Romney: Obama Would Kill Millions of Jobs |
||
|
||
|
In the final days of the campaign, John McCain needs to emphasize that Barack Obama would kill millions of jobs, Mitt Romney tells Newsmax. “It’s too late in the process to be unveiling new initiatives,” Romney says. “Instead, you focus on the consequences of an Obama presidency and the benefits of a McCain presidency. And frankly, in my lifetime, I don’t recall a more anti-job program than Barack Obama’s.” McCain’s program creates jobs, Romney says, while Obama’s shrinks them. “My own view is that’s the message in the last days. Boil it down in a way that people understand,” Romney says. “You don’t have to go through all the differences and the details. The headline is: Barack Obama will kill millions of jobs in America; John McCain will create millions of jobs in America.” While the economic crisis has hurt McCain’s chances, “What caused this downturn was profligate borrowing in the mortgage market,” Romney observes. “And who’s been pushing that? Democrats and a lot of Republicans. And then, when it came to regulate that borrowing, Republicans wanted to regulate it and reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Democrats said no, just hand out the money. That’s what caused this downturn.” In fact, “Republican Senator John Sununu of New Hampshire authored a bill to rein in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; Democrats blocked it,” Romney says. “This is Barney Frank trying to do the old two-step. This is the guy that led the charge to hand out mortgage money to people who couldn’t afford to pay. And it’s caused the crisis that we’re seeing. It’s just easy to say blame George Bush, and that’s what the Democrats are doing.” Obama’s program would kill jobs because it would raise taxes on companies and entrepreneurships that create jobs, Romney says. In addition, “Putting a penalty on employers that don’t provide a government-approved healthcare program kills jobs,” he says. “The card check program to unionize small business kills a lot of jobs, permanently. And John McCain’s program creates jobs.
“He lowers taxes on employers to create incentives to add jobs. He puts in place a healthcare plan that lets individuals buy their own insurance and keeps the burden off employers. And he invests in truly becoming energy independent, which lowers our energy prices and makes it more attractive to do business in this country.” Romney has been campaigning for McCain and he’s also been campaigning for 28 congressional candidates, five U.S. Senate candidates, and two gubernatorial candidates.
Formed in April, Romney’s Free and Strong America PAC has donated $202,000 to 75 GOP candidates. He’s made another $173,000 in donations through his affiliated state PACs, including to the National Organization of Marriage in California to pass Proposition 8 and to an effort to stop a ballot initiative in Massachusetts to decriminalize marijuana use.
In all, financial support through Romney-controlled state and federal PACs has totaled $375,000. Asked whether he would run for the presidency again, Romney says, “As you know, politics is a lot about timing; and when the window opens, you either step through or you decide not to. Well, the window opened for me, I stepped through, I got on the stage, battled hard, but I lost fair and square. And looking down the road, it’s hard to imagine the window opening again. But you know, time will tell.” In the meantime, Romney is going on a whirlwind tour in the final days of the campaign. “I think this is an absolutely critical time for our country, so all the team is pulling on the oars as hard as we can,” Romney says. “I’ve seen John McCain come from behind before, and it was in the race where he was running against me and Fred Thompson and Rudy Giuliani. He surprises folks. There’s not a lot of time to go, but I don’t count this race over yet.” |
||
October 31, 2008
October 31, 2008 at 7:37 am
I still believe Mac will pull this out, but Romney is the Repub who should have gotten the nomination.He would have fought a lot harder and explained Fannie & Freddie better. Mac let the Dems off the hook and people blamed Repubs for the financial meltdown.
October 31, 2008 at 7:50 am
Yep, galleys work even when the MSM wind is against them.
=====================================
October 31, 2008 at 8:02 am
FINALLY a mention of the dreadful Obama & Big Labor pushed EFCA and it’s scratching of the secret ballot!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMNVIQqatyU Obama’s promise
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6yrZtq27e0 ad against open ballot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afjp4Cx-3W0 McGovern ad AGAINST the open ballot – BO is more radical than McGovern. Should give people pause, methinks.
October 31, 2008 at 8:07 am
I agree.
HillBuzz, more news about Ayres, him and his wife wrote a book. Fox after months got a copy.
the book was attributed to the guy who shot JFK,
the clip of Fox showing this is in the video.
http://www.popmodal.com/video/609/Ann-Coulter–Sean-Hannity-reveal-Ayres-endorsement-of-Robert-Kennedys-assassin-Islamist-Sirhan-Sirhan
October 31, 2008 at 8:14 am
Let`s demoralize them. Tell everybody to blast “Johnny Be Good” from now until election day. Make it our battlecry. If everywhere these Obamabots go they hear “Johnny Be Good” they will start sucking their thumbs. Remember, bullies are big crybabies. WE Are Energized!
