runs again, and then we’ll have to go back to hating her for no reason.” We can just hear this nonsense now.
We clearly want to see Sarah Palin take Dr. Utopia on in three years. CLEARLY. But, the MSM is having a very real effect on many Republicans we know here in Chicago: more and more of them say that Palin can’t run for national office again because the MSM keeps pummeling her, and that Tina Fey will still be around to ridicule her more for the next three years, so Republicans should dump Palin and find someone who the MSM and SNL can’t make fun of.
Good luck with that.
Everyone can be made fun of.
Bobby Jindal will be depicted with his exorcism kit, expelling demons from under every bed, evicting Satan from every closet…where Charlie Crist just HAPPENS to be hiding, trussed up like Charlotte Rae, pearl necklace courtesy of the regulars down at the Green Iguana in Tampa…where Mitt Romney enters, clad only in his sacred magic underwear, lost, mugged, and looking for a phone to call Salt Lake to send Elders to save him.
Look what we did there, and we’re not even particularly original or talented.
But, at least we’re aware enough to realize that NO MATTER WHO Republicans run, that person will be ripped to shreds by the MSM and an entire entertainment industry that EXISTS to belittle and bemoan conservativism.
Republicans, in many ways, have themselves to blame for this. What Schumer does NOT offer as advice is something we tell all of you each and every day: lay off the gays, stop using abortion as a wedge issue, and send your religious zealots to the back of the bus if you want fiscal conservativism to relate to people who would truly embrace you, if not for all the hate flung at them in the form of weaponized religion.
Believe what you want. Keep pictures of Tom Cruise, Nathan Lane, and us for all we care up on your dartboards. Hate away! But just shut your mouths in public about it. Damn people to Hell silently, secure in your knowledge that you know best, but realize that all those male-male couples paying WAY TOO MUCH TAX on the spacious three bedroom condos they share on the Gold Coast with adorable labradoodles named Will and Grace would be votes you could have if not for Leviticus this or abomination that.
Because we have enough Obamanation currently and don’t need an extra four years of it because of your myopic stupidity.
And the greatest fear we have in this world, at this moment in time, is that we’re the only ones who see what the MSM and people like Schumer are doing: they are setting Republicans up for a 2012 fall. Mercifully, we were able to tell Michael Steele this in person when he was here in Chicago. No one can ever say a group of Hillary Dems in Boystown didn’t warn the Republicans about the heaping helpings of Jindal, Crist, and Romney coming their way. Robots sent from the future couldn’t have done a better job getting apocalypse-halting messages to the RNC than we did at the Union League Club (especially considering how we weren’t allowed in at first wearing jeans, and time-traveling cyborgs arrive completely nude in their temporal orbs, so we imagine the Union League Club would have had a problem with that too (but then again, maybe they just really, really hate jeans, but Austrian nudism is perfectly fine).
May 5, 2009 at 10:47 am
“..Robots sent from the future couldn’t have done a better job getting apocalypse-halting messages to the RNC than we did at the Union League Club..”
Outstanding imagery, but just can’t see you guys saying:
“Comm viz oss, iv you wahnt you pahty to suhvive.”
May 5, 2009 at 11:03 am
Skating,
Really, what we keep saying is “Why are Hillary Democrats working harder than you people are to save the country from lunatics? That’s YOUR job. We’re supposed to be part of those lunatics, not the ones making sense. Cats are chasing DOGS people. Rain is falling UP. Great Merciful Zeus, the world’s gone MAD.”
Because we really do talk like this in person. Ask girlpower, she’ll tell you.
May 5, 2009 at 12:41 pm
Your point is very well taken.
Hope to see you at the bowling shindig next week- perhaps glean some idears for energizing the comatose party I nominally identify with.
And indeed, it is a mad mad mad mad MAD mad world.
May 5, 2009 at 2:56 pm
We tried, Hillbuzz. We tried. Some of the really conservative Republicans are just old coot fools. I campaigned for Sarah, and wrote letters, and explained the issues to people,etc, and I DID get some McCain voters.
One of the problems for the Republican party: some of them are stuck in “my way or the highway”.
Now we ALL have to suffer undwee a narcissistic Marxist.
Stubborn fools.
May 5, 2009 at 11:00 am
Hillbuzz, I love you! Having found republicans for the first time in 2008 and not hating them was an epiphany for me too.
