A new series debuts tomorrow night on the History Channel that essentially renders all of the crying, teeth gnashing, and hair pulling over anthropogenic climate change ridiculously moot.
The World Without US takes concepts that have been around for years in the works of people like Dougal Dixon (After Man: A Zoology of the Future and Man After Man, about future human evolutions), and illustrate how ferociously efficient the natural world will be in reclaiming the planet once human civilization disappears.
Essentially it boils down to this: less than 50 years after the last human vanishes, all the forests will grow back, cities will disappear under vegetation, natural streams and rivers will flow freely again, and all the damage human industry and culture wrought on the natural world will be healed, as if the last 10,000 years or so never happened at all.
Growing up in strong Democratic households, and having Earth Day and other traditionally Democratic holidays beaten into us by heavy-handed liberal schools, we were never once shown how resilient the natural world truly is — and how throughout the fossil record species have risen and fallen as the planet’s fortunes ebbed and flowed, largely influenced primarily by the activity of the sun (since we believe it is solar flare activity, not anthropogenic industrial emissions, that causes fluctuations in global temperatures).
Check out this new series to see just how little time it would take for the whole planet to become one giant forest again, and for all sorts of new animals to evolve to reconquer the planet without humanity around to limit their develop.
If you like the series, check out Dougal Dixon’s works on alternate evolution. It’s the kind of stuff guaranteed to make you the oddball in any cocktail party, since talking about the speculative future evolution of rabbits into deer-like ungulates and rats into monstrous leonine terrors is something not appreciated by anyone without a healthy imagination, and the ability and willingness to realize that humanity gives itself way too much credit: we might be the dominant species on this planet, but in the end the planet itself will dominate us, the way it’s dominated everything else. We’ve had about 10,000 years worth of impact.
But just 50 years or so without us around would already wipe most of our achievements out completely.

April 20, 2009 at 4:05 am
Well, I think the reason that we don’t hear much about this, is because our focus on the earth is limited to our time on it. Plus, I believe some scenarios (with pollution and all) suggest it would take a long time before any life could grow here again. There are scientists doing research to figure out which planet we might possibly move to one day, after we have destroyed this one. So they, at least, seem to think this planet will remain inhospitable to human life.
Always drives me crazy. Why put all that money into finding a planet that won’t be as good as this one (given we evolved from Africa, we are well suited to this planet, or we would have become extinct), when all we have to do is take actions to preserve this one. It would certainly be easier.
Hmmm… put out less effort to get the best planet, or put out humongous effort to get a planet for which we’d have to develop technology just to let us survive on it. Such a hard choice…..
Even if someone doesn’t believe in climate change, we are polluting the world, we are killing species at an alarming rate, we are seriously overpopulating ourselves, which can only spell trouble (WAR over resources), oh, and we’re going to pay HAMAS supporters to live here. So we’re doing a lot of things we could stop doing, in order to save what we have….
April 20, 2009 at 4:07 am
Hey, my Hillary icon got replaced by a green thing, and I went into moderation….yikes!
April 20, 2009 at 4:34 am
When I studied under a Native American Medicine woman, some twenty years ago, she told me this same thing. “The Mother will heal Herself.”
I stopped waling and gnashing about that time… when I realized that we human beings are but the blink of Mother’s eye.
Already we see parts of Detroit retrning to wild.
She is omnipotent!
Peace,
SYD
April 20, 2009 at 5:39 am
Reminds me of the ending in Moby Dick: the ocean swallows the ship and calms as though nothing had ever happened. All that sound and fury comes to nothing!
All those ecowarriors are on an ego trip to be the one to “save” the planet.
April 20, 2009 at 7:41 am
Who but us can witness the resplendent beauty that is offered us?
I want a world where future generations know we each did all we could individually and collectively to perserve the Earth and all its glorious bounty.
April 20, 2009 at 7:41 am
pre v per
April 20, 2009 at 8:03 am
This isn’t new. Last year I watched this little mini-series on History Channel around midnight, as I recall. Have to check out the date at end of credits to be sure, but I’m positive I’ve seen this before. At any rate—it was hard to get to sleep after viewing it. Gotta remember God is still in charge . . .