October 31, 2008 at 8:21 am
Vote McCain… Not sure how so many can just ignore the whole raise taxes equals depression mantra and remain devoted to the Redistributionist. Long Live Capitalism!!
October 31, 2008 at 9:03 am
Being from MA, I am familiar with Romney, and can’t stand him. Nevertheless, I wish he was on the campaign trail more pushing the whole “gang of 3″ thing against an Obama, Pelosi, Reid agenda. He could be very useful now, I think. Although, for the people who wanted him as VP, I do still think he has as many negatives as Palin – just different ones.
October 31, 2008 at 9:41 am
This guy says it better than Romney. In honor of Halloween, this has to be The Messiah’s Nightmare on Elm Street.
http://www.pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/archives2/026490.php
October 31, 2008 at 9:44 am
*Please* publicize this. This will finish off Obama in NC, VA, PA, IA if this gets out — worse than if that Khadali video got out. Trust me on this one.
Obama in his own words: wants to ban concealed carry.
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/10/30/obama-audio-i-want-to-ban-concealed-weapons-permits/
October 31, 2008 at 9:49 am
URGENT! URGENT! WE FINALLY HAVE THE SMOKING GUN! BETTER LATE THAN NEVER! SPREAD THIS LINK TO EVERY BLOG AND MAJOR AND LOCAL NEWS NETWORK YOU CAN! FINALLY, OBAMA IS CAUGHT IN THE BIGGEST LIE OF ALL. HIS OWN KENYAN GRANDMOTHER, ON VIDEO, STATING HE WAS BORN IN KENYA!
http://69.36.77.100/berg/obamabirth.htm
SPREAD THE WORD ASAP!
October 31, 2008 at 9:50 am
Read this! URGENT! URGENT! WE FINALLY HAVE THE SMOKING GUN! BETTER LATE THAN NEVER! SPREAD THIS LINK TO EVERY BLOG AND MAJOR AND LOCAL NEWS NETWORK YOU CAN! FINALLY, OBAMA IS CAUGHT IN THE BIGGEST LIE OF ALL. HIS OWN KENYAN GRANDMOTHER, ON VIDEO, STATING HE WAS BORN IN KENYA!
http://69.36.77.100/berg/obamabirth.htm
SPREAD THE WORD ASAP!
October 31, 2008 at 9:54 am
See this link below then follow those links and see a video in which Obama attending Pro Palestine events.
LA Times continues to cover for Obama, info leaks via blogs
http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2008/10/la-times-contin.html
October 31, 2008 at 9:56 am
See this link then go into those link to hear that Obama attends Pro Palestine events.
LA Times continues to cover for Obama, info leaks via blogs
http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2008/10/la-times-contin.html
October 31, 2008 at 10:03 am
Obama and many democrats feel the best way to spread the wealth is by punishing productivity and taxing people who work hard. Good luck with that Dems.
This is why so many people are talking about “Going John Galt”.
If big nanny-state government is going to punish us for job creation and hard work– businesses — small and large– will cut back on hiring.
Sorry folks, but many (not all) democrats are economic illiterates. What little they do know is based on “feeling” and Marxism. Obama promised Charlie Gobson that taxes on capital must be raised even if lower taxes bring more money to the treasury. (Out of an arrogant sense of fairness.) Obama is a scary jerk.
Hang on – If Obama wins it will be Jimmy Carter II. Life is going to suck. hard.
October 31, 2008 at 10:10 am
If he’s so far ahead in battlegrounds, why is Obama playing defense in Iowa today?
October 31, 2008 at 10:11 am
Update on Fundraising scandal:
RE: OBAMA CAMPAIGN DONATION SCANDAL!!!!
The donation-processing software/company that Obama uses is called NGP, located in Washington. This should be able to lead someone into finding out whether or not the Obama campaign PURPOSELY disabled verification requirements for the name and credit card to match.
A company like that putting out this service is guaranteed to have all the checks in place. They have a lot of clients, and if they missed this, they’d be facing a lot of liability.
They serve only democrats, and a lot of democrats — http://www.ngpsoftware.com/clients
IF THE VERIFICATION IS IN PLACE ON ANY OF THOSE OTHER DEM’S WEBSITES, THEN IT POINTS TO THE FACT THAT THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN INTENTIONALLY REMOVED THOSE REQUIREMENTS. OR ASKED NGP TO DO IT FOR THEM.
FROM THE NGP WEBSITE:
KEY FEATURES OF NGP CONTRIBUTION WEB PACKAGE™:
Accept secure online contributions
Capture all FEC and/or state required information in customized forms
Customize preferences pages by setting donation minimums/maximums, amount option buttons, custom language, defaults, etc.
