Who in the Obama Administration are we pleased with, as advisers or Cabinet members?
So far, the best fits in their positions are:
(1) Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State
(2) Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture
(3) Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense
The worst fits (with no reflection on them as people, or their abilities in other roles):
(1) Dr. Steven Chu, Secretary of Energy
(2) Ray LaHood, Secretary of Transportation
(3) Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services Designate
(4) Rahm Emanuel, White House Chief of Staff
Out of all of these, the person who has the greatest chance of doing the most harm to the American economy and wasting the most of the Trillions in Spending Obama’s rammed through Congress is ironically the nicest and smartest man in the bunch: Steven Chu.
What we are really afraid of in the next three months is what Chu’s going to do when Russia, OPEC, Venezuela, and Mexico run out of cash and force a dramatic surge in oil prices. Chu, as brilliant as he is in the physics lab, and as beloved as he was in the classrooms at Berkely, will not know what to do to manage US oil policy when that foursome colludes to refill their oil profit coffers.
What’s most terrifying is that Chu still insists he’s not the arbiter of US oil policy, when as Energy Secretary, he most certainly is.
And then there’s Chu’s preference for theoretical, dream technology over proven energy solutions like responsible drilling under ANWAR, as Sarah Palin advocates, and development of offshore US oil fields, as Hillary Clinton advocated during the primaries.
Chu will see to it that billions are dumped into development of solar farms and wind turbines, when the jury’s still out on the actual benefits that will produce, especially in terms of stimulating the economy in 2009.
What do you think of the performance of the Cabinet and presidential advisers so far?
UPDATE: Also, does anyone else out there think it’s odd that, with all of Obama’s talk of Hope! and Change! and A New Kind of Politics!, out of the 35 most important positions in his Administration, just 9 are held by women?
Women make up 51% of America’s population, but represent just 26% of Obama’s Administration.
Black people make up 12% of the US population, but represent 11% of Obama’s Administration.
Why wasn’t gender equality as important to Obama as racial parity?
Just asking.
But, for the record, all of us in Boystown are thrilled Obama gave us 10% or more LGBTQ representation (probably the most in history). It’s just a shame that, in a country of 300 million, it wasn’t important for Obama to take a historic step for Change! and demand equal gender representation by including more of the qualified, capable women we know full well are out there, and would have proudly served this nation well, at posts such as Commerce, Transportation, Energy, Justice, the Interior, and Housing and Urban Development, among others.

March 4, 2009 at 1:46 am
I’d give Chu more time. Last I heard, Obama hadn’t even nominated any deputies for him yet. He does seem politically naive, but if his heart is in the right place maybe he will get a grip and start calling Sarah at 3 am.
Sebelius backstabbed Hillary but she does seem to have some credits for HHS. She’s soundly pro-choice I think.
After Hillary, the best choice I know of is Larry Summers. He was in the Clinton 90s cabinet from the first, worked up to Treasury Sec. After a politically incorrect brouhaha at Harvard, he built himself an ivory tower and devoted himself to good works such as researching how globalization was working out and how to fix it* (o felix brouhaha).
Iirc Geithner had similar Clinton 90s Treasury creds. Now he’s being set up as a bad guy so Axelrod can be a good guy, so I don’t know if Geithner is really doing as badly as anyone says.
For a while people were talking about Obama’s appointments being a “Clinton Restoration.” I don’t know who else was part of that.
*[M]aking globalization work for the masses — has become the central economic issue of the day in Summers’s mind. And since his Harvard presidency ended [....] he has set out on a search for solutions. To him, it seems like a natural sequel to the policies he pushed in the 1990s.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/10/magazine/10wwln-summers-t.html?_r=1
March 4, 2009 at 1:48 am
Chu is going to drive us into a hole so big, energy wise. Then just add all of Barack’s other misadventures in finance, and we’ll be lucky to be a third world country at the end of it all.
March 4, 2009 at 2:48 am
Best:
1. Secretary of State Clinton (no comment necessary)
2. National Security Adviser Jones (not an ass kisser, will be frank with Obama)
3. Attorney General Holder (made some unfortunate comments, but he’s tough)
4. National Economic Council – L. Summers (brilliant and practical)
5. Secretary of Defense Gates (knows the situation well, can give some real unbiased advice)
Worst:
1. Secretary of Treasury Geithner (he helped get us in this mess, he still has not developed a practical solution to the banking crisis)
2. Chief of Staff Emanuel (relations with congress? with rahm?)
3. S. HHS Sebelius (terrible manager who ran Kansas into the ground. Will do nothing for health care)
4. S. Transportation LaHood (no experience with transportation planning at this critical time makes him a terrible choice)
5. Sec. Energy Chu (brilliant, but belongs in a lab/classroom not a bureaucracy dealing with special interests he knows nothing about)
1=best
1=worst
March 4, 2009 at 6:05 am
Nobody’s got AG Eric Holder on the Worst lists? He’s sure on mine.
March 4, 2009 at 6:23 am
That’a a no brainer.Hillary out shines them all.
Worst has to be between Geithner and Holder.
March 4, 2009 at 6:31 am
Best in the Obama administration?
Hillary Rodham Clinton
End of list.
March 4, 2009 at 7:08 am
It’s very good that Hillary is so outstanding in her job..but this country not only needs someone flying all over the world..we need someone to heal the United States.
March 4, 2009 at 8:20 am
Obama is the last person to ‘heal’ the United States! He’s brought racism to a new low, divided the country as few have in my long lifetime, and appears utterly clueless about the economy, yet he plunges ahead with his many speeches which say nothing, his many photo ops, his many trips for staged ‘signings’, yada, yada, yada. This country has what the Obama mindless supporters wanted: a frontpiece with a pretty smile and no accomplishments. Unfortunately, they were too clueless to see that it’s not just words that matter, but that it is also experience, world sophistication, and considered actions which matter more. His followers have made him a hero before he’s done a damned thing!
Years ago, John Wayne was considered a hero. People believed that because he played heroes in movie roles, that he actually was a hero. He got out of serving in the war with the hardship excuse that his family needed him (8 children, I believe, or thereabouts. Sadly, as a nation, we seem to have not learned to distinguish between the superficial and the substantive.
March 4, 2009 at 10:10 am
Hmm. Without a US manufacturing base, we will have to buy all our green energy materials from foreign suppliers, manufactured by foreign workers. The BlackAgendaReport has more about it. Scary stuff.
March 4, 2009 at 12:47 pm
You are right pretty much the whole way
Best
1. Gates, 2. Greg Craig, 3. Hillary
Worst
Emanuel, Seblieus, Chu, but the worst is Geithner. He is just the care-taker for the money-changers. He seems like a little boy.