I have a suggestion. What about Arnold Schwartzenegger for pres in 2012? I would definitely vote for him if BOzo runs again (which I think he will). I believe it is the democratic plan to have dems in the WH for eternity. That is one reason they want to flood the system with immigrants, immigrants and more immigrants and illegals to get more potential democratic voters and eventually do away with the republican party. At one time I might have thought that was a good idea, but after election 2008, God forbid!!!
Getting back to Arnold, he is not a natural born citizen, but either was Obama, so Obama by not following the rules actually paved the way for others to do the same. Arnold is smart, solution oriented, fiscally responsible and socially moderate/liberal. The down side he is a known and admitted womanizer (that didn’t stop Bill Clinton to get elected, but ulimately was his demise). I am not being funny about this at all, I am serious. I understand your article perfectly and where you are coming from having lived the nightmare of election 2008. Think of this: If Arnie decides to run against BO in 2012, and people question his citizenship, etc., he can then mention Obama and say that Obama was not a true citizen either. If Obama protests, then he should ask Obama to present documentation that he is a proper citizen, which he cannot or will not do. Perhaps then Obama will not be able to run again in 2012 if that happens (I know, I am really fantasizing today, but it is fun!!!)
Thanks Hillbuzz for the insightful articles and your dedication to helping all of us.
May 5, 2009 at 11:06 am
Not wanting to get into conspiracy theories but about a month or so before the election someone told me that if you look at the theories they say the plan is for Arnold to be the next president, with the explanation you gave about natural born citizenship.
That said, Arnold’s popularity took a nose dive after the economy tanked because he does not look like he can handle California so he would not be able to handle the country.
I also wanted to say great post. It always amazes me that people will listen to one party talking about what another party should do because why would they really want to help the party elect someone!
May 5, 2009 at 11:28 am
I would like to see a Palin/Arnold ticket, LOL. I know it’s just a dream, but it’s kind of fun to think about. Both of them appeal to me as a (former) Dem, as a liberal. They both serve the people, not their personal beliefs. They both have some conservative roots running thru, the real kind, small government, less interference in people’s lives, fiscal responsibility.
May 5, 2009 at 12:47 pm
Arnold can’t run for POTUS, he’s not a natural born citizen.
And yeah, I know about the questions regarding Obama’s citizenship. Doesn’t matter, Arnold’s a Repub and we have to play by the rules.
May 5, 2009 at 1:12 pm
Arnold is a no-go. He has been the equivalent of GW Bush on wielding a veto for a spending bill.
He was an image pick several years ago, when the economy was humming and things were good. Now that we are in tough times, his state’s politics and regulations are going to damper the effectiveness of a fiscally responsible policy (if that is a part of what he truly believes).
May 5, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Um, do you live in California? Arnold is one of the worse Governors we have ever had. He’s woefully incompetent and ineffective; he lets the Democratic-controlled legislature run all over him. As a result, our state is bankrupt.
No, Arnold as President would truly sink us even more into the economic hole.
May 5, 2009 at 5:11 pm
Besides Chicago and D.C., there’s no place on Earth as corrupt as Sacramento, CA. In the first place, be not ye fooled, Arnold’s a RINO … too many years smoking smuggled Cubans and knocking back 200-year-old Scotches at the Kennedy compound. He campaigned for governator as a tough-talking instrument of real leadership – he was, after all, a successful businessman himself, and understood the plight of the business community. He promised the usual enticements: No new taxes, slash spending, and reign in the out-of-control unions who got us in to this mess. Oh yes, and figure a way to keep umpteen businesses a month from packing up and moving elsewhere – primarily due to California’s increasingly impossible to meet eco standards. Californians – including me – swallowed the hype hook, line and sinker. Hey, we’d all seen True Lies and Kindergarten Cop. He’s a stand-up, honest guy, right? A hero, right?. He swore to one and all he was a change from the impotent tool he sought to replace, Gray Davis. Sadly, once elected, it became all too apparent that Arnold is all aht and no horse, and has a deep-seated need to be adored. You know, like a movie star. Uh oh. His speeches started sounding like so much scripted bluster, delivered in that charming Austrian accent he cannot, after 40 years here, lose. I actually think he was convinced he could use his considerable charm to persuade California pols to come over to his side. Only they saw him for what he really is: a power-hungry, ambitious man, a fabulously wealthy gasbag who cannot make a decision, knuckles under to his adversaries, and pals around with Al Gore. At heart he’s an appeaser, the Dems smelled it and Arnie’s goose was cooked. In short order he morphed into one of the “girly men” he loves to vilify. Hell, he became Gray Davis, Jr. Arnold was not the answer to California’s problems … he is a lying tax and spend democrat who turned a blind eye to the rape and pillage of the state because his eye is on a bigger prize. Doubtful anybody here would vote for him for Senator, but folks in Mass would likely find him a splendid replacement for Ted.