THE POINT:
INVESTIGATING NGP, THEIR SERVICES, AND THE FEATURES OF THEIR SOFTWARE COULD BE KEY IN FINDING OUT IF THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN WAS INTENTIONAL IN CREATING LOOPHOLES IN THEIR PROCESS IN ORDER TO WIDEN THE FLOW OF INCOMING CASH
October 31, 2008 at 10:12 am
I’ve read that ex-Romney people working now for McCain are responsible for the recent smears about Sarah Palin being a rogue and a diva, etc., etc.
I don’t know how you guys at Hillbuzz have the stomach for the political arena — the treachery is astounding.
BUT, I welcome and agree with Romney’s statement — I have no doubt an Obama administration would be terrible for this country, especially without checks and balances in Congress. I think McCain’s economic message IS getting through and that’s why the race is still so tight. He’ll pick up most of the so-called “undecideds” among likely voters which will put him over the top.
October 31, 2008 at 10:13 am
Obama is lying again.
“Barack Obama refuses to release the names of the 2 million-plus people who have given his campaign less than $200.”
http://www.slate.com/id/2203421/
October 31, 2008 at 10:14 am
Romney is excellent at explaining economic policies in easy to understand terms. He’s a great surrogate for McCain.
October 31, 2008 at 10:22 am
Let’s see… Higher taxes. Capital flight. Layoffs. Judges who share the ideology of “redistributive change”.
Great.
Oh, and a national *domestic* security force.
If I may paraphrase Tammy Baker, sitting in this morning for Laura Ingraham, you should invest in black cloth: the government will be making shirts.
October 31, 2008 at 10:31 am
Ask the people of Michigan what happens when taxes are so high that businesses can’t afford to operate and have to move. It’s a prime example of what would happen on a more nationwide basis if Obama is elected.
October 31, 2008 at 10:32 am
OT: Sorry to intrude on your thread but I have been reading this morning and a lot of the blogs I generally read are sort of well, giving up. This concerns me deeply. I cam online to be energize and given hope and I’m not finding much. Couldn’t find your email. Just started this computer thing so it is probably here and I’m not smart enough to find it. Anyway, this blogger, a generally good guy seems depressed and needs a shot of “Hillbuzz”:
“So Where Do Things Stand?” http://riehlworldview.com/
This is particularly concerning as this guy has been fighting very hard, been working at this for the duration and it is sad to see such a sad post. TIA I know you guys will know what to do.
October 31, 2008 at 10:41 am
http://www.faithfreedom.org/obama.html
View this if you want to get worried
October 31, 2008 at 10:44 am
Marchreport.com is reporting Judge Surrick
voted AGAINST Obama on the birth certificate
issue!!
The decision slipped out thru one writer,
Daniel Downs, and was published in one
newspaper, before being censored.
See Marchreport.com!!
October 31, 2008 at 10:53 am
Get fired up for Tuesday, folks.
DIE WITH YOUR BOOTS ON
Another Prophet of Disaster
Who says the ship is lost,
Another Prophet of Disaster
Leaving you to count the cost.
Taunting us with Visions,
Afflicting us with fear,
Predicting War for millions,
In the hope that one appears.
No point asking when it is,
No point asking who’s to go,
No point asking what’s the game,
No point asking who’s to blame.
‘Cos if you’re gonna die, if you’re gonna die,
‘Cos if you’re gonna die, if you’re gonna die,
If you’re gonna die, die with your boots on,
If you’re gonna try, well stick around,
Gonna cry, just move along,
If you’re gonna die, you’re gonna die, gonna die.
die with your boots on,
If you’re gonna try, well stick around,
Gonna cry, just move along,
If you’re gonna die, you’re gonna die.
In 13 the Beast is Rising,
The Frenchman did surmise,
Through earthquakes and starvation,
The Warlord will arise,
Terror, Death, Destruction,
Pour from the Eastern sands,
But the truth of all predictions,
Is always in your hands.
No point asking when it is,
No point asking who’s to go,
No point asking what’s the game,
No point asking who’s to blame.
‘Cos if you’re gonna die, if you’re gonna die,
‘Cos if you’re gonna die, if you’re gonna die,
If you’re gonna die, die with your boots on,
If you’re gonna try, well stick around,
Gonna cry, just move along,
If you’re gonna die, you’re gonna die, gonna die.
die with your boots on,
If you’re gonna try, well stick around,
Gonna cry, just move along,
If you’re gonna die, you’re gonna die.
Got my boots on right now.
