People we know who work with the federal courts sent us this article today. They say the multi-state, coordinated actions of prosecutors in all of these Obama/ACORN actions show this is indeed a RICO case that’s being pursued: because the FBI is involved, and the FBI would not be involved if Obama/ACORN actions weren’t crossing state lines and thus entering into federal jurisdiction as RICO.
ACORN is coordinating these illegal activities in multiple states — which amounts to RICO — which brings in the Feds. If it wasn’t a RICO case, then the individual states would be handling all of this internally with their own attorneys-general. But, that’s not the case. The FBI is DEFINITELY involved, and that means a guy like Patrick Fitzgerald is involved from the prosecutorial side (rumor in Chicago is that it’s indeed Fitzgerald on this, but that has not been confirmed yet).
Voter fraud: that’s change Obama believes in!

Here’s the announcement the Justice Department made about the Joint Task Force:
Labor-backed group has compromised integrity of elections
Nevada state and federal authorities on Thursday announced the formation of a task force that will aggressively pursue allegations of election fraud. The secretary of state, attorney general, U.S. attorney’s office and Federal Bureau of Investigation plan to work together as the election approaches and on Election Day to ensure a free and fair election in Nevada, where record turnout is anticipated.
“This is part of an effort to work proactively,” Secretary of State Ross Miller, the state’s chief elections official, said of the combined effort, which he said would “ensure there is integrity in the system.”
Miller said investigators are already looking into allegations of fraud in voter registration, though he declined to go into specifics of an investigation he suggested was being handled by the FBI.Clark County officials have said they suspect fraud is occurring in the thousands of voter registrations being submitted by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, which works to get low-income people to vote. ACORN, whose officials have faced fraud charges in other states, says the group’s workers are trained to follow the law.
Types of activity investigators would look into include voter registration workers being paid per registration, which is illegal; registrations coming in with duplicates or false names; or registrations being discarded when they belong to a particular political party, Miller said.
During the election, authorities will be on the lookout for bribery, intimidation, interfering with the election process and people voting more than once, Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto added.
Election irregularities are a topic commonly raised by constituents she talks to around the state, she said.
In addition to creating connections between agencies to enable them to work together more readily, the Election Integrity Task Force will include a toll-free phone number for reporting potential election violations, specially trained personnel and three command posts located around the state, said Steven Martinez of the FBI in Las Vegas.
Asked whether past elections in Nevada have been tainted by fraud, Miller mentioned allegations in the runup to the 2004 election that a Republican voter-registration drive threw out or tore up Democratic registrations. Those allegations were investigated but didn’t lead to criminal prosecutions.
To make sure their registration is in order, Miller said voters should consult the Web site www.silverstate08.com, where his office maintains a searchable voter registration database.
October 15, 2008 at 4:23 pm
Will the RICO be filed against ACORN and Obama jointly or just ACORN?
October 15, 2008 at 4:32 pm
The MSM is suppressing this story until after the election. But I hope they nail Obama for his involvment with this.
October 15, 2008 at 4:48 pm
That link about “NBC Investigates” is actually MSNBC. If even the Olbermann/Matthews Leg-Tingling Network is reporting on this, the rest of the MSM may not be able to suppress it for long, especially if criminal charges are involved.
Hopefully the prosecutors are aware of the $832K donation from Obama to ACORN. He who pays the piper calls the tune.
October 15, 2008 at 4:59 pm
I wouldn’t be surprised if it his connected with the entire Chicago outfit, i.e., Rezko, Wright, Pfleger, etc.
October 15, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Obama Versus Joe The Plumber
October 15, 2008 at 5:15 pm
I wonder what kind of president Biden would be?
October 15, 2008 at 5:22 pm
200k thousand possible bogus registrations in Ohio
http://minx.cc/?post=275707
October 15, 2008 at 5:36 pm
New Palin Interview
http://www.wmur.com/video/17723155/index.html?treets=man&tml=man_break&ts=T&tmi=man_break_1_02220210152008
October 15, 2008 at 5:50 pm
TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND?!??????
October 15, 2008 at 6:09 pm
They are trying to steal our country!
October 15, 2008 at 7:04 pm
BRUNNER COMPELLED BY COURT TO ADMIT SHE’S BEEN CONCEALING TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND UNMATCHED REGISTRATIONS FROM LOCAL BOARDS OF ELECTIONS
UPDATE: NON-RESIDENT OBOTS FRAUDULENTLY VOTING IN OHIO
Updated: The tip was accurate, but the Cleveland Plain Dealer got the story out first. See update after background.
Okay, that’s what we have at the moment.
Yesterday’s majority decision, penned by former Ohio Solicitor Jeffrey Sutton, said, “Nothing about this case, or the relief (Ohio Republicans, who brought the suit) seek will allow them to prevent a single voter from casting a ballot in the November election …
“At most, the identification of a mismatch allows a county board to investigate whether the mismatch has a legitimate explanation (say, a recent change of address).”