May 5, 2009 at 7:57 pm
yogi41 Says:
“Um, do you live in California? ( yes) Arnold is one of the worse Governors we have ever had.” AMEN TO THAT!
In his defense, the state legislature has never seen an entitlement program it didn’t like or vote for. These idiots have regulated businesses outta CA.
May 5, 2009 at 4:42 pm
Yeah, then the Governator can do for the U.S. what he did for Kuliforneya ….. not. Nice idea in theory, but he’s proven to be a very ineffective leader.
May 5, 2009 at 11:20 am
Perfect Hillbuzz! I share your sentiments. You said it well.
May 5, 2009 at 11:22 am
Hillbuzz, another great thread.
I can tell you for a fact that McCain was NOT universally supported on the gun message boards (very conservative, politically) where I hang out. Oh, most of us eventually held our noses and voted for him as definitely the lesser of two evils, but there was a sizable and very vocal contingent of these conservatives—maybe as many as a fifth—who refused to go along with the program. They either wrote in Ron Paul or someone else, or they just stayed home.
And we even had a few who openly said they supported and voted for Maobama because they were hoping he’d implode and destroy the country, in the hopes that a stronger phoenix of a nation would rise from the ashes of the old.
May 5, 2009 at 11:40 am
Hillbuzz:
This is a great post.
Yesterday (after MSNBC declared Hillary more popular than Obama) I was waxing “melancholy, thinking about what “SHOULD HAVE BEEN” … Anyone think for a moment that this country would be in the shape it currently finds itself had Hillary been elected? Anyone think she’d be blaming Bush, or tolerating the insane spending that Pelosi, Reid, and Democrats are handing the country?”
I found Republicans, as well,last year. I’m at a point where I’m so tired of labels like Republican, Democrat, conservative, liberal etc.etc. They are all meaningless today.
Just give me someone with a modicum of common sense…. please!
May 5, 2009 at 12:51 pm
Hillary would have vetoed those bills and said go back to work and “bring me something I can sign.”
May 5, 2009 at 11:43 am
Does Shumer really think traditional values and strong foreign policy are a thing of the past. Does he think they aren’t something many of us will fight to save? Did he really say that Obama is lying to the American Public when he says that he really wants bi-partisianship, but, and unless conservitive grassroots citizens push the Republican party toward the center. that will never happen? I do believe he meant that, and that it is true we are being lied to, but if he thinks any of us believe they would ever push any bill through without sneaking it in, in the dead of night, or that they would ever listen to the Republican view point, or even more remotely, that of the American Taxpayer….he is sniffing something potent.
May 5, 2009 at 11:54 am
you guys are incredibly insightful and I
am particularly angry at the republicans
for sitting out the election and giving
us our current thug-in-chief. we are in
for a really bumpy ride and some damage
cannot be undone.
May 5, 2009 at 11:55 am
Truth be told, I began walking away from the Democrats during the Clarence Thomas nomination… My eyes were opened so to speak on the nastiness of the party and what the NOW organization really stands for. I began an intense investigation into politics…I read the book Bias, and I become more and more republican each year…. conservative is a better word.One thing I have learned about conservatives is they are not really republicans, but that is just the party.
When you say the Democrats are not reading the election properly you are correct, but neither are the republicans. Like it or not, the conservative group will not vote if they do not like the candidate. It is a protest non vote so to speak. One main difference between the two parties, is that republicans will call their elected officials out when they are incorrect or moving to far to the left…… Democrats almost always defend their own regardless of the situation in most cases… Personally I would never not vote… I always vote.. McCain was the perfect candidate really, he would have been a gem for the democrats and the moderate republicans… Conservatives flocked to Sarah which is the only reason McCain did as well as he did..The only true far right candidate in reality was Ron Paul. Mr. Paul to my knowledge did not endorse either candidate for presidency and he stated there was no real difference. I am willing to bet alot of his supporters voted for Obama in protest… This group may be more Libertarian than republican. You are correct as you have mentioned before, Sarah Palin is the only one at this point that could beat Obama. I know of NO Democrat except one that voted for Obama, he should have taken that election… between the acorn factor and many conservatives that did not vote I believe we were left with what we have…
May 5, 2009 at 7:46 pm
And precisely because Palin is the only one who can beat 0bama Soros, the media and, the DNC will never give up trashing her because they are all well aware of the fact. If Palin gets the nomination, SHE WINS! The progressives all know it but, they won`t admit it.