McCain / Palin 2008
October 31, 2008 at 11:00 am
AP Is Shocked: Undecided Voters Are PUMAs, And They Don’t Like Barry
You guys will like this. Sounds like the MSM is looking for a way to explain a McCain victory on Tuesday.
http://patriotroom.com/?p=3614
October 31, 2008 at 11:04 am
The jobs will be lost under both candidates. We’re in a recession and jobs will be lost. Don’t be fooled by the slander from republicans. They’re desparate and will say anything to win. Under capitalism, the upperclass is the only category who won’t suffer as they have all the money and they don’t want to depart with it to help their fellow americans. Middle class will lose jobs and their savings but the rich will keep theirs. Obama wants to help the middle class and McCain wants to give the rich more.
Hillary supports Obama and if you truely believed in what Hillary beleived, you would not be voting for McCain.
You obviously are afraid to change, hanging onto historic policies. We live in a global society now. We need to move into the 21st century and McCain doesn’t understand what that means.
Stop listening to the crap.
October 31, 2008 at 11:09 am
Obama calls $1 Trillion tax hike a “small adjustment” by re-defining $97K family income as “upper class”
I found a video clip in which Obama totally redefines what middle/upper class income is and who should pay more taxes. He is quoted on video. I think this is newsworthy, given the current focus on Obama’s plan to tax a larger number of families. The video shows Obama directly stating this. It is far less difficult to interpret than, say, the Chicago NPR audio-only about redistributive change. This is a video that’s ready-made for a campaign spot and for video news releases. All people will understand it.
In this video, Obama defined $97,000 family income as “upper class” and subject to $1 Trillion in tax increases in debate within the last year and in policy proposals. He also makes a similar claim in writing in an Op-Ed (see below).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-Sav…eature=related
The key minute: Watch from 1:15 to 2:15 for Obama’s remarkable claim that $97K family income is “upper class”
Of course there are other videos of this same debate, Nov 2007, Las Vegas from which you can clip these quotes, but this one just puts in the context of Obama/Biden redefining Middle Class income from $250K to $200K to $150K to $97K is “upper class.” and the top group—and subject to big tax hikes.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3638710&page=1
I wonder how many families with 2 or 3 kids in middle class suburbs of our major cities would consider their $97 K income to be “upper class.” If any of those kids plan to go to college, the families will hardly be living like the upper class on $97K.
Obama’s Op-Ed
http://www.qctimes.com/articles/2007…b409456532.txt
“… raise the cap on the amount of income subject to the Social Security tax. If we kept the payroll tax rate exactly the same but applied it to all earnings and not just the first $97,500, we could virtually eliminate the entire Social Security shortfall.” – Op-Ed by Barack Obama, Quad City Times, Sep., 2007
October 31, 2008 at 11:10 am
Hey guys please check out this video, we are trying to get it to go viral.
1 More B4 11 04
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yvc0tYG_YpA
thank you for your time
October 31, 2008 at 11:12 am
RUSH READING THIS NOW
As a Conservative, I Must Say I Do Quite Like the Cut of this Obama Fellow’s Jib
By T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII
Columnist, The National Topsider
Membership Chairman, The Newport Club
When my late father T. Coddington Van Voorhees VI founded the iconoclastic conservative journal National Topsider in 1948, he famously declared that “Now is the time for all good conservative helmsmen to hoist the mizzen, pour the cocktails, and steer this damned schooner hard starboard.” In the 60 years since he first uttered it after one-too-many Cosmopolitans at one of Pamela Harriman’s notorious foreign policy black tie balls, father’s pithy bon mot has served as a rallying cry for conservatives from Greenwich to Chevy Chase. Today, I say it’s time for we conservatives to once again grab the rigging and set sail with the flotilla of the true conservative in this race: Barack Obama.
Trust me, I haven’t taken this tack lightly. No Van Voorhees has supported an avowed socialist since great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandpapa Cragmont Van Voorhees lent Peter Minuet $24 and a sack of wampum to swing a subprime mortgage on Manhattan Island. Old dad himself often recounted how, as a lad, he would command the family chauffeur Carleton to drive the Duesenberg down to the Times Square Trans-Lux so he could hiss Roosevelt. But I’ve taken a good measure of this Obama fellow, and I must say I like the cut of the man’s jib.