The practical effect, Sutton wrote, may be to require the voter in question to cast a provisional ballot, when elections officials would determine the validity of the registration and thus the vote.
In a statement late last night, Brunner, a Democrat, called it “essential” that voters whose registration information matches either the motor vehicle or Social Security records “are left inviolate to vote a regular ballot on or before Election Day.”
If it matches neither, she wants county elections workers to handle “prompt communication to allow them to assist with resolving discrepancies, which, in many cases are not due to any fault of the voters.”
“It is imperative that voters not be disenfranchised because of federal government red tape, misstated technical information or glitches in databases beyond the control of voters or the secretary of state.”
But what’s left unsaid is whether voters could be disenfranchised at all and how closely the questioned registrations should be examined for fraud. That’s because even when county elections officials get access to the list of mismatched registrations, exactly what they are to do with it remains a mystery.
Brunner doesn’t want to allow the local boards to investigate at all. So she presents them with a fait accompli by refusing to tell them which registrations warrant investigation.
The court ordered her to comply by Friday. She protests she can’t and it will have to wait until Monday.
I don’t blame her for playing for time.
I have a tip which I don’t wish to out yet until I have more confidence in it. The tip concerns the number of likely fraudulent registrations she’s refused to divulge to the local boards of elections, effectively forcing them to accept votes made by these unmatchable registrations due to her concealing their likely fraudulence.
If she doesn’t tell them, they can’t strike the registrations.
The number is large. Not million large. But still large.
And she’s been sitting on them. She’s been deliberately failing to inform the local boards of elections these registrations simply do not match any information from DMV records, Social Security records, property records, tax records.
They do not check out. There is no particular reason to believe they’re real. Especially considering all the fake registrations already submitted by ACORN caught by the local boards for being transparently fake.
Whatever the number is — even if it’s smallish — she has nothing but corrupt purposes for failing to comply with state law and inform local boards of the problems.
My tip, however, says it’s not smallish at all.
UPDATE: 200 fucking thousand unmatchable registrations concealed.
More than 200,000 Ohioans who registered to vote this year for the first time or updated their voting information since Jan. 1 could be affected by the latest court ruling requiring the state to set up a new registration verification system by Friday, Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner said.
Brunner said she would comply with the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling late Tuesday but said she is deeply concerned that the decision is a veiled attempt at disenfranchising voters.
The court’s 9-6 opinion, written by Judge Jeffrey Sutton, suggested that voters whose driver’s license number or Social Security number does not exactly match those found on databases maintained by the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles or Social Security Administration could be required to use provisional ballots instead of conventional ones.
“The thing that concerns me is that Judge Sutton indicated that these mismatched names could be subjected to provisional voting and nowhere in [Help America Vote Act] is that the case. The Help America Vote Act is really not meant to be used to disenfranchise or to help determine voter eligibility,” Brunner said in an interview today.
“Essentially that provision of HAVA is basically supposed to maintain voter registration databases,” she said. “It is not for determining voter eligibility. The interpretation that seems to be coming from at least that particular judge takes HAVA and uses it as a means to exclude voters from a regular ballot. That is a concern.”
The full 6th Circuit’s opinion overturned the decision of a three-judge panel at the federal court last week and restored the ruling announced last week by U.S. District Court Judge George C. Smith.
Since Jan. 1, Ohio has 666,000 newly registered or updated voters — all of whom fall under scrutiny by this latest court ruling. Brunner said an initial review found that at least 200,000 of them might have mismatched information. Once the office identifies all of the mismatched voters, Brunner will send the list to the county boards of election where the individuals have registered.
Margin of Bush’s victory in Ohio in 2004? 118,457 votes.
200,000 would seem to be more than that.
Reality Check: Brunner is right that some — perhaps most — of these registrations will check out, after investigation. In some cases, it could be that the system hasn’t yet reflected changes-of-address or so forth.
However, many will turn out to be fraudulent — and she deliberately concealed the existence of these red flags to deny the local boards of election the opportunity to check for themselves.
How man are real, how many are fake? We don’t know — yet.
And if Jennifer Brunner had had her way, we’d have never even have had an opportunity to check at all.
She didn’t want to check into them, and she actively prevented the local boards of election from checking too. Citing — get this — “voter disenfranchisement” as her rationale.
Despite the fact that the law compels her to inform the local boards of unmatchable registrants.
Let’s say even 3/4s of these turn out legit — she was hellbent to smuggle the the 50,000 fraudulent ones into the ballot boxes.
Bear in Mind… If you’re struck from the rolls and show up to vote, that doesn’t mean you lose your vote. You can vote by provisional ballot. The envelope remains sealed until your bona fides can be established. Then, once you’ve been found to be a legal voter, the envelope is opened and your ballot is counted.