The Republicans are all gutless wonders. Plenty of Republicans were pissed at W because he never fought back and at McCain because he never attacked during the campaign. You have to play to win and the Republicans don`t, Sarah did that`s why everyone loved her. She came out at the convention and went right into attack mode. It`s time to get in the progressive`s faces. Ronnie would do it. And Ronnie didn`t let the far right get in his way. It`s time to attack. There are enough moderates in both parties to unite and elect Palin. Screw both wings. The majority rules not the party.
May 5, 2009 at 12:01 pm
Hillbuzz Said: “It is part of a very well-orchestrated plan hatched at the DNC to use the MSM and every available platform to push a weak Republican candidate to face Dr. Utopia in the next election, to guarantee him a second term. Schumer’s saying the GOP is too conservative, and needs to be moderate, but moderate is what cost the GOP the 2008 race.”
Boyz, you have no idea how similar you are to Rush and other considerate talk-radio hosts on this issue. Don’t get out the wooden stake & garlic yet! On Rush’s website is a heading “You can’t fight Left-wing absolutes with lukewarm water.” (read water as conservatism).
Re: the Republican confab with Jeb Bush yesterday, Rush stated “We did it their way in 2008. We did it with the candidate and approach that they thought would work: pandering. ‘We gotta listen to the American people.’ I maintain when a politician says, ‘We have to listen to the American people and learn,’ we are pandering. We’re not leading.
“You simply listen to what people say they want and then come up with a series of policies that give them what they want. What if what they want is destructive to the country? What if what the people want is destructive to your own party? What if what the people want is something they don’t even really understand? Where is leadership in this equation?
“These people are not conservatives when they say Reagan’s finished, leave Reagan alone, Reagan era behind, it’s over, whatever. These are people that don’t believe in conservatism. They don’t know what they do believe in so what they say is we need to reform conservatism. We need to redefine conservatism; we need to rebrand it. No, no, no, no. It’s timeless. It’s timeless. It’s the way people live their lives. It’s the basis on which the country was founded.”
Rush also commented that “clearly in last year’s campaign, the most prominent, articulate voice for standard run-of-the-mill good old-fashioned American conservatism was Sarah Palin.”
I submit that as you always say, many of us on this site stand united as never before!
May 5, 2009 at 12:04 pm
Sorry, should say “conservative” NOT considerate! Gaah, my brain woke up on the same side of the bed as JackDaddy’s!
May 5, 2009 at 2:52 pm
LOL, we need an edit button like some sites have. Edit buttons are lifesavers for people with dyslexia like myself. Maybe when hillbuzz moves!
May 5, 2009 at 1:05 pm
I KNOW some of those conservatives who didn’t show up to vote for McCain, and I told them to their faces that this Obamanation is THEIR fault.
If Obama keeps going this way, and the economy(job losses) keep tanking, the Repulicans will see the error of their ways. At this time, other than Rush Limbaugh, they’re all just a bunch of whiners.
May 5, 2009 at 9:40 pm
I contend that 2008 will have been the last election that will have been fought on the familiar battleground of television.
If Sarah plays it right, she can bypass the MSM *for the most part* and take the fight to the internet and not have to rely on the MSM. It’s a beautiful thing. I think ALL candidates will be doing this, actually.
May 5, 2009 at 12:24 pm
Hillbuzz, you are so right and there are many conservatives who see what you see. But, we tend to be drowned out by those country club republicans who want to be liked by the cool kids. They may dominate the press but they don’t dominate the ballot box.
McCain didn’t stand a chance until he put Palin on the ticket. She SIZZLES! Totally energized his campaign. The only reason that had joint appearances was to hide the fact that the people came out to see her, not him.
I’m a 9/11 republican and it amazes me that the republicans keep falling for the dems shenanigans. I quickly figured out if the press was trashing a republican, he must be effective. Heaping praise, RINO.