April 20, 2009 at 8:17 am
I love the History channel but I decided I just could not watch this program. Who needs more worry? I have been scared enough already by Nostradamus, Revelations and Nancy Pelosi. I can’t take anymore!
April 20, 2009 at 1:05 pm
Pelosi! *shudder*
April 20, 2009 at 8:31 am
“we believe it is solar flare activity, not anthropogenic industrial emissions, that causes fluctuations in global temperatures.”
Ah, sweet reason and rationality…so very nice to see first thing on a Monday morning.
And Smilla, nice work on the dual Melville and Faulkner references.
Dang, buncha smarty pantses ’round here…
April 20, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Wait! You mean my car emissions aren’t affecting the sun & causing sun flares?! :D
And yes, Smilla, I was all grins reading your Moby Dick comparison. Outside of a nuclear winter, this is what will happen after we destroy ourselves. The world will reseed as if we never existed. It may take 10,000 years, but what is that in the grand scheme?
April 21, 2009 at 5:17 am
Glad you enjoyed it, Ten.
April 20, 2009 at 9:03 am
NeeNee, this is a series based on the program they did last year.
The thing about that, there was no explanation of why or how the people all vanished. Suddenly, no more people. Then what happens?
While there are a number of scenarios in which people could become extinct they would usually do serious harm to the rest of the planet too. I guess if it were some sort of deadly virus that only affected people.
When we watched the program last year, we got hung up on that question. I mean, the people just vanished.
We were surprised they would do a series based on that program but I plan to watch.
April 20, 2009 at 10:58 am
Good to know I’m not cracking up or having an Alzheimer’s moment!
Gee, maybe they could do a cross-over series with the cast of “Lost”—talk about a mind-bender . . .
April 20, 2009 at 11:22 am
I think I finally figured out how all the people vanished.
The crew of the Enterprise came back in time and beamed everybody up.
April 20, 2009 at 8:11 pm
Or maybe Jack Bauer only worked an 8 hour day………….oops!
April 20, 2009 at 9:20 am
The Earth, mother nature, is so much bigger and badder then us. Absolutely we should take care of the environment, but I do get so tired of the arrogance that implies people are the only force on the planet. As if we’re the ones who are all powerful. It’s disrespectful. It denies how amazing this planet is, it’s like a living thing that never stops changing and repairing itself.
April 20, 2009 at 9:35 am
I totally agree!
No wonder so many people are unprepared for hurricanes and wildfire. They have been spoon fed this notion that nature is fragile.
When on the morning after a cat-2 hurricane you walk out into the garden and see how many flowers and fruit have hung on to the plants, you have to be in awe of nature. When the plants that were stripped of all the leaves sprout new growth in a matter of weeks or are blooming, you just stand there marveling at it all.
Certainly we should take care of the environment. This planet is our home. But nature is not fragile.
April 20, 2009 at 10:59 am
I.agree.1000%.
April 20, 2009 at 8:13 pm
ME 2!
April 20, 2009 at 12:32 pm
Amen to that!
April 20, 2009 at 1:46 pm
right on………..
April 20, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Since environmenalists are essentially anti-human they probably welcome doomsday for the human race.
April 20, 2009 at 12:32 pm
Um… I really don’t think environmentalists are Anti-Human.
*is an environmentalist*
Part of preserving the Environment is preserving our own Spirits. Have you ever climbed a mountain or a cliff? Or maybe just listened to the water run in a stream? Or smelled the flowers blooming in May?
I can’t imagine how anyone would feel close to God without doing that. It is all Her creation, and Her Will, in the end :)
April 20, 2009 at 12:27 pm
That’s true. Nature is so powerful and beautiful. We are nothing compared to her. I have always thought that when human beings get too arrogant and believe they can conquer her, that is when she shows us who is truly the boss.
Just look at the big spanking those Atlanteans and Lemurians got! (tee hee!)
Thanks for this reminder Hillbuzz. Fascinating… maybe I will watch.
April 20, 2009 at 1:05 pm
Think it was in the book Outbreak (by a guy named Preston) where the point of view that mankind was a type of virus on the host of planet Earth was put forth.
Very interesting point of view, and somewhat in keeping with your post just now.