How can I say this, you ask? One look at this Obama chap is all the answer you need. Suave, tanned, unflappable, Harvard connections; it’s obvious that here is a man to the conservative manor born. One imagines him at the helm of the Ship of State, basked in the sunlight diffusing through the seaspray over the bow, like some beautiful rugged Othello from a rapturous Ralph Lauren catalog, calmly issuing instructions to the deck crew in that magnificent mellifluous baritone of his. It’s that easy-going, almost effortless grace that has all the A-list conservatives like David Frum and Kathleen Parker whispering Reaganesque in hushed tones. Even Peggy Noonan — the Grand Dame of Gipperism — has succumbed to Obama’s undeniable conservative charms. Just last month I listened to her wax poetic about the Adonis of Chicago between chukkers at the Newport Club polo tournament final. “Why Peggy, you old dowager,” I quipped, “I believe you just had an orgasm.”
Certainly, my endorsement has raised more than a few eyebrows around the National Topsider water cooler, particularly among the alumni of jejune cow colleges like Michigan or Dartmouth. They sometimes point to Mr. Obama’s radical Rolodex and his hooey about “weath redistribution” and “dictatorship of the proletariat.” But, as I patiently explain, this is precisely the point – it is hooey, over-the-top rhetorical flourishes obviously designed by Mr. Obama to win over benighted inner city hoi polloi (a feat, I might add, that even the Great Communicator himself was unable to accomplish). As for his so-called radical ties, who among us hasn’t sent dinner party invitations to Gore Vidal and a leftwing terrorists or two to enliven the postprandial conversation? Leonard Bernstein loved hosting all manner of Weathermen and Black Panthers and Symbionese Liberation Army celebrities at his Park Avenue pied a terre, but it didn’t mean the Maestro wasn’t in favor of low taxes. On the contrary; I know for a fact he itemized every cent of the catering bills for his famous terrorist cocktail parties.
Just so, I have every confidence that Obama’s true conservative butterfly will emerge once in office, coaxed from its Maoist cocoon by conservatives like myself and Frum and Parker and Noonan — all of whom I am pleased to report are already under consideration for the Obama Administration State Dinner shortlist. Certainly there may be a tax increase or two, but isn’t that what estate attorneys and Cayman Island banks are for? Under a worst case scenario some of us may have to set up a lease-back depreciation arrangement on one or two of our vacation compounds, as Dad was forced to in the dark years of Carter. But I’m not worried. I’ve got a pretty good sense for character, and I’d be willing to bet my Weejuns that inside this Obama fellow lives the soul a rock-ribbed old money Brahmin. Ask yourself: could a seriously committed Marxist carry off a Brooks Brothers suit like that? I mean, other than Dad’s old commie nemesis and Harvard fencing club foe Alger Hiss.
But there is an even more compelling reason to support Barack Obama: Sarah Palin.
If you are a conservative like me, you guffawed when you heard John McCain announced this declasse rube as a running mate, followed by good-natured applause, thinking it was some sort of whimsical campus prank he was reenacting from his Annapolis years. This was, of course, quickly followed the shock of realizing that he wasn’t joking, and all that Hanoi unpleasantness had finally driven him around the bend.
It’s an inescapable conclusion that this woman has, in 6 short weeks, single-handedly destroyed the Republican party. Certainly George Bush may share some of the blame; but we conservatives must remember how our hopes were buoyed by his impressive bloodlines and Yale degree before we realized his excursion to Texas had caused him to “go native.” But la Palin offers true conservatives no such extenuating graces. I mean, my God, this woman is simply awful; the elided vowels, the beauty pageantry, the guns, the crude non-Episcopal protestantism, the embarrassing porchload of children with horrifying hillbilly names, the white after Labor Day. As fellow conservative commentator Andrew Sullivan quipped to me the other day outside a Martha’s Vineyard antique shop, it’s gratifying to know the Gipper isn’t alive to see what has become of his party.
But it’s not just American conservatives who are appalled. Just last week conservative New York Times columnist David Brooks and I were enjoying an apres-badminton apertif at the family weekend house in Montauk with my good friend Viscount Klaus-Maria Von Wallensheim, the conservative EU Agricultural Pricing Minister with whom I shared an Alpine chalet and manservant during our years as classmates at a Swiss boarding school. “Kloonkie” (my old school appellation for the Viscount) reported the growing dismay of the Continental Right over Palin’s embarrassing enthusiasm for childbirth and Israel.
“Coddsie, old chap, ” he warned, “You know I’ve always been been America’s biggest defender in Monaco. But if you elect this ill-bred charwoman, I will be be forced to move anchor to St. Tropez out of pure shame.”
David and I were left nodding silently, for how else could we respond? If Palin has lost Kloonkie, she has surely lost the entire conservative movement. The idea of this dreadful woman in Washington is almost too much to contemplate. Not only would it be a fashion disaster, one can scarcely imagine the White House social calendar — mooseburger fetes to that ghastly Joe the Plumber, perhaps followed by snow machine derbies through the Rose Garden?