I am amazed at the bewilderment republicans express at the continued attacks on Palin and the Trig Truthers. This is the very reason why the republicans are always on the defensive and are decades behind in the culture wars. The point is to destroy Palin. The only requirements for the lies are that they be clever, amusing, or bizarre. Even though Palin is strong enough to stand up to the onslaught, there may be enough squishy RINOs that will distance themselves from her and finish the job Sullivan and others started. Of course Sullivan knows they are lies but he gets to throw mud at Palin, day after day. Lying is what democrats do and they do it well. “Bush lied, people died. Rushed into war. Plastic turkey. Gitmo full of boyscouts.” ENOUGH! Sullivan knows exactly what he is doing and it could very well work. All the claims that Sullivan is insane or foolish just demonstrate that conservatives don’t get it.
It reminds me of this middle-aged woman who smugly stated that middle-aged men who dated 18-year olds were pathetic and did they realize how foolish they made themselves look? I looked her in the eye and said, his goal is to bang hot young chicks, he IS banging hot young chicks, and he shows her off to all his friends so that they know he’s banging hot chicks. Mission accomplished. She retorted that she would never consider doing the same thing– date younger men. Of course not. I told her that “she didn’t understand men or how they think and that she would continue to sit home on Friday nights alone with her cat.”
Get real people. The dems do it because it works. It’s really sad that Republicans sit back and let it happen, time after time.
May 5, 2009 at 12:48 pm
Most excellent post, BlackRedneck! Are you new, or just an occasional poster??
You are so right. For the most part, it simply does not lie within most Republicans to stoop to despicable Democratic depths. They are gentlemen and gentlewomen. Principle almost always wins over party.
In reference to the RINOS, yes they have infiltrated the party—and with the MSM—deceive the common people. Specter leaving is a great first step—although this does tip the teeter-totter almost totally to the Dem side in the Senate.
BTW, just saw a headline on Newsmax that Al Franken vows to emulate Hillary Clinton. Once ensconced, Franken says he will follow Hillary’s path to legislative legitimacy.
“Hillary came in to a certain amount of skepticism,” Franken recently told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. “They wondered ‘Is she going to be a prima donna? Use her celebrity? Is she going to be grabbing the microphone all the time?’ What she did was put her head down and work.”
Franken says he’s been consulting Hillary Clinton on how best to operate effectively in the Senate.
I’m sorry, Al Franken is a nasty,vile man.
May 5, 2009 at 1:16 pm
Hi NeeNee,
I’m a long time fan of Hillbuzz. Thanks for the welcome! I tend to lurk because the guys posts are so great and cover most of my points so I don’t post much. But, this topic has been driving me nuts because Republicans seem to be wasting a lot of time on the dems talking points. After the 2004 election, everyone acknowledged that the “values voter” put Bush over the top. Then, I watched in amazement as the Dems waged a campaign to convince people they were the true values voter (see Dear Leader’s ad at the pulpit with a huge cross) and the press bashing any republican who referenced God, especially Palin, and issued fake poll after fake poll that “showed” how republicans should distance themselves from the values voters that handed Bush the election. Now, the drive-by-media have started the same drumbeat against Palin. Stay away from the one Republican that brought out people in droves through wind, sleet, and snow. Aarrgh!
Thanks for the Franken tip. Bawahaaha! He should watch out for lightening strikes. Unlike Franken, I would never insult Hillary by comparing her to him. He’s a nonstop, one-man hate fest.
May 5, 2009 at 1:35 pm
Obama wraps himself in his fake Christianity when it suits his purposes. Calling this Black Liberation Theology belief “Christian” is stretching it. You will never convince me that he isn’t truly Muslim, or a weird-science blend of his BLT & Islam.
Oh, and I don’t believe Hillary resorted to “misplacing” a cartrunk of votes or said that clear votes for her opponent were actually meant for her!! Voters may have had skepticism, but the NY Senate election was on the up & up, I do believe. Quite unlike the Minnesota nightmare that is Al Franken.
May 5, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Loved your post, and I love your nickname!
May 5, 2009 at 1:00 pm
I don’t post here often but I appreciate your insights and desire to see America be the best it can be. I recently litened to a speech by Ronald Reagan from 1964, it was stunning in how applicable it is for today. I encourage you to read/liten to what he said. http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/ronaldreaganatimeforchoosing.htm
Why do the republicans want to distance themselves from this guy and the democrats try to sound like him?