Brunner was fighting to make sure these dodgy/suspect voters never had to prove they were real voters — she wanted their votes dumped straight into the pile, where no one could later yank them out from. Remember, even if you’re a proven fraudulent voter, your votes can’t be pulled out of the mix — because it’s secret ballot. Who knows who you voted for? In Bizarro world, it’s even possible you voted for McCain ten times.
Brunner was determined to get these suspect — not necessarily fraudulent, but suspect and requiring investigation — into that pile of voter by hook or by crook. She wasn’t willing to check them out herself, and also conspired to prevent the local boards from knocking on doors and placing follow-up calls, too.
UPDATE: Young Obama cultists signing up to vote in whatever swing state The One needs them to — even having no connection to the state whatsoever. Apart from an in-state friend willing to claim, Oh, sure, all 50 of you live in my hovel.
There’s a goddamned website facilitating this fraud — telling you who is willing to claim you live in their house, and which states you should be fraudulently signing up to vote in.
FBI? Hello? FBI?
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/275707.php
October 15, 2008 at 7:05 pm
I bet the MSM would cover ACORN if they were all arrested over the weekend preceeding the election. One can always hope, though they’ll just scream that it’s disenfranchisement and intimidation.
October 15, 2008 at 7:05 pm
Unless they can find a direct link between ACORN and Obama’s campaign leadership, it is unlikely that he will be directly implicated.
October 15, 2008 at 7:21 pm
Does anyone from HB know if any of this ACORN fraud can be backtracked to the primaries and what happened in the caucuses? We know bus loads game in, but was anything similar with illegal voting going on?
I think if there was a LOUD yell from Hill groups that jumped on this and said “see we told you so”, revisit that BHO won Dem primary by fraud, that may help him from getting elected.
October 15, 2008 at 11:18 pm
So far I see no link to the Obama campaign.
I guess I didn’t put on my little green glasses.
Dream and fart on, little cons. Dream and fart on.
October 15, 2008 at 11:20 pm
Fact: ACORN has implemented the most sophisticated quality-control system in the voter engagement field but in almost every state we are required to turn in ALL completed applications, even the ones we know to be problematic.Fact: ACORN flags in writing incomplete, problem, or suspicious cards when we turn them in,. Unfortunately, some of these same officials then come back weeks or months later and accuse us of deliberately turning in phony cards. In many cases, we can actually prove that these are the same cards we called to their attention.
Fact: Our canvassers are paid by the hour, not by the card . ACORN has a zero-tolerance policy for deliberately falsifying registrations, and in the cases where our internal quality controls have identified this happening we have fired the workers involved and turned them in to election officials and law-enforcement.
Fact: No criminal charges related to voter registration have ever been brought against ACORN or partner organizations. Convictions against individual former ACORN workers have been accomplished with our full cooperation, using the evidence obtained through our quality control and verification processes – evidence which in most cases WE called to the attention of authorities
Fact: Most election officials have recognized ACORN’s good work and praised our quality control systems. Even in the cities where election officials have complained about ACORN, the applications in question represent less than 1% of the thousands and thousands of registrations ACORN has collected.
Fact: Our accusers not only fail to provide any evidence, they fail to suggest a motive: there is virtually no chance anyone would be able to vote fraudulently, so there is no reason to deliberately submit phony registrations. ACORN is committed to ensuring that the greatest possible numbers of people are registered
ACORN will not be intimidated, we will not be provoked, and in this important moment in history we will not allow anyone to distract us from these vital efforts to empower our constituencies and our communities to speak for themselves.
October 15, 2008 at 11:53 pm
This is very good news. A reporter friend of mine has been digging, and this is a sketch of what a full investigation may uncover:
http://conaffredux.blogspot.com/2008/10/obama-terror-and-banking-crisis-part-1.html
I’m a conservative all the way, but this is a great blog.
October 16, 2008 at 12:20 am
My goodness..is Ms. Brunner related to Kathleen Harris in Floria ????? What a complete mess this election is..this blatant stealing of votes is almost laughable if it weren’t so tragic. Do hope the investigation ties all of the crooks together and we can watch the PERP walk on live tv !!!
October 16, 2008 at 12:58 am
Unbelievable: Barney Frank rebuffs GOP calls for ACORN hearings
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/frank-rebuffs-gop-calls-for-acorn-hearings-2008-10-15.html
October 16, 2008 at 4:28 am
Yes, they steal everything. Look at the way they have wormed their way into our educational system and indoctrinate our youth. Try to have a discussion with a leftist and it quickly degenerates into emotionalism and name calling. They are sneaky because their foundation is soft.
October 16, 2008 at 11:12 am
[...] According to the PUMAs. SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “Election fraud is a RICO case”, url: “http://kenanthony.bustablog.com/2008/10/election-fraud-is-a-rico-case/” }); [...]
October 20, 2008 at 6:06 pm
bsrzx qkyiphsc nsxwa akubv mxibcpndq kracywp bweklz