For now, we conservatives must do what we can to sabotage the ill-fated McCain-Palin fiasco and hope for the best. Once the election is over we can lick our wounds, read the entrails, and decide where the movement should go from here. In anticipation, the Topsider will be holding a top-level exclusive strategy conference in Nassau next January, featuring tout le monde of conservative intellectuals from the Back Bay Review, The Prospective Standard, National Bowtie, and The Swartmorean. If you are attending, please be advised that gentlemen’s jackets will be mandatory after six PM.
Until then, do not despair; the election of Mr. Obama means that at least some conservatives will still have a place at the table. I do hope I get seated next to this William Ayers fellow — I’ve heard he has some amazingly droll anecdotes!
October 31, 2008 at 11:15 am
la boheme,
He is great! Pass it on! And if you get the time, subscribe to his channel. All of his stuff is worthwhile.
October 31, 2008 at 11:16 am
Ruh-roh! You’re getting another shout out from HillBuzz!!!! And hey, I SENT THAT LINK TO HIM LAST NIGHT! I guess he’s reading my emails! Hallelujah!
890 AM Chicago
October 31, 2008 at 11:16 am
L.A. Times Protest – Obama/Rashid Khalidi tape
October 31, 2008 at 11:21 am
Saw an update today to the YouTube Baracchio video. This is good stuff. Humor can be a convincing tool for the undecided and Obama seems to lack a real sense of humor in my opinion. Pass it on!
New video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4vaDvKKan4&fmt=18
Previous video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bClMnGPwmUc&fmt=18
October 31, 2008 at 11:26 am
ABRAHAM LINCOLN:
”You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by encouraging class hatred.
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than you earn.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away man’s initiative and independence.
You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.”
A Lincoln
October 31, 2008 at 11:30 am
If the Clintons showed as much support to Obama as Mitt Romney showes to McCain than the Republicans would be ahead by 5 points now. Romney does just enough to keep his name in the headlines for 2012. Romney could be up campaigning in Michigan & other states for McCain, but he lost so he takes his ball and goes home like a whiny jerk.
October 31, 2008 at 11:32 am
“Now, I’m not suggesting Obama intends to transform this nation into 1950s-era Soviet tyranny or that he will possess the power to do so. I’m suggesting Obama is praising and mainstreaming an economic philosophy that has failed to produce a scintilla of fairness or prosperity anywhere on Earth. Ever.
If you believe that “fairness” — a childishly subjective idea that ought to be quarantined to playgrounds and Berkeley city council meetings — should be meted out by the autocrats inhabiting Washington, D.C., your faith will be duly rewarded. ”
http://www.denverpost.com/harsanyi/ci_10859779
Vote McCain/Palin – and let’s spare ourselves these old ideas.
October 31, 2008 at 11:57 am
Just heard a clip of Gov. Richardson on Denver radio on Rush L. saying “Obama’s tax plan would give a cut to the middle class which is $120k and under”
So it was $300, $250, $200, $150, $200, $250 today from Obama and now $120 from Richardson.
Yeah, sounds like they need to get their lies straight.
October 31, 2008 at 12:01 pm
Obama calls $1 Trillion tax hike a “small adjustment” by re-defining $97K family income as “upper class”
I found a video clip in which Obama totally redefines what middle/upper class income is and who should pay more taxes. He is quoted on video. I think this is newsworthy, given the current focus on Obama’s plan to tax a larger number of families. The video shows Obama directly stating this. It is far less difficult to interpret than, say, the Chicago NPR audio-only about redistributive change. This is a video that’s ready-made for a campaign spot and for video news releases. All people will understand it.
In this video, Obama defined $97,000 family income as “upper class” and subject to $1 Trillion in tax increases in debate within the last year and in policy proposals. He also makes a similar claim in writing in an Op-Ed (see below).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-SavgJlBLA
The key minute: Watch from 1:15 to 2:15 for Obama’s remarkable claim that $97K family income is “upper class”
Of course there are other videos of this same debate, Nov 2007, Las Vegas from which you can clip these quotes, but this one just puts in the context of Obama/Biden redefining Middle Class income from $250K to $200K to $150K to $97K is “upper class.” and the top group—and subject to big tax hikes.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3638710&page=1
I wonder how many families with 2 or 3 kids in middle class suburbs of our major cities would consider their $97 K income to be “upper class.” If any of those kids plan to go to college, the families will hardly be living like the upper class on $97K.
Obama’s Op-Ed
http://www.qctimes.com/articles/2007/09/21/opinion/opinion/doc46f35dac127eb409456532.txt
“… raise the cap on the amount of income subject to the Social Security tax. If we kept the payroll tax rate exactly the same but applied it to all earnings and not just the first $97,500, we could virtually eliminate the entire Social Security shortfall.” – Op-Ed by Barack Obama, Quad City Times, Sep., 2007
October 31, 2008 at 12:06 pm
Hey guys, you are on Rush again and he is
linking to your website on his site.
