The NY Times attacked Cindy McCain today – which in our opinion makes Michelle Obama fair game in the last two weeks of the campaign.

If the Times thinks it’s fair, or even fun, to attack Cindy for her miscarriages, her addiction to painkillers from chronic nerve pain, and her personal imperfections, then isn’t it fair to investigate Michelle Obama, her Princeton thesis, her opinions on the Clinton Global Initiative in Africa and President Clinton himself, her views on Black Liberation Theology, and whether or not she allowed unrepentant terrorists William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn to babysit her children?

You don’t have to dig very deep into Michelle’s life to find nasty, mean-spirited, America-hating things. Remember, this is the woman who claims she’s here to fix all of our souls — and the media has ensured we know nothing about her, really. Just like we know nothing about Obama.

If it’s fair to talk about Cindy McCain’s addiction to painkillers, why is it racist to talk about Obama’s admitted drug use — which included cocaine, among other things, while living a mysterious life in New York while at Columbia the media refuses to report on.

We bet, starting Monday, all bets will be off when it comes to Michelle. This NY Time hit on Cindy, plus Michelle’s snack attack at the Waldorf while her husband mocks and attacks average Americans like Joe the Plumber, is the kind of thing that really take the gloves off in terms of response.