May 5, 2009 at 1:20 pm
Isn’t it funny how republicans say the the era of Reagan is over but whenever the Dear Leader wants to show how strong and effective he is, the dems and drivebys compare him to Reagan? Hmmm…
Thanks for the link. I will check it out.
May 5, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Isn’t it funny how republicans say the the era of Reagan is over but whenever the Dear Leader wants to show how strong and effective he is, the dems and drivebys compare him to Reagan? Hmmm…it is a puzzle.
Thanks for the link. I will check it out.
May 5, 2009 at 2:27 pm
Hi, BlackRedneck. Yes, many republicans are saying the era of Reagan is over. Isn’t that silly? Reagan represented the heart of conservatism. You and I know that conservatives are NOT OVER yet. :)
May 5, 2009 at 2:32 pm
Afterthought: I am willing and ready to go into a “Palin Era”. YEAH!
May 5, 2009 at 2:01 pm
Ben Ferguson, a talk show host here in Memphis, played clips of Reagan’s speech last fall. I found it on utube and sent the link to my email list. Talk about a modern day prophet.
May 5, 2009 at 1:27 pm
I voted for Hillary in the primaries, and would have possibly voted for her in November because I (a conservative, NOT a Republican – there’s a difference) was not crazy about McCain.
I liked Sarah Palin and she made voting for McCain palatable, albeit not preferable. I think the flogging she took in the media means they perceive her as a threat, but that’s just me.
I can’t stand Obama. He’s already a disaster and we still have three-plus years of this insanity (unless the Republicans make a decent showing in 2010 midterms). Suffice to say I’d sleep much better at night if Hillary were in the White House because Hillary wouldn’t have gone on the “America Sux” world tour and wouldn’t be actively trying to destroy this nation by letting Pelosi et al run the show.
May 5, 2009 at 1:36 pm
If only we could get rid of the labels. We all have preconceived ideas of what we think a democrat is, what we think a republican is, etc. And having been a life-long democrat and not voting in 2008, I am not sure I know anymore what a democrat stands for. I know I do not want to be associated with a party that will trash women as they did Hillary Clinton and beat up Sarah Palin and her family and think it is okay. I know I do not want to be associated with a party that will break every rule of law to get a candidate elected to office who is not a legitimate citizen of the U.S. and not eligible under our constitution to be president. I know I do not want to be associated with a party that puts forth a candidate who hates America, who sat is a racist, anti-semitic, anti-white, anti-American church for 20 years. I do not want to be associated with a party that is so corrupt it will steal trillions of taxpayer dollars and pretend it is a stimulus bill but really it is about taking our money and paying people down the line to support democrats for years to come, and nationalizing all the major institutions under Obama’s thumb.
Republicans need to clean up their act in a big way, otherwise, we will be stuck with BO and his clones for years to come.
May 5, 2009 at 2:10 pm
I couldn’t agree with you more susan h. And I am also surrounded by dem voters who are blissfully and willfully ignorant of all the actual behavior of dems this past year and right now. The stink rises right up to their nostrils and they say “What’s that smell? Must be the other guy. Couldn’t be us, for we are all that is lovely and amazing and holier than thou.”
Eesh.
May 5, 2009 at 7:17 pm
Here here!
Throw ALL of the bums out. I know I repeat myself, but I can’t help it.
We have to end the corruption.
WE THE PEOPLE
May 5, 2009 at 8:31 pm
WE, ARE THE GROWN UPS! It’s up to us folks.
May 5, 2009 at 2:04 pm
Human Events had a great article yesterday, entitled
“Can Obama Be Called An Economic Fascist?”
Author is Jerry Doyle.
Excerpt:
“Economic fascism can be defined as government control over the four P’s:
Product, Price, Profit Margin, and People.
When the government controls the PRODUCT created by the market, when it controls the PRICE structure for product and company securities, when it controls how much PROFIT particular companies can make, and when it controls the PEOPLE who are hired and fired, economic freedom has been banished, and economic fascism reigns supreme.
“Economic fascism reigns supreme in Barack Obama’s America. Just look at the recent government handling of Chrysler. In a series of press conferences this week announcing Chrysler’s bankruptcy, Obama hit on all of the four P’s.”
Link to entire article below –
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=31701
May 5, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Nee Nee- or course he can be declared an economic facist.
But why be so narrow in the classification- he’s a general purpose, all around facist for all your facism needs!