April 20, 2009 at 1:30 pm
It would take 10 years MAX in my opinion.
April 20, 2009 at 1:52 pm
Solar flare? You don’t think it’s just God hugging us closer?
April 20, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Hmmm . . . BO thinks being pals with Chavez of Venezuela & Akmadinejad of Iran is so wonderful.
Do Iran’s nukes have the capability to eradicate the world’s population?? Their religious leaders have made no bones about the fact that they want to hasten the coming of their Ultimate Imam. Causing nuclear holocaust would certainly do the trick of ending the world as we know it.
So perhaps this little “Life After People” series might give a few libs pause for thought.
Previous administration policies kept these folks at bay, but look at recent headlines. Just in the past 90 days, Iran has crept ever closer to having capabilities that would cause world calamity—if not outright destruction.
Do you think Obama being in office has nothing to do with this accelerated schedule??
April 20, 2009 at 3:31 pm
Did anyone else notice a detail in the photo of this thread?
I do believe the building shell is a CHURCH (note the arched windows that held stained glass, and the vaulted steel).
Interesting choice of graphic, given the derision to organized religion these days . . .
April 20, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Hmmm…
does look like a Church, doesn’t it?
Well, if people have a “derision” to Organized Religion, there must be a reason for it, Nee Nee.
Churches are losing memberships faster than ever these days. I think it’s because Religious Leaders are so off message.
Amazing how you can turn a Religion of Peace and Unconditional Love and Acceptance into… well something that does not in any way resemble unconditional love and acceptance.
I’m just sayin’
April 20, 2009 at 4:30 pm
If by Religious Leaders you mean people like Jeremiah Wright, Al Sharpton and some charlatan televangelists, I agree.
But please don’t tar all pastors and religious leaders with that brush.
Yes, God is a God of love. But He’s also our Judge. You can’t pick and choose the parts of Scripture that meld with your world view and lifestyle, ignoring everything else. Too many churches offer “cafeteria” spirituality because that keeps numbers up.
We human beings are sinful and in need of a Savior. Jesus came to give us life and He wants us to have it abundantly, as Scripture says. But ETERNAL life is dependent upon putting your faith in God who by His Son’s death, won heaven for you. All the good things we do are a response to His love—not just getting your ticket punched, so to speak.
God loves us, but not the evil we do. Therein lies the difference. Churches are a hospital for sinners, not a museum for saints, as the old saying goes. When I go to church, it’s like getting a blood transfusion: my sins are forgiven and I receive a new lease on life for the coming week. Satan is at work in the world, harder than ever these days.
As Christians, we are to be “in the world, but not OF the world.” But as imperfect beings, we fall.
You sound like you’ve had a bad experience with religion & church. I would urge you to keep searching—there are wonderful places of worship where you can be assured of God’s love and forgiveness. I will pray for you, littleisis.
April 20, 2009 at 5:37 pm
*smiles*
It’s nice to be in a person’s prayers, Nee Nee. So long as they aren’t prayers of malice. But I can see that you’re a nice person- not one to pray malicious prayers.
I don’t mean to paint ALL people of organized faith with that brush. I’m sorry if that’s how I came off. That wouldn’t be nice of me and that’s not how I feel anyway.
Yes, I have had very bad experiences with organized religion myself. I grew up in a reactionary Church where Hate was spewed from the pulpit on a weekly basis, among other things.
But I know that it would be unfair for me to judge others based on my own experiences. I’ve noticed that Methodists and Unitarians are very nice. And of course all Faith is beautiful. I have read almost all of the Bible. I like Psalms and The Song of Songs. And Esther. Have you ever read the Gnostic Gospels? Like Thomas and Baruch? If not, you should. They are very beautiful.
April 20, 2009 at 8:28 pm
With all the cables, kinda looks like remnants of a bridge.
April 20, 2009 at 11:27 pm
The series says that 50 years from now the forests will return and the cities will fairly quickly be reduced to rubble?
Considering the Roman Aqueducts and the Great Wall of China have been standing as long as they have, [given the minimal upkeep they're recieving] I gotta believe that Wrigley Stadium and many major metro centers will last much longer than 50 years.
April 21, 2009 at 10:40 am
Yes I think it is probably the Brooklyn bridge.