October 31, 2008 at 12:12 pm
Romney should be in Michigan to help give Mac a fighting chance there.
October 31, 2008 at 12:33 pm
This is a good video of Obama tax plan and his threshold for middle class and who gets his tax cut. Spread it around, especially to your Republican and independent friends and family.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-SavgJlBLA
{Also, whatever happened to his Hawaii grandmother and her ailing health? Is she still dying?}
October 31, 2008 at 1:01 pm
I do agree that Obama would kill millions of jobs….in China! They would be re-created here however.
October 31, 2008 at 1:29 pm
I’ve been trying to connect the dots of Obama’s radical associations. Please help (in the comments section) if you can.
http://blog.topicaltopics.net/2008/10/connecting-the-dots/
Thanks
October 31, 2008 at 1:31 pm
I love this site – found it through Jim Treacher – and I love you guys for telling the truth about both Obama and the media. Perhaps I missing it on the page, but do you have an RSS feed?
October 31, 2008 at 1:56 pm
I would not have voted for Romney.
Consider him to be part of the circles that brought us the current derivatives crises (let’s get off that sub-prime crap being the sole source of all this). McCain is unpredictable because he’ll get outside the box. As someone voting against Obama rather than for McCain, I’ll take my chances with McCain.
October 31, 2008 at 1:57 pm
Hillbuzz, you’ve made national news! Check out Rush’s show for 10/30
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_103008/content/01125110.guest.html
October 31, 2008 at 1:59 pm
New Obama comments: Rich people are “selfish” if they don’t want taxes raised:
“John McCain and Sarah Palin they call this socialistic. You know I don’t know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness.”
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/obamas-new-atta.html
October 31, 2008 at 2:12 pm
100% proof that Obama socialist santa claus promises are the reason he’s getting millions of votes. MUST SEE, SHORT CLIP
October 31, 2008 at 2:12 pm
MUST SEE – 100% COMMUNISM
October 31, 2008 at 2:13 pm
Keep this moving quickly…
PBS has an online poll posted, asking if Sarah Palin
is qualified.
Apparently the left wing knew about this
in advance and are flooding the voting with NO votes.
The poll will be reported on PBS and picked up by
mainstream media. It can influence undecided voters
in swing states.
Please do two things — takes 20 seconds.
1) Click on link and vote YES!
Here’s the link:
http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html
2) Then send this to every McCain-Palin supporter
you know, and urge them to vote and pass it on.
The last thing we need is PBS saying their viewers don’t
think Sarah Palin is qualified.
October 31, 2008 at 2:19 pm
This may be a trick, but have you read this?
http://israelinsider.ning.com/profiles/blogs/2018399:BlogPost:11939
October 31, 2008 at 2:19 pm
Obama’s harsh tax rates.
Not a return to the 1990’s.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDMxYzI2NWEyNzYwYjNmOTU5MzI2NjIwZjRjOTlkZmU=
May we have Bill back?
October 31, 2008 at 2:28 pm
How Low Can It Go? Richardson Pegs Middle Class as Those Making Under $120,000
For the second time in a week, a prominent Democrat has downgraded Barack Obama’s definition of the middle class.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/low-richardson-pegs-middle-class-making/
sound-byte here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G88ebXY2uaI
October 31, 2008 at 2:50 pm
Here’s some “Change We Can Believe In” from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5051118.ece
Barack Obama lays plans to deaden expectation after election victory
Barack Obama has already started playing down expectations in his speeches
Tim Reid in Washington
Barack Obama’s senior advisers have drawn up plans to lower expectations for his presidency if he wins next week’s election, amid concerns that many of his euphoric supporters are harbouring unrealistic hopes of what he can achieve.
The sudden financial crisis and the prospect of a deep and painful recession have increased the urgency inside the Obama team to bring people down to earth, after a campaign in which his soaring rhetoric and promises of “hope” and “change” are now confronted with the reality of a stricken economy.
One senior adviser told The Times that the first few weeks of the transition, immediately after the election, were critical, “so there’s not a vast mood swing from exhilaration and euphoria to despair”.
The aide said that Mr Obama himself was the first to realise that expectations risked being inflated.
In an interview with a Colorado radio station, Mr Obama appeared to be engaged already in expectation lowering. Asked about his goals for the first hundred days, he said he would need more time to tackle such big and costly issues as health care reform, global warming and Iraq. “The first hundred days is going to be important, but it’s probably going to be the first thousand days that makes the difference,” he said. He has also been reminding crowds in recent days how “hard” it will be to achieve his goals, and that it will take time.