May 5, 2009 at 2:22 pm
hillbuzz I am so thankful you took your insights and messages to Steele, braving the loaner pants and all. At least they were warned – hopefully they have what it takes to take action. I think you are right on every count and I too have heard this talk of 4 years of Carter to get another Reagan and agree with you there as well – parade of fools. It’s like gambler thinking – a good way for America to lose its shirt. I know people are lukewarm about McCain but he is INFINITELY preferable to what we have now. I will take “meh” any day compared to a screaming horror fest of natural disaster proportions. Which is what we have.
May 5, 2009 at 2:23 pm
I think the dems are reading it correctly. That’s why their encouraging the Repubs to be more moderate. Apparently the Obama’s campaign manager said they are most “frightened” of running against Utah’s gov in 2012. I don’t know much about him, but apparently he is moderate. Most “frightened” means they know they can win. The republican party need to stop listening to the media!
May 5, 2009 at 3:25 pm
As a Republican (since 911) or should I say a fiscal conservative, agnostic, I have been reading this site for months. I really enjoy the editorial posts here – very witty.
With regards to the Republican party, I have to tell you that I am really not sure what will happen in the future. It is a very good possibility that Obama may be re-elected.
Congress is going to get immigration reform passed in the next few years because that will net the Democrats with 15 million new voters.Republicans will not vote against it for being called racists. Seeing that Obama has completely run roughshod over bankruptcy law with regards to GM and Chrysler, it is obvious that our country is well on it’s way to being a banana republic.
The media (except for a couple of people at FOX) are completely in the tank for Obama.
The left now control the entire country – media, entertainment, Congress, White House, education, most Federal, State, City and County employees are Democrat voters.
It won’t matter who the Republicans run in 2012, with a majority of people depending on government hand outs – the Democrat wins.
We have become Venezuela.
The Democrats fight to win, the Republicans aren’t even in the fight for fear of being called racists or worse.
May 5, 2009 at 3:54 pm
Larry Lomax, the Clark County registrar of voters, said his office reviewed the 91,002 In regards to the latest arrests of ACORN workers: Check the last sentence.
voter registration forms turned in by ACORN, verifying that information on the form matched information attached to the voter’s driver’s license number or Social Security number.
If it didn’t, those registrations were tagged as requiring identification at the polling place.
There were 28,097 forms that were duplicates or changes of name, party or address, leaving 62,905 new voters.
Of those, 23,186 actually voted in the 2008 general election, according to a report prepared by Lomax’s office.
That means almost 40,000 of the new voters registered by ACORN didn’t vote, and of those, almost 19,000 had information on file that didn’t match what was turned in on the forms.
“That’s 48 percent of those forms that I believe are clearly fraudulent,” Lomax said.
Lomax is the NV Clark county registrars officer
May 5, 2009 at 4:57 pm
This is not really news;we all know about the outright vote theft that helped the Brown Clown slide into office.Bottom line is,they got away with it and will again,since they got 4 billion from the stimulus package.Absolutely nothing will happen to these crooks.
May 5, 2009 at 9:01 pm
“Absolutely nothing will happen to these crooks.”
Not so sure about that, pistol. BO has pi$$ed a lot of CIA peeps off with these “torture memos”. I think, um, I hope these guys work together to stop the BO minions like ACORN.
May 5, 2009 at 6:59 pm
So many great points made here today, by the HB guys and all the bloggers. This really is one of the most intelligent groups on the net. I always learn so much.
I think it is time for you HB guys to hold a ThinkTank in Chicago, where we can all put our heads together, come up with some ideas, and then fan out to start spreading the word that people need to wake up and start working for 2012 before it is too late. The problem is that most republicans, including the dear one I am married to, are just too damn busy working hard in this economy and have no time to pay attention to what is happening. It is not that they do not care, it is just that they are not activists by nature. We need to figure out ways to get them involved. We need to wake up the sleeping majority, get the propaganda out there, just as the Obamedia does for their messyIwon. So how about it guys? Time for the first Hillbuzz convention? It would be so great to launch a biparitisan, grass roots effort to expose Obamao in his own home town! (I know, he only pretends to be a Chicagoan, but it would still have impact)
May 5, 2009 at 7:15 pm
That’s an interesting idea, as always, girlpower. We will have to give that one some serious thought.