“I won’t stand here and pretend that any of this will be easy – especially now,” Mr Obama told a rally in Sarasota, Florida, yesterday, citing “the cost of this economic crisis, and the cost of the war in Iraq”. Mr Obama’s transition team is headed by John Podesta, a Washington veteran and a former chief-of-staff to Bill Clinton. He has spent months overseeing a virtual Democratic government-in-exile to plan a smooth transition should Mr Obama emerge victorious next week. The plans are so far advanced that an Obama Cabinet has been largely decided upon, with the expectation that most of his senior appointments could be announced shortly after election day.
Yet Mr Obama and his aides are under no illusions about the size of the challenges the Democrat will inherit if he enters the Oval Office. Tom Daschle, the party’s former leader in the US Senate and a strong contender for the post of White House chief-of-staff in an Obama administration, said last month that the winner next week would have only a 50 per cent chance of winning a second term in 2012.
Not only will the next president take office with the country sliding into a potentially long recession — and mired in debt — but the challenges abroad are immense. There is an unfinished war in Iraq, a worsening situation in Afghanistan and an unstable and nuclear-armed Pakistan to contend with. Iran appears intent on acquiring the bomb and there remains the ever-present threat from al-Qaeda and Islamic extremists.
If he wins, Mr Obama will inherit a Democratic-controlled Congress, and might even have the benefit of a 60-seat filibuster-proof “supermajority” in the Senate. Such a scenario would allow him to push through legislation largely unfettered by Republican opposition. Yet it also means that should the country still be mired in recession in three years’ time, voters — who have short memories — will probably blame him and the Democrats on Capitol Hill. Those stakes have led Mr Obama to conclude that while expectations need to be tempered, big things need to be achieved very early in his first term, when he will still have the political capital to achieve some of his most ambitious legislative goals.
Having promised “real” change, the pressure will be on him to deliver. In the Colorado interview, Mr Obama added: “The next president has got to come quickly out of the box.”
The early priorities being lined up if he takes power are a mixture of symbolism and substance. He plans to make a major address in a big Muslim country early in his first term. Having pledged on the campaign trail to close Guantanamo Bay, he is also determined to make early moves to rid America of the controversial prison. Yet what to do with the remaining inmates looms as an intractable problem, as many of their home governments refuse to allow them to return.
Mr Obama’s first legislative goals will be to follow through on his pledge to cut taxes for the middle class and raise them for the wealthiest Americans, and to push through a hugely expensive Bill to provide near-universal health insurance.
October 31, 2008 at 3:05 pm
RNC’s Really Funny Three Stooges Ad
LOL!
http://patriotroom.com/?p=3633
October 31, 2008 at 3:10 pm
Richardson lowers the bar yet again. By the time election day gets here Obama will cut no one’s taxes. But we here in Chicago already know about Obama’s empty promises.
Richardson lowers Obama’s definition of rich to $120,000
http://politicswest.com/32378/breaking_news_bill_richardson_lowers_obamas_definition_rich_down_120_000
October 31, 2008 at 4:08 pm
By the time Tuesday arrives Obama will have gone all the way down to taxing those making 42k like McCain said. Yep, that is what Obama has done here in Illinois.
Richardson lowers Obama’s definition of rich to $120,000
http://politicswest.com/32378/breaking_news_bill_richardson_lowers_obamas_definition_rich_down_120_000
October 31, 2008 at 4:16 pm
When Obama’s elected, we’ll be paying for this woman’s gas and mortgage
October 31, 2008 at 5:25 pm
you know in Britain in 1992. the Sun newspaper said:
“If Kinnock (the guy Biden steals speeches from) wins today will the last person to leave Britain please turn out the lights”
He that election. but If Obama and Biden win the election, please can someone turn out the lights of America!!!
We would be all better off in Mexico, than under Obama.
October 31, 2008 at 5:33 pm
The funniest political I’ve ever seen!
Run this ALL weekend! :-P
October 31, 2008 at 8:20 pm
Obama is working to “lower my expectations,” huh?
That’s pretty scary, considering how low my expectations are of him. and his possible Presidency. What would be worse: watching the hit our country will take economically and overseas, or all the fawning that will go on in the Media over the “New JFK and Jackie O”?
PUMAs, I promise here and now: as a stalwart Reagan Republican, if you guys prevent that from happening, I’ll donate $50 four years from now to the Democrat of your choice…
November 1, 2008 at 12:25 pm
My expectations of Oblahblah were already so low that the only thing that comes close is what I think of Pelosi and Reid and the house/congress they run.