May 5, 2009 at 8:05 pm
I love Hillary and Sarah–I really do–but read this: http://washingtonindependent.com/41786/ron-pauls-economic-theories-winning-gop-converts
May 5, 2009 at 8:54 pm
Great article sonic.
“But the most prominent new face is Bachmann, the rising conservative star who left C-SPAN and YouTube watchers scratching their heads with a constitutional grilling that seemed to puzzle Geithner. “What provision in the Constitution could you point to to give authority for the actions that have been taken by the Treasury since March of ‘08?” asked Bachmann during a hearing on March 24. “What in the Constitution could you point to to give authority to the Treasury’s extraordinary actions that have been taken?”
Here is a GROWN UP!! Hmmm…….. Bachmann/Palin :-)
May 5, 2009 at 9:03 pm
Hate crime — hate is in the eye of the beholder, eh? And if you are a Democrat – you protect child rapists, but G-d forbid you protect the military.
ATLAS SHRUGS reports on the positively sickening behavior of House Democrats. Party above principle . . . party above principle.
If you’ve been sitting on the fence about leaving the Democrat party, you MUST read this:
During a House Judiciary Committee meeting, my brave Iowa Congressman Steve King (R-IA) offered up an amendment to the hate crimes bill to exclude pedophiles from being a protected category under the hate crimes legislation.
Every single Democrat voted it down.
You must contact your senators now to try to stop legislation that would protect “all 547 forms of sexual deviancy or ‘paraphilias’ listed by the American Psychiatric Association.”
There are only 242 crimes where there is actually some – truly – an assault, and the Dems rejected an amendment to including pedophilia from being a part of this protected class. Do you realize what that means?
If a mother hears that her child has been raped and she slaps the assailant with her purse, she is now gone after as a hate criminal because this is a protected class. There are other protected classes in here. There is nothing in this bill that references the definitions in the Hate Crimes Statistical Act…it’s not there. It was asked that it be added so a specific definition could be gotten. It is not there.
King also told the full U.S. House that the APA has a list of 547 different “paraphilias” that would be protected by members of Congress under the “hate crimes” plan.
Pedophiles and other sexual deviants would enjoy an elevated level of protection while children, seniors, veterans, and churches would not, the article says.
Gary Cass of the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission said the Senate proposal could be voted on in committee as early as tomorrow.
Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., said H.R. 1913 will create “thought crimes,” and U.S. Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said it will end equality in the U.S.
Hate crime legislation will be used as a tool against the right. Period.
Link to article:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/05/hate-crime-protection-for-pedophiles-but-no-protection-for-military.html
May 5, 2009 at 9:24 pm
“But, the video above of Schumer is no accident: it is part of a very well-orchestrated plan hatched at the DNC to use the MSM and every available platform to push a weak Republican candidate to face Dr. Utopia in the next election, to guarantee him a second term.”
When I walk onto the car lot, I gravitate to the big trucks. When my Dad walks onto the exact same lot, he gravitates to the sports cars.
Could it be the only Republicans that appeal to the MSM are the exact Republicans that no conservative really likes? Maybe that’s why they talk about them ad nauseum and every normal person groans?
May 6, 2009 at 8:37 am
I wonder, how many Reps. stayed home & didn’t vote?
I didn’t like McCain either, but doing research on Obama, gave me no other choice but to vote for McCain..cause as it stands now, if one votes for a 3rd Party it would have allowed Obama to have won..little did we know, Republicans would stay home and allow this dictator win.
What happened Nov. 2008 is what happened two years ago. Those of us that fight illegal immigration heard from Republicans they were going to vote them out…even after those Republicans were starting to listen to us..we pleaded with those voters, don’t do this..they are on our side now…yet they did and we have to rev up for the fight again.
Gov. Palin is the best choice, but we have seen how the MSM works and how they can destroy or build up others…
If all those against big government would step out from being a Dem or a Rep. and start a “common sense” party, maybe that would catch on fire!
May 6, 2009 at 4:30 pm
Wow, that was a really great post. I took a day off of HB and missed a lot. That’ll teach me. What great food for thought.
May 6, 2009 at 7:04 pm
I didn’t meet any such Republicans who espoused such muffin-headed illogicalness in person (why would a Carter necessarily create a Reagan? grrr). However, I did see a number of people post such theories on various blogs before the election. I could never tell whether they were genuine, or trolling Obot Mobies sent to psych out their opposition. Apparently, there actually were such smug muffin heads. Grrrr…